I'll do it if I don't detect a hint of criminality, the BTC0.1 is sent up front, and the BTC0.2 is placed with an escrow we mutually trust.
This smells like there is something illegal going on here. Granted it is plausible that he is far from a post office/UPS, ect. equivalent, however I think it is more likely the OP is trying to somehow harass someone who probably does not know his identity and is trying to make it look like it is you harassing him/her (hence the tracking instead of letting you drop it in the mail somewhere). Although all this is speculation.
|
|
|
When a person has equal to or greater then a number of negative trust reports then he has positive trust reports then each additional negative trust report is weighted much more heavily then the last one. If someone has less negative trust reports then positive trust reports then each negative is weighted the same as the last one. (I think a person needs to have a certain number of negative trust reports as well).
As you see in the top picture, he has 4 negative and 5 positive, so he has more positive then negative. Each negative only takes away 4 trust points (the number on the left). Since you gave him the 5th negative trust report and made it so he had the same number of negative trusts as positive trusts, the negative trust that you gave him had a very large impact. This is to fight long term scammers who start to scam after a long period of a good trading history. Some people have a very high trust score (the number on the left) but only a few positive trust reports because they got their first trust a long time ago, so they could have a rust score of 15, then turn scammer, it would only take a few people to tag them with negative trust in order to get them to have a trade with caution tag edit: It looks like it had to do with them having more then 5 negative trust reports, not having more negatives then positives. I created two custom trust lists that resulted in the following: With the below trust list: DefaultTrust grantansing receiveding miningxading meginzate Your trust score was 31: -4 / +20(20) With the below trust list: DefaultTrust grantansing receiveding miningxading meginzate kazatazung Your trust score was -31: -5 / +20(20) I think the trust score formula might have changed without public announcement because I was fairly certain that you needed to have more negative trust reports then positive trust reports in order for each additional negative trust to weigh very heavily feature to kick in
|
|
|
Awhile ago I swear I saw someone copy an old sig and re-use it for a contest and win.
And I'm like 60% sure that those 4 are the same person
Why don't you post where you say them reuse an old sig? What evidence do you have that they are the same person? Do you even know how to tell if two accounts belong to the same person?
|
|
|
Just as a tip, don't accept submissions from: izagani, roslinpl, medUSA, or ndnhc.
They usually use stolen work, etc.
You were flaming ndnhc in the da dice thread, and now you are including others in your flamewar. I received a PM from izagani asking me to look at your accusation, however you have not presented any proof in this claim or in the da dice thread. I am curious to know why you are making such claims without presenting any evidence.
|
|
|
How much do you want for the set?
|
|
|
Don't forget to change your password. Per the security log and your trust profile it has not been changed today
|
|
|
I mean fuck what should i do here to ask for a loan, i am not a scammer, you can't just call a scammer every newbie that asks for something. The reason i changed it is because i realized that some cloud mining companies are actually ponzis. The whole reason i asked this loan is so i can get started and earn some real Bitcoins
I don't think you understand the concept that you only ask for a loan if you need money for a specific reason. If your plan was to use money you get for a loan for a specific 'investment' and then it turns out that that investment is not a good one then you no longer need a loan. I think it is pretty clear that you are just trying to make your loan request sound good so that someone will lend you money so you can run away with it
|
|
|
Quickseller and Vod, why so aggressive? He was mainly asking for advice. I think all he wanted was some direction from more knowledgable members.
No need to jump to an assumption that he wants a 15 btc loan
s/he was looking for advise as to how to advertise/spam his 15 BTC loan. If you look at the link in the OP, you will see it is for a BTC jam listing of someone trying to borrow....well....15 BTC
|
|
|
Who got the bonuses this week?
The mystery is revealed in the spreadsheet! Some problem with your sig, bud. Can you repaste it again? Dear ndnhc Repaste my sig already Will enroll you tomorrow after the current week is officially over and the spreadsheet is duly updated. Your post quality needs improvement. Tip: Start and engage in quality discussions. Look like this campaign too much concentrate about constructive posts more than advertising Dadice signature people are discussing about it right now so I quit thank you for your suggestion. I would disagree. If people are making spammy posts then the company/site brand will be associated with spam - this is similar to what happened with PrimeDice last summer. If the people who are advertising DaDice are actually posting 'responsibly' and are engaging in intelligent conversation then not only will their signature space be more valuable, but the overall brand will be associated with such intelligent conversation
|
|
|
You guys are all right, i should have used a collateral and i should not use it for cloud mining ( let me change my original post )
You clearly have no intention of repaying your loan. If you were trying to get a loan to invest in a cloud mining ponzi earlier today then there is no reason why you would need a loan for a different reason now. My offer to remove my negative trust after 30 days of active participation in the forum is withdrawn
|
|
|
Newbie question. If I want to buy .5 bitcoin, and I want to pay with PayPal, I can escrow that? My PayPal account is verified, over 10 years old, but I know how people here hate PayPal. So I could send the money to you, you could hold it for xx days to be sure I don`t do a chargeback, and then it would be forwarded to whoever I buy the .5 btc from? And they would send you the .5btc, so I know I`ll get it, right?
The escrow would need to hold bitcoin for this to potentially work and it would need to be held for in excess of 6 months, which is really not realistic. You would be better off withdrawing your PP funds to your bank account and then using cash to purchase bitcoin
|
|
|
Maybe my question should have been "how do you determine the grade of a participant?"
Okay, that is accurate. Yep, it depends on post quality. Any chance on clarification? This whole 'here's a rate and succes with getting "better"' is slightly frustrating lol, we cannot write an essay about 50 participants every week, about their post quality. That is why we grade it. It is indicative info so that participants can know where they stand. Grade is relative. If your post qualiy seems good, you will get a good grade. Above average, higher grade. If someone makes useless posts, lower grade. C,C+ is average. could improve. I didn't exactly get what you asked. If this answers your question, please confirm/reply. Else do restate the question. Thanks Could you possibly give what criteria would get someone a C grade, what criteria would get a B grade, and so on
|
|
|
If someone is trying to sell a service in a particular thread and then someone else posts a link to a competing service that would not be okay. That would not only be unprofessional but the post would be off topic and should be deleted.
If however there is a thread soliciting a particular service then someone advertised a very similar service on a thread then it should be okay as it would be relivant to what is being discussed.
|
|
|
Is the green light or dark? I don't recommend selling this anyways. I'd try Quickseller as we know he won't scam, but he lowballs the shit out of everyone for big profit.
Just keep it and use it. You can earn 0.4 in a month using Bit-X's campaign
It's Dark Green Thank you but i don't have any time on my hands anymore. I won't be coming online like ever so i'm just trying to sell the account. Am looking for something over 1 BTC ,I am in no hurry. 1 BTC is a lot for a senior account, especially now with there being substantially more senior accounts then there were ~9 months ago. Granted it does have positive trust, but I don't think the positive trust adds that much value to accounts I would have to disagree with you on that Quickseller. If it has dark green trust then this would be a scammers dream. So basically if a scammer gets it for 1 BTC, with the trust and if he's a clever scammer, he would get more than what they invested in the account in my opinion. Well in order for your statement to be true then whoever buys the account would need to scam someone out of at least 1 btc in a single trade. The thing is that there are not a lot of trades above that size and the trades that are above 1 btc, people tend to know how to take appropriate precautions against themselves getting scammed. If someone where to buy this account to scam then if the scam were to fail then the buyer will have wasted the entire purchase price as the account would likely become worthless.
surprisingly these questions have not been asked yet, however are you able to provide a signed message from an old post associated with the account to prove the account is not hacked/stolen? Also do you need to use any kind of custom trust list in order to get the dark green trust?
|
|
|
I may bid one last time. 2.3BTC for 1BTC is already a lot!
Smoothie sold one for 2.7 not long ago and singles with even an "okay" grade of ms-65 tend to go for more.
|
|
|
I bid BTC2.01. Can you post pictures of the exact coin?
I am sure that he has then locked up in a safe/safety deposit box somewhere
2.15
|
|
|
Maybe my question should have been "how do you determine the grade of a participant?"
|
|
|
|