You buying or selling ? New offer
0.10 / 5M / 0.5 / smooth (AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first)
Selling, but I have a buyer already. New offer (selling): 0.15 / 5M / 0.75 / smooth ( AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first) Price unchanged 0.15 / 5M / 0.75 / smooth (min 2m; expires end of day 6/3 UTC; you send first)Sorry this was an error (quoted wrong message). The correct price is 0.125. 0.125 / 5M / 0.625 / smooth (min 2m; expires end of day 6/3 UTC; you send first)
|
|
|
easy trade. he sent first
|
|
|
You buying or selling ? New offer
0.10 / 5M / 0.5 / smooth (AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first)
Selling, but I have a buyer already. New offer (selling): 0.15 / 5M / 0.75 / smooth ( AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first) Price unchanged 0.15 / 5M / 0.75 / smooth (min 2m; expires end of day 6/3 UTC; you send first)
|
|
|
and there is a >> binary operation and there is speed factor setting (that had to be tested) are you expecting dev to rewrite base btw *competition* I think I know which coin you come from.. did the same thing from Bytecoin
I suggest you look at the repos, and look at the overall approach. There is a world of difference between the two, and the gap will only widen. In any case, I didn't claim the ability to make a one line change to the emission curve as evidence of developer competence, you did, lol.
|
|
|
Satishi's paper described how one block is settled on, with the assumption of a random walk (not always correct, but correct to a point). As far as the actual network, there was another paper that measured bitcoin's propagation delays but I can't find it right now. There have also been some threads looking at propagation on ultra-fast coins such as DOGE (60 seconds), but again I can't find the links right now.
Also interesting to play with is a node simulator I remember seeing. I think someone posted a link to one on this thread, but at 200+ pages, it will be hard to find.
Thanks smooth! Is this the propagation paper you were talking about? http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/file/49318d3f56c1d525aabf7fda78b23fc0/P2P2013_041.pdfGood read on that one. This one wasn't bad either, for a precursor to understanding a node simulator: http://www.cs.sun.ac.za/rw778/files/2014/01/2014T1.pdfYes that's the one I was thinking of. Good job finding it!
|
|
|
5.5/10 Maybe someone can try dif colors with logo, burnt orange/ dark black (shiny?), grey is meh, jmo The logo is final. Minor design tweaks (kerning is still not quite perfect) sure. Revs in a year or two like everybody does, sure. Major redesign since it failed to please 100% of the people 100% of the time, just no.
|
|
|
+1 QUAK
or BWMF, but that might be a bit obscure
Does the MF stand for Monero Fork?? Empty your mind.
|
|
|
Why not name this QUACK, I think it rocks!
+1 I agree I like QUACK, and if we can only do 4 characters then QUAK would work too. +1 QUAK or BWMF, but that might be a bit obscure
|
|
|
Hi can Intel Hexa-Core Xeon E5-2620 used for mining?
Yes. what h/s to except?
More than my intel Atom, for sure! There is no calculator for this i suppose ?Linux or Windows? There is a google docs hardware sheet. Look upthread a few pages.
|
|
|
You buying or selling ? New offer
0.10 / 5M / 0.5 / smooth (AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first)
Selling, but I have a buyer already. New offer (selling): 0.15 / 5M / 0.75 / smooth (AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first)Change to 0.125 / 5M / 0.625 / smooth (AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first)
|
|
|
Use half of the cores in AES-NI optimized processor, because AES-NI is not hyper threaded (intel, I'm not sure how many you should use on amd). Also try this faster AES-NI optimized miner: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=619373.0 (will crash on non-aes-ni processor if you don't build it on your own). This depends on the CPU model. There definitely some that improve performance going above 50%. If you want to really optimize you have to test and tweak on your own configuration, the same as any other mining.
|
|
|
moneropool.com should be removed from the OP, or at the very least remove "Note: when this pool's hashrate gets close to 50% of the network their fees will go up to 15%" which is not true and only attracts more attention to moneropool.com.
There used to be a comment on the OP that pools would be removed from the list if they got above 20%. I'm not sure why that isn't there any more.
|
|
|
It's almost always better to buy coins than to mine, but mining is essential, so I hope that every MRO user and holder will mine, if only to protect themselves, and decentralize the network.
That that is your goal (and I wholeheartedly support this goal) then solo mine from the wallet: [wallet XXX]: start_mining number-of-threads
Maybe you get lucky and score a block but even if you don't you are helping to protect the network.
|
|
|
When will GUI-wallet and a build for Mac OS X 10.6+ be developed? I look forward for it probably never. these guys aren't real developers and hardly understand what they are doing other than copy and paste. yet they managed to calculate emission/reward curve and bake into the code... such an incompetence ! please stop FUD thank you You realize that code change is exactly this right: +#define EMISSION_SPEED_FACTOR (21)
- uint64_t base_reward = (MONEY_SUPPLY - already_generated_coins) >> 18; + uint64_t base_reward = (MONEY_SUPPLY - already_generated_coins) >> EMISSION_SPEED_FACTOR;
Even if you aren't a programmer you should recognize this sort of copy-paste stuff is not exactly hard core coding.
|
|
|
Start supporting decentralization! www.Extremehash.com is giving away another round of 10% mining bonus to support this cause and build more confidence in Monero. Keep the hashes coming this way! minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mro.extremehash.com:9999 -u address -p x Tried it. Hash rate was decent for the pool while I was testing it (roughly 2% of the entire network, i.e. >1 block per hour expected) and got no blocks for many hours. 10% of nothing is nothing. You need to do better to jumpstart it somehow, or fix whatever is wrong with it. For now can't recommend. The hashrate was not always at a constant 2% of the network, so you can't estimate it this way. It was reasonably close. I know how to estimate hash rate. Whatever it was, getting zero blocks during that time period without there being a problem was unlikely. Your pool is not alone in having issues with underperformance, so I not trying to single you out, just relaying my experience. There are definitely some software and/or deployment issues that need to be worked out with these pools.
|
|
|
You buying or selling ? New offer
0.10 / 5M / 0.5 / smooth (AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first)
Selling, but I have a buyer already. New offer (selling): 0.15 / 5M / 0.75 / smooth (AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first)
|
|
|
New offer
0.10 / 5M / 0.5 / smooth (AON; expires end of day 6/2 UTC; you send first)
|
|
|
QCN is a promising coin and I'm pretty sure it will not collect dust in wallets
Love this comment. (Yes I know its part of the obvious stream of spam/pump bot posts but I still love it.)
|
|
|
we need some noob-guide mining on the OP to make MRO interesting!
The noob guide is open the wallet and type "start_mining [number-of-threads]"
Sure you can set up a pool miner and all that, but that's a tweak. For a complete noob who manages to install a wallet, the above (solo mining) is easier and better. It's not even that hard to score coins this way. For every 20 noobs who do this on a decent computer, one will get a full block (nice!) each day.
|
|
|
|