Looks like its badly propagated, probably because its a double spend. If you post the raw transaction I can rebroadcast it from time to time. do: getrawtransaction bad68aa491046583221383f566af1374d3e6aef9a3f0a0f8fef04f66d779ddc4
in the dev console and post what it returns here (please use "code" tags). Thanks I give it a try :-D https://blockchain.info/pushtxWhen I try to rebroadcast the transaction i get this Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: An outpoint is already spent in [DBBitcoinTx{txIndex=191515403, ip=2997016289, time=1479740163, size=487, distinctIn=null, distinctOut=null, note='null', blockIndexes=[], nTxInput=3, nTxOutput=1}] [(190837708, 45), (191092176, 60), (190096503, 0)] any ideas Yeah, because its a double spend so they dont allow you to broadcast a second transaction. Either use a different node[1] or send me the raw TX via PM (or post it here) and Ill broadcast it from mine. [1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_broadcasting
|
|
|
What's an idiot like franky1 even doing in DT anyway?
Thatd be a question for dserrano5. Seems to be unrelated to this "election" though. Im sure it will blow up somewhere else in meta or reputation soon. $ cat trust.txt | grep franky1 dserrano5->franky1 Welsh->franky1 worthyou->franky1
|
|
|
Looks like its badly propagated, probably because its a double spend. If you post the raw transaction I can rebroadcast it from time to time. do: getrawtransaction bad68aa491046583221383f566af1374d3e6aef9a3f0a0f8fef04f66d779ddc4
in the dev console and post what it returns here (please use "code" tags).
|
|
|
All that drama, its "just" 60-70k on my node, we hit 80k last month ~10/27. Bitcoin with 1 MB blocksize and no further additions like e.g. SegWit will be unable to handle the demand from time to time. Get ready to pay even higher fees or learn to be patient. (Bitcoin) Black Friday and Christmas are coming, this is just a hint at what will come soon.
|
|
|
- snip - What do you suggest?
I suggest you read the thread so I don't have to re-type what I already typed. I read what you suggested, I just don't trust that member he has negative trust. There is nothing anyone can do if you just give them your transaction ID. The 2nd link should be -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=16114 macbook-air has/works for a mining pool and Quickseller is in good standing with that pool.
|
|
|
Nur damit du damit nicht auf die Nase fällst... ACHTUNG(!) sowohl bitcoin core als auch Armory brauchen eine vollständige Kopie der Blockchain[1]. Das sind zur Zeit mehr als 90 Gigabyte und die Daten müssen auch lokal verifiziert werden.
Bei meinem angestammten Client Multibit kann ich davon auch ein Lied singen. Habe mich darum für Electrum entschieden und nach den bisherigen Tests finde ich ihn sehr ansprechend. Das Programm scheint alles zu haben, was ich benötige. Danke noch einmal für eure Hilfe. Multibit lädt nur Header, das sollten maximal ein paar MB sein.
|
|
|
Same here. Had three transactions just stalled for the last 26 hours after they were sent. They were of small amounts of 8.5mbtc, 6.5mbtc and 2 mbtc totaling of 17mbtc and i did not have the luxury to choose how much the sender fee was set too so now I just have to wait it out. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) I have been adding the transactions of several users here with the same problem to a broadcast script on my node. It rebroadcasts the transactions every 20 minutes, to remind the network about them. If you want, send me your transaction IDs and Ill add them as well.
|
|
|
Nope, just a long queue. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FCYiuHfF.png&t=663&c=nHXI9MOtkI2mOg) it seems im not the only one with stuck transaction... what are this issues ? why are they happening ? seems it comes a period that transactions are not being forwarded correctly by the network... why so ?
Its just more transactions than the miners can handle.
|
|
|
The transaction has quite a decent amount of fees attached to it. However, the fees is abit low as compared to the other transactions. Your transaction should confirm very soon. If it doesn't confirm after a while, message me and I'll try my best to help you.
Edit: Just rechecked. Your fees is quite alright. However, the transaction wasn't propagated throughout most of the network. Just rebroadcasted it for you and it should confirm very soon.
Till then, lock the thread using the option at the lower left corner.
Let me know when its confirmed please, Ill add it to the rebroadcast list.
|
|
|
Might as well push[1] that one as well, let me know when its confirmed please so I know when to stop. [1] Use my node to keep broadcasting the transaction into the network so it is not forgotten.
|
|
|
-snip- also ich sende seit jahren coins und so was ist mir noch nie passiert.
Seit "dem" großen Spam Angriff letztes Jahr(?)[1] kommt das leider öfter mal vor. Der aktuelle Anstieg sieht aus wie der letzten Monat. jetzt: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FCYiuHfF.png&t=663&c=nHXI9MOtkI2mOg) letzter Monat: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FgTAUM8U.png&t=663&c=BCixQ_uBbo9hxA) [1] Sorry, Hirn Sieb und so.
|
|
|
Doubled in under 12 hours. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FCYiuHfF.png&t=663&c=nHXI9MOtkI2mOg) Looks like we get this regularly now (from last month)... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FgTAUM8U.png&t=663&c=BCixQ_uBbo9hxA)
|
|
|
It might take a bit longer than usual as there is an unusual large amount of transactions waiting for a confirmation right now.
|
|
|
Man kann halt nur Annahmen darüber treffen wie das Netzwerk in nächster Zeit so ausgelastet ist. Die meisten Wallets können das inzwischen dynamisch, einige wenige setzen immer noch auf statisch "Erfahrungswerte"[1]. Und dann kommen von irgendwoher 30k transaktionen ins Netz und alle Annahmen sind fürn Arsch. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FCYiuHfF.png&t=663&c=nHXI9MOtkI2mOg) [1] z.B. 0,0001 pro KByte.
|
|
|
I think what you're trying to say is that cheating the blockchain means creating transactions or hacking it? Cheating it that make you think you have bitcoin in your address? No matter what it is, it's very hard to cheat or force a transaction or something on the blockchain. It is called a blockchain for a reason, connected blocks with timestamps written all over it. It's not easily tampered even if everyone would cheat or tamper it. It won't ever happen because it's impossible.
Is that so? -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152348.0-> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0050.mediawiki
|
|
|
working out your method. i'll let you know if i get it sorted mate. thanks anyway Why do you want to export your private keys? If you use "Repair Wallet"[1] it should remove unconfirmed transactions[2]. If it does not, you can restore the wallet from your seed words. Once you have done that, you can create a double spend that pays a higher fee and sends the coins to yourself instead of the other party. [1] https://multibit.org/help/hd0.3/repair-wallet.html[2] Im not entirely sure here, but thats what "reset" used to do on classic.
|
|
|
Just to keep everyone here updated, the transaction is confirmed now. I often rebroadcast transactions for others with my node using the ruby script above. If anyone else has need, just send me a PM and Ill add yours to the loop as soon as I can.
|
|
|
hab 2 btc versendet mit core wallet 13.1 empfohlene fees verwendet, zwar auf nomal weils ohne zeitdruck war. normal ging auch vor ein paar tagen noch enwandfrei. 6 stunden und die überweisung war durch.
jetzt warte ich schon fast 24 stunden auf bestättigungen. ich getrau mich auch nicht nochmal 2 btc zu senden. weil ich bei der berechnung von angemessenen fees nicht ganz druchblick. die empfohlenen aus dem wallet sind ja nicht sicher. für eine durchführung. gestern waren die fee 0.00014 ich hab heute mal getested und schnell eingestellt die ist dann aber auch nur 0.00015 also nicht so der grosse unterschied. ich getrau mich darum nicht mehr noch eine üw zu senden. was wenn das dann auch zu wenig ist? darum meine frage wie berechnet man die fee ?
beim neuen wallet kann ich ja auch benutzerdefiniert eingeben
Angenommen Du möchtest deine Transaktion im nächsten Block sehen, dann muss deine Fee hoch genug sein um unter den Top 2000 Transaktionen in Bezug auf Fee pro Byte sein. Wie groß die Transaktion ist zeigt dir core vor dem senden an. Wie viel andere TX im Netzwerk gerade zahlen, kann core ebenfalls relativ gut abschätzen. Diese Abschätzung benötigt aber Zeit, der Client sollte also ein bisschen laufen. Alternativ gibt es Seiten wie "cointape"[1] die ebenfalls eine Abschätzung veröffentlichen. Mit der Menge an Bitcoin die du sendest hat das nichts zu tun. [1] https://bitcoinfees.21.co/
|
|
|
|