|
Out of curiosity how much do you want for it? Can you confirm that it has no outstanding loans and that it does not have any negative trust at all?
|
|
|
|
signed message is not available for any of these except the last but devthedev is vouching for it to be good ! So buy without Risk. How does devthedev know the accounts are legit? Did you buy them from him directly? If you only used him as escrow for when you purchased the accounts, but did not procure a signed message then there is a risk both that the accounts are hacked and that there will later be a claim that the accounts are hacked. This is especially true considering that you have no issue with openly selling illegally obtained gift cardsSo if someone will clam that his account was hacked, the responsibility will be of devthedev not of chronic sky. Beware guys.... How would devthedev be responsible if the account was hacked? He was only acting as escrow, it is not his problem if the buyer (sky) doesn't request a signed message as a stipulation to have the deal go through If the seller doesn't own any signed message than the beware is for the possible buyers not for the escrow. As usually the fault is of the seller and devthedev should not help him. Why is it my fault ? Isn't the Escrow supposed to confirm before releasing funds? The seller has said to provide the Signed message but he did not in his first message so i messaged him again but devthedev had already Released the Escrow. They are clean and good! I take full responsibility and you will be Refunded , if they turn out bad! Stop Pissing me off for no Freaking Reasons. Was this part of the original escrow agreement that was agreed to by everyone prior to you funding escrow? If not then that is not his fault The Escrow terms were to deliver me the account credentials and after i confirm , he will release the Escrow but later changed that account Credentials will be sent to devthdev , he took a day to deliver the accounts(it's alright seeing he is quite busy) but then when i didn't received the signed message along with them (the seller has said in OP that he can provide a signed message) , the Escrow was release without even concerning me if the accounts are as stated . What thread did you buy from? It is not the escrow's responsibility to check the terms of the thread you are buying from anyway. If the terms were that you would confirm the account credentials or the credentials would be sent to devthedev and then forwarded to you, no where does it say that you need a signed message along with the credentials, therefore he would have no reason to require one prior to releasing escrow |
|
|
|
signed message is not available for any of these except the last but devthedev is vouching for it to be good ! So buy without Risk. How does devthedev know the accounts are legit? Did you buy them from him directly? If you only used him as escrow for when you purchased the accounts, but did not procure a signed message then there is a risk both that the accounts are hacked and that there will later be a claim that the accounts are hacked. This is especially true considering that you have no issue with openly selling illegally obtained gift cardsSo if someone will clam that his account was hacked, the responsibility will be of devthedev not of chronic sky. Beware guys.... How would devthedev be responsible if the account was hacked? He was only acting as escrow, it is not his problem if the buyer (sky) doesn't request a signed message as a stipulation to have the deal go through If the seller doesn't own any signed message than the beware is for the possible buyers not for the escrow. As usually the fault is of the seller and devthedev should not help him. Why is it my fault ? Isn't the Escrow supposed to confirm before releasing funds? The seller has said to provide the Signed message but he did not in his first message so i messaged him again but devthedev had already Released the Escrow. They are clean and good! I take full responsibility and you will be Refunded , if they turn out bad! Stop Pissing me off for no Freaking Reasons. Was this part of the original escrow agreement that was agreed to by everyone prior to you funding escrow? If not then that is not his fault Also if you purchased them from a farmer then he most likely will have additional accounts for sale and there is no reason why you cannot contact him to get a signed message after the fact, and if he does have additional accounts then he should have no problem doing so if he wants repeat business |
|
|
|
|
I am exiting the account sales business. There really is not a conflict of interest - I am just looking out for the potential buyers of your accounts
|
|
|
|
You are free to use a escrow , exchange is done instantly [within 15 minutes ]
If you do not use escrow then you are all but certain to get scammed, even for a small amount. There are multiple scam accusations against this person, including one for ~$10 already on the verge to pay the guy brother  , will pay him max by tomorrow you will see  You had the money to pay them both over a week ago but you refused to do so then, why should I believe that you will repay your victims now? |
|
|
|
signed message is not available for any of these except the last but devthedev is vouching for it to be good ! So buy without Risk. How does devthedev know the accounts are legit? Did you buy them from him directly? If you only used him as escrow for when you purchased the accounts, but did not procure a signed message then there is a risk both that the accounts are hacked and that there will later be a claim that the accounts are hacked. This is especially true considering that you have no issue with openly selling illegally obtained gift cardsSo if someone will clam that his account was hacked, the responsibility will be of devthedev not of chronic sky. Beware guys.... How would devthedev be responsible if the account was hacked? He was only acting as escrow, it is not his problem if the buyer (sky) doesn't request a signed message as a stipulation to have the deal go through |
|
|
|
You are free to use a escrow , exchange is done instantly [within 15 minutes ]
If you do not use escrow then you are all but certain to get scammed, even for a small amount. There are multiple scam accusations against this person, including one for ~$10 |
|
|
|
signed message is not available for any of these except the last but devthedev is vouching for it to be good ! So buy without Risk. How does devthedev know the accounts are legit? Did you buy them from him directly? If you only used him as escrow for when you purchased the accounts, but did not procure a signed message then there is a risk both that the accounts are hacked and that there will later be a claim that the accounts are hacked. This is especially true considering that you have no issue with openly selling illegally obtained gift cards |
|
|
|
Hello can you provided an escrow for my loan request and hold my account as collateral ? And the lender irfan
Yes please Do it, We want you as an escrow here. Just so you know, it is usually best to have any collateral for a loan secured prior to funding the loan, not after. |
|
|
|
sorry everyone if I'm wrong, because I want to be a trusted here
In order to gain trust then you will need to participate in a number of trades over time and to actively participate in the community. You will generally need to be trusted prior to being able to offer escrow services. |
|
|
|
|
Why did two random newbies make random "reserved" posts in posts 3 and 4? Are they alts of yours?
Also I don't think people should care how exactly you store your customers' funds as if they are somehow lost then you should cover the losses with your own funds.
|
|
|
|
|
Well I think it would be somewhat implied that you would be banned from a campaign if you are denied payment, especially for that reason. This is further implied by the fact that marcotheminer has had a rhetoric of fighting spam.
The policy of allowing people to continue participating in the campaign after being banned is a policy that almost encourages spam.
|
|
|
|
|
When you get unbanned it will likely be your last chance. You were also breaking the rules of your signature campaign as people who are banned can't participate in the campaign.
You are right. You were only posting. You were not actually reading the content behind the thread nor were you actually participating in conversation
|
|
|
|
-----BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Signed by DougB62 on bitcointalk, Friday, 03/20/2015 (00:45 EDT | UTC -4)
-----BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
ADDRESS: 12nu7Ez3Xp5VMgFTmu3e9RJeNxo6ogBL9V
HzsPywO3IU3lg/gG0Q1PK2ru/MkfR2pi8PVZFS6zKYDOFRwHI7CG18nLMRK4qV9QWFChRqNo812UP2hhT3d0tug=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
My PGP key: -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: SKS 1.1.5
Comment: Hostname: pgp.mit.edu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=p2QO
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
I quickseller (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358020) confirm that I control the PGP key with a fingerprint of F364 AB33 6F00 9BA4 736C 7F69 532D D290 F0BE B516 as well as the private key to 184QFyikUtYLzsGc7Hhn5xAV1rTJmpy6JZ which is posted on the following post: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=812533.msg10212363#msg10212363) and the private key to 16FWQBvwQm1E7gNx9BCZo1FHRsQA9paC84 which was posted in PMID#msg2623560 March 20 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVC6buAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWlp8H/isuWRC3qD6F325arAHEEbNq
ygF1QRgPevr4lC6/vEhdbyJ08DNpD+QD2rD54gTkjfebbazx7WI0j249d3y/FXLf
lRpQnGfZb19PzVhJMhOPGpHTcCG85nSK8nrEVTKkHWDznWYn5q6GUh63poyQQHge
O6B63PCC+BsYRqwAV8yIw4sD9I3dD9jhf1wXuPNINGEgtBsNmgNXFx272pjHJsg6
hKaydUjrgI1xJqOuH2avvFZjeBfotkenmt4FsFlId/7bD6T3F5HNMwUh7zJPayyR
8T3GYG5vhK3syMivlzi9cxAgBUlID6+0InjGYjjHl+HZUZc6eFvcKhiF3UoXtv4=
=LOU5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I quickseller (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358020) confirm that I control the PGP key with a fingerprint of F364 AB33 6F00 9BA4 736C 7F69 532D D290 F0BE B516 as well as the private key to 184QFyikUtYLzsGc7Hhn5xAV1rTJmpy6JZ which is posted on the following post: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=812533.msg10212363#msg10212363) and the private key to 16FWQBvwQm1E7gNx9BCZo1FHRsQA9paC84 which was posted in PMID#msg2623560 March 20 2015
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
184QFyikUtYLzsGc7Hhn5xAV1rTJmpy6JZ
H4GL8Y8EBH5ob3fn5NFBI87Np0Yt+KIu7zWy6vBAOVa/di46dy8CfL9aJg1Tu9H5JFD+lh5+36cA8Ai9VpbTGvw=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I quickseller (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358020) confirm that I control the PGP key with a fingerprint of F364 AB33 6F00 9BA4 736C 7F69 532D D290 F0BE B516 as well as the private key to 184QFyikUtYLzsGc7Hhn5xAV1rTJmpy6JZ which is posted on the following post: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=812533.msg10212363#msg10212363) and the private key to 16FWQBvwQm1E7gNx9BCZo1FHRsQA9paC84 which was posted in PMID#msg2623560 March 20 2015
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
16FWQBvwQm1E7gNx9BCZo1FHRsQA9paC84
HGIJKeYVvqSivIxXcbnsV3YXzEjYpIr0Sc9pYSDTWjDxDvTr4NByQBHMRJZ4ZwqwRvSfeltaTt4NdV3vyq7PL80= |
|
|
|
|
How much CLAIM exactly are you trying to sell? Your screenshot says that your total is just under 2.2 million CLAIM (which is worth ~12,100 BTC) counting both on site and off site. It also says that you have ~21,900 CLAIM invested directly on the site (which is worth ~121 BTC). According to JD, there is ~426,000 CLAIM invested in the bankroll, 11% of which is ~46,800 CLAIM (which is worth ~257 BTC) - all values assume an exchange rate of .0055
|
|
|
|
The 45 second wait time between login attempts is not going to change and is the same for everyone. It is to prevent people from trying to brute force passwords.
The same thing can be accomplished with a 3 second delay per attempt and locking an account after 5 attempts, but whatever. I have a set of 5 passwords that I rotate on my log-ins and sometimes forget which I use on what site... so a 45 second delay per log-in attempt is ridiculous. The longer the delay the more difficult it will be to brute force a password. It is especially important to make it a long time between attempts because people can likely get around the delay to an extent (via changing their IP address after each attempt - but they would have limited numbers of IP addresses). It would also not be feasible to lock out accounts after 5 attempts as people do not need to have an associated email address nor secret question with their account. |
|
|
|
|
People are greedy and will likely fall victim to him when he offers a good deal on those gift cards. There have been countless Starbucks gift card sellers who are buying gift cards via stolen credit cards who eventually end up scamming and many people end up stupidly willing to send first despite having multiple negatives.
I am not sure why newbies can create self moderated threads however I imagine it has to do with the lack of newbie jail and the fact that the forum doesn't moderate scams. Newbies need to be able to lock threads for once they are done selling something (once what they were selling has sold).
|
|
|
|
|
This is done however your negative trust should be sufficient (or were you removed from default trust when CITM was removed)
Edit: it looks like your negative trust still shows up by default.
|
|
|
|
|
The 45 second wait time between login attempts is not going to change and is the same for everyone. It is to prevent people from trying to brute force passwords.
|
|
|
|
I would like to know who chronsky purchased the account from so it can be established who exactly is selling these allegedly hacked accounts.
check PM I don't see the reason you want to keep this secret. Especially considering the fact that you gave the person negative trust already. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
