@Tranz
I can live with 8.8 days of mature time, can't see a real problem with it. But correct the showed metrics of the wallet in one of the next patches, please.
No this is BAD ... It means you can manipulate the interest rate without committing your coins to the risk of staking .... 24 hours to play the difficulty for legitimate coins aged up to 9 days
|
|
|
Good news and bad. Good news I found the issue. The setting for the kernel Modifier is set for 6 hours. static const unsigned int MODIFIER_INTERVAL = 6 * 60 * 60; On the surface this seems fine. But it runs through this function: // Get selection interval section (in seconds) static int64_t GetStakeModifierSelectionIntervalSection(int nSection) { assert (nSection >= 0 && nSection < 64); return (nModifierInterval * 63 / (63 + ((63 - nSection) * (MODIFIER_INTERVAL_RATIO - 1)))); } Which changes it to 8.8 days(seem familiar?). So no stake can be calculated that is below this ModiferSelection. Bad News? I can't change this without a hard fork Sorry I didn't catch this earlier. I did test this quite a bit. But the testnest setting: bool LoadBlockIndex(bool fAllowNew) { LOCK(cs_main);
if (fTestNet) { pchMessageStart[0] = 0xcd; pchMessageStart[1] = 0xf2; pchMessageStart[2] = 0xc0; pchMessageStart[3] = 0xef;
bnProofOfStakeLimit = bnProofOfStakeLimitTestNet; // 0x00000fff PoS base target is fixed in testnet bnProofOfWorkLimit = bnProofOfWorkLimitTestNet; // 0x0000ffff PoW base target is fixed in testnet nStakeMinAge = 2 * 60 * 60; // test net min age is 2 hours
nModifierInterval = 20 * 60; // test modifier interval is 20 minutes nCoinbaseMaturity = 10; // test maturity is 10 blocks nStakeTargetSpacing = 1 * 60; // test block spacing is 3 minutes } Is set in a complete different modal. So my test passed there. And I didn't realize it was different. But this is one of those settings that can't be tested on main net unless you fork off your own chain. I think for the time being we have been through enough forks. I will plan for another one in the next 6-12 months or possible sooner that will fix this issue. Plus other things we may decide. Another hint: The message "You have 50% chance of producing a stake within TIME" delivers an at least 10 times higher time span than the real minting occurs.
This I can and have fixed for the next release. I can see why there might be cause for concern as I have some blocks at 8.8 days which have 10x the weight of much smaller blocks at 13-14 days and only blocks over 10 days have staked since the fork .. but its no scientific.
8.8 is the min, so those should be up for stake now. So what does this mean for difficulty? If all blocks we eligible to state after 1 day I'd expect this difficulty. We have this difficulty but they are not staking ..... possible we'll need another fork sooner rather than later?
|
|
|
I wonder if the mature time really has dropped from 10 days to 1 day. Reorganized coins have not staked yet after 3 days. Any info about this?
You can see in coin control, the coins that are 1 day old and greater have weight. So they can stake. But with the higher difficulty can take a while to stake. I'll try to find an example to ensure it is working correctly. I just had one and it orphaned .lol scratch that .. wrong wallet. I can see why there might be cause for concern as I have some blocks at 8.8 days which have 10x the weight of much smaller blocks at 13-14 days and only blocks over 10 days have staked since the fork .. but its no scientific. also showing a big discrepancy between the wallet weight on the green up arrow button and that reported as total in coin control very approximate to difference of not including the coin age between 1 and 10 days ??
|
|
|
I wonder if the mature time really has dropped from 10 days to 1 day. Reorganized coins have not staked yet after 3 days. Any info about this?
You can see in coin control, the coins that are 1 day old and greater have weight. So they can stake. But with the higher difficulty can take a while to stake. I'll try to find an example to ensure it is working correctly. I just had one and it orphaned .lol scratch that .. wrong wallet. I can see why there might be cause for concern as I have some blocks at 8.8 days which have 10x the weight of much smaller blocks at 13-14 days and only blocks over 10 days have staked since the fork .. but its no scientific.
|
|
|
I wonder if the mature time really has dropped from 10 days to 1 day. Reorganized coins have not staked yet after 3 days. Any info about this?
How big are your blocks ? 50000 potential stake is around 130 now, and age is nearly 3 days I have some of them, so statistically it should happen. OK I have a few at various sizes including a risky one @+100k (interest rate might still be low enough to miss the cap) lets see what happens though I have plenty sitting around 7-8k which are 8 days and I would have expected at least one to go by now
|
|
|
I wonder if the mature time really has dropped from 10 days to 1 day. Reorganized coins have not staked yet after 3 days. Any info about this?
How big are your blocks ?
|
|
|
The section of the code that changes the reward won't take effect until Friday Sept 15.The reward should move back up then.
OK can you clarify for those of me that are pretending to concentrate on the day job instead of the fork and failing to do either :/ Hows the reward changing again?
|
|
|
yup difficulty way up 0.087 from .004 Block time still av 26 seconds from the fork and ~ two a minute now.
45% reward and dropping
Still interesting to see how the network / community re calibrates itself from here
guessing the default split combine thresholds need looking at going forward
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me if I can run 2 seperate wallets on 1 PC simultanously?
I think you can use -datadir <path> switch and duplicate everything. (not the wallet.dat) Been a long time since I tried anything like that, Sure I've done it in the past with other wallets.
|
|
|
... net-weight related I think the minimum is now set to 20%
Tranz told this, 20% shall be the minimum. As I know, long term the reward drops to around 1%. So, a staking "minimum" reward of 20% is misleading, Tranz should clarify this. I never had one single coin, if it's "reward" would be 100% or even 20% long term. Yeah clarification needed. I was under the impression that the minimum per stake % would drop to was now 20% driven by network weight and competing block numbers We might find out soon as were down to the 50s now. I forget what future returns/ rewards are projected
|
|
|
Can anybody commit, if chainz.cryptoid.info is on the right chain?
I see two different highs in my wallets: 5667066 and 5667029
Client too unresponsive to do anything right now but.. Huge number of orphans massive net-weight hike large drop in annual % (80%) and the one stake I have is on the explorer I'd guess the explorer and I are both on the busy chain at least .... My client fell behind by about 20 blocks and started suffering .. interestingly only using 30MB of RAM right now ... not bad down from 2GB :/ probably needs a restart but I'm scared .lol Just my two cents: Huge number of orphans, because many small blocks are competing with each other, because block time is two minutes now massive net-weight is because of reduction of mature time from 10 days to 1 day. So around 10 times more concurrent minting stakes at this time. annual stake reward drops from around 100% to 20%, as announced. To me it seems to work as expected, but has to stabilize. I see you managed to read between my lines .... saved me the typing Actually the % is ~65% which is difficulty / net-weight related I think the minimum is now set to 20%
|
|
|
Can anybody commit, if chainz.cryptoid.info is on the right chain?
I see two different highs in my wallets: 5667066 and 5667029
Client too unresponsive to do anything right now but.. Huge number of orphans massive net-weight hike large drop in annual % (80%) and the one stake I have is on the explorer I'd guess the explorer and I are both on the busy chain at least .... My client fell behind by about 20 blocks and started suffering .. interestingly only using 30MB of RAM right now ... not bad down from 2GB :/ probably needs a restart but I'm scared .lol
|
|
|
15 blocks to go and my mature block count is going to go through the roof.... and only 1/6th of the stake space available.
interesting
|
|
|
Changes in this version to create a more stable block chain with less resource usage include: - Fixed issued where clients were creating own chain
- Block time changed to 2 mins.
- Min stake Age changed to 1 day
- Min stake reward set at 20% Yearly
- Stake will degrade over difficulty slower
- Old clients will be disconnected on Friday Sept 15
Is stake cap changing?
|
|
|
My wallet is at "2 years and 8 weeks behind" from like 10 hours ago. Is that normal?
It will depend on your machine to some extent but I started a bootstrap re-sync 14 hours ago and I'm currently 1 year 17 weeks behind if that helps.. Which client are you using? I'm using 1.4.17. Same version here Now down to 44 weeks
|
|
|
My wallet is at "2 years and 8 weeks behind" from like 10 hours ago. Is that normal?
It will depend on your machine to some extent but I started a bootstrap re-sync 14 hours ago and I'm currently 1 year 17 weeks behind if that helps..
|
|
|
Anyone else getting large network usage?
CLAM seems to use more network that any client I have, often peaking around 2-3 Mbps 2GB in 6GB out in two days.
|
|
|
Is there any active market where you can sell Max at this moment? I mean, send and sell coins because only market active (Jubi) doesn't accept sending-receiving coins on market at this moment. Or I'm wrong?
www.yobit.net/en/trade/MAX/BTCAlways the same with MAX ... where can you sell :-/
|
|
|
Just a reminder that I will start working on the governance code for HYP in early September. This means that if you want to vote on issues about HYP (block reward, header hashing, budget system, block time, etc) you will need to get your HYP staking. Remember that HYP takes some time to age, so if you want to participate in voting, you should setup your staking now!!
i honestly thought header hashing optimisation and such wouldn't need bloody voting, kinda asking a long-legged blonde which braking system she prefers in her car bosch or lucas Oh can't help myself here. Dunno, Long legged or not Sabine Schmitz might well have an opinion. Alternative female blonde racing drivers exist.
|
|
|
So I dumped the privkey of one of my wallets - imported to BCC wallet just fine. This particular wallet had slightly over 1BTC in it for ~3 months.
When the BCC wallet was done rescanning it only shows a balance of 0.435BCC
Am I missing something here? As I said all of the BTC in this particular wallet had been sitting for months without being touched.
The wallet total could be made up from several address deposits .. ie more than 1 privkey check the addresses that received the BTC and use all relevant prov keys.
|
|
|
|