GF members (the majority), have remained calm and some have expressed their concerns privately. Most of whom were happy to go over the numbers I provided. A lot of dissatisfaction was expressed over the speed of development and I communicated the difficulty of being a sole dev who does his own debugging. (Basically it's like trying to mark your own homework)
Can you please let us know how those numbers were provided to the GF holders? Because if they were emailed, I did not get them. BTW, I would be happy if some of the majority of those GF members would also express their satisfaction here, because if I was not speaking for them, then they could go against me and give you more support, isn't it? Note that people have said several times they want to help you test the code. Do something with that.What caused the delay in all this? Because it is obvious you promised to have something ready last Friday, and now you are saying that you will not be able to work on it for another 3 days? Regarding the BOLD comment (by me)... wanting does not help. Debugging and pointing parts of the code with some reasoning do! Also saying just, "it doesn't work or it's not good enough..." - it's for the ones that don't know what to do with their money, and those, I am sorry.. can wait. =) People sometimes loose more time fighting against a cause that could just be won by implementing alternative technologies and prove they are better and worth of their words. Main property of evolution is not fighting... it's sharing! I am able to help with debugging if I get more than 3 days to test. And be sure I can give constructive information. But like a developer needs time to develop, a debugger needs to have time to test. Last time the code of the alpha release was put on github around 24 hours before release of the Windows client, and the github source was even not up to date (was obviously different from the windows client). Nothing was working like it should. I think at that time I have mentioned that the reason why Lotto was not working was because there was no reference to it in the code. I did not go into much detail there, because I was almost sure Barwizi knew that it was not working yet and why. It was there in the GUI, but let me put it like this, I can make wonderful GUIs which seem to have lots of functions in it, but if there is nothing behind it it won't work. It is like selling a Tesla without engine, if you turn the key it won't start. I never got the chance to test Lotto when the blockchain was reset, because transactions failed and it got stuck very soon in the blockchain. The strange thing is that the blockchain seemed to have worked somehow till then. I stopped looking over the code until Barwizi is ready with this problem. I am very curious to which developers he has asked for help, and if there is a bounty planned for them. |
|
|
|
Barwizi initially explained what was holding everything up: There is one stupid line of code holding everything up. I have asked fellow developers for a way around, we'll see what they come up with.
To which Frigga77 afterwards asked: What caused the delay in all this? Because it is obvious you promised to have something ready last Friday, and now you are saying that you will not be able to work on it for another 3 days?
My guess is the answer is: "There is one stupid line of code holding everything up. Barwizi has asked fellow developers for a way around"That is his explanation afterwards. Did you miss that he is not working on the code right now? Because that is what I am reading in his message and that is what I am reacting at. Anyway, I am not going to defend my point of view here, I know I am not going to change your mind and I am fine with that. |
|
|
|
GF members (the majority), have remained calm and some have expressed their concerns privately. Most of whom were happy to go over the numbers I provided. A lot of dissatisfaction was expressed over the speed of development and I communicated the difficulty of being a sole dev who does his own debugging. (Basically it's like trying to mark your own homework)
Can you please let us know how those numbers were provided to the GF holders? Because if they were emailed, I did not get them. BTW, I would be happy if some of the majority of those GF members would also express their satisfaction here, because if I was not speaking for them, then they could go against me and give you more support, isn't it? Note that people have said several times they want to help you test the code. Do something with that. What caused the delay in all this? Because it is obvious you promised to have something ready last Friday, and now you are saying that you will not be able to work on it for another 3 days? |
|
|
|
The GF holders keep screaming "4 months!!". Well perhaps you all should change what you've been doing for the last 4 months. Running around screaming scammer on a constant basis hasn't worked very well. Why not try a different approach. I have found that if you are less confrontational, but more conversational, you get a LOT more out of Barwizi. Just look at the previous threads... You'll see I'm right.
...(oh, and when wallets are in the middle of crashing, that's the worst time to start piping up asking questions. You guys could have waited a couple days until that ordeal was done.)
You forget that other people have been doing that, like Chocobo. Maybe you should look up his story. What you all refuse to see is that Barwizi always has a good way of turning words around. I tried to confront him every time, and I really believe that that should be done in the open, this thread, and nowhere else, otherwise my words will also be twisted. Of course I see that you, the people that were holding NRS at the time of the snapshot, want to get your profit. My view is that all the promised features will just remain that: promises. At this moment NRS is not more than a lousy copy of Cinnicoin. Anyway, considering you get annoyed with the warnings is why I decided that this will be my last warning in this topic, because I see that most that still around here don't want to hear all this. I do not want you all to loose that money, but I have given up on NRS and I really hope that other people will do good research into this before buying one single NRS or trusting Barwizi with Project X. I do not trust him with one single satoshi. There are so many better alternatives around. And our timing might not be good for you, but it would always be bad timing for those who already invested. |
|
|
|
STOP WITH THIS DAMN SPAM!!!!
Don't you have anything better to do in life? Barwizi could be a scammer but you are definitely an idiot
As for Barwizi being a scammer, well I don't know about that. I read the posts claiming he didn't pay out, I also read the rebuttal from him claiming that the mining operation lost money. I'm more inclined to believe the latter since mining is a loosing endeavor. Even if his claims that the mining operation lost money would be correct, then he still needs to show the numbers. As for this moment, I am sure the mining rigs are running, but we don't know which address it is going to, and how much was made. Beside that, we paid around 42 BTC total for the mining rig, and did not get any ROI. If you can make clear the 12 BTC that would have been mined (and it could be more then 35 by now) went into, be my guest, but we honestly have no clue. Don't forget that the GF holders did NOT get ANYTHING out of it. And that there was a promise that with the new blockchain, they would also get a share, which was not kept. NRS lotto is still not working. And Barwizi promised to have his updates ready last Thursday or Friday, but did not say it was postponed until he reacted last Sunday, saying he was out of the house. Anyway, I wish you all very happy dreams and lots of prosperity (which will definitely come if you invest in anything BUT NRS). When you finally will see that this coin will be doomed to fail you will remember you were warned. BTW, what kind of punishment would be appropriate for a frauduleus developer? |
|
|
|
|
If Barwizi will come up with the numbers of BTC and Curecoin(?) that the mining rig has produced and will have showed that he is serious about giving the profit to the GF holders (that is, will have paid to them what belongs to them) the "Socalled FUD" will instantly stop, I am sure about that. Only, that has not happened for 4 months now. You can ask the GF holders to stop responding in this thread, but better would be if you ask Barwizi to solve this problem with us, instead of doing as if nothing happened.
|
|
|
|
It is my guess that Barwizi is going to retire his forum username, and start developing under a different name.
I have no idea why you guys kept pushing as hard as you did while he was still developing things. The entire time he said he was going to bring value to both GF holders as well as Noirbits and Noirshares holders.
Instead, you guys just wanted to pound him into the dirt and piss on him, bring collateral damage to everyone nearby.
Great job. I suppose now you can walk around with a smirk on your face that I'm out my NRS too now.
All you did was pour more gas on a smoldering fire and made it worse.
Handling things a little more tactful might have still brought you ways to recover your losses while Barwizi continued to develop and release new things. He was getting close to releasing the NRS / NRB snapshot chain. Now that's dead it seems.
If Barwizi does come back, I'll be shocked. The silence so far has been very telling.
I understand how you feel about people bringing bad news here. I wished we, the bad news bringers are wrong. But even though Barwizi is still there, the problems are not solved yet. This is what you get when someone promises time and time again to make things right and then not following up on it. Even disappearing without giving any reason for that while he promises that he would deliver last Friday. Blaming the people that want justice is not the way to go. Open your eyes. 4, now even 5 people here are consistent in telling you that Barwizi is not honest about some things. They did not make a deal about it, they just confirm over and over that things are not going how they should. If that is too much pressure on Barwizi, then he should not have taken the money of the GF in the first place. He did have months to clear his name, but instead he just pretended to be of good faith and continued his silence about the GF situation. I guess he is still continuing mining with the rigs he bought on our expenses. You can say we damaged this coin, but we only react on a developer who is doing more harm then good to this coin and community, so see where the real damage comes from. Like I said, it is all about keeping up appearances. |
|
|
|
What does this mean? If this one person keeps pushing there will be none of what? I would like a response on Skype btw Barwizi.. I dont like being ignored.
It means, perhaps, that some relaxing needs to occur. I have been watching this coin all summer and while I don't understand the issues I see one major theme - a guy who is consistently working to make this thing work. I have watched you guys take my investment to -15x its value (not a GF holder). I still believe in this guy. He doesn't have help. Sure, it seems that he can't deliver in a 'timely fashion' what was promised but he seems to be steadily working towards it. I'm not arguing that some people might not be entitled to answers but I think he means that he is working towards fixing everything and perhaps a bit more patience is more productive than constant demands. I'm going back to the background (check my post history; I am not a shill and am doing well enough in crypto world *knock on wood* so please don't think I am here to favor...much less argue my impressions - Read - I won't reply)... It is all about keeping up appearances... |
|
|
|
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
Well I agree about voting and talk, but hope that lotto will be implemented soon, as the GF holders are waiting for that feature to be implemented. BTW I have been keeping silent about the questions I am having about the mining operation and the money that still needs to be accounted for for the GF holders (there are still 23 bitcoins unaccounted for, and I guess the mining operation is still making money, so it is getting more), but only because I wanted to give Barwizi time to solve the problems with the blockchain. The question about the accounting Barwizi has to do for at least 23 bitcoins is still standing and should also be answered asap. I have had to make a few modifications whose implications i am trying to test out, i have soomeone who helps but their free time is limited. You want an in-wallet block finder? I can work that in, but that's probably on Thursday, with wallets available friday (unless i get a day off) Current status
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X As for GF stuff, i agree we need to work on it and close the book on it asap. If you would put as much effort and time on giving the accounting as you are spending on the Project X thread, you would be ready with it now. So where is it? keep pushing and there will be none. You've already crossed the line calling me a scammer, cracking a whip at me will do nothing to help your cause. It will simply push me to follow the advice "let it all go". I rest my case. You are manipulating me in this way, I cannot ask, but you will not deliver unless people are pushing you, you appear to be willing to do the accounting, but appearance is void. You noticed I gave you time to make things right. We are waiting for 4 months now for any accounting. It was never given. If you were really were so concerned about what people think of you, you would do more effort to contradict the facts with proof. The fact is we did not get anything out of those 23 or more bitcoins, they are still with you and you are doing no effort at all to make that right. You are always good at keeping up the appearance of doing something, but in fact you do very little for NRS. It looks like it has become more of a burden to you then something you are passionate about. You are passionate about your new idea, Project X, but with the knowledge I have now, I would say that your interest for that project will remain until you have taken your money out from it and will be "sidetracked" by whatever it is in about 2 months time. |
|
|
|
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
Well I agree about voting and talk, but hope that lotto will be implemented soon, as the GF holders are waiting for that feature to be implemented. BTW I have been keeping silent about the questions I am having about the mining operation and the money that still needs to be accounted for for the GF holders (there are still 23 bitcoins unaccounted for, and I guess the mining operation is still making money, so it is getting more), but only because I wanted to give Barwizi time to solve the problems with the blockchain. The question about the accounting Barwizi has to do for at least 23 bitcoins is still standing and should also be answered asap. I have had to make a few modifications whose implications i am trying to test out, i have soomeone who helps but their free time is limited. You want an in-wallet block finder? I can work that in, but that's probably on Thursday, with wallets available friday (unless i get a day off) Current status
Mineable ✔
Chat ✔
Voting ✔
Lotto (mining) ✔
Lotto (tickets ) X As for GF stuff, i agree we need to work on it and close the book on it asap. If you would put as much effort and time on giving the accounting as you are spending on the Project X thread, you would be ready with it now. So where is it? |
|
|
|
I think we need to approach exchanges. There is a fear that adding SpreadCoin to exchanges will ruin the price but no one forces you to sell it now, you can wait and sell later. I don't think that adding it later will make price higher, price will always be determined by supply and demand. For low volume coins price can easily go up or down 10x in one moment because of just one person who will buy or sell many coins.
In fact, low price can be advantageous for us, people who don't belive in the future of SpreadCoin will sell and those who do will buy.
What do you think?
Of course we don't have large community and it may be hard to convince exchanges to list SpreadCoin, but we can try.
I support SPR to be listed on the exchange ASAP.  me too  |
|
|
|
When you release it, I recommend commenting out smsg, voting, etc.
Right now we just need a stable merged chain that is mineable and can do basic transactions.
Oh, and a block explorer that lets us check blocks and transactions.
That's all.
This way if new features cause a problem, you can checkpoint back if necessary and have people revert to the previous client (as much as I hate to think of that happening).
Most of all, we'll have a block explorer to verify if our nodes are current, etc. Launching a new chain with no block explorer is pretty weird and confusing.
Well I agree about voting and talk, but hope that lotto will be implemented soon, as the GF holders are waiting for that feature to be implemented. BTW I have been keeping silent about the questions I am having about the mining operation and the money that still needs to be accounted for for the GF holders (there are still 23 bitcoins unaccounted for, and I guess the mining operation is still making money, so it is getting more), but only because I wanted to give Barwizi time to solve the problems with the blockchain. The question about the accounting Barwizi has to do for at least 23 bitcoins is still standing and should also be answered asap. |
|
|
|
I think I have some problem.
My address is 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I had 7273.916572 NRS.
In the previous NRS, I type dumpprivkey 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv and I got
Private key for address 9hWttyc1RSwY8FHG6BfTYAwTgphDqxtJyv is not known (code -4)
Can you help me?
You shouldn't have to dump any keys to switch to the new NRS chain. Just use your old wallet file as though it were the wallet for the new chain. (Be sure to back it up first, though.) Thanks. I just replaced old wallet.dat to new one. However, I found this error and qt wallet didn't run. "Warning : error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correcly, but transaction data or address book entries might be missing or incorrect." The wallet is not running at this moment because the database of the main server got corrupted, there was a fork at 238, you will have to wait until Barwizi comes with an update. |
|
|
|
When can we start to mine?
In a few days. It takes longer to see issues on the net when i do it alone. ? You are saying someone is helping you with the code and now you are saying you do it alone? What was happening at block 238? Why did things go wrong? |
|
|
|
I think the block chain was reset
{
"version" : "v0.2.3.1-beta",
"protocolversion" : 60010,
"wallets" : 1,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"unspendable" : 0.00000000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 5,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"moneysupply" : 51.11060000,
"connections" : 0,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "0.0.0.0",
"difficulty" : 0.00000000,
"testnet" : false,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00100000,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"errors" :
i think your right i found the 4th block 2.222 "blocks" : 4, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespermin" : "No information yet. Wait at least 4 minutes after starting mining for estimate.", "networkhashps" : 0, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } This is what happens while my wallet crashes (substituted my ipaddress by myip). Seems that the chain I try to reach is on block 239? accepted connection 207.245.41.195:64965 send version message: version 60010, blocks=239, us=myip:33333, them=207.245.41.195:64965, peer=207.245.41.195:64965 Added time data, samples 2, offset -5 (+0 minutes) Moving 207.245.41.195:33333 to tried receive version message: version 60010, blocks=238, us=myip:33333, them=207.245.41.195:33333, peer=207.245.41.195:64965 if I wipe my .NoirShares folder, it also connects to that same chain, no difference there. I will add the nodes Billyboy402 gave to the config file and see if that makes a difference. edit 1: added NoirShares.conf with all the nodes. In that case NoirShares wallet starts without crashing, but is saying there are 232 blocks left and won't sync. If I look at getmininginfo I see that I am stuck after block 6. So in my opinion the blockchain is not reset, but the chain won't load. Or maybe the blockchain is reset but still remembers it had 238 blocks before  Guess something odd happened at block 238. edit 2: Trying to start with my former wallet (the one that mined in the last chain): Crashing again with core dump. I think I got block 4 in that chain, so it should have been there unconfirmed by now after downloading the first 6 blocks. db.log: BDB0060 PANIC: fatal region error detected; run recovery. edit 3: Now it loads again with my wallet with my mined coins until block 238: was it a seednodes problem again? edit 4: 5 mins later again (sry, but editing is better than typing new messages every time): tried to start the miner: crashing again at block 239, db.log tells me: BDB0060 PANIC: fatal region error detected; run recovery In the process of deleting files, starting again, adding files etc I also saw this message several times trying to start and crashing: ************************ EXCEPTION: St13runtime_error CDB() : can't open database file smsgPubKeys.dat, error -30973 NoirShares in ProcessMessages() I tend to get the message if I delete all in .NoirShares except for NoirShares.conf and wallet.dat. Deleting wallet.dat seems to solve that, and after that I can replace the wallet with my old wallet again. Seems we are still stuck at block 238? edit 5: { "blocks" : 238, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 0.00000009, "errors" : "", "generate" : true, "genproclimit" : 2, "hashespermin" : 8.31875512, "networkhashps" : 2, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } edit 6: this is getting pathetic, after 1 hour mining again it crashes.... db.log: BDB2506 file wallet.dat has LSN 1/1108655, past end of log at 1/1071557 BDB2507 Commonly caused by moving a database from one database environment BDB2508 to another without clearing the database LSNs, or by removing all of BDB2509 the log files from a database environment BDB2516 DB_ENV->log_flush: LSN of 1/1108655 past current end-of-log of 1/1071557 BDB2517 Database environment corrupt; the wrong log files may have been removed or incompatible database files imported from another environment BDB0061 PANIC: BDB0087 DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery BDB3027 wallet.dat: unable to flush page: 18 BDB4519 txn_checkpoint: failed to flush the buffer cache: BDB0087 DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery BDB0060 PANIC: fatal region error detected; run recovery BDB0060 PANIC: fatal region error detected; run recovery edit 7: Wallet keeps crashing once in a while, will start after deleting .NoirShares, then crash after a while again. still stuck at block 238 |
|
|
|
latest wallet suddenly crashed and now shows 0 connections/out of sync...
I have the same situation.... I had the wallet up for some hours yesterday, mined some to test Lotto (which I didn't because of the transferring problem), closed it for the night and now tried to start it again (compiled in Ubuntu). It keeps crashing with: Segmentation fault (core dumped). I will try to find the logfiles. |
|
|
|
EVERYONE STOP! For now please don't run your wallets. I'm sorry to say i am resetting the chain to block 0.
The grant database is causing crashes because of the reduced amount clashing with those still adamantly using the very first wallet i released. Also there seems to be an issue with transactions that i am trying to deal with now.
So we are going to start from the beginning. There will be no more major changes for a while, and i will lay out the changes here later.
The new client starting afresh, (i promise this wont happen again) will be available within the hour. All genesis balances are preserved.
Lol, I asked you the first time alpha came out if the mining would be permanent or could be deleted (reset blockchain). You did not answer the 3 times I asked. I guess people were thinking this would be permanent! And now on your own you decide to throw away all the mining power people have put in, because your programming sucks. What if NRS 2.0 would have been on the exchanges already? Shall i quit and stop completely since i am so incompetent? I remember telling people that this is alpha code , which means it's got issues, and i tried to maintain their balances, but now we've reached a point where it just cant be. So from now on you take over, since i am clearly not good enough a coder for your tastes. I have problems with your actions, which don't show your competence. So if you are competent, then show us. I won't be too proud to applaud you if you show me being wrong. I am not a coder. But I can read code to a certain extent and I have people available that can read the bits I can't. Since you can read code to an extent...how many coins have this many moving parts outside of the basic bitcoin code? Let's see there's PoS, Lotto, Voting , Encrypted Messaging and the Receipting functions, Dynamic loading/unloading of wallets, two RNGs and a one of a kind PoW algorithm that is entwined with one of the RNGs. If you want finished off-the-shelf software, wait until bitcoin goes from versions 0.9.*** to version 1.0. I am dealing with all this code while also answering your questions, and doing research to try and get an equitable accounting, how about giving me a sip of that super juice, because to maintain all that is just not possible let alone with me at my day job. promised functionality: 7 months promised accounting: 3 months you are the one delaying. Not me. Anyway, I will stop this conversation for now, because I don't want to annoy people. BTW syscoin had a lot of problems and had build a lot of functionality too in their wallet. So complexity might be a problem indeed. |
|
|
|
EVERYONE STOP! For now please don't run your wallets. I'm sorry to say i am resetting the chain to block 0.
The grant database is causing crashes because of the reduced amount clashing with those still adamantly using the very first wallet i released. Also there seems to be an issue with transactions that i am trying to deal with now.
So we are going to start from the beginning. There will be no more major changes for a while, and i will lay out the changes here later.
The new client starting afresh, (i promise this wont happen again) will be available within the hour. All genesis balances are preserved.
Lol, I asked you the first time alpha came out if the mining would be permanent or could be deleted (reset blockchain). You did not answer the 3 times I asked. I guess people were thinking this would be permanent! And now on your own you decide to throw away all the mining power people have put in, because your programming sucks. What if NRS 2.0 would have been on the exchanges already? Shall i quit and stop completely since i am so incompetent? I remember telling people that this is alpha code , which means it's got issues, and i tried to maintain their balances, but now we've reached a point where it just cant be. So from now on you take over, since i am clearly not good enough a coder for your tastes. I have problems with your actions, which don't show your competence. So if you are competent, then show us. I won't be too proud to applaud you if you show me being wrong. I am not a coder. But I can read code to a certain extent and I have people available that can read the bits I can't. |
|
|
|
EVERYONE STOP! For now please don't run your wallets. I'm sorry to say i am resetting the chain to block 0.
The grant database is causing crashes because of the reduced amount clashing with those still adamantly using the very first wallet i released. Also there seems to be an issue with transactions that i am trying to deal with now.
So we are going to start from the beginning. There will be no more major changes for a while, and i will lay out the changes here later.
The new client starting afresh, (i promise this wont happen again) will be available within the hour. All genesis balances are preserved.
Lol, I asked you the first time alpha came out if the mining would be permanent or could be deleted (reset blockchain). You did not answer the 3 times I asked. I guess people were thinking this would be permanent! And now on your own you decide to throw away all the mining power people have put in, because your programming sucks. What if NRS 2.0 would have been on the exchanges already? |
|
|
|
I think you are just trying to make a sensation, if you were honestly looking for answers you would stay on track, we are still dealing with the actual amount put in , then once that is done we will move on to each issue in turn. Throwing up numbers like that serves no purpose except to try give credibilty to something you have not even proven yet.
So you presume I am not honestly looking for answers after I have put in around 5 hours work yesterday and today, trying to find out if the information given was correct? I have even given you the benefit of the doubt for 7 BTC yesterday, but you were telling Chocobo his figures were not right. So I stepped in and did some calculations based on ALL the information. It is not only you who decides how the investigation is going Barwizi. I react on your postings. I am still missing the receipt for the taxes. You still did not account for a lot of things and are trying to avoid conversation about them every time. Like I said before: if you want to be cleared from the accusations, you need to be open about your expenses for the GF. As the CEO, you are responsible in case other officers are not around. do you have skype so we can have a more fluid conversation, then you can post what we find here? I am not avoiding anything and i keep telling you lets do one thing at a time. why do you insist on doing a lot of things at the same time? I made us start from the beggining with reason, that way, we can make sure nothing slips by us. trying to do every thing at once will lead to miscalculations and maybe we'll completely miss some importnat stuff. I don't use skype because of it being not open source. Also I don't see why I should skype, I do not need to debate about it to change the conditions. You can make a Google spreadsheet if you want with the accounting and give the whole GF holders group access to it. You can upload needed documents lke receipts to Google drive. Simple and effective. The accounting question has been questioned here for around 3 months. So you have had 3 months to prepare these things. The amount still open and unaccounted for is 23 BTC. The Group will take a look and let you know if they see anything they have questions about. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
