Take a weight gainer protein shake for post workout recovery and some dhea to stimulate extra testosterone production all the while working out 5 days a week. Also, some form of nitric oxide will help give the pump effect. You'll put on muscle and the continual production of it will be fueled by the heightened protein intake. And yeah, you'll need a diet to go along with that that this is high protein and high carb for a couple years and then see where you're at. You just have to make a plan and always follow through on it, you'll become addicted to the gym and how it makes you feel about yourself before you know it. I cut myself down from about 245 lbs to 210 over the last years via constant cardio and a more moderate approach to lifting. You need the opposite according what your goals are.
I would be very cautious with dhea, especially for a 21 year old with a naturally high test level. The dhea can easily aromatize into estrogen and can lead to severe depressive episodes if estrogen rises to fast, both my father and I react very badly to dhea. I have my wife taking it to try to correct hormone imbalances from birth control an it works well for her mood and recovery. For test boosters, tribulus works well for stimulation of leydig cells for total test production, and maca works well for binding to shbg, increasing free test levels, though this is more useful in older, 30+ men. The op doesn't need any test boosters unless he has a testosterone dysfunction of some kind. We tried many combinations and protocols on my father. Pre treatment his test was 320 ng/dl [270-1070]. Herbal supplements got his into the mid 400's but we had to cycle frequently and t was expensive. We finally settled on 100mg test-cypionate a week, which is keeping his levels in the 700's. I suspect, based on his recovery rate and growth rate, his levels are higher than mine now. The OP doesn't need anything but whey protein, not weight gainers full of sugar, and food. I re-read the original post, and you are already taking in a fair amount of whey. It could entirely be possibly you need to kick the calories up to the 4-5000 a day range to grow. I'll easily eat 4000+ calories a day when im training heavy and not dieting. This is a lot of food, I would suspect you are eating under 2000 a day and do not know how to properly judge your intake. A chicken breast is only about 200-250 calories. Can you eat 10 a day? Body building is expensive, whole milk and fats can help. |
|
|
|
Good lord, don't listen to anyone here. I'm 35 have been training for over a decade, my dead and squat are north of 450, my bench is hovering around 300. I broke my shoulder blade a few years ago and its been slow recovery. I've always been a shitty bencher. Go here and read. www.t-nation.comPick a program, I strongly recommend Wendlers 5/3/1 for strength. The ebook is available on torrent sites. Do it for a year at least. Eat at least 3500 calories a day, with 200+ grams of protein, i find my recovery is vastly improved with 60g whey right away workout, timing is important. I have my 58 year old father doing 5/3/1 and pulled 360lbs dead lift after 6 months of training, he was untrained for about 20 years and riddled with injuries. Here's the torrent https://kickass.so/5-3-1-the-simplest-and-most-effective-training-system-for-raw-strength-pdf-gooner-t8842680.html[edit] I should add, unless you beat the shit out of yourself in the gym, you wont stimulate your appetite. I've trained with a lot of people who claim to eat a lot, then they train with me and they are ravenous for meat for days. If you force feed yourself without giving it all in the gym you'll just get fat. For the first 2-3 weeks You should feel like complete shit the day after the workout. You will adapt. |
|
|
|
The energy comes from the aether. The induction coil amplifies the voltage and the vacuum tubes amplify the current.
Look up what a vacuum tube is, the same as a transistor, it is not an amplifier. They can act as an amplifier by acting as an electronic switch, where a small current activates a gate allowing a large current (already existing elsewhere!!) to flow. They do not convert a small current to a large current.  Notice the C? This current already exists and is supplied externally. Quit being stupid. |
|
|
|
Tesla coil is an overunity device.
Please show on the circuit were over unity is achieved. Here's what I think happened. You didn't actually know what a Tesla coil was. Now you're going to commit a logical fallacy, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts , and tell me you meant something else, which doesn't exist, but you'll claim it does and it's just a secret. |
|
|
|
Tesla coils could solve 99% of the world's problems.
Only if the solution was electrocuting 99% of retarded people such as yourself. How does this solve any problems  I built one when I was 12 out of an old TV transformer, besides throwing an extremely low current arc, what good is it? Here, build one, solve the worlds problems.  |
|
|
|
I watched this documentary about a European engineer (I think Romanian) who invented an electrical generator, that uses the Earth graviational field to produce 200W of electricity. All materials used were basic - rotors, weights, dynamos etc.
This is called a dam.  No. A dam uses water, not gravity and costs billions. This thing you can make yourself and uses no external fuel or another costly force to run. But it's not surprising that there is lack of funding for this kind of inventions. Look up gravitational potential energy, how do you think a dam works? Go to school. Hint UE -> KE -> e- |
|
|
|
I watched this documentary about a European engineer (I think Romanian) who invented an electrical generator, that uses the Earth graviational field to produce 200W of electricity. All materials used were basic - rotors, weights, dynamos etc.
This is called a dam. |
|
|
|
Finally, the M&M experiment (the erroneous attempt at detecting the æther) has been debunked.
Cite your source, a peer reviewed one, with a detailed methodology so I can replicate it. |
|
|
|
|
Google Simple school girl motor
Yes you can have two motors, one acting as a generator, one as a motor, sharing fields, but you cant extract any power from the system
Its called a school girl circuit, because its so simple even a school girl could build it, its been around along time.
|
|
|
|
Aether is an outdated belief, like flat earth. We believed that electromagnetic energy, which includes light, traveled in waves, and waves require a medium to travel through. However, there is vacuum in space, so we couldn't understand how those waves could travel through space, and theorized that maybe the universe is filled with this aether that energy waves go through. However, there was no way for us to detect that aether, and numerous experiments showed that there is no evidence for its existence, other than that light and radio travel through space somehow. It was much later after Tesla that we discovered that light is both a wave and a particle - photon - and thus that energy can travel through space in particle form. Something like aether, which we could never prove existed, turned out to not be needed for the universe to work, and is thus considered to not be real in science. In short, not everything Tesla invented was scientifically correct or functional. Especially in his later years when he went from electro mechanical systems, to more theoretical based on ideas that wouldn't be proven false or true for decades later. Oh, and this sentence on that web site Their emissions of longitudinal impulses can exceed the speed of light pretty much confirms my suspicion that it's be. Nothing can exceed the speed of light. "A Brief History of Superluminal Wave Experiments 1) In 1988 researcher Alexi Guy Obolensky, working together with Prof. Panos Pappas, transmitted electric pulse shock waves at superluminal speed. They published the results of their experiment in Electricity and Wireless World,December 1988, pp. 1162 – 1165. page 1162, page 1163, page 1164, page 1165 The above page links are provided on Dr. Pappas’ website. Some of the images are marked with corrections that Dr. Pappas has made to correct mistakes made in the original published manuscript which was mistakenly not sent to A. G. Obolensky for his final review. 2) Also in 1988, Eric Dollard demonstrated an experiment in which he sent longitudinal waves through a coaxial cable at 1.26 c. He discusses this in the following video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-721789270445596549#. See especially the part 14 minutes into the video. 3) In 2005 – 2006 Alexi Guy Obolensky and myself transmitted high voltage Coulomb shock wave pulses across his laboratory at a speed averaging 1.26 c. At 3.07 meters distance the pulse arrived 1.7 nanoseconds faster than luminal speed. Our threshold resolution for distinguishing time delays was 125 picoseconds. The rise time of our shock front was about 0.8 nanoseconds. The speed declined inversely with increasing distance from the emitting electrode in accordance with the predictions of subquantum kinetics. At a distance of 83 cm from the electrode the speed was clocked as high as 2.1 c with speeds as high as 8 c being projected at 65 cm distance! Graphs of the data are published in my book Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion, p. 177 -185. Other than this reporting, Obolensky and myself have not yet taken the time to write up the results for publication in a technical journal due to current demands on our time. Nevertheless, as described in Verification Number 11, our experiment confirmed a key a priori prediction of subquantum kinetics. 4) Also around this time, Eugene Podkletnov and Modanese performed experiments with the Podkletnov gravity impulse beam generator in which they succeeded in sending gravity shock impulses over a distance of 1211 meters at a speed of 64 c. They report their findings in a paper entitled “Study of Light Interaction with Gravity Impulses and Measurements of the Speed of Gravity Impulses” which is appearing this year (2011) in an edited book of papers. E. Podkletnov has disclosed to me in personal communication that they have succeeded in measuring speeds of several thousand c in a higher power impulse beam generator. 5) Dr. Panos Pappas has recently continued experiments on superluminal pulse propagation in his own laboratory in Athens, Greece. He reports the results of his work on his papimi.gr website. In addition to the above there are various reports of superluminal signal propagation over very short distances such as the papers by Ishii and Giakos (1991) and Enders and Nimtz (1993)." Source: http://starburstfound.org/neutrinos-break-speed-light-limit-physics-crisis/If it can't be replicated in another lab, it isn't science and it is bullshit. |
|
|
|
Build one and prove it, collect Nobel prize. Do you not need 1 million dollars? |
|
|
|
|
There is much confusion here between free energy ($$$) and an over unity machine. An over unity machine is impossible. A nuclear reaction is not an over unity, the inputs are not greater than the outputs. The binding energy contained in a mass of uranium is less that the output energy, even atomic weapons are very inefficient and convert a small percentage of the mass's binding energy to another form (heat, em radiation..etc)
Free energy is a different story though and they are sources which are free from a dollar cost, but not from a systems cost. A hamster in a wheel is free energy if you don't have to feed the hamster. I have done the math on my hedgehog who loves his wheel. He is about 20% efficient.
I have an old alternator on my exercise bike, which charges a lead battery with an inverter. Its more of a novelty but i have used it when we've lost power in a storm. It would be free if I didn't have to eat.
Find a way to draw energy into you personal "system" from outside of it, like the river hydro electric idea in the post above me, will provide you with free energy, but it steals it from somewhere else. In this case the earth's potential gravity.
This other stuff about secret machines that burn water, or "brown's gas" which is just hydrogen are bull, because it requires more energy to break the reactants down into a useful form than you get out of it. Unless you have an unlimited source of local free hydrogen, what good is it.
The other issues are people confusing pollution with C02. Its possible to have a very complete reaction with methane or another simple hydro carbon and have only c02 as a product, but the issue is the ability of CO2 to retain solar energy, not smog which is just particulate matter in the atmosphere. The later will eventually come out of suspension and settle.
Realistic long term solutions involve, tidal, solar and wind, but ultimately we need better battery capacity, which is coming online, albeit slowly. I read an estimate years ago that if most of the desert in New Mexico (I think) was covered in solar panels it would provide for the entire planets energy requirements, in all aspects, jets, ships, cars, provided they were all electric and storage capacity was adequate.
|
|
|
|
1) Get a girlfriend, 2) Stop excessive masturbating, 3) Stop smoking, 4) Do exercises everyday for 1 hour at least, 5) Ban xhamster, 6) Ban pornhub, 7) Ban xvideos,  Ban youporn 9) Ban porn from your computer. 10) Stop being so concerned about what other people do with their junk. 11) Burn bible. 12) Use brain. |
|
|
|
If Darkcoin wants to have an traction, they need to seed their core. Had it a few days now and not 1 connection to start a download
Are you kidding? With 1200 masternodes on vps dark is the fasting syncing coin I've seen. I can download the entire block chain in maybe 15 minutes. Unlike god damn monero taking days and bricking my laptop in the process. |
|
|
|
Im sorry but this is ridiculous. How can Einstein's work be questioned after all these years? Why would this information take so long to surface?
This is nothing more than a conspiracy theory in my opinion, And I find it appalling that people would write such things about one of the greatest minds that ever lived.
Why would this information take so long to surface? A lot of major athletes were caught doping many severals AFTER they won golds  look at armstrong.. There is nothing to surface, the OP is claiming Einstein stole all his ideas without crediting the people who discovered them, that is plagiarism. Here is the original 1905 paper and other scientists are noted extensively throughout, including the ones the OP claims were stolen from. Original German http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.19053221004/pdfEnglish translation http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/If you actually read the paper, it isn't complicated, basic calculus is all that's required, it shows that the ether isn't necessary for light propagation. Applying Galilean relativity, X' = X +Vo(t), sets up a solution that doesn't satisfy Maxwell's equations. What that means is that if you calculate for the ether, Maxwell's equations break down. If you ignore the ether, the formulas work. These equations are the basis for all electronics and electrical theory |
|
|
|
All waves need a medium to travel. The medium for the electromagnetic waves is the ETHER. THE FIFTH ELEMENT.
 |
|
|
|
...
He didn't come up with the Lorentz contraction either, but he was the person who pieced everything together. These other scientists aren't marginalized, we call it a Lorentz contraction, Hilbert space, the Michelson and Morley disproved the ether.
...
The M&M experiment is bunk, what they did was like trying to mesure the wind speed outside of a moving car with the anemometer inside the cab and the windows rolled up. Yep you're right...you are saying the experiment couldn't detect the medium light was supposed to travel in, because it wasn't in the medium, except that they could physically see the apparatus, which means there is light, which means its should be in the medium... oh wait... Is the counter argument 'bunk' mathematically rigorous? The experiment used Galilean relativity, not even Einstein reformulation, the velocity of the planet though space didn't add or subtract to lights relative velocity. It is counter intuitive that a light wave, as opposed to any other wave, doesn't need a medium to travel in. Once induction was understood by Faraday, it is intuitive how a electric wave can propagate itself when the magnetic perpendicular component is factored in. Or do we not understand radio waves? Arguing for the ether is arguing for a flat earth. About plagiarism, I just took these. Let the man speak for himself.    Please cite plagiarism |
|
|
|
I don't know who calls him the father of modern science and i disagree, modern science is the quantum level, not the macroscopic level of general relativity. There's been very little progress towards fundamental understanding of gravity...I'm still waiting for the graviton. He didn't come up with the Lorentz contraction either, but he was the person who pieced everything together. These other scientists aren't marginalized, we call it a Lorentz contraction, Hilbert space, the Michelson and Morley disproved the ether. Again you are leaving out the entire equation  The (pc)^2 is the critical part, this is the part that sets the speed of light as a speed limit. The p is momentum, energy use increases at the square of momentum, this is critical to ideas of faster than light travel, not conversion of mass to energy in the mc^2 part. And this one  The gamma is called the Lorentz factor, not the Einstein factor. None of this matter though, this is all special relativity. The general theory and the Einstein field equations are the true breakthrough, besides he won the Nobel prize for the photo electric effect, how solar panels work, not relativity special or general. |
|
|
|
Yes, nuclear energy comes from the aether (zero point energy). Dont show me mathematics. Mathematics are not science. It is a tool for the science. Show me experiments. Science = experiment. Tell me the input and the output of an atomic bomb.
Math is a model useful for prediction, if the model if sufficiently accurate. You think the Manhattan project just randomly blew things up in Nevada until they got lucky and used enriched 235, then just had also happened to be refining across the country? Without math? input=uranium output=boom Without math how can you quantify these inputs and outputs? How much uranium do we use, lots? What is the blast radius, really big??? you dont even know what zero point energy means...idiot. I had a professor who's day job is at CERN, a student in class asked him about the zero point energy, "what does that mean, there is still a potential in the ground state?" He literally shrugged his shoulders and said "who knows, its interesting though". So please tell me what use this is, how to harness it, and collect your Nobel prize. |
|
|
|
Because the output energy is bigger than the input energy. Faraday wrote it requires 96Kj of electrical energy to split water into HHO with an increase of 286Kj of heat energy created when Hydrogen is recombined to make water. Gasoline and Diesel are around 90 Octane, but HHO is 130 Octane.
This is impossible, not because we don't have the technology to make this work, but because that's not how the universe works. Note that NONE of the people who came up with any such "inventions" actually use them to power their houses and cars. A classic example of bigger output than the input, is nuclear energy. Nuclear energy uses the aether power. But you can see many other examples here: It Runs On Water Full Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81RQ6XwaRyMgood lord, no nuclear energy doesn't come from the 'aether' the total energy in a system includes the binding energy and the inertial rest mass, e=mc^2 isnt the full equation the rest of the equation is the rest mass. The nuclear binding energy that overcomes the repulsive force of the protons, fission of uranium doesn't add extra energy, the energy is already there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_binding_energy#Mass_defect |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
