Bitcoin Forum
July 03, 2024, 02:58:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 »
121  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BTC-E reported compromised on: February 14, 2012, 06:48:08 PM
What with Trade Hill closing and this instance those unaware should check out Intersango.com.

We don't advertise much but we are one of the biggest exchanges. We are the 2nd longest running exchange. The longest running exchange not to have been compromised. We have never suffered a hack and we are the only bitcoin exchange owned and operated by core bitcoin developers. We have the most competitive rates especially once considering transfer costs to and from Intersango.com

We operate with honesty, and have absolutely no hidden fees. Our long history confirms this time and time again.

We also have always had excellent and fast support!


EDIT: I mention this mostly due to the fact that Patrick Strateman (known on these forums and IRC as phantomcircuit) has repeatedly found security vulnerabilities like the above mentioned. Having strong developers and security specialists does make a huge difference. The whole reason we created Intersango was because we realized this was Bitcoins biggest problem, reliable exchanges.

Is this new wave of regulations affecting you? Do you still accept Dwolla and Paxum for deposits and withdrawals? It seems like those put an end to Tradehill. I would like an alternative to gox.

On topic segment:  BTC-E seems to have suffered from the same stupidity as Bitscalper. Does no one understand even simple salted MD5? LOL


even salted md5's can easily be cracked

I think the min standard nowadays is using SHA 256 with atleast a 16 byte random salt
122  Economy / Trading Discussion / [Resolved] Another Scam report on: February 08, 2012, 04:21:52 AM
As you can see in this thread he was selling a Visiontek HD 4850
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60857.0

This is a Visiontek 4850:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details_ss.asp?EdpNo=3923757&CatId=3670

I bought it from him.... but when I received the package there wasn't a 4850 in it the card was a Visiontek HD 4350

This exact card he sent me:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814129149

This card only gets 8 mh/s
I was expecting the 4850 that gets around 100 mh/s

Also the HDMI port on the 4350 that he sent me is blown

I replied to the sale thread and sent him a PM and I've seen him online since then but he won't reply to me which is why I'm writing this scam report....

123  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] Miner Parts (VGA, PSU, CPU, Extenders...) on: February 07, 2012, 06:48:32 PM
I received my package today.......

You sent me a visiontek 4350 NOT a visiontek 4850
this is the card: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814129149

WTF?!?!
if i had known it was a 4350 I wouldn't have bought it this card only get 8mh/s

the 4850 gets around 100 mh/s
124  Economy / Goods / Re: [sold] 3x Diamond 5970 new oem $410 shipped USA on: February 07, 2012, 02:47:26 AM
i didn't notice they were out of stock  Tongue
125  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTB] 5970 for ~70 BTC on: February 07, 2012, 02:32:27 AM
newegg used to have Diamond model for $330

ive seen alot of people buying them and reselling on this board for around $400

but they have bad rep
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54617.0
126  Economy / Goods / Re: [sold] 3x Diamond 5970 new oem $410 shipped USA on: February 07, 2012, 02:27:23 AM
im guessing that these cards are from newegg?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814103195

$80 cheaper than what your selling for.....

also these cards have a bad rep if they are from newegg read here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54617.0
127  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] Handmade Hemp Bracelets on: February 06, 2012, 12:37:27 AM
I love hemp stuff Smiley
If I didn't already have a bunch of these I made myself I'd buy some.
Good luck with sales!
128  Economy / Services / Re: B>Votes on: February 05, 2012, 06:09:27 AM
+1 vote

btc address: 1BNFvb7e62j5CANx1WARq5jADaXJ6uVhZa
129  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for someone to create/modify software for this forum [1100+ BTC] on: February 05, 2012, 06:01:33 AM
The first file I randomly clicked on was over 4000 lines long, contains no function documentation, huge stretches of if/elseif blocks (not sure if that's avoidable, but it's damn ugly), magic numbers in your switch blocks and huge code duplication.

I don't mean to crap on your work, but in any mildly successful software company that wouldn't get through a code review. It wouldn't get past me anyway and I'm not even employed as a software engineer.

Well at least thanks for taking a look - I think you may not be very familiar with working with generated source code. Such code is (for most users) is not even something you would look at (ever used yacc?).

Because the code is generated the "magic numbers" are of zero problem (they will change automatically when regeneration occurs if required). The code is for the most part boilerplate and requires some replication of things in order to support "dynamic dispatch".

It is true I don't write a lot of comments as I learned (the hard way) that skillful programmers *read code* rather than comments (which inevitably become misleading as programmers tend to change code without changing comments).

Perhaps take a look at the file "ciyam_server.cpp" or "ciyam_client.cpp" to get a better idea of how I write code.

In regards to your last statement I did work as a member of the tech team that created on one of the biggest insurance software platforms ever created in Australia (company was called Paxus and eventually become owned by CSC), I also worked for Telstra (an Australian Telco that has thousands of employees) and for a very successful company Hardcat for over 11 years and I have never had any of my software fail to pass code reviews.


Cheers,

Ian.


Don't feel bad I never write comments either  Tongue
I do as you said and just read the code
130  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for Programmer on: February 05, 2012, 05:36:24 AM
what do you need done?
131  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Tradehill Btc Withdraw (In Process for more than 12 hours) - Whats going on? on: February 05, 2012, 04:40:40 AM
I agree although I've used them for about a year now and never had a problem up until about a month ago.......
They need to get it together... ever since they had that problem with their bank last month they've had horrible support for their users.
132  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Tradehill Btc Withdraw (In Process for more than 12 hours) - Whats going on? on: February 05, 2012, 04:24:44 AM
usually not more than 12 hours im pretty sure but here lately tradehill has been super slow with stuff and not responding to people I'm not sure whats going on with them  Huh
133  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Here we go again: BTCServ hacked, BTC gone on: February 05, 2012, 03:58:21 AM
blockchain.info says the transaction was sent by 68.58.218.245

http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ipall/?tool_id=67&ip=68.58.218.245

this may or may not be the actual sender or it could just be a node that relayed the tx
 they could be behind a proxy....

the IP leads to Charleston, SC
traceroute:

Code:
68.58.218.245 is from United States(US) in region North America


TraceRoute to 68.58.218.245 [c-68-58-218-245.hsd1.sc.comcast.net]

Hop (ms) (ms) (ms)      IP Address Host name
1   0   0   0      206.123.64.154 jbdr2.0.dal.colo4.com 

2   0   0   0      64.124.196.225 xe-4-2-0.er2.dfw2.us.above.net 
3   0   0   0      64.125.29.121 xe-3-0-0.er1.dfw2.us.above.net 
4   1   3   3      64.125.13.186 above-comcast.dfw2.us.above.net 
5   0   0   0      68.86.85.25 pos-2-5-0-0-cr01.dallas.tx.ibone.comcast.net 
6   21   21   21      68.86.86.130 pos-0-10-0-0-cr01.atlanta.ga.ibone.comcast.net 
7   25   25   25      68.86.85.226 pos-1-5-0-0-cr01.charlotte.nc.ibone.comcast.net 
8   45   35   35      68.86.93.174 te-0-3-0-1-ar02.westside.fl.jacksvil.comcast.net 
9   40   40   40      68.86.168.210 te-7-3-ar02.savannah.ga.savannah.comcast.net 
10   42   42   42      68.86.250.98 te-2-3-ar02.charleston.sc.chrlstn.comcast.net 
11   43   43   43      68.86.144.18 te-9-3-ur02.charleston.sc.chrlstn.comcast.net 
12   54   59   59      68.85.123.26   - 
13   Timed out   Timed out   Timed out         - 
14   Timed out   Timed out   Timed out         - 
15   Timed out   Timed out   Timed out         - 
16   Timed out   Timed out   Timed out         - 

Trace aborted.
134  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why some pools pay 115% that much? on: February 05, 2012, 03:03:32 AM
I agree with p4man.... I don't understand why anyone would want to give someone 1.15 bitcoins and get in return 1 bitcoin.  the only way he could be profiting is selling these for over 115% but this still contradicts what hes saying because once he sells them how is he gna convert the ZAR back into bitcoins to pay the miners their extra 15%?

he does mention he has his own rigs though so i guess this could work out he could convert the ZAR to btc by paying for power for his rigs....

however if this is how hes doing it hes limited to how much his rigs produce he said his rigs are running at 50Gh/s

thats around 984.3 btc a month
1 Gh/s a month is around 20 BTC

984.3 / .15 = 6562
6562 / 20 = 328.1

so the total Gh/s he could purchase is 328.1 anything over that and he wont be able to pay the extra 15%
135  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Protocol used for pool mining on: February 05, 2012, 02:11:06 AM
no i think hes talking about the pushpool daemon heres the source:

https://github.com/jgarzik/pushpool
136  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Tradehill Btc Withdraw (In Process for more than 12 hours) - Whats going on? on: February 04, 2012, 11:16:16 PM
I think on large amounts they manually confirm it so nobody gets large amounts stolen has it went through yet?
137  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Who creates the jobs? on: February 04, 2012, 08:37:43 AM
I'm glad you admit the article isn't entirely interesting but I did read it and the followup. It boils down to the claim that without customers, there would be no jobs. Which is true. But wait, without the sun, there would be no jobs either. Therefore the sun actually creates the jobs. All hail Apollo, the sun god!

We already have a sun, so thats not relevant. We already have companies making just about everything that people desire and that money can buy. What we dont have is customer demand for their products because the customers are broke. Its not rocket science.
+1
138  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: hashing speed for solo mining? on: February 04, 2012, 05:12:04 AM
lets do some more math Smiley

260 5830 use about 200 watts a piece or 0.2 kWh

0.2 * 260 = 52 kWh this is the watts used by all cards in a hour
52 kWh * 24 = 1248 kWh per day
1248 kWh * 30 = 37440 kWh per month

now lets say your only paying $0.10 per kWh
1248 * 0.1 = around $124.8 per day
37440 * 0.1 = around $3744 a month

Now lets compare to FPGA's
163 X6500 = 65 Gh/s

each one uses about 20 watts
0.02 * 163 = 3.26 kWh used by all cards per hour
3.26 * 24 = 78.24 kWh per day
78.24 * 30 = 2347.2 kWh per month

again lets say your only paying $0.10 per kWh
78.24 * 0.1 = around $7.824 per day
2347.2 * 0.1 = around $234.72 a month

65 Gh/s will be about 30 blocks a month
30 * 50 = 1500 bitcoins a month

current market price is around $6
6 * 1500 = $9000 a month

$9000 - $3744 = $5256 a month profit for 260 radeon 5830's
$9000 - $234.72 = $8765.28 a month profit for 163 FPGA's



 
139  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: US government super computer made from 2000 ps3 systems. 500 TeraFLOPS o.O on: February 04, 2012, 04:40:15 AM
PS3's only get 26.6 Mh/s 

they are better at doing stuff like folding which is prob what the airforce is using them for
140  Economy / Services / Re: Need someone to teach me how to decrypt this code, have key on: February 04, 2012, 01:25:40 AM
I will do it for 1 btc lol
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!