Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 08:43:33 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »
121  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOVETO.FUND - MoveTo Growth Fund on: July 14, 2012, 10:09:53 PM
+1  I invested in this fund specifically for lack of pirate exposure. Not only for the risk either... I want to know for sure what business my investments are supporting and that they are ethical.  Not making any allegations whatsoever but I can't be sure if there isn't full disclosure from the issuer.

Thanks for the feedback. I get the feeling a lot of investors feel this way - so it's good for me to fully understand this.

Anyways, glad we got that cleared up. Now: up-up and away we go! Shocked
122  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOVETO.FUND - MoveTo Growth Fund on: July 14, 2012, 11:22:24 AM
NAV per share updated to 1.0828000403
123  Economy / Securities / Re: [CPA] Cytokene's Insurance Thread on: July 14, 2012, 11:16:58 AM
OK so I discussed the deal with my investors here and it seems best that I do not go forward with this deal. Sorry about that, but I do appreciate your time.

That said, CPA itself as a company looks like it could be a promising investment, so in the near future ( once you've established sufficient price history ) I may consider investing into CPA equity.

Thanks mate.
124  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOVETO.FUND - MoveTo Growth Fund on: July 14, 2012, 11:09:10 AM
Update today

I'm *considering* a minor modification of the share contract (which would naturally require me to open a 1-month long buy-back offer at the full NAV as per the share contract) in order to allow us to invest in a fully insured pirate deposit (via CPA) with a small percentage of our capital - see the insurance discussion here. Please note that with this opportunity we will still have zero pirate default risk, which is a position I have maintained since the start of the fund, and have no intention to ever go against. Regardless, please review this idea and give me your feedback, because I not wish to taint the fund in any manner if investors believe this deal would in some way go against our philosophy. I absolutely will not invest in this without your blessing, so please comment.

I think maintaining zero pirate default risk is best for the fund, as long as you don't have a better use for the coin (i.e. normal trading).

I have plenty of coin in btcst, so for me, finding bitcoin investments that are not dependent upon pirate is important.  I don't expect a default, but diversify just in case.

If Pirate were to default I suspect the overall market would get hit, which would still affect your nav and share price, so don't think that avoiding direct exposure will completely insulate MOVETO.  If you have some dry powder at that time (even if only via the insurance payout), and your system really is good, you might be able to pick some bargains, ultimately sending the nav soaring when things recover.  Smiley

Ok, so I thought about this and your feedback for a long while, and believe it is best for the fund that we continue to be 100% pirate-free in every sense. So I will not do the insurance deal with CPA.

The following reasons come to mind:

- The thing is, even if we made a small 100% insured pass-through, it still *taints* the fund in the sense that returns cannot then be compared to other non-pirate / pirate investments.

- We miss opportunities to snag great non-pirate investment that will continue to deliver gains long after the pirate ship has sailed.

- If pirate defaults (or even if he just winds down his operations and returns funds) there would likely be a mad rush into non-pirate investments, driving prices up and yields down, so we want to already be holding these investments rather than waiting for an insurance payout.

So to reiterate: I will not do the deal, and we will continue with the current share contract and remain 100% pirate-free in every sense.

Many thanks,
-cyto
125  Economy / Securities / Re: [CPA] Cytokene's Insurance Thread on: July 14, 2012, 12:37:56 AM
Ahh well we're not offering you a rate, you asked for a rate ;-)

Anyways no, the details of customer accounts are private. However if one of them chooses to speak up, now would be the time.

If you compare this rate to YARR, then at 1.50 per share YARR pays 4%. So from a fees standpoint you are better off with YARR. See this is why I made YARR, because it is cheaper to insure people this way than to bother about individual contracts. However, contracts can be altered to suit the customer, so there are benefits in terms of how we structure it. If you buy YARR for example, you are not going to have 1,000 coins and you will get a lower income from your investment. So there are reasons to sign this contract, it's not just a one way street YARR is better or a contract is better. But we generally prefer the YARR route for it's simplicity.

By the way, we just deposited 500 bitcoins with Starfish Bank and i must say, I was struck with Mr. Harnett's professionalism. He is long on customer service, let me tell you.

So there you have it. This is why we are cancelling the 2,000 coin pirate contract -- because it's better for us to just offer pirate insurance via YARR. Better for you, too! Unless you need special terms in your contract. In your case, you pay a higher weekly premium because the initial premium (the load) is zero. That's the tradeoff.

Makes perfect sense. I still need to vet this out with my investors first. I will get back to you soon. cheers!
126  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOVETO.FUND - MoveTo Growth Fund on: July 13, 2012, 08:34:09 PM
Update today

I'm *considering* a minor modification of the share contract (which would naturally require me to open a 1-month long buy-back offer at the full NAV per share as per the share contract) in order to allow us to invest in a fully insured pirate deposit (via CPA) with a small percentage of our capital - see the insurance discussion here. Please note that with this opportunity we will still have zero pirate default risk, which is a position I have maintained since the start of the fund, and have no intention to ever go against. Regardless, please review this idea and give me your feedback, because I not wish to taint the fund in any manner if investors believe this deal would in some way go against our philosophy. I absolutely will not invest in this without your blessing, so please comment.

Many thanks,
-cyto
127  Economy / Securities / Re: [CPA] Cytokene's Insurance Thread on: July 13, 2012, 07:51:28 PM
Another few questions for you.

-How much are you insuring in total right now?
-How much are you insuring of pirate funds, and how much non-pirate funds are you insuring?
-What is your current amount of backing capital?

Thanks.

Hi! All of these questions and more are answered on our holdings & NAV webpage:
http://www.tsukino.ca/cpa/accounts/

Right now, we're in the process of cancelling a large pirate account, so the amount of pirate we cover will drop by up to 2,000 and then be increased by 1,000 (your account). So your coverage would't actually start until sometime next week.

Very interesting. I does look like you've got enough capital to fully insure this, so I feel pretty good about that aspect. However, what kind of deals have you done for the other pirate accounts that you're insuring? Can you point me to the relevant thread for these? I just want to compare to the rates that you're offering me, thanks.
128  Economy / Securities / Re: [CPA] Cytokene's Insurance Thread on: July 13, 2012, 12:01:48 AM
Another few questions for you.

-How much are you insuring in total right now?
-How much are you insuring of pirate funds, and how much non-pirate funds are you insuring?
-What is your current amount of backing capital?

Thanks.
129  Economy / Securities / Re: [CPA] Cytokene's Insurance Thread on: July 12, 2012, 11:58:03 PM
What we will do is draw up a contract for you with those terms. We will set a term of 5 months for you, expiring at the end of September 2012. You could renew it then, but we'll keep the option of not renewing it, just standard business practice. That's right, we won't be "returning your coins to you at any time" -- unless of course that's what you want.

Here is your contract. If you agree, please give me a clean (new) address where to send the interest payments, because we will use blockchaininfo to track payments. We will also give you a new address to send payment too. These addresses and your email will be plugged into this contract and then you must GPG clearsign it and send it back to us.

Ok so, if there's anything you want changed or added please let us know!

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

CPA Pirate Insurance Contract (CPA Account #11)
Customer: Cytokene <-email->
Customer Contact Info: Cytokene on bitcointalk.org
CPA Agents: usagi (tsukino)
DATE: July 13th, 2012


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////


A-I. Investment Hypothesis
1. Cytokene ("the customer") will loan the sum total of 1,000 (one thousand)
   bitcoins to CPA at address [-to be determined-].
2. CPA will pay the customer 3.5% per week in the form of 35 bitcoins per
   week to address [-to be determined-].
3. Payments will be made no later than Monday, 11pm JST (Japan Standard
   Time) for at least one full week of holding.
4. CPA reserves the right to return the principal (the 1,000 bitcoins) and
   cancel the contract given 30 day's notice to the customer and/or without
   notice after January 1st, 2013.
5. The customer will allow a period of 5 business days for us to process
   withdrawls.
6. In the event of a Pirate Default (Bitcoin Savings & Trust) this contract
   will immediately expire and the 1,000 bitcoins will be returned with
   respect to A-I-5.


A-II. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or
   the breach of this contract, shall be settled by binding internet
   arbitration at judge.me in accordance with the judge.me arbitration
   agreement. The arbitrator's decision shall be final and legally binding
   and judgment may be entered thereon.
2. The customer must indemnify (make whole) CPA's incurred legal fees if
   they lose their claim, limited to the amount required to be paid by CPA
   to judge.me.
3. All judge.me fees related to this contract must be paid in bitcoins.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

This sounds great. The risk for me then is only the default of CPA, and 3.5%/week is more than I can get from other investments.

However, I will need to vet this out with my investors before I decide to take the plunge. It would require a minor modification of my share contract - right now I state that I "will not be involved in any pirate related investments" which I would need to change to read "will not take any pirate default risk". That was my intention anyway, but it doesn't read that way.

I will get back to you with my decision probably after the weekend. Thanks.
130  Economy / Securities / Re: [CPA] Hedge your GLBSE risk - 0.5% to 1% per MONTH! on: July 12, 2012, 10:25:17 PM
@cytokine: Usagi offered much better rates in the CPA thread (you'd get nearly 6% per week for insuring 7%) and he has his own PPT (YARR) which is not accepting deposits atm though. Statements about how much money is available are available in his FAQ.

Thanks, I'll take a look. It depends on if he has enough non-pirate assets to back all of the pirate that he's insuring.
131  Economy / Securities / Re: [CPA] Hedge your GLBSE risk - 0.5% to 1% per MONTH! on: July 12, 2012, 09:10:09 PM
Ok, so here's how I want to do it. I would like you to be the broker for the deal if possible. I'll give you a certain amount of BTC deposit ( probably each friday ), which you then take and pass-through to pirate. You have to provide me 100% insurance on the deposit total, but you get to keep 50% of the profits ( that is, you pay me 3.5% each week ).

Let me know if you want to do this. If so, I would mark this as a USAGI DEPOSIT or CPA DEPOSIT on my fund's investment page, since although it's related to pirate, it exposes us to no pirate risk ( only CPA risk ). However, I would have to clear all of this with my investors before I could finalize the deal, since this would be a minor modification of the share contract - but I'm waiting to see your response first.

Also, what kind of backing do you have right now for your insurance program? What assurance do I have that you'll be capable of insuring a ~1K BTC deposit in this manner? Some kind of financial sheet that I could review would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
-cyto
132  Economy / Securities / Re: TyGrr Insurance Hedge your GLBSE risk. on: July 12, 2012, 04:39:27 AM
Goat: I have a proposition for you. Can you provide 100% insurance against pirate defaulting for a specific amount of BTC?

Here is how the deal would work, if you're up for it:

- I would send you 1K BTC to put into a pirate account on behalf of my fund
- You would pay me 3.5% per week on the investment to a specific BTC address
- You would keep the other 3.5% per week for yourself
- However, if pirate defaults, then you still owe the 1K BTC to the fund

Let me know if you're interested in this kind of deal. I've been completely avoiding pirate in my fund because I don't understand what he's doing, but with full insurance provided by someone trustworthy, then it would obviously make sense to invest some capital here.

Let me know, thanks.

The problem with this is you give me 1000 BTC and I put it with Pirate. I then need to have 1000 BTC ready in case there is a default. Now let us say that I can take that 1000 BTC and get 2% from it. so what I am really doing is getting 5.5% a week with the same risk of fail as if I were to put my full amount into pirate.

There is no way I could do anything like this.

For insurance you would have to pay an upfront premium and take less than 7%. Like say pay me 1500 BTC for 1000 BTC into the program getting 5% a week back. I would then be willing to take the risk that pirate will not default and if he does pay you back 1000BTC.

You have to take some risk as well, you would need to wait 10 weeks before you made back your premium.

Does this seem reasonable?

Thanks

Hmm I guess there's no way to do this using insurance. I cannot take any pirate default risk per my share contract.
133  Economy / Securities / Re: TyGrr Insurance Hedge your GLBSE risk. on: July 11, 2012, 11:03:31 PM
Goat: I have a proposition for you. Can you provide 100% insurance against pirate defaulting for a specific amount of BTC?

Here is how the deal would work, if you're up for it:

- I would send you 1K BTC to put into a pirate account on behalf of my fund
- You would pay me 3.5% per week on the investment to a specific BTC address
- You would keep the other 3.5% per week for yourself
- However, if pirate defaults, then you still owe the 1K BTC to the fund

Let me know if you're interested in this kind of deal. I've been completely avoiding pirate in my fund because I don't understand what he's doing, but with full insurance provided by someone trustworthy, then it would obviously make sense to invest some capital here.

Let me know, thanks.
134  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: How to live off of your Bitcoins? on: July 07, 2012, 08:45:44 PM
Freedom is one of my highest values in life and although I don't seek luxury I am fine with making as much wealth via productive means as possible.  I am happy to live quite simply with more emphasis on the important small things like healthful food and relationships than external status indicators.  There are lots of websites and individuals who claim to be able to teach individual sovereignty for a price like http://www.sovereignman.com but I'm pretty sure with some diligence you can find most of what you need to know gratis. Cheers Smiley

I could not agree with this sentiment more.

Thanks for the website, it looks like a great resource.
135  Economy / Securities / Re: [FEEDBACK REQUSTED] Gigamining -> Teramining Upgrade Paths on: July 07, 2012, 05:56:58 PM
I would also like to say that, by providing this upgrade option, you have earned a HUGE amount of trust far above and beyond that of other similar bonds issuers, and therefore I will seriously take this into consideration when deciding where to invest in the future.
136  Economy / Securities / Re: [FEEDBACK REQUSTED] Gigamining -> Teramining Upgrade Paths on: July 07, 2012, 05:40:46 PM
I'm very interested in this. I have 247 shares of GIGAMINING and I would definitely trade these in for TERAMINING shares ASAP. I would take the paid upgrade path.
137  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] MOVETO.FUND - MoveTo Growth Fund on: July 07, 2012, 02:03:04 AM
This looks great, I will probably buy ~150 shares or so in about a week.

Smiley
138  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: NCKRAZZE's Deposits - Low Risk Deposits with Guaranteed Payback Weekly @ 2.5% /w on: July 07, 2012, 02:01:15 AM
Deposits sent out, please confirm.

Confirmed! Cheesy
139  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: How to live off of your Bitcoins? on: July 07, 2012, 12:02:19 AM
Move to Barbados, Cayman Islands, Ecuador, Estonia, Isle of Man, Singapore or any other country without any capital gains tax.  You could also become a sovereign citizen and hop around the planet with multiple residencies and passports.

Now you're talking! Cool I'm actually a resident in several different countries already, but only a citizen of the US. And all my friends are here.

Meanwhile, I should probably get familiar with this:

Self-Employed Individuals Tax Center


Thanks for the ideas. I love the concept of being a "sovereign citizen", that is so cool! I just hate being tied down to any single location; I'd love to go around visiting friends all over the world and having adventures before I hit 30.
140  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: How to live off of your Bitcoins? on: July 06, 2012, 11:32:51 PM
Dont live like  a gansta and drive  a ferrari with no visible means of income.

True... one can drive an old car and live in a small apartment, but go out and eat lobster every night using cash. And you'd be just fine.

The funny thing is, in terms of quality of life that's actually probably a much better life than living in a nice house with two cars with payments you can barely make and having to slog to work for a 9 to 5 that you hate. For me, money is a means to freedom, not a means to "luxury".

On that note, I'm hoping to hit the road one day if I can make enough from BTC, and just travel and run my business from my laptop+clearwire connection. That would be the life for me. Smiley Maybe I could eventually settle down in New Hampshire if I meet up with a nice liberty oriented girl... *sigh*
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!