Bitcoin Forum
June 27, 2024, 12:43:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 [61] 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 »
1201  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Explain wallets to me on: June 16, 2016, 05:20:46 AM
Quote
Is a wallet merely a collection of private/public key pairs that can be used to send/receive Bitcoins?

Mostly this. Rest is ease of use (compared to working with a command line.)

edit: Working with multiple addresses is more a privacy issue, rather than security.
1202  Other / Meta / Re: how to upgrade my rank in btctalk faster so I can earn bitcoins? on: June 15, 2016, 05:15:02 AM
Best is to spam around low content posts and answer to every topic, even - or better - especially when you don't have a clue about it. You will also make it to my ignore list pretty quick.
1203  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: June 13, 2016, 05:29:33 AM
I feel that she is a really cool moderator, sure everyone has their own opinions, but there's this little thing called Ignore button, you can Ignore even mods you know. So if you disagree what's stopping you from being a crybaby to deal with the issue the way it's supposed to be dealt with.

Actually, no, you cannot ignore mods LOL


~BCX~


I can, but Lauda is one of the few sig spammers, who actually provides content, so I have unignored him/her/it.

edit: grammar
1204  Other / Meta / Re: Are AD campaigners killing Bitcointalk.org ? on: June 13, 2016, 05:13:11 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1485646.0
1205  Other / Meta / Re: Low quality posts from people with signature ads - "Ignore all" button needed on: June 06, 2016, 06:12:33 AM
]
I find almost all threads/postings from people with ad campaigns in their signature have such an extremely low content, that I would like to see a button to ignore them all at once. Please ...

Must be leading by example and showing us how to make quality posts.

So much better now  Grin



Almost all? Least you are not full on biased,way to keep that door open in case you need to back pedal a little bit.
I find you to be very low content as well,so it is a mutual feeling right back you! Wink


Sometimes I check back and show ignored postings. Almost all of them are writing senseless stuff, like "Bitcoin will remain an eternal secret and its creator is watching this forum" (add some extreme grammar errors for the real experience). It is obvious, that these comments are posted only for sig spamming and not to contribute something (at least funny) to the topics, like Lauda does.

So, thanks again Lauda and Danny. This forum is a better place with the ignore list Cheesy
1206  Other / Meta / Re: Low quality posts from people with signature ads - "Ignore all" button needed on: June 01, 2016, 08:47:36 PM
So much better now  Grin

1207  Other / Meta / Re: Low quality posts from people with signature ads - "Ignore all" button needed on: May 26, 2016, 01:12:34 PM
Thanks. That will help a lot already! (despite you being on that list, too)
1208  Other / Meta / Low quality posts from people with signature ads - "Ignore all" button needed on: May 26, 2016, 05:55:46 AM
I find almost all threads/postings from people with ad campaigns in their signature have such an extremely low content, that I would like to see a button to ignore them all at once. Please ...
1209  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ~$10,000 in cryptos stolen off my desktop from an encrypted folder, how, why? on: May 18, 2016, 07:16:20 PM

I was just about to link to his Twitter: https://twitter.com/GammaGroupPR
1210  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED on: May 17, 2016, 03:06:54 PM
the ones who control most bitcoins has more to lose.
Miners aren't necessarily the ones who control most bitcoins! The early adopters control a large amount, the future miners have less than one-third of bitcoins left to mine the rest of this century.

Early adopters sold at a price of 10$ thinking they reached the moon.
1211  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BREAKING NEWS: SATOSHI FINALLY REVEALED! on: May 17, 2016, 12:30:01 PM
Craig involved at Silk Road??? Holy Moley!



How come, the US has a problem with the extradition? Pretty strange. I would expect them to be able to get PoM in a plane without his permission in form of a signature.

It seems, there are more to the story than our naked eyes meet. Here is the hint of involvement of Dr. Craig Wright in SR saga...



Source: https://twitter.com/BitcoinBelle/status/732039453166931968
1212  Other / Archival / Re: Almost ~$10,000 in stolen funds, hacker located on Bitcoin Talk Forms! on: May 16, 2016, 01:54:46 PM
There is a PaulieGolding account at OpenBazaar. Possible to contact him over there.
1213  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who is "Variety Jones"? on: May 16, 2016, 07:43:27 AM
How come, the US has a problem with the extradition? Pretty strange. I would expect them to be able to get PoM in a plane without his permission in form of a signature.
1214  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Theymos: “Bitcoins Belonging to Satoshi Should Be Destroyed” on: May 14, 2016, 07:27:40 AM



Theymos is right on this.

Let's see how many of you are crying when some bad ass hacker comes along, gains access and dumps 1,000,000 BTC on the market.

It will be welcome to December 2011 all over again

But Hey

I firmly believe in global purification through nuclear annihilation anyway.


~BCX~




Theymos is wrong!

Let's see how many of you are crying when Satoshi Nakamoto comes along and dumps 1 Mio Bitcoins on the market.

This risk was always present and when asked about Bitcoin security, people tend to post a picture of the sun. You here stuff, like "Laws of Thermodynamics forbid Bitcoin to be hacked" or "Bitcoin is protected by the power of Math" etc pp.

If somebody was able to hack Bitcoin now, we are finished with it. Too many people will lose their money and trust.
1215  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Theymos: “Bitcoins Belonging to Satoshi Should Be Destroyed” on: May 12, 2016, 06:05:18 PM
With all the drama raging, everyone already at each other's throats, why would someone bring up quantum computers breaking Bitcoin and start talking about destroying Satoshi's coins?
Help me out with this Undecided

For some reason there is hostility developing towards Satoshi. Which is incredible because without him, there would be no cryptocurrency.

Makes you wonder what would happen if Christ returned - I expect he'd be lynched and crucified in a jiffy by all his loyal supporters.

And they would take his gold coins to ensure nobody else will steal them.
1216  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Theymos: “Bitcoins Belonging to Satoshi Should Be Destroyed” on: May 12, 2016, 07:13:22 AM
Theymos forgot one important thing: IF someone could hack these coins, Bitcoin would be worthless, not because of the inflation, but because somebody was able to hack it.

edit: "Theymos is this you?"
1217  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Theymos: “Bitcoins Belonging to Satoshi Should Be Destroyed” on: May 12, 2016, 06:39:42 AM
Et tu, Brute?
1218  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Put some Respeck On Craig Wright's name on: May 12, 2016, 06:21:18 AM
Why would we put respect on him , for what ? Because he's claiming to be something he is not ? What kind of person does that?
I am yet to see signed message you talk about, and when you find it , post it in this format :

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
msg
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
satoshi's known address
signature
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Oh, wait.. you can't..

This, forever and always
1219  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What would happen if Satoshi Returned ? on: May 12, 2016, 04:19:55 AM
Look here, what happens: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4ixkee/looking_to_buy_1000000_in_bitcoin_lottery_win/

Quote
Looking to buy £1,000,000 in bitcoin - lottery win (self.Bitcoin)

submitted 5 hours ago by theworldsaplayground

How can I buy about one million pounds in bitcoin? I have a circle account can I do an order so large?

Answer snippets:

Quote
For further information on which exchanges and/or bulk purchasers you can PM me, I don't want to plug anyone.

Quote
I agree, I would do the same if I won the lottery too.

PM me if you genuinely need contacts for that kind of cheddar.

Quote
or PM me, we'll get to work for you.

Quote
Edit: After sending me 1 BTC. <3

Quote
Please send me an email and we can talk about your needs via skype tomorrow.


Imagine the PMs...
1220  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin already using too much power by 2020? on: May 11, 2016, 04:59:29 PM
Until there is an alternative to proof-of-work that is proved to be secure enough to power a global, decentralized ledger, it would not be correct to call bitcoin mining useless or wasteful -- unless, of course, you don’t think Bitcoin provides any value to the world.

Transacting via blockchain secured by POW uses too much energy, by design.
The cost of mining 1 BTC can not be significantly lower than the price of 1 BTC -- that's how the network is secured. Read the white paper. That's as wasteful as having to spend $90 to print a hundred-dollar bill.
With most of that $90 being Chinese, coal-fired electrical cost Smiley

Bitcoin is not responsible for how mining energy is produced. Btw the same "coal-fired" energy is used to support fiat.

Now you seem to have an exact idea on how much for example a dollar (or a yuan) actually costs to produce, secure, transfer, hold, defend  etc. Mind to share the number?

Of course bitcoin is not responsible for how mining energy is produced, bitcoin is just a codebase, can't do anything without people.
The fact that most of the mining happens i China on government-subsidized, 70% coal-fired power is just a fact. That's how it is, AGD.

The revamped $100 bill costs 12.5 cents to produce — a 60% increase over the 7.8 cents it cost to print the older version of the bill.
Hope this helps.

Production cost is easy to google. How about my question? (remember: produce, secure, transfer, hold, defend - and add recycling cost, salaries, cost for storing, cost of couterfeiting etc etc etc.)

The price will be much higher than the actual prodution cost and this is also higher than Bitcoins mining cost. Again, you need to understand, that you are not here to "help", but to discuss. Stop your "hope this helps" bullshit already. It sounds arrogant and also lets you look like an idiot, combined with the lack of actual content, that you provide.

If you include the price of your laptop, your internet connection, your iPhone, your "hardware wallet," all the "bitcoin businesses" that get VC funding and piss it away, all the time you waste on the internet getting ripped off & pumping BTC, I'll include the cost of brick & mortar banks.

Deal?

See what I mean? You can't provide any content to support your statement. You don't know the actual price and energy that is wasted for fiat, though you are stating that Bitcoin mining is "a waste of energy" and definitely higher than fiat. All that yaddayadda about "cost of my laptop" have no relevance for this discussion, because I don't use it only for Bitcoin transactions. How much would it cost for me to send 100000$ USD to China? How much would it cost to send the same amount in Bitcoin? Which transaction would be faster and which would be cheaper? See, Bitcoin has some obvious advantages, which justify a certain amount of energy to be used to secure the system.



Pages: « 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 [61] 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!