Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no

[freedoge.co]

based on experience, i would agree to let him go.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

@ABitNut

Keen observation.

My favorite post by a pissed off member to a moderator was when a banned newbie flew into a rage after Badbear perma-banned him.

 


~BCX~

WHY YOU ERASE ALL MY POST, ALL OF THEM ARE RELEVANT TO THE TOPIC. I MOST MORE THAN 100 IN 3 MONTHS BUT YOU JUST ERASE IT BANNED MY ACCOUNT FUCK YOU ASSHOLE. YOUR JUST AFRAID THAT MANY OF THE MEMBER WILL GET A HIGH POSITION NO WONDER MANY OF THE MEMBER IS NEWBIE BECAUSE YOU JUST ERASE THE POST THAT WE ARE POSTING.TIME WILL COME NOBODY WILL USE THIS FORUM BECAUSE OF THE FUCKING THINGS YOU DO.FUCK THIS BULLSHIT FORUM.

Yeah I would have bookmarked that one too.  Effing hilarious. 

I love these butthurt threads.  Gives Schadenfreude connoisseurs like me a chance to throw dirtballs with impunity.

[2c0de]

I feel that she is a really cool moderator, sure everyone has their own opinions, but there's this little thing called Ignore button, you can Ignore even mods you know. So if you disagree what's stopping you from being a crybaby to deal with the issue the way it's supposed to be dealt with.

[BitcoinEXpress]

I feel that she is a really cool moderator, sure everyone has their own opinions, but there's this little thing called Ignore button, you can Ignore even mods you know. So if you disagree what's stopping you from being a crybaby to deal with the issue the way it's supposed to be dealt with.

Actually, no, you cannot ignore mods LOL


~BCX~

[AGD]

I feel that she is a really cool moderator, sure everyone has their own opinions, but there's this little thing called Ignore button, you can Ignore even mods you know. So if you disagree what's stopping you from being a crybaby to deal with the issue the way it's supposed to be dealt with.

Actually, no, you cannot ignore mods LOL


~BCX~

I can, but Lauda is one of the few sig spammers, who actually provides content, so I have unignored him/her/it.

edit: grammar

[Decoded]

I think Lauda is doing their job quite well. He/She is allowed to speak his/her what she wants, ya know. If you want, ask her which one of her posts are opinionated and which ones are professional.

I feel that she is a really cool moderator, sure everyone has their own opinions, but there's this little thing called Ignore button, you can Ignore even mods you know. So if you disagree what's stopping you from being a crybaby to deal with the issue the way it's supposed to be dealt with.

Actually, no, you cannot ignore mods LOL


~BCX~

Ughhhh put ~BCX~ in your signature already!!!! xD

[beastmodeBiscuitGravy]

Lauda is expert, and can get direct personal tech support from Core Devs without getting shooed away to #Bitcoin. This is of great help to us.

[Vod]

I see Lauda acting/posting more often than any other moderator, and it is always helpful.

IMO he is doing a great job.   

[Jet Cash]

I vote remain

This isn't a Brexit thread is it?

[isvicre]

Not a bad mod. Usually helpful or informative posts and i havent seen much censorship tbh.

If you dont agree with her opinion then debate her openly, no need to call for an active, useful mod to stand down.

[Spoetnik]

Oh do we get to "vote" Mitchell
..joke from comment on page 1 (i did not go past that point)

I have had a couple incidents of butting heads with Lauda.
But what ever..

Let me offer my own perspective.
Lauda has opinions which is fair.. staff are allowed to share them.
They are also entitled to interpret the rules how they like.. it's their job.
Nothing much we can do but whine to thymos about it etc
BUT !
What is "it" ?
Seems you created this topic NOOB / OP with out saying WHY.
You clearly made this because of some incident you failed to bring up.
Not a good sign LOL

I do appreciate that Lauda makes more of an effort to communicate with the users here.
Some staff moderate and never say a word to anyone about anything.

Anyway i seen no reason why Lauda should be demoted.
I did not think i would either clicking on this topic.

[Jet Cash]

If threads like this are created, he's obviously doing a really good job.

Mods - please review the posters who feel he cramps their style.

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

Dear Lauda,

Stop cramping my style!

Sincerely,

~BMB~

[Lutpin]

Funny how this thread is still going on (you might call it a running gag by now).
And also funny that in the meantime, while here the discussions were going on, Lauda got more (rather than less) responsibilities.

I see Lauda acting/posting more often than any other moderator, and it is always helpful.

Ewh, he's a sigspammer.
I guess you can turn everything either way or the other.

IMO he is doing a great job.

And that's only your opinion. Mine could be completely different the same.

[Jet Cash]

Yawn. Why don't we ban Bitcoin from this forum - after all it's linked to the drug trade.

[BitcoinEXpress]

I think Lauda should be the only proven Sig Spammer to be a Global Moderator.

He does a good job, annoyingly sig spamming at the same time, but good job.


~BCX~

[Vod]

Lauda to replace Badbear, now that the latter is no longer as active anymore!

[BitcoinEXpress]

Lauda to replace Badbear, now that the latter is no longer as active anymore!

If that were to happen, he would have to change his name to "BadLauda" LOL


~BCX~

[thesame12]

Lauda to replace Badbear, now that the latter is no longer as active anymore!

If that were to happen, he would have to change his name to "BadLauda" LOL


~BCX~

Dude, please. Can you not do that? You're killing me.

[gorgon666]

What a day for Lauda!

Lauda advertises for a company she knows to be shady, get publicly called out about this, waits for her payment and then removes her signature. Not exactly a beacon of ethics if you ask me.

Now Lauda is asking 2BTC per month for her signature and is proactively denying any consequences of advertising for a future shady company: "[...]can not be held accountable for any misdoings by the client"

Anyone that follows Lauda's posts knows that she does not keep an open mind