AGD (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2070
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 05:55:46 AM |
|
I find almost all threads/postings from people with ad campaigns in their signature have such an extremely low content, that I would like to see a button to ignore them all at once. Please ...
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 09:48:35 AM |
|
Considering that the administration has not commented on the presented proposals ( example here) which intend to make spamming harder, I doubt that we are going to see something like an 'ignore all' button. It might be worth looking into DannyHamilton's list which has about ~1900 users.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
AGD (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2070
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 01:12:34 PM |
|
Thanks. That will help a lot already! (despite you being on that list, too)
|
|
|
|
twister
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 02:32:33 PM |
|
Thanks. That will help a lot already! (despite you being on that list, too)
Actually no, he isn't. Check the January update and the list of the people at the bottom who were removed from the list. But I am so you will probably not see this post if you have already applied it.
|
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 02:44:33 PM |
|
Spam is an integral part of a forum. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) If you literally ignore everyone, you can only go through your own posts, right?
|
|
|
|
dserrano5
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1029
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 06:54:31 PM |
|
I find almost all threads/postings from people with ad campaigns in their signature have such an extremely low content, that I would like to see a button to ignore them all at once. Please ...
Your request has already been answered so let me propose a different approach: take the Signature AdBlock script by grue and patch it (or request a patch) so it blocks not only the sig, but the post as a whole. Ok, it's not a perfect solution because you'll miss some substantial posts that happen to sport a sig, but maybe you hadn't considered this and it may be a reasonable option to you.
|
|
|
|
krunox123
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 07:03:42 PM |
|
If you literally ignore everyone, you can only go through your own posts, right?
I'm pretty sure he is looking to find a way to ignore all the low-quality users. That would be a nice feature, lol. That's if only it's possible. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
Life sucks.
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 07:37:59 PM |
|
If you literally ignore everyone, you can only go through your own posts, right?
I'm pretty sure he is looking to find a way to ignore all the low-quality users. That would be a nice feature, lol. That's if only it's possible. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) It would end up pretty complicated. Suppose theymos comes up with an algorithm that beats Google's that groups all the low-quality users and adds the feature, and a low-quality user clicks the button, will he ignore himself? Will it be like he is banned forever or will he be able to unignore himself? How will ignoring himself affect his Real Life... What if all the low-quality users end up meaning all the users of the forum? Will the forum self-destruct? Too many questions. I think we should change the topic. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
bitcoin730
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 07:44:21 PM |
|
Why people are trying to get profit bro
|
|
|
|
Evildrum
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 07:58:49 PM |
|
In turn can we get a button to ignore people that fill this way about signatures? Would not want to waste their time or my own having to respond to each other in a public forum,when it would just be rubbing each other the wrong way. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Feel free to add me to your list. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 08:03:58 PM |
|
In turn can we get a button to ignore people that fill this way about signatures? Would not want to waste their time or my own having to respond to each other in a public forum,when it would just be rubbing each other the wrong way. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Feel free to add me to your list. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Okay. Two forums - one with sigs and one without. but I still prefer this one. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Sig haters can choose to block signatures through settings but the posts will still be there. May be it is possible to come up with a feature that removes the post along with the signature - but won't the conversations be disconnected from each other?
|
|
|
|
krunox123
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 08:09:32 PM |
|
It would end up pretty complicated.
Is it? Suppose theymos comes up with an algorithm that beats Google's that groups all the low-quality users and adds the feature, and a low-quality user clicks the button, will he ignore himself?
Ignoring himself sounds a bit silly, IMO. Low-quality users can still participate in any discussions, but neither of us can see their posts. It's like they are invisible around the forum, and discussing all the matters by themselves( or just ban them altogether). ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Will it be like he is banned forever or will he not be able to unignore himself?
FTFY. Either of them sounds good. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) How will ignoring himself affect his Real Life...
Real life will start ignoring himself as well. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) What if all the low-quality users end up meaning all the users of the forum?
Well, then there is no reason for this forum to exist anymore. Will the forum self-destruct?
Perhaps. Too many questions. I think we should change the topic. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I think you missed out the main question(s). How do we define high-quality or low-quality users?
|
Life sucks.
|
|
|
Evildrum
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 08:14:39 PM Last edit: May 26, 2016, 10:51:06 PM by Evildrum |
|
Its really a half baked idea and creates more problems due to the people using ignore lists making echo posts which would get a signature wearer in trouble. It creates a double standard but I like these people doing this because it communicates how shortsighted they are in addressing issues. Signature bias plagues so many here and they think it gives them the right to spit on people that wear one.
The people that have called me out so far have been lacking in English or even worse posters than the people they accuse of spam. Yet it is encouraged to attack signatures where ever people see fit.
If people are determined to put this weird bubble up that states how little they understand public intercourse so be it. Reflects on them more than the signature,so have at it.
|
|
|
|
Jhanzo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2016, 10:17:10 PM |
|
How hard could it be for you to take a bit of time and ignore users one by one depending on their post(s)? Ignoring all users with signature campaigns or using someone else's ignore list is not always the best choice as you might find some users ignored by the feature (another user) not very stupid after all.
|
Trusted an exchange that climbed to the top 3 in just under 2 years with your money? you are fucking stupid.
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2016, 06:08:03 AM |
|
It would end up pretty complicated.
Is it? Yep. Suppose theymos comes up with an algorithm that beats Google's that groups all the low-quality users and adds the feature, and a low-quality user clicks the button, will he ignore himself?
Ignoring himself sounds a bit silly, IMO. Low-quality users can still participate in any discussions, but neither of us can see their posts. It's like they are invisible around the forum, and discussing all the matters by themselves( or just ban them altogether). ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) We will have weird looking threads with disconnected conversations. Better to launch a nospam.bitcointalk.org on invite-only basis for good quality posters like me. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Will it be like he is banned forever or will he not be able to unignore himself?
FTFY. Either Both of them sounds good. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) FTFY ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) How will ignoring himself affect his Real Life...
Real life will start ignoring himself as well. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Doesn't sound very encouraging... What if all the low-quality users end up meaning all the users of the forum?
Well, then there is no reason for this forum to exist anymore. Will the forum self-destruct?
Perhaps. For the survival of the forum, we should dump the concept. Spammers will be unemployed. Too many questions. I think we should change the topic. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I think you missed out the main question(s). How do we define high-quality or low-quality users? By that master algorithm.
|
|
|
|
AGD (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2070
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 01, 2016, 08:47:36 PM |
|
So much better now ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FEWsZ4HD.png&t=665&c=mIEUUi4x1U71lQ)
|
|
|
|
Evildrum
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 01, 2016, 09:52:21 PM |
|
] I find almost all threads/postings from people with ad campaigns in their signature have such an extremely low content, that I would like to see a button to ignore them all at once. Please ...
Must be leading by example and showing us how to make quality posts. So much better now ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FEWsZ4HD.png&t=665&c=mIEUUi4x1U71lQ) Almost all? Least you are not full on biased,way to keep that door open in case you need to back pedal a little bit. I find you to be very low content as well,so it is a mutual feeling right back you! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
AGD (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2070
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 06, 2016, 06:12:33 AM |
|
] I find almost all threads/postings from people with ad campaigns in their signature have such an extremely low content, that I would like to see a button to ignore them all at once. Please ...
Must be leading by example and showing us how to make quality posts. So much better now ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FEWsZ4HD.png&t=665&c=mIEUUi4x1U71lQ) Almost all? Least you are not full on biased,way to keep that door open in case you need to back pedal a little bit. I find you to be very low content as well,so it is a mutual feeling right back you! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Sometimes I check back and show ignored postings. Almost all of them are writing senseless stuff, like "Bitcoin will remain an eternal secret and its creator is watching this forum" (add some extreme grammar errors for the real experience). It is obvious, that these comments are posted only for sig spamming and not to contribute something (at least funny) to the topics, like Lauda does. So, thanks again Lauda and Danny. This forum is a better place with the ignore list ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
koshgel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 06, 2016, 11:25:03 PM |
|
Low quality has taken on a new meaning in this forum. As long as you drone on and create lazy sentence after lazy sentence, somehow having more characters in your post means it's not low quality. It's fucking low quality if I have to read the same reply to a question 15 different ways that are a paragraph long. You can easily have a constructive post that is concise.
An "ignore all" function won't solve the original problem of "low quality" posts.
|
|
|
|
Dajackal
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 06, 2016, 11:27:48 PM |
|
Considering that the administration has not commented on the presented proposals ( example here) which intend to make spamming harder, I doubt that we are going to see something like an 'ignore all' button. It might be worth looking into DannyHamilton's list which has about ~1900 users. OMG, his list is bonkers. How did he have the time to put it together?
|
|
|
|
|