I have an S3 that I am probably going to sell in the very near future. You can make an offer for it what you would be willing to pay.

Signing up via tor will not get your account banned. You will need to pay a fee in order to start posting however this is not a ban. With a ban you cannot pay to get the ban lifted.

There are a lot of scam attempts and they tend to take a long time to sell them. Plus it is frustrating to see the level of spam on most of the accounts.

actually my inventory is running very low and will likely stop selling once I sell what I have

If you don't have collatetal then it would be unlikely you will get a loan here. Especially with the rate you are offering.

Your hearing aids are likely to not be worth $4000 in four years when the loan is due as advances in medical technology makes current equipment depreciate very quickly. I am also unsure if there is any kind of secondary market for hearing aids.

That is the handle of the person buying up a lot of silver coins Lesbian Cow

Well who is bogooloo

Did he happen to say what the new rates are?

Well, in theory if one ad is displayed multiple times in one page then each additional advertisement displayed will be less effective and companies will want to try to limit this by creating smaller signature campaigns. Although the nature of free markets say that generally speaking once a company is successful it will continue to grow which would allow them to have a bigger budget for advertisements.

The campaign that I am in does a pretty good job in not paying for spam, which is ultimately what needs to happen. Unfortunately it is very time intensive to monitor for spam on a campaign basis with the help of some administrative tools. There was a good amount of spam from the campaign that I am in last week, and will probably be a bit of spam for another week or two until people realize they won't get paid for shit posts. I think the site owner will likely see that that kind of advertising is much more effective as people will be less likely to skip reading posts from people who make nothing but shit posts (and skip over the signature/ad as well).

As it stands now, if someone were to get banned in the middle of a signature campaign, it would only appear as if they stopped posting, and as long as they made the minimum number of posts required they would likely still get paid, so there is really a very small penalty for being banned. If a ban were also to, at the very least result in a signature being removed while they are banned then they would not be paid because almost all signature campaigns require that the signature be kept up the duration of the payment period.

I can say that I often see something that someone is selling themselves (for example their escrow service, physical coins, ect.) that I may be interested in buying, and the amount of business they do would obviously not warrant any kind of paid advertisement.

I dont think very many (any) people have legit gift cards in that large of an amount. No one is certainly going to be dumb enough to accept PayPal from a newbie and if they were to accept PayPal from a trusted member they would likely want a preimum

The forum has been hacked a number of times before sometimes for a long time before being discovered. In theory a hacker could edit my post but he wouldn't be able to edit it so the signature matches.

Why don't you use gyft? It would result in you being guaranteed that you will not be getting a carded gift card.

If you are willing to bump up your rate to 100% then I could do this via Bitcoin.

yes.

---

I am not sure this would be effective in reducing spam, it could even make it worse as companies would pay less so the people who are willing to try to earn via signature spamming will either need to work harder (spam more) or would be willing to accept less. I would say that generally people who are willing to accept low payments will probably generally spam more.

I do agree with your point that people should not be forced to view ads although it is currently setup so that only heros+ can disable forum ads.

I think a good solution would be to have a second tier of a ban when someone is banned for insubstantial posts + paid signature (aka signature spam). One could be banned for 14 days from posting/sending PMs and then once that ban expires, for a person to be unable to display their own signature (they can't participate in signature campaigns).

It would probably also not be a bad idea to disable displaying a signature when the ban starts as well so that when a person is banned they will likely be denied payment from their campaign because their signature is removed. This would cause people to be more careful about getting banned because it would mean they won't get paid for their "work" verses they just can't post now and would likely appear as though they just went on vacation.

I think it is interesting to see that CITM has so many people on his trust list that gave positive trust to FC that he still has 150 trust even with two negatives.

It is also interesting that everyone except two people are on CITM's trust list that gave FC positive trust (a few are on others trust as well)

I have a feeling the person who posted that is Marcotheminer announcing the reduction. This is obviously speculation but it would make sense. I don't think you can edit your posts when you are banned.

I would have considered this had it not been the ridiculous amount of posts you expect to get for .6 per week. If you had 6 senior accounts then you would be earning .78 btc per week @.0013 per post, or .98 @ .0014 and your risk would be very little.

In addition to the above you would increase the value of your accounts because their posting history would dramatically improve and they would eventually rank up.

---

I would be willing to escrow such an arrangement though, but I would not take any responsibility if you cannot regain control of your account from the person you are paying to post for you

Do we need to reenroll if we want to continue? If so then my current post count is 3010 (although I have made some posts since you counted posts for last weeks payment)

Well it seems to be your argument for the manager to pay for all posts despite their spam status, which is obviously not the solution. If you are making a lot of one liners then you are more likely to have few/none of your one liners paid for, while on the other hand if you have mostly posts that you put a lot of effort into then a very short post would be more likely to be paid out. Yes that is not treating everyone exactly the same when deciding when to pay a specific post however the one liner is more likely to be looked at closely if written by someone who has a reputation for putting effort into their posts verses someone who has likely made their ways to many people's ignore list for posting crap

The first page of his posts are good because he is making an argument to have gotten paid for more of his posts, which he ironically put a lot more effort into making then when he was making posts hoping to get paid for 100 posts.

It would be possible to make an argument to advocate for someone to get unbanned or to have their 'sentence' reduced, however I would personally say that would not be appropriate to do so in this case. Even if such an argument was made, there is nothing to say that he would follow such advice, although I do think BadBear is generally fair.

The loan repayment has been received at 12U9Hf7zZ8eiskXZGD9KiBVHa46buXVp1W as per my conversation with the borrower and MZ. The .11 due as per MZ was sent to 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh which is the addresses requested to be sent to as per MZ and the rest sent to an address controlled by me as requested by MZ.

I have returned the collateral to the borrower via PM and restored his bitcointalk account to his control.

He was there because he has sold/traded/trafficked in hacked/stolen accounts in the past and it appears that any time he creates/uses an account to attempt to sell other accounts, BadBear sends a negative trust it's way