Did you save the LoG? Can I have a quick explanation/link of what is that? I said that I did save the order id and the passphrase of it. Aren't those enough? See 6 posts up, the LoG is the only independently verifiable proof.
|
|
|
The problem is that I can't see my order through the site. I enter mycryptomixer.com/order/<the order id> and it returns me: Did you save the LoG?
|
|
|
The address that I have doesn't start with a 5 or an L or K. It starts with a 1. The address starts with a 1. It's the private key that starts with 5, L or K. Warning: ignore all private messages from people who offer to "help" you. People have been scammed that way. Bonus for after recovering and moving your Bitcoin: you probably own some Forkcoins too. Don't do anything with them before securing your Bitcoin, but don't forget about them either.
|
|
|
but even if we say that for every individual user who makes a withdrawal there are 5 more transactions happening in the background (which seems very generous, considering that one withdrawal transaction with 100 outputs would allow for 500 more background transactions) paying the same high fees You're ignoring the fact that one input transaction adds much more in terms of transaction size than one output transaction. It would be interesting to see how many daily Bitcoin deposits Binance receives, and how many withdrawals it sends.
|
|
|
Good bye (and good riddance). Bitcoin scales just fine. Nobody is forcing you to use it, and we really don't care if you leave. There is no need to announce it. This doesn't solve the problem, nor does it help Newbies. Bitcoin scaling is bad, high fees are bad. At the end of 2017, fees reached up to 1000 sat/byte, right before the Bitcoin price started plummeting. I can no longer send someone $10 worth of Bitcoin to try it, and I consider that a serious shortcoming. For OP, why not use the lightning network? Agree with mk4, layer 2 soon will be the solution. I use LN whenever it's accepted, but opening and closing channels also costs on-chain fees. I'm mostly using BlueWallet (custodial LN) and Phoenix Wallet (non-custodial LN) now, and both of them cover the cost of opening channels while charging only a small amount. I don't think that business model is sustainable when fees go up, and I wouldn't want to use LN when opening and closing a channel costs $50. The fee in terms of Satoshis is also going up, since the user base is expanding. Bitcoin can't handle more users as long as it can't handle more transactions. All those people "trading" Bitcoin on exchanges without withdrawing to their own wallet aren't real Bitcoin users in my book. Back in 2017 I said as a user I don't care how Bitcoin scales, as long as it does it. Segwit helpt a bit, but I think the Bitcoin price drop had a larger effect. Either way, scaling takes far too long. I'm now using shitForks for some small payments. I'd love to use Bitcoin for it, but it's not possible. But as long as exchanges use bad practice and pay thousands of dollars on consolidation fees, block space keeps getting wasted.
|
|
|
There are 3906 combinations that would meet this criteria *2 (compressed or not). It there a script that I could feed with dictionary to check this? I think bitcoin-tool can do this. Note that I'm not recommending to trust it, so I suggest to it in an offline Virtual Machine.
|
|
|
Also on my Windows 10 machine I can't see the USB drive in the file manager to make a back up - what I i missing? It's a hardware wallet, you can't make a backup from your PC.
|
|
|
I've used my Delete button a bit. See https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_5093271.htmlI see that it is quite acceptable to add personal publications, (although I would not mind if a new rule was added on this matter). It's been discussed before, and I'm okay with it.
|
|
|
Does anyone know how to do a OP_return script under the transaction to notify whomever the owner of this wallet address that a mistake was made? 1SuggestionCreateBurnAddressDd9g8 1Send546satoshiThereAndToxxxWAVJ9 1TheAddyWith13Bitcoinxxxxxy3AjfNy Create Burn Address to add a visible message
|
|
|
And yet they still charge 0.0005 BTC for a withdrawal. So even when fees are this high, they are still making around 0.00045 BTC per customer per withdrawal. That's $20! What a complete rip off. As much as I dislike the high withdrawal fees on exchanges, what you're saying is not entirely true: the fee in that transaction could be so low because they only used one input. That's possible because they consolidate their inputs in other transactions This transaction for instance paid 0.05336637 BTC in fee for 252 inputs (and only 2 outputs). It would be much more fair to largely reduce the withdrawal fees, and charge a deposit fee. I know only one exchange that does that. But since that discourages people from depositing, while the current situation discourages withdrawals. From a business perspective, this makes much more sense. They also pay too much for their consolidating transaction, they could easily have saved a thousands dollar on this. They must really earn a lot if they don't care about this. From the sample transaction above, I noticed one address with 275,856 transactions. It looks like someone uses this exchange to consolidate hundreds of thousands of small inputs. They should simply not allow that, it costs them money. They should also start using native Segwit to reduce fees! Blocks are full, and large exchanges are responsible for a large part of this.
|
|
|
You also have things like the RIP TecShare thread. Not saying it's not good to have, I miss him a bit too. But it's in reputation, it's not a reputation thing. He didn't rip anyone off, he didn't steal funds, etc. Same with Lauda leaving, not a reputation thing. "Reputation" isn't only scam-related, so I think those 2 topics fit there. I am getting less tolerant about it. I click the Ignore button a bit faster lately. If someone posts BS, ignore them!
|
|
|
or newbies coming in saying some service, that is a known scam I usually ignore the topics about random websites, it makes me think they're hoping to earn Merit. I dislike moderating things like this Earlier today I reported a topic, asking for it to be merged. My report is still Unhandled. If it gets merged, I'd say moderation works fine. I don't expect it to become stricter though, as this forum's mission is to be "as free as possible".
|
|
|
What's the source of these gift cards? Amazon has been blocking accounts after using fraudulent gift cards.
|
|
|
a guy named David If it's Dave, I trust his professional opinion. I don't know a David in this business.
|
|
|
Do you (or does anyone) have any ideas how this could have happened -- this could potentially really help other users not face the same issue. That's easy, don't do this: Mistakes made- Depositing before downloading, saving and verifying the Letter of Guarantee
- Sending a large amount of Bitcoin to a relatively small and unknown service
- Sending your entire Bitcoin savings at once to a third party
- Keeping your life savings entirely in Bitcoin
Malware (did a malware search) You should never trust a malware search for 100%. There's always the possibility of unknown malware. Cloned site (Was using PureVPN and incognito mode, very cautious of typing in the correct url: mycryptomixer.com) I'm pretty sure a VPN server can do the same thing Tor exit nodes do. Tor exit nodes (Was using Google Chrome on the main site, not onion) As far as I understand, .onion sites can't be altered the way "normal" sites can be altered by a compromised Tor exit node.
|
|
|
I've reported this topic, asking to merge it with your other topic. There's no need to create a new topic instead of posting or editing your other topic.
|
|
|
Assuming LoyceV Bob received few satoshi of 0.001BTC in total from faucet 10 different times using a compressed legacy bitcoin address, this means the trasaction will have 10 inputs. If LoyceV Bob wants to send the whole bitcoin to CryptopreneurBrainboss Alice single uncompressed legacy address at ones, this is how the fee will look like. This is much better transaction 6x
|
|
|
|