I think an "Advanced" tab should be added where you can send your own commands to the wallet and the daemon, because in the current version you can't tell the daemon to start mining.
Advanced commands are good but there should be a simple check box to turn on and off mining, maybe with a setting for number of threads. |
|
|
|
|
I don't use Windows either, but from your screen shots and write up I am impressed with your work. I am definitely looking forward to hearing feedback from eh Windows users.
|
|
|
|
|
Updated.
Will be offline for a while.
|
|
|
|
The real merit of this coin lies in the anonymity enhancing features of the protocol and the robust decentralization implied by CPU-mining. Without those, it is just another pump and dump. If they can be improved and made more robust, the coin may have a bright future. I worry about the BMO fork, however. Quazarcoin and bytecoin are transparent scams, and will die naturally, but BMR vs MRO is a serious problem for image and marketing.
+1 Valid point. We should take care about BMR resurrection and reach agreement or cooperation with thankful_for_today. This is actually as confusing to us as you. At one point, thankful_for_today said he was okay with name change: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=563821.msg6368600#msg6368600Then he disappeared for more than a week after the merge mining vote failed. Two days ago he PM'd us saying he regretted not listening to the community more and about working together. We proposed setting up a sourceforge for MRO to have a mailing list, which thankful_for_today said he would. Then all of a sudden there was a PM followed by the same posted on here implying the old name was still in effect. And I don't know what else that entails. That's pretty much it. There's no other behind-the-scenes discussion between him and us. thankful_for_today is often gone and acts a bit strange sometimes, but he's not malicious at all. So I think this will sort itself out fine. Ideally, he'll stay as a dev and contribute to the github (anyone can do that by the way -- this project is now completely decentralized). Everything will work out. Monero is doing so good. Those that helped bring it about will come together and make it even better. Any recommendations on community trusted OTC buys for Monero? thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
100k diff -> 100000/120 H/s = 833 H/s. A typical CPU can get ~10-15 H/s, so this translates to some 50-80 CPUs from July 2012 to February 2014 (see graph). Of course, some people have more than 1 CPU so it's hard to know how many holders there are. If you're going to mention the graph, for pretty much all of 2013 (or at least what claims to be 2013) it was well below 100k, more like 30-50k, which is roughly 20-40 PCs, or a smaller number of powerful workstations or servers. Only in late 2013 did it get as high as 100k. That is not a released coin being widely used by some large secret community in the deep web or anywhere else. It is at best a small group of developers. |
|
|
|
552 @ 0.000905 / 2014-05-09 11:56:04
1080 @ 0.001330 2014-05-09 14:40:30
100 @ 0.00100 2014-05-09 09:38:02 I guess the first trade in the list is at 21.56:04 in stead of 11:56:04 ? 23 actually. I did copy paste from the top of of the forum page and it shows 12 hour times (at least for me). |
|
|
|
Can anyone please tell me how to check wallet balance or if a block has been found?
If you have the wallet open in a window, type refresh. If you find a block you will usually get about 17 MRO but will sometimes be less due to the antispam penalty rules. In the daemon window you will see "Found block" if you find a block, but since there are lots of messages that come up there it can scroll off. You can also check the log file bitmonerod.log Thanks I've just done refresh and balance is still 0 so will keep mining  I strongly recommend not checking your balance frequently when mining with one PC. It will just drive you crazy with discouragement. You should expect to get one block a week or so. Just ignore it and let it do its thing, check back every few days. You might want to back down the threads if it makes more annoying fan noise at full power. Thanks for your advice but on this pc I have a modified case fan cooling the cpu so it runs pretty cool. I will however take your advice and check balance every now and again because of low hashrate. Isn't this coin business all about finding a block or more with low hashrate... that's what my attraction is anyway, someone with no money being able to change it to nice money. Yes but its a waiting game with a low hash rate. Once pools come online you will have the option to get a small amount on a much more regular basis. Do you think pools will come online anytime soon? According to this post good progress is being made: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6640190#msg6640190 |
|
|
|
I am trying to optimize the binaries for linux with Intel C++ Composer XE 2013. I'm getting this error. [ 33%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/cryptonote_core.dir/cryptonote_core/tx_pool.cpp.o
icpc: command line warning #10006: ignoring unknown option '-Wvla'
icpc: command line warning #10006: ignoring unknown option '-Wlogical-op'
icpc: command line warning #10006: ignoring unknown option '-flto'
/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/src/serialization/binary_archive.h(135): error #63: shift count is too large
v >>= 8;
^
detected during:
instantiation of "void binary_archive<true>::serialize_uint(T) [with T=unsigned char]" at line 127
instantiation of "void binary_archive<true>::serialize_int(T) [with T=unsigned char]" at line 165
 Without looking too closely that looks like a compiler bug to me, or overly aggressive static checking that gets it wrong. Maybe you can turn off that check? oh... -Werror was in CMakeLists.txt, so the warnings were treated as errors.  OK that makes sense. The line in question is dead code but the warning recognizer doesn't understand that. |
|
|
|
Can anyone please tell me how to check wallet balance or if a block has been found?
If you have the wallet open in a window, type refresh. If you find a block you will usually get about 17 MRO but will sometimes be less due to the antispam penalty rules. In the daemon window you will see "Found block" if you find a block, but since there are lots of messages that come up there it can scroll off. You can also check the log file bitmonerod.log Thanks I've just done refresh and balance is still 0 so will keep mining I strongly recommend not checking your balance frequently when mining with one PC. It will just drive you crazy with discouragement. You should expect to get one block a week or so. Just ignore it and let it do its thing, check back every few days. You might want to back down the threads if it makes more annoying fan noise at full power. Thanks for your advice but on this pc I have a modified case fan cooling the cpu so it runs pretty cool. I will however take your advice and check balance every now and again because of low hashrate. Isn't this coin business all about finding a block or more with low hashrate... that's what my attraction is anyway, someone with no money being able to change it to nice money. Yes but its a waiting game with a low hash rate. Once pools come online you will have the option to get a small amount on a much more regular basis. |
|
|
|
Can anyone please tell me how to check wallet balance or if a block has been found?
If you have the wallet open in a window, type refresh. If you find a block you will usually get about 17 MRO but will sometimes be less due to the antispam penalty rules. In the daemon window you will see "Found block" if you find a block, but since there are lots of messages that come up there it can scroll off. You can also check the log file bitmonerod.log Thanks I've just done refresh and balance is still 0 so will keep mining I strongly recommend not checking your balance frequently when mining with one PC. It will just drive you crazy with discouragement. You should expect to get one block a week or so. Just ignore it and let it do its thing, check back every few days. You might want to back down the threads if it makes more annoying fan noise at full power. |
|
|
|
and by the way, when you trade a fucking $200.01 and pay $0.01 more as fee, of course a $0.01 will change your life right ? and if you do that 100 time a month this would sum up to $1 in total, this will get you broke!!!
This is wrong because there is automated trading that does a high volume of trades in a short period of time. Even if you don't do this yourself, if your orders are traded against by algorithms you may get many, many executions. There is no reason to assume 100 trades in a month is a lot. You could get 100 trades in a minute. I am aware of bots and the way they work but 100 trade a minute !!! why ? it is not like you see major price moves over the course of a minute...it is just plain retard to do that then complain about paying more fees, and again, rounding prices up is all around your daily life, you just don't feel it or know about it. It may be retarded but the problem is you don't have to be the one doing it. You can put in one big order and bots can trade against your order in a 100 (or 1000) little pieces, costing you up to an extra 0.01 in fees each time. This may add up to a lot. |
|
|
|
Can anyone please tell me how to check wallet balance or if a block has been found?
If you have the wallet open in a window, type refresh. If you find a block you will usually get about 17 MRO but will sometimes be less due to the antispam penalty rules. In the daemon window you will see "Found block" if you find a block, but since there are lots of messages that come up there it can scroll off. You can also check the log file bitmonerod.log |
|
|
|
and by the way, when you trade a fucking $200.01 and pay $0.01 more as fee, of course a $0.01 will change your life right ? and if you do that 100 time a month this would sum up to $1 in total, this will get you broke!!!
This is wrong because there is automated trading that does a high volume of trades in a short period of time. Even if you don't do this yourself, if your orders are traded against by algorithms you may get many, many executions. There is no reason to assume 100 trades in a month is a lot. You could get 100 trades in a minute. |
|
|
|
Adding more decimals is the only fair solution for both parties.
Either this, or round fairly, because on average it would even out. I think this could likely be gamed unless rounding were done randomly (and then it is difficult to audit) and it would not average out. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
