If you did not get a signed message when you purchased the account then there would be a possibility that the previous owner could come back and claim it was hacked. This could be mitigated if you were able to ask the previous owner for a signed message.

I removed my feedback on the account since Glucose agreed that the loan is considered "repaid"

The interest will probably be more then the exchange fees however the interest would not be more then what the borrower *hopes* the exchange rate will have increased since they got the loan.

If they sell the collateral they are offering then they will have to pay exchange fees, and would miss out on any additional price appreciation between the time they take out the loan and the time they get the money to repay the loan.

A lot of loans secured by alt coins are likely done for altcoin trading so the loans essentially are allowing for additional leverage

You have zero trade history, you should not be providing escrow services.

Did you get a signed message when you bought the account?

Can you prove ownership with a signed message from an address associated with the account?

Confirmed, pending receipt of a signed message from 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh requesting the loan. Per our previous conversation this will be an interest free loan due to you are very active in the community.

---

txid: 12492ba29b0700d65c6f5f5e09d2e8aeeaaa6255cc0fa59db0abef9d7ef312ec
Please send .15 BTC to 1AE7aXaYK1xny8v5if5QBW6SzXfVRTS7ry by March 5 2015

Thanks.

Can you confirm ownership of your account via signing a message with a btc address associated with your account?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

This is quickseller from bitcointalk and today is March 1 2015. I confirm that I am in control of the following described account:
"110+ Activity | Registered on June 2014 | Neutral Feedback | No Open Loans | Not Hacked or Stolen | Not Participating in signature campaigns."

Additionally I confirm that I am in possession of a signed message documenting the transfer of ownership to Muhammed Zakir.

The auction will end at March 2 2015 at 11:07 AM, forum time. Once this time passes, I will announce a winner. It is safe for the winner to send the winning amount to 1BcLYtDhvygPaw5wSForoqdtknXnBJUkwV as indicated above by Muhammed Zakir.

The identity of the account will not be revealed to anyone except the winner and will not be revealed until the winner has paid his/her winning bid to the address above.

Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU8rSsAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUW90IH/R02CMNfP91BblGm7NgRE+i3
Dotr2oeW8Qtr7L2TmjuAUf/w91xVGtmy1GLwjfEIdat98/pmbLv+e5rXXra7AfuB
EFbrZb//fW57pm8nyn19akwOxLbSHlkIXjBFLvTAq66B6m8l1t9Y3jFTzRjolJR3
L6BH3RAn4BbrudQUbnN/W/Eu8bGKQzhjBP26T3udBE8zj6pjFCJR+33reST0y7op
bfV4wHXHJbyeJApfv7vcSwM2DqWE8e4AlOBQdx4M/qkGAmSBShj0P+aHjR+9HkIu
6yJQT5ywZZVloMtijQKf8HTeEEUCSbVnSRz2amK01msas19nTn+NxyxjKIRqrIs=
=vtkw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

This is the current high bid.

If you are not willing/able to sign a message then there is nothing that would stop you from later claiming the account was hacked in the future, and upon such claim there is nothing that a buyer could show to give evidence that such account is not hacked. This of course is assuming that the account is in fact not hacked, if it is hacked then the same problem would occur except instead of it being from you, the claim of the account being hacked would be from the 'real' owner of the account.

edit: can you at the very least sign a message from 1GD6to1SHojfpRBqwZPUPWNGE6UPrnjrvs which you posted here?

both donator and VIP get access to the donator forum, get s donator/VIP tag, have 5 coins under your name.

VIP also can create a custom title

you actually need to have vip status not donator.

Theymos will chance usernames in only certain circumstances idr what exactly the criteria is though.

I posted almost 800 posts last month and he didn't count any of mine lol (granted I am not in his campaign but you still shouldn't complain)

Lol you didn't even vote in your own poll?

Needless to say it is not a good idea to lend to this person.

lol. It is a site where you need to make a lot of dumb spammy posts in order to gamble

The games and rounds section is designed for people to make insubstantial posts in order to claim (usually) small amounts of Bitcoin. The pomzi section is a section to discuss ponzis just like the gambling section except for ponzis instead of actual casinos.

he must have had good luck at a gambling site. #gamblingloan

generally speaking people take better care of their money then their bitcountalk accounts. Also they will likely access their bitcountalk accounts more often then their money giving more attack vectors to hack a Bitcointalk account then to steal private keys.

it is showing as 0/uncomfirmed now but I have no reason to believe it won't confirm.  I updated my trust to positive.

I won't update this post once the tx confirms (like I said I am confident it will confirm)