Bitcoin Forum
October 11, 2024, 07:07:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 [620] 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 ... 1343 »
12381  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoins in Steam coming soon... on: April 26, 2016, 08:19:07 AM
For those that are interested, this is how it looks like when you want to deposit funds.

12382  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / MOVED: Relation between BTC and PPC, LTC on: April 26, 2016, 07:47:50 AM
This topic has been moved to Altcoin Discussion.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1451321.0
12383  Other / Meta / Re: What is necrobumping and unsubstantial posts? on: April 26, 2016, 07:44:29 AM
I thought unsubstantial posts were always deleted as being off-topic so how can an account be banned for making unsubstantial posts?
Why is the post simply not just deleted?
Since the others have explained to you what is and what isn't, I'll just answer this question. When you break the forum rules, there is going to be a consequence for doing such. Depending on the severity and the number of times that you've done is is what decides your punishment. Insubstantial or off-topic posts are also against the rules. However, you surely won't be banned for making a few of those (especially unintentionally, e.g. discussion has drifted away from original topic). On the other hand, if you keep ignoring the posts that get deleted and keep on doing this you will end up being punished (especially if you're in a signature campaign, i.e. have an incentive to do this).
12384  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Security Leak: Logic flaw with "core" on: April 26, 2016, 07:40:28 AM
Interesting, that you would assume I was implying you were the troll, and not that those responding to you are the trolls?
I would say that it is beyond obvious right now as he has identified himself as the troll.

There's a quote from Hamlet Act III Scene II that would seem to apply here.
Which one?
12385  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: New SegWit stats? on: April 25, 2016, 09:39:31 PM
Any estimated time before this to come ? Since the latest update was pretty recently, I doubt that we will see something in the near future.
Quote
2016-04-15 - Bitcoin Core version 0.12.1 released
2016-02-23 - Bitcoin Core version 0.12.0 released
2015-11-13 - Bitcoin Core version 0.11.2 released
2015-10-15 - Bitcoin Core version 0.11.1 released
You can clearly see that sometimes the amount of time between minor versions is very short.
12386  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / MOVED: SWIFT hacked on: April 25, 2016, 09:27:16 PM
This topic has been moved to Off-topic.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1450969.0
12387  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Security Leak: Logic flaw with "core" on: April 25, 2016, 09:22:39 PM
This is no 'security flaw', and therefore it does not need fixing. Your whole post is based on assumptions and the conclusion is not relevant.

It should be graphical and easy to read for the average customer of the currency.  
There is no such thing as a 'customer of the currency'.

The url should be /roadmap.
Please remind me again where the dollar roadmap is, usa.gov/roadmap? Roll Eyes
12388  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: New SegWit stats? on: April 25, 2016, 08:27:03 PM
When will those two version be released? I shall buy some bitcoin just before the release and make a quick profit.
Nobody knows. Forcing the developers to work on a schedule isn't going to help anyone either, and could make matters worse (software - quality wise). I'd say within the next 3-4 months (since it is a minor release; these come quicker), unless a severe bug gets found.


12389  Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] "Goxxed For The Last Time! (A commiserative coin)" number 11 on: April 25, 2016, 08:11:58 PM
0.048BTC
12390  Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] "Goxxed For The Last Time! (A commiserative coin)" number 11 on: April 25, 2016, 05:59:55 PM
0.042
12391  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: New SegWit stats? on: April 25, 2016, 05:24:00 PM
Segwit has not been released. You are doing an inadequate amount of reading. The code for Segwit has been released and merged. It will most likely come with the next Bitcoin Core version (0.12.2/3).
12392  Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] "Goxxed For The Last Time! (A commiserative coin)" number 11 on: April 25, 2016, 04:54:56 PM
why so? 0,002 is a minimum increment... Everybody is free to put an higher one.
Maybe you should have stated that it was the minimum. I assume that these things do not work equally everywhere.
Anyhow, in that case, I bid 0.035 BTC.
12393  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: SegWit is a waste of disk space? on: April 25, 2016, 04:48:33 PM
We don't NEED SegWit, we need something that can make us scale properly.
Your statement is contradictory. LN will make the network scale 'properly'. LN requires Segwit, therefore we need Segwit.


OP it seems like you've read some false information somewhere. There are certain places that you should stay away from.
12394  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / MOVED: Bitcoin online wallets on: April 25, 2016, 04:44:36 PM
This topic has been moved to Beginners & Help.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1450750.0
12395  Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] "Goxxed For The Last Time! (A commiserative coin)" number 11 on: April 25, 2016, 04:41:41 PM
Why don't people understand bid increments? The bid above should be invalid IMO.
12396  Other / Beginners & Help / MOVED: Posting images to show up without having to click on: April 25, 2016, 03:44:20 PM
This topic has been moved to Meta.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1450569.0
12397  Other / New forum software / Re: option to make voters public. on: April 25, 2016, 03:43:53 PM
I did say option. it means it would be optional. and to make it more clear, automatically add a notice saying "your vote will be published".

and with the way how polls currently are, most sensible users wouldn't even care about their results.
Okayn, that makes more sense. I have probably missed that word at first. The polls could use more option anyway. I wouldn't mind it then, since the user could just choose not to participate in those polls (without having to avoid all  forum based polls).
12398  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Rudarenje on: April 25, 2016, 02:49:00 PM
evo mene zanima tvoje mišljenje?
Jedino tocno misljenje: Ne znam. Moze se desiti gotovo nista, a moze doci do znatnog pomaka cijene. Da glumim da znam nesto i da lupam neke brojeve (kao sto 99.9% clanova radi) mi nije na kraj pameti. Meni je manje vise svejedno jer ce 1 BTC uvijek biti = 1 BTC.

Od 0,00 do "to the mooooon"...  Grin
To je postalo 'standardna' stvar sto se tice cijene, rudarenja i tako to.
12399  Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] "Goxxed For The Last Time! (A commiserative coin)" number 11 on: April 25, 2016, 01:50:54 PM
0.026BTC
12400  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Rudarenje on: April 25, 2016, 01:20:51 PM
A prema analizama,BTC bi trebao biti 800$ oko 7-8mj,tako da dolazimo na istu nagradu za rudarenje...
Tocnije receno, prema "analizama". Cuo sam procjene od tih analiza za svaki broj izmedu 500 i 10 000 do sada. Ljudi lupaju a ustvari nemaju pojma sta ce se tocno dogoditi.
Pages: « 1 ... 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 [620] 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 ... 1343 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!