Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 08:45:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 »
1241  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: 16x extender cable problem in MSI BB Marshal mother board on: June 03, 2011, 12:16:34 PM
I'm almost positive that I read in another forum post Windows is capped at 4 GPU's.  If you want 8 you'll need to go with Linux.

http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=97478 claims differently. I have no first hand experience, so I can't say directly, but I see noe reason why windows would set such a limit.

/agreed as to possibly destroying the FSB though. Consider an externally powered PCI-E riser or something.
1242  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: 2 5870s running at different mhps on: June 03, 2011, 05:17:07 AM
use phoenix, ur not getting the potential out the cards, run them both at 1ghz 185 mem and get easy 440 out of them!

not all cards are happy at that rate. Just out of curiousity I bumped a card from 975/300 to 1000/185 and my mhash dropped from 432 to 398.
1243  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: 2 5870s running at different mhps on: June 03, 2011, 04:58:53 AM
Yes, whatever your card has to actively display takes power away from mining. If you watch a movie or whatever some of the GPU cycles goes there instead. I'm somewhat surprised at losing quite so much hashing power. Perhaps turn off windows aero or whatever all those fancy pants addons are.
1244  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: 5850, low temp but still seeing artifacts? on: June 03, 2011, 04:53:43 AM
iirc stock speeds for a 5850 is 725. Just because temps are low doesn't mean the card is happy, and 225MHz (31%) overclock is quite large. Overclocking stresses hardware even at lower temps, but it shouldn't kill it in the next few days if that's what you're worried about.
1245  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Does video memory matter? on: June 03, 2011, 04:10:08 AM
Just a note, 6990s have terrible MHash/$ ratio, and the more time passes the higher the difficulty gets, making time to ROI get longer and longer.
1246  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Who is user #2631 on BTCGuild and what are you mining with?!?!?! on: June 03, 2011, 04:08:32 AM
Is it cypherfox's two clusters of FPGA's ? 

Or ArtForz's custom-asic chips?

Do those even exist? I haven't been paying much attention but last I saw there wasn't any evidence of those existing.

There's a thread somewhere about biggest miners, I think it was a few weeks back. I can't find it right now.

ArtForz was said to have somewhere in the range of 40Gh/s with about half of that being asic chips.

That's too bad that you can't find it. I remember seeing cypherfox's thread for weeks with lots of bold claims and tons of people going on and on with pie in the sky dreams, but I never saw any hard evidence that he produced anything real. Would have been nice to see if that had really come to anything or not.

I'll have to look up ArtForz separately.
1247  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: If you had 10 grand to start off with... on: June 03, 2011, 04:06:08 AM
A single water cooling solution? Not sure what you mean by that. 8x 6990s will put off about 3000Watts of waste heat. Even a 480 radiator can't handle that. With 18 push/pull 3000RPM high static pressure fans on each, maybe 3 GTX360s could handle it (at ~10C delta).

Water cooling for mining isnt' a very cost effective way to go anyway though. Would be cheaper to build 4 rigs running 2x 6990s, and cool probably about the same (each 6990 waterblock is ~$150).
1248  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Who is user #2631 on BTCGuild and what are you mining with?!?!?! on: June 03, 2011, 03:51:12 AM
Is it cypherfox's two clusters of FPGA's ? 

Or ArtForz's custom-asic chips?

Do those even exist? I haven't been paying much attention but last I saw there wasn't any evidence of those existing.
1249  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: If you had 10 grand to start off with... on: June 03, 2011, 02:31:27 AM
Id buy 7x rigs that could mine at 1.8 ghash/s each, and one that could could do 1.2 ghash/s. Total is just about $10k.

Im giving this estimate using partial info... But if you can use pci-e extenders to put 6x video cards on a MSI 890fxa-gd70 motherboard, then my numbers are correct. 13.8 ghash/s should make its costs back in a little over a month (probably more with difficulty increases (but price might jump too)). After that, just a ridiculous amount of $$ coming in.
i actually looked into this!! Funny thing is i got discouraged because you need to have a cooling system for the cards. i went for a 7 slot motherboard and was buying 7 6990 only to find out that the water cooling block that needs to be put onto each card wont fit on the motherboard because there isnt enough space between each card!!! angry Angry

You know what's even harsher than not fitting on the motherboard? The fact that the power draw for 7x 6990s is about 2,500Watts, which is greater than any single PSU can handle, and also draws more amps than any single household circuit can provide, let alone the power through the motherboard would almost definitely destroy it. Doomed from the outset.
1250  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: phatk vs. poclbm effective hash rate on: June 03, 2011, 01:52:35 AM
I would even say that 24 hours probably isn't enough to test it out. Due to the inherent varying nature of Bitcoin, using anything less than a 7 day average is really just an estimate, and probably not a very good one at that.

I agree and disagree. For a formalized study of the differences between the two I would say yes. But I was mostly suggesting a simple pattern seeking "once over" of his history to start. Deepbit solves around 75-90 blocks a day depending on its luck, which is a sizable number to work with. He is thinking he sees ~10% difference between the two miners, which is a significant difference. Were he to look at all the points from each he should see a significant and consistent shift upward between the two data sets. As well as a significantly different average once outliers are thrown away.

To really get into the meat of the matter though I agree you need to go big on your datapoints.
1251  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: are we being stupid? on: June 03, 2011, 01:41:49 AM
EDIT: Thanks JJG for demonstrating my point. For the record you've been saying the same thing for a couple months now, and while you might be right in the future, you've been wrong up til now.
Tell me one point in time where it made more sense to buy a 2600USD mining rig (which has costs to operate too!) than to buy 2600 USD worth of bitcoins!
Theoretical mining rig(s): Caseless -- Used 5870 $175 each // 400MHash/sec; Random mobo choice -- MSI 790X-G45 AM3 $90 each new (cheaper used) // 5PCI-E slots; Cheapo 1x PCIE extenders $5 each; Corsair tx950 $150; some crap ram $20; Sempron 140 $40. There is a thread floating around somewhere about how to build a custom wood enclosure for like $30 of wood and nails that houses 5 x 2 cards very nicely.

2x above (5 5870s) = $2400. Use the last $150-$200 for some fans or something, I don't care. Hashing power of system 4GHash/sec, electricity cost estimated @ 1296kWh / month + fans, let's round it out to 1400kWh/month, locale dependent, 11cents / kWh = $154 / month.

So, I can choose any point in time? Let's go with 2/18 - 4/18. Nice 2 month period of time. This is winter time so the cost of cooling will be opening a window and pointing a fan out of it to vent the hot air.
To the 400 MH/s starting from 2/18:
No way a 5870 would have gotten that hash rate back then, as BFI_INT was not in miners yet (as well as the phatk kernel)! Also you did not calculate potential downtime (since you slightly undersized the PSU for example at your projected electricity use of nearly 2000W per hour) + setup time. Also prices of 5870s at that point of time were likely different from 175USD. Also not included is shipping time/cost plus risk of hardware bein DoA (used!) and setup time.

However thanks for that detailed overview anyways.

This was a wholly theoretical exercise in mining vs buying as a response to someone. I chose numbers to most benefit my argument, and I said so from the start. However it was pretty close so as to be relevant, there is no point in taking shipping / building time into account, as the idea was to begin mining on the same date as buying coins, not start buying equipment. The chances of DoA equipment is irrelevant. DoA rates are negligble. I've been continually buying 5870s for < $180 for the past month, there was a sale from newegg about 2 or 3 months ago for 5870 2GB models for $180. It's not at all that much of a stretch. A 5870 gets between 430 - 440MHash/sec right now with BFI_INT and phatk, 400Mhash with a good overclock is reasonable. 2000Watts (per hour doesnt mean anything) is overkill on electricty. I run 3x5870s on < 600Watts right now overclocked, so my numbers were fine.

Anyway, small things aside, the soundness of the argument stands. When bitcoins price remains relatively stable, difficulty does not increase that much, and mining is superior to buying coins. When bitcoins price explodes obviously having bought a coin the day before is better. But no one can know the future.

As Litt says, he wishes he had bought a buncha coins instead of buying mining equipment. Why didn't he? Because he couldn't predict the future. No one knew that bitcoin was going to explode from $1 / BTC to $11 / BTC in a matter of 2 months. It might have stagnated forever. And it might continue to rise or it might plummet like a rock, in which case buying coins is far far far stupider than buying mining equipment.


My only argument from the start has been that you don't know the future, so speculating that one approach or the other is better is irrelevant. You can guess as to what you think might happen, and plan accordingly, and that's the best you can do. But don't tell people that it will definitely be this way or that.
1252  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Is it safe to run a miner 24/7? on: June 03, 2011, 12:38:04 AM
Mine have been running at 90-95 degree celcius for over 10 days straight. I really don't think temps damage a card unless their heading over 100 degree celcius. Cards tend to scale back processing as they hit that temp so there's a built in failsafe. Or they might blow up.

10 days of runtime on a few cards is an incredibly poor sampling to draw from for statistical analysis. Heat is a proven killer of hardware, no ifs ands or buts about it, the rate varies however.

In all likelihood the cards will still last for a few years even running quite hot 24/7, but you certainly increase the chance of hardware degradation and failure, and the rate at which it heads to that. The MTBF is likely the length of the original warranty on the card, estimate perhaps 10-30% shaved off that.
1253  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: $2000 on a new super rig or add more graphics cards to current on: June 03, 2011, 12:31:50 AM
So many threads without any criteria to be met. What do you want? To maximize profit? To minimize noise and heat? To maximize your e-peen?

If you want to make the most money I suggest you check http://www.psychic-forum.com/forum/ instead. Minimizing noise and heat would behoove you to build another rig to keep cards spaced out and happy. Maximizing epeen definitely entails lots of 6990s.
1254  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: If you had 10 grand to start off with... on: June 03, 2011, 12:15:58 AM
If I had $10,000 I'd buy $10,000 worth of bitcoins and then send them to 1KtzPMokNekE5pjzqaDsdf6fEr77Utn3eA

Just sayin...
1255  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: how much can i sell a sapphire 5850 xtreme for? on: June 03, 2011, 12:11:05 AM
You can sell it for as much as people are willing to pay for it. Law of economics.

I personally would pay like < $140 for one, but I've seen people pay upwards of $200 on these forums. Madness knows no bounds.
1256  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Will Many graphic card on one mother board work? on: June 02, 2011, 11:52:42 PM
Were you crossfiring the cards? Or in Windows XP 32bit (I think). Crossfire is forced to 4 GPUs max. One version of windows is reported to also have that limitation.


As for PSU problem, 6 5870s can run comfortably on a 1200W with no worries. The biggest worry is still as I said frying the motherboard by running so much power through it.
1257  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Mining profit on: June 02, 2011, 11:47:25 PM
Read the like 4 threads on this topic on the first page of this forum.

Your calculations are flawed in that the price is highly unstable, the difficulty is highly unstable, and mining bitcoins itself is highly unstable (the amount varies by luck, even in big pools).
1258  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Is it safe to run a miner 24/7? on: June 02, 2011, 10:39:41 PM
The card I´m using is not overclocked at all or anything like that. Though I guess I shouldn´t have any problems letting the miner run 24/7?

Btw...what about a non overclocked CPU? Any problems if it stays on 99% 24/7?

What is your criteria for problems? Running a card at 100% usage 24/7 will almost certainly degrade the card. Now if it degrades its useful lifespan from 6 years to 4 years, that's not a real problem for most people, but there's no way to know any of that in advance.

Basically you are murdering your card, but you are doing it slowly. Figure out for yourself what that means to you.
1259  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Custom made GPU miners on: June 02, 2011, 10:33:01 PM
I don't think you get his meaning; he doesn't mean AMD re-do the chip, he means for someone like sapphire, xfx, his, or diamond to build a board with 4 cypress gpu's and 512MB RAM

I got his meaning just fine, I don't think you get my meaning.

1) Cypress chips are not to my knowledge being fabricated anymore. I don't suspect any group is just sitting on a big fat stockpile of unused Cypress chips, so in order to start a new line either AMD would need to return to a last gen fabrication line or have some stockpile to be bought out.

2) A PCB design process costs a lot of money. I'm not an electrical engineer and I'm guessing none of the rest of us are either, but talk to one and they will tell you that it's not a simple matter of slapping a chip onto a piece of silicon to make a functional graphics card. Where is the profit motive?

3) Cypress cards already sell very very well. What is the profit motive to instead of running their already existing designs, creating a custom designed PCB? As already stated there are maybe 20,000 high end cards mining right now maximum, that may seem like a big number to you, but to companies that deal with shipping out millions of units that's a waste of money.
1260  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: D-day: 6/6 at 3 PM on: June 02, 2011, 09:50:18 PM
At the current block discovery rate, the difficulty level is going to be reset to 515,000 (plus or minus) at 3 PM next Monday, 6/6.

I think that might be the point at which CPU mining is *always* a money-losing proposition.

Right now you can make .01 (USD) per hour.


Matthew


I'm not totally sure where your numbers are coming from, but I'm fine with accepting them, CPU mining is a terribly wasteful application of resources anyway. I don't mean to be one of those eco-freakos but the application of 95-140W of electricity usage to gain a dollar or two x tens of thousands of people = massively wasteful use of limited resources.

When we all get some awesome solar energy generation or something go nuts, but til then I'll balk at super inefficient uses of power.

http://blockexplorer.com/q/estimate

http://blockexplorer.com/q/ for more info

I meant more his calculations for profitability.
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!