^^^Billionaires want to buy 25% of all bitcoin??

Sorry but which billionaires would be that stoopid to think or say something like that?
Its like saying 'billionaire said they wanted to buy 25% of all the gold in the world,  or 25% of all the islands in the world'

It smells like some nextevel shillery from someone wanting to big note and set a web for hnwi clients, irs honeytrap etc?

What happened to Jorge Stolfi? Brazilian socialists shills are getting routed tbese days, hope that guy rots in a miserable outcome of his own making.

if i was completely wasted, how could i write great poetry about bacon?


2017, what a supprise

Bacon, lets talk about bacon

Fair enough.. but I said that holding also includes continuing to buy, and ends up being a profitable strategy, when done with prudence.. especially when BTC prices are likely going to be higher in the future than they are today.. especially if you are able to take at least a 5 year investment timeline to establish your btc stake by accumulating, buying on dips.. and various other forms of incrementalism practices, such as selling small amounts of BTC as the price goes up in order to buy lower than you sell and to sell higher than you buy.


I don't short BTC.  I mostly long btc and I skim profits on the way up (and if the bTC price goes back down, I use dollars from skimmed profits on the way up to buy back more BTC than I sold - that is to the extent that the BTC price goes down after i had sold some).    Works well, and does not involve emotions, such as anger as you seem to want to project upon me (perhaps while you are looking in the mirror regarding your own anger issues - at least seemingly butt-hurt issues).


Again.. no emotions here.  I have a strategy that attempts to largely remove emotions out of the actual practice.. and largely I have been increasing the increments that I trade, too so that not as many sell or buy orders are triggered.. which causes even less emotion from me.

On the other hand, you might catch me getting worked up, a bit, about FUD spreading, sorcerer seeking and selective history bear trolls like yourself who seem to be inclined to spread misinformation about your own historical record and mislead about what is important in bitcoin, including assigning pie in the sky probabilities while trying to assert that you have some kind of scientific insight about BTC's price direction (which tends to be down from your historical presentations), while you tend to have a decently large history of being wrong - and perhaps you serve as a kind of reverse indicator regarding actual likely BTC price direction.


In other words, you come out of the wood-work from time to time while presenting some kind of nonsensical doom and gloom message.... so perhaps there is some consistency with you in that regard, like roach, constantly losing in your BTC price projections.... While at least you try to suggest that you remain in the game.. but likely making similar (and maybe worse ) mistakes as roach.. with your ongoing betting when roach's bet is just a failure to realize gain rather than actively losing money, which seems to be a decent part of your ongoing bitcoin plays.

Just source it from proper places and there's no problem with it. None of us would exist today if not for countless species eating each other for all of time.

And if everybody goes vegan/vegetarian instead of supporting farmers who care for animal welfare (or a few years from now cultured meat) things will take much longer to improve.

There is the sense of coiling as we near the end of the month that was present at the end of March and April. I wonder if the outcome will be similar.

I suspect that we will see more consolidation in the range we are in and maybe even down to the $7k to 8k range as we enter June.

Now I could be completely wrong, we could hit the first of the month and blow upwards through vegeta levels but I think it would be short lived.

A couple months spent consolidating in this range would be good imho.

It's is however best to do your own research.

1h
https://i.imgur.com/W9Vdkct.jpg

4h
https://i.imgur.com/8calzUk.jpg

D
https://i.imgur.com/q520B5F.jpg

W

#stronghands'19

Ok just cause y'all bacon enthusiasts ..... I have to say some of my days of eating that....


I loved my bacon thin and crispy AF coming with some goat cheese and honey or something, gonna need to watch myself for not switching back to tha meat

^Yes, I'm not sure how that guy claims to be good at macro-anything when he completely ignored Japan is the biggest Keynesian dystopia ever created and instead blamed it on partriachal inequality LOL.  The other part is sort of chicken and egg scenario concerning the Keynesianism vs population decline.  Debt based fiats require infinite growth, and the population stopped growing so they require 0% interest rates etc etc.  None of this stuff has anything to do with 'abusive patriarchy'.  The planet simply does not accommodate infinite growth.

You are only showing how little you know about Japan.   It has been insanely hard for most women in Japan to work more than a few years and that is still mostly true.   The declining birthrate isn't from woman working in Japan.   The workplace in Japan is only slowly opening up to women.   While there have always been some career women in Japan, on a percent basis it has been very low.  Most women only work a few years at most and stop as soon as they marry.  

In fact the declining birthrate in Japan shows the failure of sexism in the modern world.

PS. No butthurt here ... the vulgar comments only show extremely low IQs.   

As someone that has some macro economics background and who is also married to a Japanese woman I'm going to ignore the profound stupidity presented in this thread.  

When there are not enough people in the workforce, productivity on a national level suffers and economies can actually shrink.   That is actually the problem Japan has been facing for some time.     Sexism has actually damaged the economy and it is only very slowly changes.   While it is true that more people going to work can drive down wages, that really isn't important.   What is important is what those wages can buy.   How many hours you have to work to live is actually more important than how much of some variable currency you actually earn.  

In Japan more women are moving into the workplace and more people are working longer.   This last year over 97% of college grads have already started working.   The school year ended in March and by April 1st over 97% were employed.  That is a strong labor market.

Anyway the average woman is a lot smarter than most of the bozos here that can't control their hormones.    

No. Wages went down BECAUSE women work, they are not a reaction to it.

Women work. Double the workers means half the wages. Basic bitch supply and demand THIS IS NOT ANY KIND OF RIDDLE.

Women can be productive, or reproductive. Not both.

Aren't japanese getting the LEAST sex in OECD?
Something does not compute.