Can see a problem with the PvP game here on primedice. If there is a faucet, whats stopping me from using a different computer, get the faucet amount and just keep playing with myself until I have both my BTC + faucet money AND I now have enough to cash out. Now, this is isnt much but if someone finds a way to bot this, it could become an issue.
Worst case we could implement a minimum bet on PVP of 0.0001 or so. Does this mean faucet will never be higher than 0.0001 for any level member?  U want more than 10k ?  I think it wouldn't be a faucet any more if it was giving that amount away. Wouldn't be very difficult to make the minimum withdraw then either. |
|
|
|
Surprised to see that Stunna hasn't changed rates for the lower forum ranks to compete with ritz.
Bit dissapointed as well, truth to be said.
Its just childish to up the rates whenever some new competitor appears . And i don't understand why u disappointing when u are on ritz campaign  Perhaps because it's nice to see competition going whatever the cause is. And also you're implying Stunna is behaving childishly, as he already DID up the rates, just not for the lower ranks. Keep your shitposts to yourself, ty. Please don't post here about any rats or stupid posts Stunna already clear this if any one have problem then create your own thread and talk all about these rats and any thing Good Luck He actually said "By all means discuss the campaign", which this would probably fall under, but there goes that irony again. And I laughed at 'shitposts'. |
|
|
|
even if it happens you don't need to go back 5years..! just note down the winners of all the games played today..! or try to get the marketting charts with you and than just go 1or2days behind.. if you want to time travel for money, atleast this is my plan ..!
even if it happens you don't need to go back 5years..! just note down the winners of all the games played today..! or try to get the marketting charts with you and than just go 1or2days behind.. if you want to time travel for money, atleast this is my plan ..!
sunny0123, are you a bot? Or same person with different user names trying to increase post count? That's ain't good ! We don't need such shitty things here! I cam to this forum cause my friemd told me this is good one with strict rules against bots Haha. There are no rules except don't spam or use spambots. Everything else goes . |
|
|
|
Were the ATMs somehow tied to MtGox?
I seriously doubt it. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin went bankrupt? haha.
|
|
|
|
|
Would be a great experiment that's for sure, but I think it'd be a case of too soon. Plus, Scotland needs to actually vote for independence first.
|
|
|
|
There's a difference between this scenario and getting junk mail sent to your house. I never said or assumed I'm untraceable, but obscurity provides you with relative safety on here. It's unlikely people have access to those databases here and if they did they have no way of connecting your handle to a real world address unless you make it easier for them.
There's some reason that the people who read bitcointalk.org are a bigger threat than the people who have access to the databases that are used to send me junk mail? There's some reason that the people who read bitcointalk.org are a bigger threat than the entire population of the earth (if any of those junk mail databases are ever leaked to the public)? I'd like your address Buy a dollars worth of BTC and he might give it to you. |
|
|
|
How and when did they attack Tor? I don't see how they can disrupt Bitcoin anyway.
Anything computer related can be interrupted or shut down/hacked. Nothing in the cyber world is safe. Good look taking down a decentralised network. How and when did they attack Tor? I don't see how they can disrupt Bitcoin anyway.
http://www.wired.com/2013/09/freedom-hosting-fbi/Relevant article. There was too much panic whet the FBI took down Silk Road. At the time people were saying that TOR should never be considered anonymous again and .onions were shutting down one after another. I don't really think they attacked Tor, but took over a server. It's not like Bitcoin is hosted on one. |
|
|
|
|
How and when did they attack Tor? I don't see how they can disrupt Bitcoin anyway.
|
|
|
|
He killed himself due to deep emotional problems....if he didn't commit suicide that day no doubt he would be on a long winding road of mental issues and drinking/drug abuse to this day or just prolonged suicide for another date. His wife was no support she is/was a crackhead.
but like you pointed out anything is possible.
Or he could've got better like many people do. Quite the assumptions your making. |
|
|
|
Nah he would look worse than that because of the drugs and drinking. You or anybody else won't know what he looks like; better or worse. How do you know he would've continued drugs and drink? |
|
|
|
There's a difference between this scenario and getting junk mail sent to your house. I never said or assumed I'm untraceable, but obscurity provides you with relative safety on here. It's unlikely people have access to those databases here and if they did they have no way of connecting your handle to a real world address unless you make it easier for them.
There's some reason that the people who read bitcointalk.org are a bigger threat than the people who have access to the databases that are used to send me junk mail? There's some reason that the people who read bitcointalk.org are a bigger threat than the entire population of the earth (if any of those junk mail databases are ever leaked to the public)? Depends on personal motives. |
|
|
|
well indeed ... I must say samsung has got good shock durability but when you put rubber cover (1$) on it. Dropped from 1.5m (hand) on a concrete - will not do a lot of damage ( with rubber cover on ) Cases are gash though. Nobody wants to use a case. |
|
|
|
lol, this isn't silkroad
if only jennifers was around.
I know it is not Silk Road. I wouldn't buy them off Silk Road because they are so expensive! They are legal in the UK so I don't see any problem looking for them on the forums. I have loads of good sources in the UK but none accept bitcoin. PM'ed both you guys back. Steroids are legal in the UK? |
|
|
|
iPhone was a great phone indeed ... iPhone 1,2...
now this is jus a phone ... without anything special ...
I've only had and still have the iPhone 3s. It's served me well, but I wont be going back. The 3s are built pretty solidly, but the new ones crack as soon as you drop it. |
|
|
|
No, it's impossible. There's no such thing as 'time'. You cannot go into the future and certainly not the past.
Well... time what is time. you cannot say there is no time ... I can, because there isn't. Using a quote doesn't make 'time' magically exist. You can say time exists in the same way god does to some. Time doesn't exist, clocks do |
|
|
|
Because, if it's really a black box, it is emitting only sporadic pings which probably means that either the battery is coming to an end, or it has been severely damaged and might permanently stop working any time. In which case we're back to square one.
Even if the battery runs out of power, the data can be recovered later. But it will not emit any radio signals and finding it it will be extremely difficult. If the signal stops that needle in a haystack gets even smaller. |
|
|
|
What's with the red negative trust on Ritz? There's really no reason provided why he got it, are people allowed to give negative trust without any reason? Seems like an unfair system to be honest, lol.
The trust system isn't really fair and people can leave what they want within reason or not, but that feedback does seem harsh and a bit suspicious to me. Ritz is best PMing the guy and try to get it removed as that's the only way really. Untrusted feedback doesn't seem to appear below the nickname on the threads so only trusted feedback is a problem More infos here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0 I have to read it myself with https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=215278.0 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=360473.0I'm aware of that, but Ritz now clearly has some feedback from a 'trusted' source showing. |
|
|
|
No, its more fun this way. I have spent a lot of time on this forum. Im not going to throw away that for 0.005 BTC.
Just a small point, this simply proves to peope that you won't scam for 0.005 and not that there are members who are completely trustworthy. You statement I'm not going to 'throw away' this account simply highlights the fact that you value the trust on your account at a greater value than 0.005. However it does not prove that one can be trusted for far larger sums (ie 1 mill BTC). Basically what I'm trying to say is that 'trust' is only up to an extent of a certain monetary value - there are extremely few people who wouldn't throw away their morality for huge sums whereas most people would try to look honest when dealing with minute sums. This is unfortunately a classic way long-conners work. Gain trust with a little risk then take the big bucks later. BTW, not saying you’re untrustworthy or nefarious, nahtnam, but I agree with Light on all fronts . Lol, . Sorry if there was any confusion with what I wrote. I re-read my post and it does seem to be about trust, but my point was just to run a nice little giveaway just for fun. Nah, it's all good. Pity I have to warn people about trust, this place wasn't so bad when it started - guess humanity took over and the scammers made this place home eh. Nice to see some good souls around here though It's the nature of the business. Bitcoin's advantages are also massive advantages to scammers. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
