Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 03:20:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 »
1281  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Here's how I think we could implement Bitcoin debit cards w/o a third party on: June 16, 2014, 08:30:08 PM
"private key" implies that there is some form of digital signature or encryption involved.
OK, you're right. I used the wrong word. However, I still need to give some “secret code” to make a transaction with my debit card (e.g. the 4 digit code at the back when purchasing online, totally unrelated to my account number). If the whole system is to be trusted, then nobody can spend from my account without that secret code.
1282  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Here's how I think we could implement Bitcoin debit cards w/o a third party on: June 16, 2014, 04:59:09 PM
No, it deosn't.

It reads your account number.

You rely on a trusted authority to protect the funds that you've placed on deposit in that account.

With bitcoin, there is no trusted entity.  Instead you trust the security of the private key.
It needs to somehow tell your bank that it wants to take funds from there. How can the bank prove that they are trying to spend from the right account?

Of course the bank is a trusted entity, but it's one that needs private keys to confirm who's spending what.
1283  Other / MultiBit / Re: Treat comma and dot the same on: June 16, 2014, 04:25:10 PM
For instance, in the UK 1,000 means one thousand but in Germany it means one.
But people don't write 1,000 when they mean 1, and most of the time if they want a thousand they would write 1000 (without comma or dot).
1284  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Here's how I think we could implement Bitcoin debit cards w/o a third party on: June 16, 2014, 04:15:08 PM
Wouldn't the card reader owner be able to see your private key, though?
A fiat debit card reader also reads your “private key” (or equivalent for bank accounts). It's essential for it to work.
1285  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Here's how I think we could implement Bitcoin debit cards w/o a third party on: June 16, 2014, 01:19:20 AM
The problem with that approach is, how do you determine the PIN? Also, desktop and mobile apps would need to include it as well, otherwise we would have two kinds of private keys, and how would that work?
One of the big problem with Bitcoin is that it's not easy enough to spend in the real world. QR codes suck and inserting a card is a lot simpler than pulling out your smart phone, starting the app, scan the QR code and then send the agreed amount of bitcoins.
Yet most banks have created apps to make payments with your phone. For me it's more practical to carry a single object to do most stuff.

I understand why a decentralized debit card system would work, but the implementation may be harder than it seems.
1286  Other / MultiBit / Re: We should stop recommending Multibit on bitcoin.org, NOW on: June 13, 2014, 05:43:37 AM
The bug was related to incorrectly importing Blockchain.info keys. If you have never imported anything then you have nothing to worry about. Also, it was fixed in the latest release.
1287  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Taking Down Bitcoin on: June 06, 2014, 08:23:07 PM
Your proposal won't work, because there is no centralized timing source.
How does that affect the scenario described?
1288  Other / MultiBit / Re: MultiBit on: June 06, 2014, 01:13:57 AM
So if I don't make a new backup, the old one will fail to import and I lose my coins?
The old one will import correctly, but will not contain the new private keys (obviously). Only then will you lose your coins, but only if you are not careful.
1289  Bitcoin / BitcoinJ / Re: Using BitcoinJ in .NET (C#) on: May 28, 2014, 03:40:49 PM
But you can manually connect to the network and send the messages to support it yourself. (Partial Merkle Tree are implemented, and bloom filter also)
OK, I will consider it Smiley
1290  Bitcoin / BitcoinJ / Re: Using BitcoinJ in .NET (C#) on: May 28, 2014, 01:28:55 PM
Alternatively, you can try https://github.com/NicolasDorier/NBitcoin
Support more feature than BitcoinJ, except for the payment (BIP70) that I'm developping right now.
You can sign and send transactions.

I wrote two small article on it.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/768412/NBitcoin-The-most-complete-Bitcoin-port-Part-Crypt
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/775226/NBitcoin-Cryptography-Part
Does it support SPV mode? I was thinking on a Windows Phone app, and I don't think it could (or should) run a full node.
1291  Other / MultiBit / Re: Not showing "Available for spend" Multibit on: May 26, 2014, 06:38:51 AM
As far as I know, “Available to spend” only appears when the amount is less than the total. You should be fine spending it.
1292  Other / Off-topic / Re: A 3 year old just asked me for the wifi password on: May 13, 2014, 02:24:28 PM
better to tell them that bitcoin is a bad bad thing must stay away from it ,, its bad juju . but this will make them want bitcoin more -_-
Older people also tell me that smartphones are a bad thing and that I should stay away from them.
1293  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A bitcoin full node FAQ on: May 12, 2014, 02:57:40 AM
I want to run a full node, but I don't have any spare computer to leave it running 24/7. I'm planning to buy hosting. Is that a good idea? What specs should the hosting have?
1294  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Storj - Decentralized Storage on: May 10, 2014, 05:35:55 PM
Mega is the only one I know that does large file client side uploads, and I think their tech only works on Chrome. Their code isn't exactly open source.
Mega also works on Firefox. There's an extension, but it's optional. Maybe we could download the extension and see its source to find if encryption is done there...
1295  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: USA Today Superimposed Logo with Bitcoin on: May 09, 2014, 07:15:11 PM
Quote
A non-crypto person wouldn't even be able to tell what it is.
No, but the different logo may be noticed, and if they click it, they will see this news.
1296  Other / MultiBit / Re: multibit safe? on: May 05, 2014, 05:26:37 PM
Where does it say that?
Where does it say what?
That it's FUD? People don't usually say their own post is FUD.
That it was an imported key? Here.
1297  Other / MultiBit / Re: multibit safe? on: May 05, 2014, 04:38:23 PM
That article is FUD. It's the same user that complained with everyone about losing their imported keys.
1298  Other / MultiBit / Re: multibit safe? on: May 05, 2014, 12:00:40 AM
And the best thing of all is that MultiBit has a serious bug which can lose your bitcoins easily!
Th bug was actually pretty hard to hit, and it has already been fixed in the latest version.
1299  Other / Off-topic / Re: Does Anybody Know Any Good Paradoxes or Riddles? on: May 04, 2014, 11:31:51 PM
Catch-22: A situation in which someone is in need of something that can only be had by not being in need of it.
You mean, like the Philosopher's Stone in HP1?
1300  Other / Off-topic / Re: Does Anybody Know Any Good Paradoxes or Riddles? on: May 04, 2014, 11:30:38 PM
Here's one:

If Pinoccio said "My nose will grow now!". What would happen???
His nose will not grow. What Pinocchio states is a prediction, which can be neither true nor false at the time it is stated.
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!