Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 09:16:27 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 »
1301  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Foundation on: October 15, 2012, 05:13:45 AM
Anyone feeling they can help one way or another can get in touch with BF and start volunteering.
1302  Economy / Securities / Re: {Bakewell} Get an equitable stake in a transparent & growing mining company on: October 14, 2012, 06:41:57 PM
Just got an email from the GLBSE:

Quote
Your GLBSE account has been processed for bitcoin. The next step will be to send you information about your assets, and to provide this information to issuers (if you agreed) allowing you to continue your relationship with your issuers.

Seems like general canned mail for regular accounts, I still have noting in terms of BAKEWELL from the GLBSE

This is a significant workload for Nefario, and it's only himself or few people at best doing the whole job. Chances are good that information will be sent out soon to issuers.
1303  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Foundation on: October 14, 2012, 04:58:51 PM
I didnt get into bitcoins to get rich.

I got into bitcoins to hopefully help make this world a much better place for my kids and grandkids.

I believe the people involved in TBF are purchasing power and control and will abuse them. It is the nature of humans. Also, they will be led to use this control by others who pressure them, like the CIA or other government entities Gavin is friends with.

I believe we have just seen the end of bitcoin as we knew it unless the users of bitcoin stand up for bitcoin.

Can you try to be more specific? Your beliefs are interesting, but facts would more useful for the discussion. For example: you don't like a particular piece of code that Gavin has contributed; or you don't like a particular action that BF has performed.

P.S. I hope you are right that we have just seen the end of Bitcoin as we knew it. Please have a look into the list of specific issues: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113400.msg1230387#msg1230387
1304  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: adoption by country: nodes per capita on: October 14, 2012, 04:53:21 PM
Can we get this list online versus on this forum?

The sources are cited in the OP. Help yourself!
1305  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Foundation on: October 14, 2012, 03:40:56 PM
Most of the developers - myself included - have an income unrelated to Bitcoin. Though few would refuse a donation for our work, I myself never expected any payment for it. I work on what I like to, and if that benefits the community, so much the better.

Gavin however has worked on Bitcoin full-time since a long time, without any other income, and at least in my opinion he does a great job. Certainly it shouldn't be this foundation's only purpose, but I see no harm in making sure he can keep working on this project.

Bullshit! I think he could probably retire off of the coins he has now if he simply keeps working to ensure the exchange to fiat rate continues to grow. No other income is necessary considering he was probably mining and testing the live system since 50 btc blocks were popping up on a solo client every few seconds!
It amazes me that you were able to amass 1,500 posts without learning even the basics of how coins are generated.
1306  Economy / Securities / Re: Verifing account of GLBSE discussion on: October 13, 2012, 04:47:59 PM
nefario is forced to testify in a grand jury.. otherwise he'll get 18 months in prison.
Reference?
Reference, or welcome to the ignore list.
1307  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 12, 2012, 08:18:44 AM
Technically, if friedcats prediction holds and the initial mining generates enough surplus to cover the initial investments as dividends, I don't care what the share price is. Anything is profit above that point.
The more interesting question is whether the operating profit will be enough to grow the company or whether additional financing rounds are necessary.
Hard to say without knowing everyone's J/Mhash and the fab cost. An arms race is on!
1308  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: adoption by country: nodes per capita on: October 12, 2012, 07:42:31 AM
Interesting. Perhaps you want to calculate it per internet user though, instead of per capita:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_Internet_users

Good point. I fixed the OP!
1309  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: adoption by country: nodes per capita on: October 12, 2012, 07:16:28 AM
Clearly, Bitcoin protocol is buggy around the equator:



 Grin
1310  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: adoption by country: nodes per capita on: October 12, 2012, 06:17:00 AM
I took per-country data from bitcoinstatus.rowit.co.uk, and calculated per-capita adoption based on population size (taken from Wikipedia).
Here is the list in descending order of nodes per 100,000:

Belize is a country of only 300k people and I know of at least 3 people using bitcoin. 

You'd think we would have made the list.

Glad to hear that. The reasons for not seeing Belize in the Rowit list may be:

- No data collection is perfect, and Rowit is certainly not an exception.
- Those three people would need to be running their clients with the listening port open (I think).
- IP-to-country databases are sometimes wrong.
1311  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / adoption by country: nodes per capita on: October 12, 2012, 05:09:50 AM
I took per-country data from bitcoinstatus.rowit.co.uk, and calculated per-capita adoption based on population size (taken from Wikipedia).
Here is the list in descending order of nodes per 100,000 people, and another one per 100,000 internet users:
Country
Finland
Iceland
Sweden
Slovenia
Canada
Australia
Norway
Netherlands
United_States
Estonia
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Latvia
Czech_Republic
Switzerland
Denmark
Ireland
United_Kingdom
Germany
Bulgaria
Austria
Lithuania
Poland
Israel
Belgium
Romania
Ukraine
Russian_Federation
Portugal
Belarus
Slovakia
Serbia
Croatia
Greece
Singapore
France
Hungary
Hong_Kong
Moldova
Spain
Italy
Bosnia_Herzegowina
Argentina
Kazakhstan
Chile
Taiwan
South Africa
Venezuela
Brazil
Thailand
Mexico
Malaysia
Colombia
Korea
Japan
Viet_Nam
China
Philippines
Turkey
Indonesia
India
nodes per 100,000 people
4.39
4.37
2.98
2.62
2.56
2.44
2.40
2.33
2.19
2.16
2.15
1.91
1.74
1.73
1.71
1.68
1.57
1.48
1.47
1.43
1.37
1.01
0.95
0.91
0.88
0.81
0.79
0.78
0.77
0.72
0.62
0.55
0.54
0.49
0.48
0.45
0.44
0.42
0.39
0.38
0.31
0.28
0.26
0.20
0.16
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.00
||| Country
Finland
Iceland
Slovenia
Sweden
Canada
Bulgaria
Estonia
Australia
United_States
Norway
Ukraine
Netherlands
Czech_Republic
Luxembourg
New_Zealand
Latvia
Switzerland
Ireland
Denmark
Russian_Federation
Germany
Belarus
Austria
United_Kingdom
Romania
Poland
Lithuania
Israel
Portugal
Serbia
Belgium
Moldova
Greece
Slovakia
Hungary
Croatia
Singapore
France
Spain
Hong_Kong
Italy
South_Africa
Bosnia_Herzegowina
Kazakhstan
Argentina
Chile
Thailand
Venezuela
Brazil
Taiwan
Mexico
Viet_Nam
Malaysia
Colombia
China
Philippines
Korea
Japan
India
Indonesia
Turkey
nodes per 100,000 internet users
5.06
4.74
3.75
3.43
3.22
2.90
2.85
2.84
2.81
2.74
2.59
2.54
2.45
2.40
2.30
2.28
2.05
2.01
1.89
1.83
1.79
1.78
1.77
1.75
1.60
1.53
1.39
1.38
1.36
1.26
1.17
1.00
0.93
0.83
0.75
0.73
0.64
0.58
0.58
0.57
0.53
0.49
0.47
0.44
0.37
0.30
0.26
0.20
0.17
0.17
0.16
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.07
0.07
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
1312  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Time for some good news, BTC Userbase (Full Nodes) grows again. on: October 12, 2012, 03:58:46 AM
Wow this is pretty excellent news. The reason this had been falling forever was the macro trend of users switching primarily to e-wallets, and I doubt that trend will stop. So for the standard client number to be rising -despite- this macro trend is extremely positive.

Traffic analysis described by Dan Kaminsky requires the attacker to have significant numbers of zombie nodes. We do need more users running the full client.
1313  Economy / Securities / Re: [Investment Fund] Bitcoin Greater China Fund on: October 11, 2012, 04:50:09 PM
Can you provide a contact number?
1314  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Nefario on: October 11, 2012, 02:42:56 PM
Nefario destroyed the value of those assets. That's just a fact. There is no practically no value left to save.
Except for those assets which have an intrinsic value. Which, until they pay off, is in the eye/judgement of the (be)holder. (And dependent on the integrity of the issuer.)

Not everyone buys to flip. Some of us have bought stuff to own.
Yep. Assuming the issuers of my shares keep doing things as planned, I am better off like this.
1315  Economy / Securities / Re: {Bakewell} Get an equitable stake in a transparent & growing mining company on: October 11, 2012, 03:50:25 AM
Seems like we are moving forward. You may now log on to GLBSE, and leave a BTC address if you want your funds returned. You can also provide a contact email and tick a check box if you want this info forwarded to the issuers of the assets you hold.
1316  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: No bitcoin in Iran on: October 10, 2012, 08:32:10 PM
gah, guys!

this is not only about if and how could i get hands on bitcoin now but also generally about how will it ever be successful in iran and cuba where there would definitely be a need for bitcoin.

and no, the bitcoin download is not blocked by the iranians but by sourceforge and google code. they point me to these documents:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sitelegal/wiki/Terms_of_Use#ProhibitedPersons
... oh, actually the desktop client is on github which is accessible but due to limited bandwidth there is little point in getting it up and running for me now anyway ...

and no, it has nothing to do with sha256 as all of sourceforge and google code is blocked here. sorry but that is a reason for me to use other hosters. too general embargoes are always evil.

The best and smartest thing for everyone to do is to make noise about thei monstruous crime of "trade sanctions" and influencing the US and EU policy. Millions of innocent people are hurt, some literally killed, by sanctions. No medications, no parts for trucks, elevators, airplanes, no medical equipment, no scientific journals. On top of that, societies are pushed into criminal spiral because all the goods have to smugled in. Speaking about tens of thousands of children who died in Iraq as a direct consequence of US trade sanctions, Madeleine Albright stated, as a US official: "we think the price was worth it".
So, the best we can do is to stop this nonsense. In the meantime, software and blockchain can be brought in on your laptops, and copies can be distributed p2p on DVDs at news stands, video-clubs,  and such.   
1317  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: No bitcoin in Iran on: October 10, 2012, 08:21:51 PM
source forge blocks countries such as iran out of their own sense of right and wrong. not due to the US laws.

Where did you get this "information"?
1318  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 10, 2012, 06:34:26 PM
I'd be concerned about giving out info to GLBSE. Nefario is going to do anything he has to to get himself out of this mess.

I don't think buying a share in a mining OP like ASICminer should be a legal issue, but you never know.
Technically, asking for IDs at this moment is totally unnecessary, because the database has not been compromised. You could work with user ID and passwords to resolve any claims. The reason must be rooted in some legal context. At this point I have zero trust in Nefario.

Collecting personal information of this kind without privacy policy in place, government oversight, and insurance is outright illegal. There is no way this was attempted under real legal advice. Something else is going on. I can't help but notice that Pirate was also asking for investors' info from PPT operators towards the end of his scheme.
1319  Economy / Securities / Re: Verifing account of GLBSE discussion on: October 10, 2012, 06:25:59 PM
I suspect  Nefario and all of us are being screwed by his incompetent lawyer, or even worse by SEC, Pirate, or PPT gang who all have important interest, one way or another, in GLBSE database. SEC/FSA want to see it (assuming they really are involved), Pirate and the PPT gang want nobody to be able to see it, ever.
There is no way whatsoever a lawyer would ask him to collect personal information like this, in violation of so many laws and regulations.
 
1320  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: October 10, 2012, 02:03:49 PM
A relevant story by Inaba at BFL forums:
 
Quote
So for an update on shipping times... As you might imagine, we get this question a lot. It seems like it would be a simple question to answer, but it's not. Let me describe the process so people can better understand why.


If you look at the current FPGA board in a Single or MiniRig, you'll see lots of capacitors, resistors, etc... about 350 little tiny parts attached to the board. Contrary to some of the conspiracy theories out there, all our boards are completely custom made, they aren't purchased from another manufacturer, etc... they are designed by us and made for us and us alone. As such, we are required to volume source every single part that goes on the board.


The ASICs are similar in so far as they also have nearly 350 components on each board. With the FPGAs, we sourced parts in the hundreds or low thousands at a time. For some of the ASIC parts, we are sourcing hundreds of thousands at a time which requires direct ordering & lead time dependancy from the respective manufacturers. However, for this first batch, we're mostly able to depend on available distribution stock from places like Mouser and DigiKey. Shortly after we get the first batch of everything in, we'll have our larger mega stockpiles arrive from other vendors and/or direct from the distributors, it's just the first batch that's going to be rough.


So, we've got he myriad distributors shipping thousands of little pieces to us, the PCB manufacturer sending us the bare PCBs, the HSF manufacturer sending the HSFs to us, the PSU manufacturer sending the PSU's to us, the case manufacturer sending the cases to us and most importantly, the fab sending the ASIC chips to us. All of these must arrive on time and as expected for everything to go off without a hitch. So far, so good.


When we made our announcement for shipping dates, we padded in some extra weeks in case of delays, and as we try to herd all these cats into one corral, our padding is slowly eaten up with mostly minor problems, but they all add up. With the bump in specs, we spent some time ensuring the power subsystem is over powered to accommodate the new and future power requirements - our chips are capable of higher speeds than what we initially intended to send out in the first batch, and they still have quite a bit of headroom; We decided to go ahead design the power subsystem to handle the maximum theoretical load of the chips. This means we can now crank the board up with some minor tweaking. Each chip is theoretically capable of operating at 1 GHz, we are running them at 500 MHz with the new specs... we will likely never see 1 GHz operations, simply because of heat density issues and a few other factors, but we have at least another 25% of headroom we can play with, if not more. Again, we built in a lot of padding into the specs, just in case something went wrong. We have basically padded everything we could in terms of estimates and that padding is what has allowed us to bump specs on short notice and keep our shipping times in line even in the face of delays.


Ok, so we have the cats herded, the specs staked out, now we have to actually build these things. As many of you know, we've purchased SMT machines to allow us to manufacture our own boards - and I have mentioned this before, but many have not heard it - we will not be using the SMT equipment to process our first batch of boards; we will be using the same house that did the pick and place for our previous generation products, which means we're still at the mercy of someone else for our first batch shipments. There has been some delays at that stage, but we have the padding, so it's not been a critical issue. There has also been some delays at the foundry, but again, we have padding, so it's not been a critical issue. We are also paying for an expedited run at the foundry (which does not come cheap) to keep our timeline up. All these things have to work out perfectly and our timeline is still looking good. However, if something does not work out perfectly, our timeline is going to slip, plain and simple. We've used up most of our padding at this point and we are still ironing out a few little wrinkles here and there. This has been a long explanation for a simple answer: I would like to tell you we are still on time or pretty close to it, because we are. However, I would also like to tell you that we are going to slip a couple weeks or so if anything goes wrong, and given the complexity of the issues facing us, I would say it's almost inevitable something will crop up between now and the beginning of November that we are not expecting; What that is, I don't know yet, but I would rather error on the side of caution, say the timeline is going to slip a little bit and then surprise everyone with an early delivery than promise an early delivery and not meet that promise. So that's what I'm doing and there's your answer. When I have more information, I'll let people know as soon as I can.
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!