I need a bit more  explanation in order to attempt to get closer to understanding what is significant about this way of attempting to arrange the data.  In other words, I cannot really appreciate what the chart is saying.. it just looks like a clumping blob of colors.

When they came back, there were no fees.... everything came back. The main reason that I remember was because I kept thinking that this is not supposed to happen.. .so I still have not figured out why it happen because I did not do anything like attempting to employ Replace By Fee (RBF) or anything like that.

FTFY - Understatement of the year.    even though currently feels a bit "annoying" your team will thank me later, perhaps?

I had a couple transactions come back to me in 2017.... so I am not sure what can cause that because I did not do anything besides attempting to send and getting a pending transaction that ended up coming back to my wallet.

Infofront sleeping at the wheel.

Maybe fatty has worn him out? 

Bad fatty!!!!  Bad fatty!!!!  (hehehehehehe not the same as saying "fuck you fatty", without any other content.....  ././.....   #nohomo )

You still did not say who is Meister?  And who fucking gives any shits if a company fucks up their security practices?  Does  that reflect on the bitcoin protocol or something?  You can keep whistling but it just amounts to a kind of retarded disconnect as far as I can see from the information (and the lack of logical connections) that you have so far provided in whatever lame point that you are trying to make.   You hope that some bitcoiners lose some money because of those security flaws, is that your point?

I am sure that you heard of various network effects by now, you purposeful diptwit.

your stupid ass bcash variants have hardly any network effects, either calculated separately or combined, and even if there were some kind of pumpening of either or those pieces of trash (even if they were to rejoin forces.. hahahaha), that pumpening in itself would not be enough to presume network effects.  Network effects take time, and sometimes are a bit difficult to measure, but they are more than a mere market cap measurement, especially if such market cap might not be sustained, which was the other aspect of my post that you purposefully deleted out, because apparently, you prefer to selectively respond in a way that allows you to spin phoney baloney ideas and muddy any kinds of waters that you might be able to muddy. 

You guys (I mean nutjob scammersw) preparing ur lil selfies for a pumpening and perhaps another spamming attack that you likely will not be able to sustain?  You have enough resources to accomplish all of that?  Nonsense spreading helps, right, if it is convincing?   Work harder jbreher?  AmiNOTrite?

I should not encourage you because you tend to be intended to fail/refuse to read the proper sarcasm contained in my earlier assertion....  I am doubting whether there is any hope for you, at all.   

I know that Lopp is CTO, but what does Meister have to do with anything related to Casa Hodl security issues?  Are you talking about Adam Meister or some other Meister?

Ok... Fair enough.

6 weeks is a long time ago in terms of remembering some things, including a variety of posts, too - even if I had merited that particular post.  Maybe Alzheimer's is kicking in?  Sucks to be me.   

That sounds correct.


Surely, that makes sense.


Great.  You don't consider me as a potential trade secret robber.   


There is a certain level of satisfaction that comes from stacking sats, even if the process is a bit drawn out, and furthermore, you seem to have developed your own renditions and/or signature techniques.  Of course, there may be some guys (and maybe even a gal or two) who does something similar to you, but surely, your personal investment into your technique has caused you to have a kind of expertise in your own customization, whether truly SOMA or just outwardly proclaimed for modesty sakes as such... hahahahaha.


Lambos, hookers and blow are on their way, including the fact that many of us, including yours truly, have stacked our strategies to be more weighted towards long, so even though the lambos, hookers and blow are not 100% guaranteed, there is decent likelihood that they are on their way and also, even if scenarios play out that are less than lambos, hookers and blow, then many of us, especially those of us who are stacking towards long and likely including those of us who attempt to prepare for price directions that go both ways, are still quite likely to become a decent amount better off in both our psychology and our finances from our having been involved in bitcoin.   Of course, a going to zero situation would also be amongst the worst possibilities for those of us who are mostly going long, even though you might be able to profit somewhat from that kind of scenario.  I also have a preference that BTC prices never return below $5k, especially in years to come, even though I would still likely be profitable with prices in the $1k price arena.. still, it feels a lot better to have decent amounts of equity built up.

I cannot really disagree with much, if any, part of your clarification. 




 

Hm?  I don't recall seeing those predictions in this thread, so I suppose it is not memorial for me.  Perhaps, I am not reading this thread (and retaining) as thoroughly as I should be... for some strange reason.

Great financial advice... to be frugal and then retire early.  It's called deferred gratification, and if you end up retiring before you are 50 or something like that, then there could be plenty of time to enjoy the fruits of such early in life frugalities.

Um, um, um......

The fool is the more foolish?....



Hahahaha...




I am not falling for your reverse psychological attempt at a trap, and I will quote whomever I like.  



I don't recall every white knighting anyone.  You mean that if I say something nice about roach then that is white-knighting?  my comment about roach was a kind of sarcasm, so that would not be white knighting, right?  You might have a misunderstanding of white-knighting mic, unless I am just confused about the reference.



The quoting of roach is all relative.. and discretionary, too.  I stick to my earlier position to exercise discretion as I see fit, and to not fall into any attempts at reverse psychology traps.     

You (hv_) are surely making up arbitrary rules in order to attempt to create a definition of bitcoin that could possibly cause some bullshit cultist shitcoin bitcoin attack vector to claim to be bitcoin... What a bunch of nonsense.  If you understand the concept of various network effects, then you might begin to understand that bitcoin has seven market affects going in its favor, and bcash variants hardly mark a dent in any of the network effects,  unless there were a network effect for a prolific ability to spread phoney baloney, then perhaps one of your bcashes would prevail in that (even while there is no such legitimate network effect that gives credibility to a project merely for an ability to spread phoney baloney... ... helrow?).


As if you are making any kind of meaningful assessment of importance and the power of BIG daddy bitcoin.   



You can hope all that you like, and that is not going to get you anywhere without meaningful network effects.


Well yeah.. bitcoin is an improvement upon all the PMs including gold and silver which are the most touted of the PMs for having some kind of store of value and/or currency effect, and of course, bitcoin beats both of them on those grounds.

They are both variants of bcash, and who cares about details? including if their is any meaning to whether one or another of them might be the real bcash.. who cares?

Don't feel like that.  Gosh.  I am blushing.

In other words, try to exercise some emotional control within these here interwebs (aka tubes).


Sounds good, to the extent that it makes any sense.  The part about attempting to structure your outstanding orders in such a way that causes you to feel largely emotionally neutral about bitcoin's short-term price direction resonates with me the most.    


Sometimes tweaks can feel boring, but from time to time, tweaking tends to be a prudent and preferable practice.

You cannot really believe that "the real bitcoin" is based on market cap, can you? 

How long would such pumpening of the shitcoin price would be needed in terms of sustainability in your perverted conceptualization of what is "the real bitcoin", jbreher?

That's the spirit, d_eddie!!!!   I was not trying to bust your balls over anything, especially in terms of some of the Opsec issues or even the potential "trade secret" problems that could come from too many "trading disclosures;"  however, it seems to be a nice thing to hear some of the particulars regarding how a comparative (and even seeming to be largely sensible) trading strategy is playing out.  

In the real world, we all likely make mistakes here and there, even including our attempts to real world implement our own trading strategies, and yeah, perhaps once in a while we will also become quite lucky or unlucky too, and attempting to learn from that (if possible) is something that I enjoy to share within this thread - to the extent that there is a willing participant, such as yourself... and I surely don't want to encourage anyone to either give up opsec or even to disclose any kinds of trading strategy secrets that might cause too much of a following to such strategy and then screw up the results - yet frequently talking about trading strategies after they have been deployed should be less of a risk of the copy cat problem.. and sure if you want to refer to some kind of practice that you do in kind of an obscure way, that might be understandable too if you are trying to retain it as a kind of possible personal "trade secret" advantage that you believe that you might have.

By the way, you are quite unlikely to get me attempting to even employ your various strategies, even if they might be helpful for me (and others) to attempt to understand.  I appreciate your various attempts and even creativity in explaining them, from time to time, even though I frequently sigh some relief (when I read them) that I am NOT attempting to employ them (even if there may be considerable market move times that you could well likely be stacking decently more sats than me).