2. Every post/topic is credited with original source link, and I added quote later to make you feel better on second post. I've seen a similar case from Ratimov recently. I don't think it's plagiarism, and I don't think you'll get banned for it. But: you can easily improve on this and prevent all confusion (and accusations) by doing this: You could have literally included the instructions from GitHub in a quote and have it referenced to the source. Did you know you can quote like this? Bitcoin private keys are stored on paper in multiple geographic locations See the code: [quote author="[url=https://github.com/JWWeatherman/yeticold][u]JWWeatherman / yeticold[/u] [i]on GitHub.com[/i][/url]"] Bitcoin private keys are stored on paper in multiple geographic locations[/quote] I don't like adding a link (or worse: a list of links) at the bottom of a post as a disclaimer. That makes it more difficult to verify the original source, while it doesn't really give the credits the source deserves.
|
|
|
I have the random words Restart Tails, start Electrum, Create new wallet, select "Standard wallet", select "I already have a seed", enter your seed. DO NOT post your seed words anywhere on the internet!
|
|
|
8. Bitcoin Geek .............................. o_e_l_e_o, HCP I'm surprised you're the only one who mentions HCP. And that's the problem with Voting like this: it's more of a Recognition award than an award for actual accomplishments. Excluding my own post, I've been mentioned 72 times in this topic. I'm flattered, but whoever choose me as "Geek" is wrong: HCP knows much more about Bitcoin than me. So here's my vote: 01. Best Moderator ................. Global Moderators in general are pretty good. 2. SpamBuster ..................... MindlessElectron 3. ScamBuster ..................... JollyGood is amazingly determined. 4. Golden Feather ................. theymos 5. Event of the Year .............. Covid-19. Unless we reach a new ATH, in that case I pick the ATH as event of the year. ATH beats Covid-19! 6. Fail of the Year ............... fahrizanmh, see https://archive.is/Ce61x#selection-8797.0-8823.2 7. Discovery of the Year .......... 8. Bitcoin Geek ................... HCP 9. Bitcointalk Ninja .............. TryNinja (Doh!) 10. Craft Master ................... 11. Antihero ....................... 12. Absolute Hero of Good .......... Satoshi Nakamoto 13. Miss Bitcointalk ............... There are no girls on the internet
|
|
|
maybe it's worth adding a link to the seclog for the last 5 years to the LoyceV's seclog log thread? That is literally what that thread is all about ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) user " Jetfox", who has 1100 posts in his statistics, but he has only 14 pages of history (277 posts). How is this possible? You have local boards on ignore.
As I said before. I'm not interested in this topic. Who can add me wherever they want TrustList or Distrust. This doesn't really concern me. 5 days later: 11/22/2020 1:29:40 AM DT1 peers ekiller DT1 distrusts LoyceV DT1 11/22/2020 1:29:40 AM DT1 peers ekiller DT1 distrusts Vod DT1 Just like I said: I noticed both ekiller and wolwoo have excluded everyone (Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they distrust each other) who excluded them: Ekiller now reached DT1 Strength (-1).
|
|
|
Then I tried it at Kleopatra. I tried to import the public key via the Tools menu -> Clipboard -> Certificate Import (I see this method is not in the OP). I don't have that option (in Kleopatra, running Linux) under the Tools menu, but it works from the system tray. I have the Certificate imported under "Other Certificates". Then verify the message I did this also from the system tray, but get this: ![Image loading...](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Floyce.club%2Fother%2FKleopatra.png&t=663&c=8N47Ri4vMpGxNA) I have no idea how to proceed ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) I have another message I want to verify ( for a potential scam accusation thread), and that one I can't share.
|
|
|
If all goes well, it'll keep 6 snapshots. When I have a few, I'll see how I can keep some older ones too instead of only the most recent days. Update: I changed my script to keep 9 snapshots. I'll keep 4 from the last 3-4 days, and 5 snapshots from the last 4-5 months. The older snapshots will be created in the coming months, I don't have them yet. I couldn't test this yet, I'll see next month if it works as expected.
|
|
|
A stable coin is stable because it's backed by fiat currency. Unlike shittokens, you can't just create it out of thin air and give it a stable value. Tether currently has a market cap above 18 billion dollars. That should mean the creator holds more than 18 billion dollars in a bank somewhere. According to Wikipedia, a year and a half ago each coin was backed by $0.74. If that ratio is still the same, there's almost 5 billion dollars of "air" in it now. I can't believe people still use it! So who knows, if you can hype your euroshitcoin, you might actually get away with it too!
|
|
|
One of my strategies for combating multiple accounts will be verifying active bitcoin addresses - not throw away addresses. Ideally, all Bitcoin addresses would be throw away addresses. Have at least one transaction within the last 90 days, and one transaction older than 90 days. Address reuse reduces privacy. Add the fact that I have several addresses that would qualify, and it won't accomplish what you're looking for.
|
|
|
Also LN related to above I can't envisage rocking up to a coffee shop and creating a channel to said shop to then buy a cup of Joe (giving the shop a small amount of inbound and outbound capacity) - unless of course you were planing on being a regular customer as confirmation time to open a channel will be an initial issue. Makes me wonder how many customers would be willing to pay 10 or 100 cups of coffee up front to fund their channel. I don't expect direct channels (where you don't pay any routing fees) to become a big thing.
|
|
|
The account has been in read mode for three years... What do you think about it? That's not necessarily a bad thing, I have accounts like that on a few (specialized) forums. I only go there if I need to know something. His last posts were all about Flat Earth ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
The user doesn't need LN. I think we can agree to disagree here. I like to be able to buy a coffee with Bitcoin, and it's possible here. Also with LN for much less fees on said coffee.
|
|
|
Total PGP n00b here ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) I'm trying to verify a PGP signed message. This is the message: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
{ "comment": "Never share your Letter of Guarantee with third parties. Attach this document to our Support Team only when you are facing problems with your mixing order. The Letter of Guarantee is only available during the active mixing operation. After the completion all data about your order will be deleted automatically from our database.", "createdAt": "2020-11-19T09:57:06.272Z", "orderId": "8met22-y42jhq-113f2m", "currency": "BTC", "serviceFee": "3.68%", "feePerAddress": "0.00025 BTC", "depositAddress": "3MCTfAkzR41eGJhPwvBHQ2EuL66JsGx4VH", "destinations": [ { "address": "1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD", "share": "100.0%", "delay": "129 minutes" } ] } -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
wsFcBAEBCgAGBQJftkF5AAoJEMAcNId3N5pdvUcQAJKd9AuhleFpHAVgfWZ/ xVXigNTyVAUrkcz+mhYjYzgK7wvsWpPdQ5nl91EcZrqyQykbSvRB3YR68/32 jZGVkbXbEkuph6aXABb1rcAo7dmI7MaroMaWg1HLN+Lz1zEjljYJNgeKrHNN +VlMdO2ucLRyBnDJOeBccaIVTyT6qflyjOXNLaIjebdlYmp2EPFc/abx5N2A hCdT0Yk7qsTH7RPwwRordt05LhF018g0Azjb7/GR8mdCCgKPpgOsxYoIMcEE KtG/71xrItsbBRNPxQKaS2VrjGYyaHGvQ6P1XJ99TR/t4RZotaMyLcoIjBEN Z5Sdb0sFjZOCuyFScDR/3FkiKqVIUzWeyAyGaWfKxHsJdT5grTZtmrBCb25n sGj+P9vk6OktLkA06rWszGcl4z0TfWlHbE0Xo7dK2RN4oJS6LF2GjwDO/BVD fpsKpZ4Z2r+1VVF/G+zI2+9hTocRFMCCmWdvEfMSLIfu6G5Ln4CeBFbXO7cD LHzKKNlNtLTZbpHhprrljb09gOqebAQ2hCGBt4jP+ZgmQvWGHfgVL7x4kZjw 9Xk1x9h+TKfNEBN5j38tDpna5k9PgF3EV4fyv0dBIu5Sruf8ekvqw6c4dI9W no6JyJLpuQQFL4NB+kWXcUg7tfzEqK0/zhgCp+MjKdst0VxRrsg/tGh3RGS5 KSBB =h7XR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- And this is the PGP public key: -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
mQINBF5yaMIBEACvcgvBCIvlrgE66MjdW6e5wbyrBaWgiV/0nr5TlP/rG+P+DUid VCjfEmheMedSmU0huEHkwwr4qUJ4rDk4KrKqa71F+ygxJ/MfkSXDOn1UFpW8QpMu svtV5ScWdeki/MU2rvLyywzUK/yhv7SRv0ISjc39PWByBauRntSOJzFw9WEkRqgN sjv9RCginbqOXqlyc/jZy75k+P/cF1f6/QLyfOGTus/HqZBze0QRiA/7kMfKgj05 FgPn6FXAgLHmwPnYulHpcvsTSm8e4Ex54fCMr3Z9CFXkR996+CTyoxrOwWePu6sb WBDf/6ZRfWF0UTgUu48prD/ptKOeOlk0xS0MuCWlXynMryDp5pWY7TS57h0Vh4lj aVs0eAxzblLnUQ+kNc6j1Xq+ihd5+ebM4VwNr01Y3XEMomiJ+oe36v19q69r+hoN QrKBeHActR1TNUCOb2KZjHz9iWBckkF4Umr3iFyQdrYqfUP3xq2SUZ4f7GARAy1Y yDMOI2KOKH4QqI+JGCClZbBFlJhU/DVaxRbcugiTbGGilMXeeBDkOYeab6KVFCKt d7tDvv5W5wQzA9yiu1H9Ow6KO7aNfLIfUF3H+u8zYjPpKauI+sBaA5Z8sKDO8e3L Yp4eliU1ZfCau+rKgi4uCCyuTcSuhuSq9I3uMA/wUzmsM9AKkM7jkDI2SQARAQAB tCxNeUNyeXB0b01peGVyIDxteWNyeXB0b21peGVyQHByb3Rvbm1haWwuY29tPokC TgQTAQgAOBYhBJsDZ39O20DDMZdtOMAcNId3N5pdBQJecmjCAhsDBQsJCAcCBhUK CQgLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEMAcNId3N5pdpsgP/2m9QOdXyfZHWmUlwxazjzBs 0vKQEUyoNwRo8avH1nZnUOaxzb6dHDWQ5WIQ8rin8Tvf0FNWuF9h3TxbLVtPINEY 7ckkBRubz1/VIv8eOS97+gwgVVAcLdHjpQOhiYRG9yvgIc4a5/tlVny1FppIQ9u/ iz9IqY2ABcqXktkRDaQgURTu8FRm4CWpujEZsKxWlAh1lnzKMSzPt3bA6qxmv4lB 9p08Ff88zQNKNY32f8eRBbAdyd9DUvhhC+FdV8pTWwrRwGf6/sqiMAP7tnR5y9sV Kaw77g8zDhAnrA78sWxaYejT4TD8l6sAWdCC8DTEBuufZQiyGcuEQyK1sMgLmrQt Bs5c/T7+7Z/G5h6M/0q9e032w4Kf+lCZFymP5ZBoOt+2nTiKk4iwM9pxHQ70ZeGu Di91JMgdO2Wv/HBHjPsROWc5w69uOQGmrVdCw3gRCbwishoQY81ZH4H9a5jgsV2M 1vM3oj6OqECBXqKj9FrEBEEkyOgP2wghmfxEDjJZzG59Qcf7AkMve4CMNfcUd86O ayj/3lWz/iN9ww8bGb+FW1eUwGvf8L5jhntvayawamGbUiIlPpEkqvw2o9afFjBz Tmwng8bQCuJOch5zOXEYP5Ypdh1QXKfbwmoK0DSpkdy+7O0X6NbNqPP3J1cilczk ARoMKMoePKmrrhUPR7yduQINBF5yaMIBEADEVnC9uconzx01mcLPPxvkghk0BQ1Q IwFi06b0hee3I1+aHASmYMH7kJ5OMZAWGPHS++trOYSjNAQCbLDDVOtkayHetqU5 6QhuAEUowrp0qKiFtDGy6Le9j04JZ3lndL4vn4f9XxYotbf+vsaTCGp85T6KKLMJ KYMpS9lpjgfevWO22BYYEEI1kwIJZ41JNQGhP27hKgyVOJu3rxo772OFJSnYQ2+m 05fFHmMBasrRcT9t4xguHUcEQLx/lqWUN4hTE3BDbDE66THrbxNcCCSL4Dl36OZi t4Q/ifsvUbPNfzX9kcpeRaW6Gj08nL9+V+wVq6CDCMZQaJHBcLq85/Cp7BCFfud1 LA2fd8Cg7klSnnZ5GEdIk9L+JSvUcyhAiT+/Md7/Tg0EGa1RC5Ns1UC5SiC21srM GNz4Iwmdjc0DseD4jKA9pRGO4+VlXuyUU8Zh+gfdZJeUY4Xd0OH4JwSqMQcnr5z/ uSH5hOEfE79piqU5NL+gxydyj27K4HzgFUx/mpfUkeluQRX0qXqnuSKfNcn6Xd5T /8hIrG1LlcPMMfjVRsvUzD9ocj9O/I3NkIDzkaOtBxgLvka1orAZWj8H4L1P2YGl +81YmLkFsxefqD0GKHdbazJE3uGpS/U5Tp5eDghycffSY7QDj1RIr+Rt2ETAXNEj drsglt9DNJdPIwARAQABiQI2BBgBCAAgFiEEmwNnf07bQMMxl204wBw0h3c3ml0F Al5yaMICGwwACgkQwBw0h3c3ml1XJBAAp3BKpuh1NIHDOlFFkNGTJjrgz7e/v7zr qckU08OKnx6X9ARjVFP5Edr+OJQpBs5Kanr1oaYcpN72RV1X4LH1G6WNY36QfQ1a 9X0K6Lyx8CzdkWplZEYMA3COnW6hXFIeyFwBQxBey+ZWNtgUP4iTsVq94K0K2pQF P+wL01ycD/BC3aG+I2T3mlqZCR0OgBuhQlZsUNMRI/neODta8cy/fmFuRvF8Xxnr CnMhush03mUBCNDic0srV8d5zERNyxwRXPwRo+Y4LBY+RqImXnTMHXCDN92eSTjB dxppzgI+1KHfe7Lp1FIlh6YGh1mobJ7fsqS1q23ac96zzEoA7S8hcmhWNkUP67w7 OolXBoxnUz5pzz4iTVXnPwQJdrjmsG6CGRceCZG1zx6vxOdX82HLmkHh/1ePu4yk pK/LuIIodhB3YwjmtJNUjBNgbFjiX2VKGqdBw5f/qGe9GkcBVhQ8NH2C2p7bz5ad pHd+uVZvZnxqKe99YUIjBox/xg/dEDmjDBmeezYeH0TDuSTaZnVQ5Ut4dfjvVKkw uG4DoJ7raJ8vfH9vja+b5awR7xiUGX8kuluxR+yakannhqkRTlA5bsniBPgZJwUJ 2FEbtVKX130lYybsw3CPL4dAoo/5fCNIc/ukxQbrq+CPftuK4axXePhdCDV/Rc8A Lt9gVJ7O5Sk= =d7db -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- After trying to verify, Kleopatra tells me this: Not enough information to check signature validity.Signed on Thursday, 19 November 2020 10:57:13 CET by mycryptomixer@protonmail.com (Key ID: 0x77379A5D). The validity of the signature cannot be verified. Am I doing something wrong?
|
|
|
You have an interesting way to lead a discussion. I'm basically just speculating here. But I do know many people believe in LN. Why else would there already be so many different wallets out there, some with very active development? Either fools or fans will risk their money for a profit of less than 1% per year. If fools and fans make LN grow, I'm okay with that ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If people use custodial services, they don't need LN. That's not true. Any exchange, casino or random website can create their own custodial "tipping service". The great thing from making a LN custodial service is that it also works externally. BlueWallet for instance is custodial, if I make a payment to another BlueWallet user, nothing happens on the Lightning Network. But I can use the same wallet to make an external payment too. Without that, there wouldn't be any use for this wallet.
|
|
|
They used Ethereum or ETH word to scam, not Bitcoin. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) The Ethereum blockchain has been used to create, hype and sell worthless tokens for years, and they've used the same tokens to "pay" shills for years too. So this is no surprise ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
Update: I've restored the update frequency as advertised. Recently it had gotten very slow, but I think I've solved the problem. Due to a moved file, bans weren't highlighted anymore. I only found out now, and it's fixed.
|
|
|
Bump: the number of posts per day is going up, and a large part of it is spam or a scam.
|
|
|
So we aren't allowed to create an account in the site? Just deposit and place a bet? Yes. Isn't it great? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) What if i want to sign in through my mobile phone? How to get my old things back? Why would you even want that? Deposit or withdraw in seconds, just deposit to your phone. I've used different browsers on different devices, they don't need to be tied together. Moreover the deposit and withdrawal section is too a bit confusing If you can't figure this out, LN isn't for you ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
If you have 1 BTC, wouldn't it be better to open 10 X 0.1 channels, or even 100 X 0.01 channels which would make you a mini-hub that others could then start connecting to? It depends ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Opening 100 channels eats up on-chain fees. One large channel with a well-connected node saves those fees. This is more like a real scenario. A $ 1000 channel means that you have to pay the hub $30 per year. Maybe it's more realistic the hub won't earn $30 per year from a $1000 investment. It's not as if there's a shortage of people hodling Bitcoin, but the problem (and that may be a much bigger problem) is that LN-nodes can't use cold storage. If you have 1000 Bitcoin and you could safely increase your stash by running a LN-hub, you wouldn't mind if the revenue is small. It's still better than nothing. But switching from cold storage to a hot node isn't going to happen for a small profit. 8 cents per transaction-this is already comparable to transactions in another blockchain. For example, take dash. There are instant payments that can be made for ~10 cents per transaction. And at the same time, you don't need any centralized hub, you don't need channels, you don't need a third party to replenish the channel. The question is, what will users prefer? People prefer Bitcoin. Almost all altcoins are solely created for the purpose of earning the creator more Bitcoin, just like tokens/ICOs later on and no doubt the whole Defi-hype that's currently being blown up. For example, how will 90% of customers use LN? How will 90% of sellers use LN? My guess: Customers will use custodial wallets, just like many people hold their crypto on exchanges. Sellers will use payment processors.
~snip~ Please fix your quote, that's not my text.
|
|
|
Eighty-seventh week paid. Thanks again! I'm glad to see you've calibrated your flux capacitors back to your usual perfect timing ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|