I doubt there is one besides spam
I wanted to pay people who tweet for me on service section.Guess i should just use Blockchain wallet. Blockchain.info won't help you get a non-standard transaction accepted by the network... This. Either increase the payment or wait until you can payout at least 0.001 btc. Yes, this is significantly higher than the dust limit, but a payout just above the dust limit is like no payment at all. Keep in mind that they have to spend fees in order to use the coins you send them. If you send someone 2730 satoshi they will likely have to spend more in fees to use the input. |
|
|
|
-snip- I am kick-starting this thread again even though it hasn't been posted in awhile, because Elliptic (who I mentioned here a very long time ago - see my quoted post above) and LexisNexis (see Aug. 3 2016 story at https://news.bitcoin.com/elliptic-bitcoin-aml-platform/ ) are developing a way to curb what they consider "illegal cryptocurrency transactions." In other words, AML, and attempts at financial censorship, folks. I propose for those of us still reading this that we look into these companies closely and revise the IP tables (see above post) as an interim measure. Make sure these AML idiots are blocked to the max extent possible as they probe the network. Any news on this? They will only need a single connection to get a copy, but they would have no information about the origin IP of the transaction. |
|
|
|
From what I read from Lauda, the General threads are to replace this one. |
|
|
|
Hey guys, im new to bitcoins, i have an ecommerce website and there i had to write my master public key for electrum. I received a payment and cant see it on my wallet, i tried to restore a wallet just using the public key and saw the bitcoins there. I dont have the seed because its not created by me, i have a mac, the master public key to my and this wallet are the same but the addressed to receive are different
So, who got you the master public key? They should have the master private key (or seed) which is needed to spend the funds. thanks so much for replying, i have the master public key, i have the seed, but i dont see the funds available in this wallet, i can only see them in some other wallet i find when i try to restore. again ty so much for replying fast If you restore a new wallet from your seed does it have the same addresses as the one you restore from the master public key? |
|
|
|
-snip-
Well you'd get that message if you try sending 12 satoshi to multiple addresses. Any output with less 2730 satoshi is considered dust by default (it can change depending on a node's preference). You'll have to increase your transaction fee to make it go through.
No, fees dont help if your outputs are dust. A transaction with an output lower than 2739 satroshi is considered non-standard and will not be relayed by most nodes. This is most likely also true for the electrum servers (they are nodes as well). @kpcian if you have to send dust for some reason (I doubt there is one besides spam), give the TX directly to a miner. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Yes, that way you dont have to resync if the database gets corrupted again. You can just restore from the (uncorrupted) copy and sync the rest of the way (e.g. the month).
Takes some time to copy the folder, 97 GB  How long did it take you to resync under these conditions? Its 9 days since your first post. Just an idea. Im not doing it myself, but I also never had these problems. |
|
|
|
Easy copy paste. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Today is 6/11/2016 - If I ever need it, i will have my staked message staked here. Thank you, yestarday was 5/11/2016.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1LeQzEzfr4Gi13khkopDjrDGFeEbketVyM
IBSQV3LvJZjPEwy9dZGOJvXmpg0eYROgu7g+tOGnnH8IbYIlzGP0ofbni1gVgAzCLesJyjW9lDhcMS7uqU/awOU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Plain text. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Today is 6/11/2016 - If I ever need it, i will have my staked message staked here. Thank you, yestarday was 5/11/2016. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1LeQzEzfr4Gi13khkopDjrDGFeEbketVyM IBSQV3LvJZjPEwy9dZGOJvXmpg0eYROgu7g+tOGnnH8IbYIlzGP0ofbni1gVgAzCLesJyjW9lDhcMS7uqU/awOU= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- If you aren't smart enough to find the address; 1LeQzEzfr4Gi13khkopDjrDGFeEbketVyM and btw, Bump verified (bitcoin core) |
|
|
|
At last.
After bitcoin-qt stoppet 2 last time, I did'nt start over again.
I restartet my computer I opened Bitcoin Core again (it was 4 weeks back) and it sync to finished.
When starting up with this attemps I closed my Norton Firewall and used instad Windows Defender.
Not sure this was the reason for success. I opened Norton and could find that Bitcoin-Qt.exe was
on exeption. In Windows Defender it was possible also to set the map with BitCoinCore data on exeption,
but I cannot find something similar in Norton Firewall.
Thank you all for trying help me.
Consider creating a backup copy of the folder once a month so you dont have to resync from scratch every time something like this happens (might very well been norton). Yes, my wallet.dat backup was 1 year old. But you mean I should creat a backup copy of the hole folder? Yes, that way you dont have to resync if the database gets corrupted again. You can just restore from the (uncorrupted) copy and sync the rest of the way (e.g. the month). |
|
|
|
Hey guys, im new to bitcoins, i have an ecommerce website and there i had to write my master public key for electrum. I received a payment and cant see it on my wallet, i tried to restore a wallet just using the public key and saw the bitcoins there. I dont have the seed because its not created by me, i have a mac, the master public key to my and this wallet are the same but the addressed to receive are different
So, who got you the master public key? They should have the master private key (or seed) which is needed to spend the funds. |
|
|
|
klondike has emailed me from a reliable email account, and looks like he has recovered it. Waiting on signed message, should be coming any time.
any news? |
|
|
|
At last.
After bitcoin-qt stoppet 2 last time, I did'nt start over again.
I restartet my computer I opened Bitcoin Core again (it was 4 weeks back) and it sync to finished.
When starting up with this attemps I closed my Norton Firewall and used instad Windows Defender.
Not sure this was the reason for success. I opened Norton and could find that Bitcoin-Qt.exe was
on exeption. In Windows Defender it was possible also to set the map with BitCoinCore data on exeption,
but I cannot find something similar in Norton Firewall.
Thank you all for trying help me.
Consider creating a backup copy of the folder once a month so you dont have to resync from scratch every time something like this happens (might very well been norton). |
|
|
|
I am, but the account was last active in August, so clearly the hacker stopped using the account, there's no need for -ve trust.
Yeah, there is absolutly no chance that the account gets sold and this gets more complicated. |
|
|
|
I guess the answer to "why?" is "why not?" I have been holding back on this for a while, but I think I will just post how cheap this is. I dont think people understand this from a desktop/laptop perspective. If you have a place to put these loud and heavy boxes and can afford the running cost you can easily get one with enough RAM to support a blockchain.
Heading over to ebay (germany first)... searching for the rack mounted servers category and picking 128 GB(!) RAM gets me:
...
That's what I'm saying, these old hardware, DDR2 or DDR3 with that much RAM, and that many cores ... they're cheap now. I see videos on youtube for stuff with 1 TB of RAM. I heard about a server with 4 TB of RAM that only does DNS or something like that, stored everything in memory. I'm almost never buying a desktop or laptop again... okay, maybe a laptop. I get an old server or workstation for cheap, and it has triple or quadruple the RAM everyone else has, with double or triple the cores everyone else has, put in a previous generation GPU, and I can play the latest games... (I think.) Or play two players with two keyboards and two monitors and two mice. Or I think Linus even did 7 to 8 gamers in one rig. (That's not fair, they used 36 core CPUs, and 8 GPUs on one motherboard.) I wouldnt really use old servers for gaming. They tend to be old generation CPUs (thus slower) with lower clock speed (slower again) and AFAIK only a few games benefit from a larger number of cores. I have seen that video and IIRC it was done a new set of CPUs. Its also difficult to get driver support for some of the boards, but that can probably be solved by VMs. They are still great for almost every other task (besides maybe spreadsheets  ). |
|
|
|
I just saw this on the lending thread. And i just want to ask those sites. thank for anyone who is going to answer it.
I want to be familiar with this. Think all you want.
other than coinig.com i would suggest you not to use any sites online that request your private key. Also most wallets do contain a "sign message" feature that you can utilize. Dont use coinig please, its broken.  Full message so you can test yourself: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
coinig.com
is
broken!
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
14iJ9cSUV1bK35o7md7VyPowUX6pGqPiCu
ILGol8lneR0gWan2hvz1HWd2WOXZOj9PubRob8FREGKvBY1/IP4TPHUPEKOaHTvcciIGnYbVMyEen9dXxQzB4Ok=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
|
-snip-
Don't know when the last person to donate 10 BTC took place. But it should be reconsider if only lowering by a little bit.
Why? Just to piss off all past donators who were promissed the amount would not be lowered? To get more people to donate.
For what? 1.5 Million USD (or more? Not sure about the exact number) has been used for new forum software, the income on ads is enough to cover the hosting and give a little to mods. Or perhaps create a new donator ranking that's lower. But I guess keeping it at 10 is better than the opposite conversation, which is Bitcoin crashing to the point where 10 BTC is too little.
|
|
|
|
Well, I know that SSD Hard Drives are very fast and nowdays faster than any other hard drive but why do you need to store blockchain in a RAM drive? I amn't newbie but I can't understand how you can to store something on installed memory (RAM)
I can't understand what you say about RAM but I would say that store blockchain in your SSD, it's good and search time will be fast also with good CPU/RAM.
You just said it. RAM drive. Look it up if you don't know what that is. If you're using Windows, you have some app or something, and it eats a chunk of your memory, and you see a new drive letter, say R: or X:, Y:, Z:. I don't need to answer the "why", ... if it's possible, someone will do it anyway. I guess the answer to "why?" is "why not?" I have been holding back on this for a while, but I think I will just post how cheap this is. I dont think people understand this from a desktop/laptop perspective. If you have a place to put these loud and heavy boxes and can afford the running cost you can easily get one with enough RAM to support a blockchain. Heading over to ebay (germany first)... searching for the rack mounted servers category and picking 128 GB(!) RAM gets me: HP Proliant DL585 G6[1] price: 429 EUR CPU: 4*6 = 24 Core 2,6GHz AMD Opteron RAM: 32*4 GB = 128GB DDR2 (no ECC?) Just needs a few disks and is good to go There is even one[2] with similar specs for 349 EUR. If you are saying "booo, ddr2 sucks", get this[3] one for 774 EUR. CPU: 2*6 = 12 Core, 2,66Ghz Xeon X5650 RAM: 16*8 = 128 GB DDR3 DISK: 2*300 GB SAS Same in the UK[4], 8 Cores, 128 GB DDR3, 537 GBP. and the US[5], 8 Cores, 128 GB DDR3, 569 USD. [1] http://www.ebay.de/itm/HP-Proliant-DL585-G6-4x-Six-Core-2-6GHz-8435-128GB-RAM-Rackschienen-/401041664720[2] http://www.ebay.de/itm/HP-ProLiant-DL580-G5-4x-QuadCore-Xeon-E7430-16x-2-13-GHz-128-GB-RAM-4x146-GB-HDD-/112193516338[3] http://www.ebay.de/itm/IBM-X3550-M3-2x-Xeon-X5650-6-Core-2-66GHz-128GB-RAM-600GB-SAS-HDD-Raid-2x-PSU-/222264199184[4] http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/HP-PROLIANT-DL360-G7-SERVER-TWO-E5506-2-13GHZ-128GB-600GB-10K-SAS-P410I-/311732562256[5] http://www.ebay.com/itm/HP-PROLIANT-DL360-G7-SERVER-TWO-E5506-2-13GHZ-128GB-2-X-146GB-10K-SAS-P410I-/192016881457 |
|
|
|
-snip-
It isn't an altcoin if it uses the same blockchain, same client without a restriction on the blocksize
At the moment BU contribute between 5 and 10% of the global btc hash rate..... You can see the charts if you Google for them
This is not about BU. Either SegWit is activated or not. If its activated wallets must have code to handle the new SegWit transactions.
-snip-
It can't start working automatically without doing the coding for it otherwise Electrum tweet wouldn't make much sense.
-snip-
Judging from this tweet[1] MultiBit HD is either already SegWit ready or at least they are working on it. As you can see from the date its been a while since KeepKey bought the wallet. [1] https://twitter.com/delrayman/status/735531413005598721 |
|
|
|
Schädling kann ich ausschließen... Die Überweisung habe ich ja schließlich selber getätigt.
Ich habe auch ein Backup der Wallet einmal eingespielt, aber auch ohne Ergebnis. Es fehlen die 2 von mir angewiesenen Bitcoins.
Hat noch jemand eine Idee was ich tun kann? Die können ja nicht weg sein sondern müssten noch irgendwo wieder zu holen sein da die Transaktion ja nicht durchgeführt wurde.
Poste mal die Transaktions ID für die eingehenden Bitcoin bitte. Wenn die nicht bestätigt war dann ist die mit "zapwallettxes" auch aus der Wallet geworfen worden. |
|
|
|
Re: Bitcoin Core 0.13.1 Released
Today at 02:52:52 AM
Reply with quote #35
I upgraded my client to ver 0.13.1 today but I encountered some problem with my antivirus - Avast.
After an upgrade when I wanted to start my wallet Avast stopped the process did a deep scan and quarantined the bitcoin-qt.exe.
Apparently bitcoin-qt.exe is infected with Dyna:BitCoinMiner-CR[PUP] - but I am pretty sure it is a false positive.
Well, kinda. AFAIK bitcoin core can still be used for mining, even though it only makes sense on Testnets. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
