Can you show me documented evidence of this?







It's Vod's word vs. the angle read off of a sextant, who has more credibility? Vod has the irrefutable word of NASA to call upon, the ultimate proof from the most credible source in all of existence that's vetted by every scientific authority on earth. The sextant reading on the other hand is clearly observational error on the part of the operator, amirite?

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

As the number of experiments you suggest approaches infinity, the possibility of a globe approaches zero. Also you seem to conflate researching documented information and facts with stories written by hacks, quacks and crackpot scientists. You keep repeating these same stories that are beamed into your head via TV, can't you understand everything on TV is fake news and the government is in on it? Can you tell me the official 911 narrative resembles anything that looks like a fact? Do you think that corporations put fluoride and roundup in your beer because it helps increase your testosterone level?

A glimmer of hope, a partial application of logic?

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

Wow selective memory, awesome. My answer is the same as the last time you tried frame my statement by omitting perspective and convergence. If you've accounted for those two effects via altitude and magnification only then will the atmosphere be your limiting factor. There's a lot more atmosphere to look through when viewing objects on the horizon then there is looking up in regards to your dim Moon hypothesis.

The Black Sun isn't mystical enough for you?

Hang yourself.

It took a few minuets to brew the coffee. Did you know that monkeys giving birth to humans only happens on a globe Earth?


Image: Monkey

So you not going to push the Moon bounce LASER test, smart move considering they were bouncing LASERs off the Moon before Apollo 11. I'm not sure how you were going prove their LIDAR isn't fucking pwned with the latest Intel Management Engine 0-day exploit straight outta Israel. Also it's not like just anybody can afford to get a giant LASER.


Image: Giant LASER

OK, so a selenelion eclipse or so-called horizontal eclipse with the Sun and Moon both visible in the sky above the viewer is evidence (although not completely conclusive) the Earth is flat and motionless. I suspect atmospheric refraction on a globe can't fully explain the documented position of the eclipsed Moon together with the Sun in the sky.


^{Image Source: https://mashable.com/2014/10/06/total-lunar-eclipse-selenelion-october-2014/}

"Wednesday's Lunar Eclipse Is Technically Impossible" --  Joe Rao, SPACE.com

In regards to the Solar eclipse there's nothing about it that excludes a flat Earth, the Sun is a projected object and is being obscured by something. This object causing the eclipse is referred to as the "Black Sun" and is unknown. It could be a filter or some kind of function of the projector. What I can say as fact is that the Moon is missing in photographs of the partial phase and that falsifies the globe.


^{Image Source: https://youtu.be/PrWM0lpEKrk}

What part of rope yourself don't you understand?

Anybody with a sextant can confirm it's about 3,000 miles, this is documented and there's nothing left for you to argue, please kill yourself.

Just rope yourself. Anybody else who thinks a sextant lies about the angles it measures please kill yourself too, thanks.

The distance to the Sun as measured by a sextant is 3,000 miles, guess what that proves?

Radar uses radio waves which are the same as light but with longer wavelengths and they are affected by perspective the same as light. The pencil beam radar used in navy missile targeting systems can paint a target ship at over 100 miles; only possible on a flat Earth.

Bump.



The only hivemind retard here is you and your inability to understand perspective. Are you going argue the guy walking away from the camera on the ground has sunk into the football field, or perhaps he's walked up, over and behind the curve of the field? The Sun sets due to perspective, atmospheric conditions and elevation not withstanding.

Also did you just accuse me of copy&paste while in the same post copy&paste bullshit from the Jews at quora?

Bump.

---

---

This is fucking insane, Vod is literally trying to discredit the sextant. Go hang youself already buddy.

For newcomers who may not understand the context here, Vod is trying to argue that a sextant can't measure distances so he can fraudulently claim the Sun is 93 million miles away.

Yes triangulation is used when measuring the distance to the Sun with a sextant and it's about 3,000 miles.

Just quit your bullshit.

I've see multiple news articles claiming that flat earthers drink their own urine. However it seems that NASA and their followers like to accuse others of doing what they're doing while they're doing it, consider the following:

NASA urine recycler test -- https://youtu.be/fV1HkTTlZ_I


"that's just straight up piss" -- NASA

Rope yourself.

In the meantime you've yet to detail how I can prove the Sun is 93 million miles away. If I use a sextant to mesure the distance It's about 3,000 miles, please explain? All you're doing is repeating what you're told by the proven liars at NASA. Acussing me of doing what you're doing while you're doing it is such a scumbag move, scumbag.

I do make use of existing memes and articles, but the majority of what I post is original content, my own observations and opinions. You on the other hand can't articulate, prove or otherwise debate anything without crying, b-b-but NASA says so.

I've forwarded to the part about the height of NASA's buildings.

All About Fake Space - NASA and it's SIZE issues. Bolden cheats.-- https://youtu.be/Sgv-juzElEY?t=683

It's not all fisheye lenses, CGI and movie special effects, sometimes NASA just straight up lies to your face about things they think you won't look into.

^^^ The atom bomb, the hydrogen bomb they're propaganda. When you watch the available test footage and look at the available images and information it's all NASA tier movie fantasy. I know I can't personally verify the science behind creating thermonuclear explosions and all the available evidence appears to be manufactured.

The dangers of radiation appear to be exaggerated for propaganda purposes, apparently you can go swimming in the cooling pond of a nuclear power plant and it's nice and warm. I also don't believe the power plant works like they claim but the massive conspiracy surrounding electrical energy production is another conspiracy connected to this conspiracy and the globe and space conspiracy.

Anybody can take a picture of the Sun, NASA produces nothing but propaganda. Nothing NASA tells you or shows you is true, they've even been caught lying about the height of their buildings. It's photoshop, fisheye lenses, guys hanging from wires and zero-g flying movies studios called space shuttles (now retired due to advances in CGI). NASA is a fraud and a conspiracy against mankind.

I'm not going to deny that plasma could be involved or produced, the Sun is directed energy and a lot of it. Finally how can I measure the distance to the Sun so the results don't match with empirical measurement like you claim? Don't just link bullshit propaganda hit pieces from quara, tell me how? If I measure the distance to the Sun with an empirical measuring device such as a sextant, it's 3,000 miles away. How can I prove that the distance I can measure isn't true and that I must add 92,997,000 miles to the result?

Your claims are preposterous and you should go rope yourself. This conspiracy you're engaging in against myself and humanity is literally a crime.

It's bomb worship!


Source: Beneath the Planet of the Apes The Bomb

Nothing but lights in the sky.

^^^ You're missing so much context:

My claim: There are lights in the sky.
Your claim: There are huge spheres and giant bombs that never stop exploding in the sky.

My claim: The atmosphere distorts the lights in the sky.
Your claim: The atmosphere doesn't mirror.

You don't even understand proper grammar, that's not even a proper sentence, how can you tell me what's what? It's like you ask me what colour is the sky and I tell you it's not sweet & sour.