If I was the same or even in cahoots with this guy then don't you think I would have gotten him to help me a lot earlier?
That person is a long time known scammer and a lier. There is noting he could say that could help you. |
|
|
|
|
What is the minimum withdrawal amount?
|
|
|
|
I really don't get why so many people try this scam. Does anyone actually ever fall for it?
it only cost them 2 minutes to make a new account and send message maybe 0.001% people fall for it and its worth a shot for them It actually takes 6 minutes to create an account and send a PM but yea I see your point. I just don't see anyone being dumb enough to fall for it, at least not anyone with enough money to make it worth their while. i have seen same pms before with same layout as well i mean writing "sr member" in signature i think he got success in the past so he is keep trying ps looks like u have created alot of accounts u know the exact time  and thank you for your quick response on marking a scamer There is a 360 second limit that limits new users from sending a PM or posting from the time they last did an "action" which includes logging in (or creating a new account), posting or sending a PM |
|
|
|
I really don't get why so many people try this scam. Does anyone actually ever fall for it?
it only cost them 2 minutes to make a new account and send message maybe 0.001% people fall for it and its worth a shot for them It actually takes 6 minutes to create an account and send a PM but yea I see your point. I just don't see anyone being dumb enough to fall for it, at least not anyone with enough money to make it worth their while. |
|
|
|
What is your asking price if all accounts are purchased? Are you able to produce a signed message to prove ownership of the accounts?
What are the posts like? Do they actually engage in conversations or are they mostly spam
0.24 For all account 70% post engage in conversation About "produce a signed message" i dont understand about this how to do it ? Have the accounts ever posted a BTC address in the past? Do you control the private keys to the addresses they posted? Have they ever been banned or had a lot of their posts deleted? Have the accounts ever posted a BTC address in the past? - Yes, it was post when registering Sig camp Do you control the private keys to the addresses they posted? - Yes Have they ever been banned or had a lot of their posts deleted? - Never banned - very few posts deleted below 5 post I sent you a PM |
|
|
|
What is your asking price if all accounts are purchased? Are you able to produce a signed message to prove ownership of the accounts?
What are the posts like? Do they actually engage in conversations or are they mostly spam
0.24 For all account 70% post engage in conversation About "produce a signed message" i dont understand about this how to do it ? Have the accounts ever posted a BTC address in the past? Do you control the private keys to the addresses they posted? Have they ever been banned or had a lot of their posts deleted? |
|
|
|
|
I really don't get why so many people try this scam. Does anyone actually ever fall for it?
|
|
|
|
|
What is your asking price if all accounts are purchased? Are you able to produce a signed message to prove ownership of the accounts?
What are the posts like? Do they actually engage in conversations or are they mostly spam
|
|
|
|
Loan amount required: 0.015-0.01
Term length: Within 4 Days
Interest: Will pay 10-15% interest
Collateral- None but if still my account
Addy- 1BtBqWDJ28o1pWYiqtX1oUcBKpU1d86XSC
You need collateral according to both the OP and the title of this thread |
|
|
|
Where the hell do you get off saying that I hack accounts now, and why would I hack redsnows account... I admire him as an escrow even though he messed up a little.
Both you and Spodermen were actively pushing/promoting bitcoin-stocks. This makes me believe that you are either one and the same or are partners with him. It is confirmed that Spodermen was selling hacked accounts. I do not know for sure that was your rationale behind blackmailing me into removing my trust left for Redsn0w, however I am fairly confident that it was more then "he is your friend" If you were to hack his account you would likely use it the same way every other recently hacked account was used for - to try to scam - since it has a decent amount of trust it probably could get a pretty large take I am Spodermen, thought I should let you know, and I want to express I didn't sell the account. I was reselling the default trust account you were selling. Stop spreading bullshit because your so called proof meant jack shit. You fail as "scam detector" with false evidence, i'm going to be working my ass off to prove all of your cases wrong, and when I do i'll be putting you to shame in front of this whole section. I am glad that I am able to piss off scammers. I am not sure why you aren't posting from your Spodermen account, however you admitting to be one and the same only confirms that you are either the same as michaledair or are partners with him as you both were pushing bitcoin-stocks very hard. |
|
|
|
|
What collateral can you offer? You can send me the details via PM if you want to keep it private.
|
|
|
|
|
You just took out a loan yesterday that you repaid. You have negative trust from Vod because you were asking for a loan on your 23rd post.
Was the only reason you created this account to take out multiple loans?
|
|
|
|
|
All of the probably 100 blockchain.info phishing sites
The many bitmixer.io phishing sites
mtgox.com
(you also have btc-e.io listed twice)
butterflylabs.com/
onedice.me
dicebitco.in
cryptodouble.com
bitcoin-stocks.com
hashie.co
ltcgear.com
minethatcloud.com
moneypakforbitcoins.com
|
|
|
|
For the record I do still believe that there is very strong evidence that he is an alt/partner of Plutonium, moreia and Spodermen who were involved in various scams/hacking. You can see the trust I left for moreia for more information. Please delete the quoted section, I'm not sure if I still need the loan... but you can leave the comment (Thanks). And my comment on that is that I am not the owner of those accounts, I consented to an IP check but BadBear did not want to get involved. I would say it would be more likely that you are part of the same scamming ring then being alts of each other so an IP check would really not do anything. |
|
|
|
Still need loan, if you have a problem with my trust then please view it and message me if there are any problems.
I did not scam anyone so all is good.
Thank you.edit by quickseller: the OP deleted this post after I quoted it and says he no longer needs the loan
For the record I do still believe that there is very strong evidence that he is an alt/partner of Plutonium, moreia and Spodermen who were involved in various scams/hacking. You can see the trust I left for moreia for more information. |
|
|
|
|
Just delete it. Make sure nothing is there in either the security question nor the security answer. Then enter your password and click Change Profile.
You are right, you really should not be using a security question
|
|
|
|
Why would you possibly think it is a good idea to use someone with that much negative trust as escrow?
I did not see negative trust to this member , just saw Full member + 3 Star
+
How to be a member of this negative points is still in the Forum here ?Look at your screenshot again. On the left it says -20:-5/+0 (0) Warning: Trade with extreme cautionDo you have any PM's from SiDhant showing that he suggested using LYCAN as a middleman? |
|
|
|
|
Why would you possibly think it is a good idea to use someone with that much negative trust as escrow?
|
|
|
|
|
If you could provide a signed message from a BTC address associated with an old unedited post, increase the interest amount and agree to repay in BTC (I am not interested in cash) then I could probably do this. If you don't trust my reputation enough for me to hold the account personally then I would agree to using escrow to hold your account.
|
|
|
|
I'm out of the default trust now, I'm gonna work with badbear and sort out the claim made against me that i use all those alts. (See my trust for the list that quickseller made)
In general, I'm not going to get involved with these sorts of accusations of alts/sockpuppets. If I'm not going to confirm such accusations, then it's a bad idea to deny them as well. In cases where I do not deny them, people would see it as effectively a confirmation, when there are other reasons I may not want to confirm such allegations. You'll also end up in situations where people will just start throwing a bunch of accusations out to see what sticks. Besides, I can't state with any authority whether x is not y, only thing I can do is state whether there is evidence they are (and see previous statement for why I won't disclose that). Lack of such evidence doesn't mean they aren't. There are lots of bad reasons to start doing this sort of thing, in the end I've decided it's best to just stay out of it, as an admin anyway. This doesn't mean I won't take actions regarding my personal trust list. Is it not possible to check the ips that logged into to the alts and my account? I know you are against doing it as an admin, but I don't want to be marked with this false negative trust... Like I said above even if it were shown that you are not an alt of the people claimed to be you I would only edit the negative to reflect you being an extortionist, which I think is the worse of the claims. Like MadZ said, my feedback says you are either an alt or an associate (e.g. in the same scamming ring) of them. Like I said, I would accept you publishing a single PM to/from Plutonium as proof you are not one and the same. I really don't care if I am labeled as an EXTORTIONIST, that is basically what I did to you and I realize that. I just do not want to be falsely accused of something that I did not do. If I had to choose between being called a thief or an extortionist then I would pick thief any day (I am not either of them). I have edited my feedback to show you as only being an extortionist, although I cannot guarantee that someone else will look at the same evidence I looked at and make the same conclusion (and potentially leave similar feedback that I originally left you). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
