There are many underlying factors for the market price correction. One is exchanger issues,and another is the cme gap as we all know. Ofcourse it would be better to buy at a lower market value but problem is lack of assurance with the bottom. You'd be lucky if you would be able to predict the bottom price of it. The market price which is currently around $25.8k could still fall. Now as an investor, you may wait for a lower market value to avail bigger discount but since there's no certainty of the anticipated price correction, it would be some sort of a gamble waiting for more. The market price could recover anytime so better check your expectations. It is either to wait for a little longer or to invest now and/or buy already and ignore possible downfall of the value. Entering at a lower msrket price would generate bigger profit, so remain determined still.

Assumptions might probably because of its price action when the token was released in tbe market, as well as with what happened with $PEPE. Memetokens are a bit of a hot topic recently but in reality these kind of tokens are simply dependent with demand and not with its utility; in which we can say that its market value won't be sustainable in a long run, unless hype would be created among investors in this industry.If it is potential, indeed memecoins has low tendency of having higher market value in the future. There'd be spikes on the market price but won't last for a period. These tokens are ones which ride the 'wave' but are not creating such thing. You can make profit out of it thru swing trades but I highly doubt with long term holding.

Hoarding issues and monopoly I guess. Also, it would be impossible to have a global shortage with eggs, it is more likely to happen in a city or country but not as wide as global. Hoarding issue happens to many marketable goods. Inflation on tbe other hand is a different story wherein it affects majority of the world market concerning market prices. Based on what I have observed, if it is shortage with agricultural products then it would only last for a month or more, but if it is with minerals then that would be for a long period of time. This is because of resources wherein agricultural products can be 'cultured', which is a reason for us to not panic in some instances.

Also it would make no difference in comparison with fiat. Being decentralized, anonymity, and convenience won't be at edge for this technology. Therefore its price might not be as in demand as it is at the present for that reason. Actually, in some instances, Bitcoin is being regulated through third party wallets or exchanges wherein tax in form of transaction fee is present. But unlike with total regulation, there is an alternative which is thru hardware wallets and decentralized platforms. Bitcoin being in physical form would create changes with its current 'stand' in our lives to both investors and users of it. Added risk is to not be recognized by majority of countries as an offical currency on the same instance.

As long as there's no clear sanctions to those who will be proven to use or invest into this technology, I think there's nothing to worry about. It is a campaign which probably just warns the public due to the risk involved. Those who would be easily convinced not to do so are basically ones who knows nothing mucb about this industry. Not unless there will be a direct prohibition 'coz you might have trouble accessing and transacting with your funds which would really impose risk in your asset. But if you are really worried, then try making a pause, you won't be wrong for that, and wait for things to be more clear regarding this movement of them.

There's no easily earned money. Leverage trading could give you more but will cost you more if you happened to have the wrong position. There's no law prohibiting beginners to engage into this but atleast equip themselves with knowledge first 'coz they will just be gambling if they don't have any trading plan. There are many YT Channels in which they can learn from as well as people who shares their TAs. Regarding shared TA, it won't be enough basis 'coz that's subjective to who shared it. Your responsibility as a viewer is to analyze and validate the shared TA, and to come up with the decision whether to go along with his analysis or make on your own.

No such thing I guess 'coz if there is, that exchanger is giving their service for free. Investors or users are the ones to shoulder transaction fees simply because they are jist using an exchanger platform. Transaction fees on my end is not a problem although in some instances the fees are too high. With regards to exchanges, Binance has one of the largest fees but I do still use it 'coz I'm confident with my funds on their platform. If you are hurting for an ezchanger fee then go with decentralized ones which would lower TX Fees.
It would be indeed suspiscious. The possible reason why they would do such thing is to gather as many users as possible and eventually collect their funds and leave with it in a sudden.

Another things is through transactions, you are not giving the service for free. But biggest source indeed is through lending or loan (in my area). It allows the bank to make their funds revolve around their users with monetary interest. It is the nature of centralization which made this possible and if we would compare it from this technology then there's a huge difference with how money flows. As we all know, banks have plenty of users which is considered aspect of bank. In this industry as well but centralization and decentralization are far from one another. As ive read in the replies, banks has the weath and all but due to centralization, they are also liable withnegative tendencies such as losses.

Simply because gold is different from Bitcoin, as we all know. They have different utility and not to mention global acceptance. Bitcoin has a more volatile and higher market value but that's not enough. I do also view that Bitcoin do not need to surpass gold because of these differences; it just needs to be as is. Bitcoin is really a profitable asset but is it enough criteria to make it the greatest? It has its pros and cons just like other investments but we should keep in mind that it is still a currency that should be used in transactions. It happened that at the present it is more often viewed as something which is just profitable.

Memecoin, as we all know, has no utility, therefore its market value would only depend to demand. On the other hand, demand is based on the majority so if you are eyeing for such coin then you should guess or wait until huge investors support the demand in order to create a price increase. In this industry in general, price movements are uncertain. So think of how big the risk is if you are into such token concept. Just check the first ones to be released in this maarket and you guys will already kniw the anwer whether it is a good or bad investment. Unless you would ride the trend, investing into it won't be profitable especially for long term holding.

There are many tokens to choose from. Every coin will have its risk present from doing so. Your task as an investor is to minimize the risk of losing money therefore you have to select what would be best and not to just limit oneself to a single 'bucket'.

It is better to always build a strong foundation before starting something especially a business or a company. I am one of those people who prefer getting a degree or atleast knowledge of what they want to achieve. First of all, things would be efficient from planning to actualization. It would also result to less mistakes during process. Indeed there are successful businessmen who did not go to college but we don't have the same fate so atleast establish something on your end to start on your own.How would you utilize the experience then? That is partly correct. Experiences teach the best lessons in life but not all the time. Why would education be created if it is not necessary? Capital and such is a given necessity ofcourse. Think of how many people have tried doing their business but not all succeeded.

As other users have said, it is not a trustworthy site. You may try filing a case but indeed that would take time. If you have tried contacting their support and nothing happened, unfortunately you'd be really needing to face the reality. I have experienced sort of a scam before which pushed me to just accept it than to stress about it. I'm not rich but I am aware that if there's just a small chance to recover my funds, it won't be worthy of my time and effort. I'll be just looking for other way to earn money to somehow compensate with my loss. A matter of conserving my energy to what is left with me than to force things trying to please those who fooled me. Money can be earned but stress will haunt you for a long time.

AI could only utilize existing data programmed into it and not generate their own info. It happened that TAs are based from patterns and previous price movements such as determining the buyer's zone and seller's zone. So I guess AIs could be a good tool for investors as well but analysis would be and should be coming from the investor himself. AI's output does not include emotion and sometimes it plays a role in every investor's decision. Also with decision making whether to continue holding or setting a stop loss. However, the bottomline is, these will just be tools to help us and I agree that relying that much into it won't be advisable.

If it's his own money, then he may hide it from his father. But what's important is if your friend fully understands whaat he is engaging himself with. He should be fsmiliar wwith the risk and the nature of the market prices wherein there will be times the market value of Bitcoin would fall which will display loss on his portfolio. This is for his own good and for yoy to not be blame if ever something unfortunaate would happen. And with regards to his father's opinion, we should accept the fact that not all people would be interested towards this industry and that's better than for them to push through without understanding a single thing.If they can find a way despite of the situation, and still decide to do so, I guess that's their own will and the only thing we csn do is support it as long as it is feaasible. For sure they know what would be the possible problems and it's their initiative to still continue.

Well, I'm quite making profit from it through swing trades so i guess it is still good. But not as good as it suppose to. If you have holdings of it and you're down with more than 50% then I guess it would be better to just continue for the benefit of the doubt than to permanently cut the loss. However if it is because AGLO is your prosepect which concerns you whether it is dead already or not, I'd say choose other coin 'coz there are many to choose from.I have this five month rule wherein I am checking if there is a satisfactory recovery of a token which is down for a period of time. If there's no huge increase or if it doesn't go long with spikes on major tokens, I think it would be risky to engage with. But ofcourse that is different from a coin being actully dead, as others have said.

Will never be possible. Investors could only draw assumptions and speculations of how will the market move based on several factors such as news and other relative informations refflecting to world market and this industry in general. Well timeframes would also help with formulation of assumptions or the idea of making a prediction but most of the time, accurately predicting market behavior is impossible especially in this industry wherein market price volatility is in nature since demand is a changing factor which reacts to many things.More of a scientific or valid guess becuse there are basis of those speculations such as previous chart and market price behavior within that month or quarter and such as well as events relative to one another such as halving.

Well, there will always be a risk. Choosing a hardware wallet would make it prone of being stolen especially if your 'keys' are in there or if happened that bad people knew it. Putting it on exchangers and other online platforms make it prone to hacking,malwares, and the likes. So it does depend to the investor on how secure it will be. It is our money we are talking about therefore its security depends on us. But in comparison to which would be the best, I am using hardware wallet for years and fortunately, I did not encounter any problem. But as others have said, electrum is the best option. So you choose depending on your investment routine.

Likewise with other social media platforms such as Facebook and the likes. Actually a friend of mine, due to curiousity, availed some sort of service for 20bucks if I'm not mistaken and with a day, he got 2000+ followers. I do think it is BOT service 'coz after a month, the number of followers he got, decreased. And yes, this should be a warning to all investors and not in particular with this project alone. Number of followers and likes in social media could really be decieving and is often regarded as features of credibility but in reality it is not. At the end of the day we would only know a project is a fraud once they are into it already so atleast manage the risk everytime you plan to engage with new projects.

Series of bad events. One thing I guess which caused the market ctash is the issue concerning the largest exchanger which is Binance. It happened that investors associated this instance with what happened before with FTX as we all know. Another is the CME Gap which is meant to be filled before an actual uptrend occur. Not only these two but there are more for sure. This is how easily demand can be affected both direct and indirect events could make a 'wave' towards the market value of cryptos.

Whether it is the right time to buy or not, I think it would be better to check on one's capacity or tolerance with this industry's risk. Ofcourse an investor would want to buy at a lower market price but problem is, it would be hard to determine the exact bottom. The price could also increase in no time. Therefore, you should make a decision whether to wait for a little longer or to enter right now and endure possible market price downfall.

In what way they are earning?
The only way an individual could earn money from this industry in general, and without investing is through airdrops (not all are paying), whitelisting, faucets, and campaigns in this forum (on signatures requirement is high knowing how hard it is to earn merit although there are contests they may join but there are skills required). Also with investment, the market price of Bitcoin is not consistently increasing which means profit won't be continuous, and that answers the question as well regarding unemployment and such which I think is impossible. Investments are good for additional profit or income but won't be guaranteed to generate consistent money.