holding is the ultimate goal, and trading is the best option for actively doubling it, because I am an active person then more interested in using it for trading and facing a risk with skill and experience, assuming that the passive holder will be able to buy a car from profit every year, but for traders can definitely buy villas and resorts. there will always be maximum benefit from active trading.

We need to suffer a loss to make a positive experience, all traders never get lucky in a row and they always learn from mistakes, before, I spent almost $ 1000 just for trial and learning process, but before less than half, my insights became wider when I started getting some coins from the campaign. Previously only knew btc and eth, but this time it's easier to execute lots of potential altcoins.

the conclusion if you want to use the smallest capital, it can wait until you get altcoin from the campaign first, you will get experience from the development until the reason why the price of the coin rises.

Gambling has a future because it can make people affected with comfort until addiction with the use of the smallest capital. It's used by many owners to make it easier for them. Although the risk of defeat is more than 50% but people keep going back because it considers gambling is the easiest and fastest business model. The government also finally legalize gambling because the business can not be stopped.

HYIPs that appear in some trading coins apply only to short-term earnings, though full of fraud risks but still many people love them, I am also not going to discuss this issue.

Trading is better than gambling because the ordering is not based on the emotion that some people play in a table. Fundamental analysis is better than luck analysis, in trade we call it with much more complex speculation than gambling luck.

There are some points they should develop that is about account security, if the user only has a private key that can not be changed then the possibility to be stolen is very large. this is very dangerous for people affected by phishing links.

second development is a gas arrangement that is not understood by everyone, this is a problem because people who do not like it will leave without wanting to learn more

The third is transactions that often delay up to more than 24 hours, this is a big problem if there is congestion due to large volume increases in the same time (Bottle neck)

I think this is a form of conspiracy, so far Russia has not banned ethereum, and only always makes news of controversy about bitcoin, they also continue to interrogate burger king as owner of whoppercoin. They realize that bitcoins can not be fully controlled and they want crypto currencies that can be fully intervened.

the answer is two: government and hardfork.

1. the government is able to destroy the bitcoin legally if they agree to deem it unfit to be the official currency, it will destroy the value of bitcoin massively.

2. hardfork is also capable of destroying bitcoin systems quickly if system upgrades ultimately fail, this becomes a fear for some users and developers.

bitcoin appears and fights earlier than the currently popular altcoins, automatically applicable if the loyalists will be more because the level of trust has been tested for a long time, no matter how much altcoin offers better functionality, bitcoin will still be a conversion center. There is a fear of crypto inflation if the transition period of volume moves to altcoin.

Not necessarily based on price and conversion center alone, ethereum now has more value with the implementation of smart contract, so far bitcoin did not release similar innovations and remain trapped in block arrangements and transaction costs, if bitcoin does not respond to innovation. the effect will be bad and the same as nokia which is destroyed by android.

If we look at it in the short term then we will see this bitcoin rising trend this week, we have to buy more and not sell it at all, or will lose the momentum of price increases, hold bitcoin still have to read the market situation and no need to panic when there is a decline, we should be smarter in the face of ongoing fluctuations.

If Slack is limited and only for the participation of clearly listed bounty participants, then it really will not be a problem, but I think the problem is very complicated and the project should start switching to telegram and Disscord. I'm used to using Slack, and actually admins can set the post settings to minimize spam phishing.

we just need to focus on some parts of bounty only, do not have to follow all the bounty parts that exist because it will waste more time, I just follow the signature campaign and spend more time to analyze trading charts. The income offered by other types of bounty is greater, but I can anticipate by following the ICO.

The interface of etherdelta is not as complicated as other markets that one level with it, although the loading is heavy but always improves the system every day. Etherdelta is a favorite of all ICO coins and offers an easier decentralization because there is no need to register with an identity card or send an email.

Civilizations are formed from the interests of various countries and agree on their respective sovereignty, if they impose a single currency then there will be a big problem because there must be a step intervention against the currency, In this case if bitcoin applies as single currency, then it will be more problem great because the state can not make majority arrangements.

Depending on their state regulations, retailers have the potential to help the state from the tax sector if using bitcoin, but most are constrained by rules that only allow e-money (fiat) as a means of payment; There should be a trigger from some developers to provide btc-fiat conversion services to be a middle ground between consumers and retail businesses.

People who are good at getting opportunities with strategy and analysis will win all existing businesses, lots of smart people who can not think broadly, but strategic person is dominated by smart people because his insights are definitely broad. Strategic person will be stronger to do.

there must be a responsible state or memorandum of understanding from various countries to declare EURO as the currency of europe. The connection with bitcoin is the same, but the problem is that bitcoin applies to broader domains on a world scale making it impossible to agree fully because of factors of interest. There must be at least a clear regulation of every country involved in the deal.

we will get a lot of fresh air if we do both where we can get more coins at cheaper price when investing in ICO, this is good for continuity trading although not all in accordance with price expectations. Sometimes I feel bored when trading in full, and ICO is a fun speculation.

It is just a combination of words that happen to be a joke, satoshi is a pseudonym that will never be revealed in the public realm at any time, if anyone claims even the original satoshi then no one will believe. A pseudonym is useful for distributing bitcoin evenly, if bitcoin gives rise to a central figure it will not be special anymore because bitcoin is very popular because there is no single mastery.

I'm not too worried because if bitcoin has no value, then at least there will be time to turn it into a fiat, the assets we get will be very sufficient to engage in real business. If we focus fully then it will earn more than with people who divide the time between bitcoin with real work.