Ежедневный Marketplace - тестовый запуск.


                                            http://telegra.ph/Ezhednevnyj-Marketplace---testovyj-zapusk-02-02

Открывается и сразу закрывается в 12.00 по Москве. Это будет именно черная пятница, а не магазин на постоянной основе.

4 часа

The only persons who can remove your negative trusts on your account are the DT Members who rated your account, and by giving 50 merits points to a normal post just doesn't seems logical enough in the first place, I would advise you to respect the forum rules in order to make this forum a better place for every users.

To start with, I think that soniclord shot himself in the foot by first trying to retaliate with negative trust, then waiting three days, then PMing actmyname—and then waiting only three hours for a reply before posting this thread!  (This was apparently in the late evening in actmyname’s time zone, too.)

Add to this that to exonerate himself of guilt, soniclord would need to prove that he has an IQ not exceeding 75.  I think that is the functional requirement for innocently awarding 50 merits as a “test” to a random (pinky-swear! random!) post which just so happened to be in a scamcoin airdrop thread.  Well, either severe mental retardation—or a state of insanity, replete with psychotic delusions.  There can be no other way for someone to actually do that innocently.  It is implausible, improbable, impossible.

For OP, I am sorry to read this thread, negative trust indeed is a game changer if you got one, well you can say it broke your life.
But if you re a legendary member, i think you already know that this forum always update the rules if anything new to be implemented. And i guess it is a usual/normal things to search about something new before you try or do something with it.Because you give 50 merit points to someone random (your point of view) and the post is not good too, you can be accused of things, such as :
1. Selling merit points.
2. Sending merit points to your alts.
3. Etc
There are much to do to prove that you re not guilty beside only making a thread about it. And i guess it will be hard to prove that you re not guilty because the lack of evidences. If you have enough evidences, maybe you can talk to the one who gives you red trust.

And for many times, i already say this so many times since merit points implemented because people keep telling that this forum should be decentralized because it is about cryptocurrency and bitcoin.

N.b. that according to actmyname’s profile, he appears to be in the -05:00 time zone.  Therefore, you PMed him at 21:08:51 in his time zone; and you absolutely, positively expected his response by just after midnight (!).

Again, this was three days after you attempted retaliatory action against him.

Did I get that right, now?  I am asking nicely.  Please advise if I be mistaken about anything.

(Protip for the peanut gallery:  Shake a guy like this enough, and he will usually cough up something interesting!)

Do I look like an admin to you?  You do look like an idiot to me.

(I was proud to rank up from Jr. Member just yesterday.  The forum is totally my toy!)

For one example, and mainly for the benefit of people who jump to the end of the thread:  I showed above that you (futilely) to retaliate against actmyname with negative trust between 9 hours and 35 hours after he (actually) bled your trust.  You said it was “over three days”.  Proofs are above.

Edit to add:  It should go without repeated mention, only an abject moron would buy your crock of a story about throwing 50 merits to a random user in an airdrop thread as a “test”.  Yes, and I have a bridge to sell.

You just described in a nutshell why we need the merit system.  Do you think that soniclord would ever have attained “Legendary” status with a merits requirement?

(By the way, kudos for trawling his post history.  I didn’t bother after I caught him in repeated lies, because I hate liars on principle.  Proofs are above in this thread.)

So , i just went through your profile to see are you really that innocent or not ?
Well , I got my answer . I went upto 10th page and didn'nt see a single good post that would actually help the forum to have some quality . You are just a self acclaimed "legendery member " who have just got that posotion due to the time and some shit posts you gave to the forum . I really don't see a reason to argue here .
You "apparently" give 50 merits for testing ? I haven't got any .. can u spear some . lol .  
For  consideration , you could also have given 50 merits to one of your own accounts . This is obvious that some eyebrows will be raised and you will be getting negative trust for this practice .
I really think that giving one merit is " more than enough" for mere "testing" purpose .
If you are still not clear about how this sysytem works .. you can have a clear reference and idea from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.0  and
 https://imgur.com/Ig2u5Un  .

Before this escalates and Lauda rips you a new one and you end up painted red by 10 people.. ask yourself why Lauda would need to buy merits??

You can see how many they have been given and you can see the most generous merit givers..

This is either a poor joke or a stupid move that will backfire

I used to run forums although not for crypto and I can tell you a lot of the users post for their own interests not the forum interests. As you can see just from the posts allready users are getting stung by the merit system. At the end of the day its up to the owner/s of the forum how they run but from my experience merit causes nothing but problems on forums.