|
Riecoin is pretty good if you have just have an average CPU.
If you have Xeon e5 v3-v4 with a large cache then XMR will be more profitable that RIC.
|
|
|
|
My AMD 1700x machine crashes every time I start mining. It generates the the initial prime numbers OK, but then crashes,  CPU never goes above 45 Deg C. not sure why...  I have the same exact issue with a dual Opteron 2376. This happens most of the time but about 10% of the time it actually works for awhile, and stops again usually after a difficulty re-target. I haven't done any debugging on the issue, figured it wasn't that fast of a cpu anyway  |
|
|
|
so if the numbers of miners do not increase and the solo miner continues what? why the solo miner do something like that and eventually kill his own coins as well ?
I'm not sure why they would do this either but it has already been done in the past. Look at the orphan rate between 2016-11-14 and 2017-02-02, they nearly killed the coin during that time. This is what originally prompted me to open a pool. As of now it looks like hashrate distribution is more stable since my last post. Just to be clear, the Riecoin network is actually running better than ever but having more users would greatly help the market  Please help spread the word about this coin and see if we can get some more miners on board. |
|
|
|
Can you explain a little more? Is there an advantage for solo mining? If Riecoin continues with this mining trend, all small-medium miners (90% of users) are penalized.
Why not use the pools available and so help all the miners? It's so simple!
Otherwise I think this coin will not have easy life...
Solo mining is usually not an issue but in this case, a single solo miner has a large portion of the network hashrate. The miner(s) are participating in selfish mining practices as well, exacerbating the problem. In the last few days this has become more apparent and is reflected in the increased orphan rate as a single miner may have over 50% of the network hashrate and temporarily withholding broadcast of some blocks. There has also been a large drop in difficulty the last few days around the same time RLGzidMRkhfqEWjUY8fVxmgLS7HCdogXYN began approaching 50% network hashrate. Interestingly RSoTqUcauJewHZYmPnM8w3p1LVcV5C2Fh1 hashrate percentage is down substantially over the same period giving the other miner a large portion of the network. The solution to this problem is more average users mining on pools, it's doubtful solo miner will ever pool mine. Users should try and promote this coin, as it offers good supplemental income if you have extra computers lying around. This coin needs more miners/users if it's to succeed. "flying under the radar" is not an option. uBlock.it will be re-opening registrations in the next few days. |
|
|
|
As part of our compliance processes, we periodically assess listed tokens, and some may end up delisted as a result. In the process of undertaking this review, we may find that although a token is unlikely to be a security, it may still warrant delisting because liquidity, volume, and overall community involvement may be too minimal to warrant continued support on our platform. https://m.poloniex.com/press-releases/2017.08.17-Token-Listing-Policy-Reminder/Anyone can read about Poloniex's policies on their website. Stop spreading FUD, the coin just had it's wallet re-enabled. Poloniex was aware of the profits BTC38 was taking otherwise they would have never re-enabled it. |
|
|
|
Will this coin be delisted soon from poloniex?
lol why would that happen, they literally just fixed their wallet. If they wanted to de-list they would have done so several months ago  |
|
|
|
LOL so much FUD in here. Siacoin is here to stay, just enabled file sharing and network performance is top priority according to dev. I'm one of the larger Sia hosts out there and it's true, we change our prices pretty often to stay competitive.
|
|
|
|
There's no volume on Poloniex for a reason, I think most people are ignoring the Poloniex price at this point. |
|
|
|
Any dev care to chime in on this? Thank you Ziiip, That's a good find, and am glad to see some curious developers taking the time to look 😉 That simply was a marker to let all clients below 8.5.3 to no longer participate and broadcast on the FastCoin network once this block height has been reached. Being that our coin has been in over 4 years of existence, we have had several wallet version releases and wallets from 8.5.3 and up are still fully supported. Thanks again for pointing this out, hope this answers your question. Best Fast So it's just a coincidence that all 10.2 nodes get stuck on block 2990306? The chainparams for 10.2.2-irc specify v2 at block=1 see the following https://github.com/fastcoinproject/fastcoin/blob/10.2.2-irc/src/chainparams.cpp#L181And 10.2.2 specifies block=5500000 while m0gliE's branch specifies block=2990306 https://github.com/fastcoinproject/fastcoin/blob/10.2.2/src/chainparams.cpp#L181Which branch was the windows binary on sourceforge compiled from And which chainparams.cpp is correct? |
|
|
|
|
Yep, just copied the wallet.dat to my ABC node.
|
|
|
|
How would the BCC chain know what coins you spend on the BTC chain and vise versa? Wouldn't their separation mean you could sell both 100 BTC and 100 BCC? After the split the two chains will not interact or connect at all and only share the historical block chain, so how would they know you spent 10 BTC or BCC to take i from your balance of the other? I think you need to be more clear with your advise. It's not "don't sell your BCC", it's "don't sell". Everyone (with private keys) will get an amount of BCC that equals the amount they have in BTC. For example, let's say someone owns 100 Bitcoin. They will then also own 100 BCC. If they sell 10 bitcoin, they will then have 90 bitcoin and 90 BCC.
The more I read posts today the more it sounds like people think they're getting something for free. They're not...they're just getting the option to convert existing Bitcoin to Bitcoin Cash.
Yes, he HabBear has no idea how it works. Once the fork is complete you will be able to move your private key to a wallet that supports BCC and be able to spend your BCC. If you spend BCC, your BTC will remain, so you ARE getting something for free! lol, apparently a bunch of people don't know how it works, if they did alts would be WAY down like 500% |
|
|
|
Any dev care to chime in on this? |
|
|
|
|
It appears that many nodes on the network are not up to date or have forked off, I think this may be due to some clients connecting to the wrong network (not fastcoin) for whatever reason.
If you're stuck on block 10175412 you may need to re-index or revert back to the latest chainstate from google drive before trying the following.
I have found the following nodes to be reliable and fully synced.
addnode=217.77.220.34
addnode=207.210.56.43
addnode=85.25.197.148:3344
addnode=71.252.137.242
addnode=71.252.137.246
For anyone still having issues getting synced try using the following parameters in your conf file.
connect=217.77.220.34
connect=207.210.56.43
connect=85.25.197.148:3344
connect=71.252.137.242
connect=71.252.137.246
listen=1
After you're synced you should be able to safely change back to addnode= but if you're daemon ends up establishing an outbound connection to a bad node you may end up having to re-index.
The connect= parameter prevents your node from establishing additional outbound connections beyond what you specified, which can be helpful if you have a set of reliable/trusted nodes.
cheers
|
|
|
|
Wonder how many blocks were orphaned when this coin forked a few years back. If anyone has a node that has synced from block 1 please pm me so i can connect to it. thx |
|
|
|
I was able to download the entire block chain from block 1, but I downloaded the wallet about a month ago on one of my computers. On a second computer the other night I was having the same issue as some of the other people have posted recently and had to reinstall, after downloading the blockchain from the separate file. Once I did that the wallet synced up within 30 min. or so though.
Is the node you synced successfully from block 1 with still running? |
|
|
|
So i started cpu mining riecoin again just for the heck of it, i have a dual Xeon E5-2670 so 16 threads, 32 cores, I am using xptminer2 from the riecon.ovh site but i only seem to get about 80% usage when using -t 31 (as it does cores + 1. Is there a better miner to get closer to 100% efficiency? [EDIT] Am i able to use https://github.com/gatra/cpuminer-rminerdFor riecoin? Try running two instances with -t 15, pinning each to a socket or NUMA node. Pinning the miner to each numa node has worked well for me, especially on dual socket Xeon E5 v3/v4 CPU's. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
