Basically this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422052.500

It provided much exposure for NXT (and NEM, NOX, NEXX, ME.TOO and FRX)

To be precise, CfB says he will support a good crypto. He did not specifically say that crypto would be NEX, just that he felt he needed to be fair.

Let's not make it bigger than it is.

Put like that, we completely agree.

Edit: klee, thanks a lot. I'm so glad that a simple idea like "let's organise all this information daily" helps people. It's good to fell appreciated and the feeling is mutual.

Good!
If it cán be translated to Dutch, I'll do it, by the way.
That way Google can't nag about duplicate content.

This seems an unnecessarily hard distinction to me.
If he asks, that is a different story, of course.

But if he gets all the tools, that's great, too, isn't it?
If I give someone a saw, hammer and nails, it isn't mean if I don't help to create a wardrobe.

Quit taking the actions of one community member as a representation of the whole

if you'd read a few pages back, people are actually rather nice about your initiative.

if you want to call it that with (probably) no research, go ahead.
I f you want to know more, please take a look at our wiki: http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/wiki/Main_Page

Question to all other writers here.

Would you be OK with me posting some of your writings on my blog nxtcoins.nl with proper references to your original posts/articles?

Dutch people read English well and most of them "work" better in English anyway because most technical terms aren't translated in Dutch.

I am talking about the posts by Salsacz and Anon and this one by to start with.

It will be totally clear it is not my work and I will properly attribute it to the correct writer.

If you are not OK, I will find another way to incorporate your work into the site.

Are you sure you are in the right thread?
Serious question.

Nxt has been around since november and is up and running.
Maybe you are confused with NEX, NOX, NEXX, NEM, ME.TOO or FRX?
Those are all new since yesterday?

I repeat, I mean this question seriously.

Then I repeat my thanks to neer.g!

From 0 to 500,000 in one day for promotion and also extras for people who's efforts are appreciated.

Big thumbs up!

If you give him the source, you will be giving him 1,000,000,000 NEX.

That's more than generous enough

There is no such thing as a free lunch.

Give the tools. All the tools that he should get in open source.

If he puts in the effort and succeeds, that is how it goes.

Our own success does not depend on what he does, it depends on what wé do.


 

Basically the same as for Nxt: if they can't survive on their own, they don't deserve to.

Seeing as he has already told you that he thinks the code is beneath him, I would let him figure it out for himself and put his money (or not-money) where his mouth is.
You have no obligation to help. That means it is totally up to you. You also have no exclusive obligation to Nxt.

On a personal note I would dislike it that my investment went down the drain because of one person's crusade against Nxt, though.

The ironic thing is that by doing this he makes a strong case against releasing the source. He turns the situation around and uses emotional blackmail to get his point across.
I don't mind him creating a fork, that's to be expected. I dó mind him using videos and other material by the community. That shows he is willing to stoop to immoral methods to prove his point.

And the point is just one thing: he thinks Nxt distribution is unfair. Nothing else. He has no aim to build a better coin and system. He just wants it to be "fair", whatever that means in his personal universe.

I've seen this question before. It's normal and understandable.
My own answer to it is that you can't force them to contribute, frustrating as it is.
Yes, it hurts Nxt, but it's water under the bridge now.

As far as I know there is no big coordinated initiative. But then again, some may be giving out stuff behind the scenes. I got 3500 Nxt from an unknown big account yesterday. No reply on who it was.

In short: I choose to work with the situation as is. I can't force anyone to give out their stake, so prefer to focus on the things that are, not what I'd like them to be.

My, I should become a preacher... Sorry if that sounded a bit over the top...  

Works for me. Basically the "coordinated" marketing is as much a project as any others. No need to give it higher status. That just leads to epithets like "official".

Thanks for helping me get that straight. Been racking my brain to formulate, but it's been a long day

Voted 2, but am a proponent of a hybrid version: funding committee plans and has its own agenda ánd gives out funds to open bounties.

Otherwise we will keep having problems that marketing efforts will be largely uncoordinated.

Open bounties are a good idea, and need to be there, though, if only as a means to get as many people involved as possible. Some people don't like to work in a team environment, and we shouldn't force them.

Marketing needs to be planned and thus budgeted.
We already know that the client is coming soon. So planning and budgetting to be able to start the campaign as soon as the client is there is logical.

Parallel processing.

Marketing must plan and get ready while devs develop.

The idea that marketing is effortless is an example of good marketing in itself

Indeed, password holders are executors of the community consensus. That's how I read the plan.

Interesting