Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:51:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 [71] 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 »
1401  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Private enterprise bankrupting America? on: March 03, 2012, 06:29:53 PM
nice article.

the US healthcare = innocent people sacrificed to the Free Markets idol.

1402  Economy / Speculation / Re: Summary of recent events? on: March 03, 2012, 01:20:52 PM
I am still waiting for a major web wallet to get hacked...
1403  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hacked Linode & coins stolen to 1NRy8GbX56MymBhDYM... on: March 03, 2012, 12:33:38 PM
Ok.. it's clear now...

They follow their own rules and not Bitcoin rules....

what "Bitcoin rules" were you expecting them to follow? your "Bitcoin rules"?
1404  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hacked Linode & coins stolen to 1NRy8GbX56MymBhDYMyqsNKwW9VupqKVG7 on: March 02, 2012, 07:19:14 AM
do these incidents not bode well for online clients like Electrum or Blockchain.info?

even with encrypted user generated private keys, they can be stolen by the server when opened to sign tx's.

Please do not mix things. There are two separate issues:
1. - the security of the server that your client is talking to.
2. - the security of the software running on your computer.

1. It is completely impossible for an Electrum server to steal your coins, because transactions are signed locally. The only way to steal your coins would be to compromise your own computer.
2. Someone gaining access to the server that distributes the software could insert malicious code in the software that is being distributed. (the tar.gz or .zip file, or the executable). Such an attack would only affect the users who downloaded and installed software between the time of the attack and the time where the attack is discovered. This kind of attack is possible for any type of bitcoin client (even the official one). It is mitigated by scrutiny from the community.

Please understand that the situation is very different if you use a web wallet such as blockchain.info. If you use a web wallet, points 1 and 2 are not distinct; an attacker who gains control of the server will modify the javascript code that is sent by the server. The danger is amplified by the fact that your web browser will update the javascript code running on your computer everytime you use the service, and not just when you decide to upgrade your client. Thus, if the server is compromised, then the attacker can quickly replace the javascript code running in the web browser of all clients, and do whatever they want.
1405  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockchain.info is no longer the best Bitcoin client. on: February 26, 2012, 08:12:59 AM
have you learned - at your expenses - what 'single point of failure' means?
1406  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Money stolen by tradehill on: February 26, 2012, 07:58:47 AM
Everything is down: Blockchain.info, blockexplorer.com, the main ABE site... Luckily, I managed to at least find one instance of ABE still running and up to date:
http://blockexplorer.funkymonkey.org/address/1KpoMx7ZcR45qMo1Uf3iQ8fsurhgtnQfcK

what do you mean, abe is down?!?
it works perfectly for me: http://abe.john-edwin-tobey.org/

If you have problems accessing it, I can restore the Abe instance at ecdsa.org, but I 'd rather not to because it slows down the Electrum server.
1407  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Impressive bitcoin one liners for non bitcoiners on: February 24, 2012, 10:19:52 PM
I would like to revive this thread, with a quote from Rick Falkvinge:
“Once people have tasted what it’s like being without a gatekeeper […], then there is no going back, is there?”

source: Eurobit
1408  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Using Blockchain.info and StrongCoin at the same time on: February 24, 2012, 05:37:01 PM
it would be possible if blochchain.info and strongcoin.com agreed to use the same deterministic key generation algorithm.

but that's not the case right now. if you do that, your wallets will diverge because they keep creating different keys.


I thought strongcoin simply sent change back to same address?
I did not know about that. if that's the case, then I guess it's possible to use both.
1409  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Using Blockchain.info and StrongCoin at the same time on: February 24, 2012, 01:01:44 PM
it would be possible if blochchain.info and strongcoin.com agreed to use the same deterministic key generation algorithm.

but that's not the case right now. if you do that, your wallets will diverge because they keep creating different keys.
1410  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: blockchain.info false positives on: February 23, 2012, 05:17:10 PM
what are you considering to be a false positive though?  are you thinking that since any transaction that didn't originate from 78.47.154.42 was relayed by someoen else thus if blockchain.info reports that transaction "first relayed by" by 78.47.154.42 then that is technically false?

yes.
1411  Economy / Service Discussion / blockchain.info false positives on: February 23, 2012, 04:07:47 PM
I compared the last 50 transactions relayed by my Electrum server with the list displayed at http://blockchain.info/ip-address/78.47.154.42

Results:
- accuracy: 36%
- false positive rate: 64%

Technically, it's not too bad, because the number of possible IPs in the network is quite large.
However, I don't think that such a high error rate makes the data useful for any purpose.
Maybe they should publish a list of n IPs that could have relayed the transaction, with a percentage of confidence.
1412  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: probability that 2 clients generate the same public key? on: February 23, 2012, 01:48:33 PM
Your chances of hitting the megamillion lottery and being killed by a meteorite are far, far greater.

The probability of being hit by a meteorite depend on the mass of the meteorite (and also on the shape and composition of the meteorite, but we will not consider these parameters here).
There is a mass that maximizes the probability; smaller meteorites have an increased probability of being destroyed by the atmosphere, and larger meteorites tend to be less common than smaller ones.

It is possible to express the probability of very unlikely events as the mass of a meteorite having same probability of hitting you during a period of one year.
(some practical work will need to be done to calibrate the conversion, but this is not infeasible)

Armed with this new conceptual framework, we can convert the length of a private key into kilograms.
Hashes per second spent by an attacker on a key change the mass of the object (nonlinearly)

Useful, isn't it?
1413  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - a new thin client on: February 23, 2012, 10:19:12 AM
A quick note on Bitcoin aliases.

In order to be used for signatures, Bitcoin aliases need to have the following properties:
 1.- cannot be hijacked (redirected to another Bitcoin address) by an attacker
 2.- cannot be tampered by their owner (i.e. the owner cannot secretely change their alias and pretend they did not sign something they actually signed).
Aliases stored on a website and secured by their owner might have property 1, but they do not have the second property.
I believe that Bitcoin aliases will need to be stored in a blockchain-based storage such as Namecoin or DIANNA.

I will update my proposal (http://ecdsa.org/bitcoin_URIs.html), and the way aliases are handled in Electrum in order to reflect this.
1414  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum: the blockchain is the cloud on: February 23, 2012, 10:14:50 AM
Hello

I have succesfully run Electrum on my ARM Ubuntu system.

Many thanks for this work so far.

But my understanding of "the client" topic is still marginal.
I would like to run p2pool on that ARM system wich needs a bitcoin client to supply the chain.
(Recompiling the original client for ARM has been unsucsessfull on my side so far)

Do you consider Electrum suffiecient for p2pool or is it missing some parts that would be nessesary.

I hope those aren't to dumb questions.

Thanks in advance

no, this will not be sufficient.
if you could not compile the original client, perhaps you should try libbitcoin?
1415  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Another respected cryptographer predicts collapse in bitcoin mining on: February 23, 2012, 09:49:01 AM
FUD.
1416  Bitcoin / Wallet software / [Electrum] remote wallets on: February 22, 2012, 05:06:44 PM
Electrum 0.41 has support for remote wallets.
With this you can generate addresses on a website without leaving the private keys on the server.

This is possible because Electrum uses a "type 2" deterministic wallet;
this means that it is possible to generate new addresses without the wallet seed.

Electrum 0.41 includes two new files:
*remote_wallet.py : a script that is run on a remote server and can be queried with jsonrpc
*remote.php : An example in php. See it live here: http://ecdsa.org/remote.php

Here is how to create and use a remote wallet:

On your local machine, create a new wallet, and create a neutralized copy (without seed):
Code:
$ ./electrum -w mywallet create
$ ./electrum -w mywallet seed | awk '{print $1}'> seedfile
$ cat mywallet | sed "s/`cat seedfile`//g" > neutralized_wallet
Copy the neutralized_wallet to your webserver.
On your webserver, edit the configuration variables in remote_wallet.py (username, password, wallet path).
Then, start the script:
Code:
$ nohup python remote_wallet.py > /var/log/remote_wallet.log &
On your local machine, start Electrum with the --remote option:
Code:
$ ./electrum -w wallet --remote=http://foo:bar@myserver.org:8444
Your local wallet will be synchronized with the remote wallet.
If you visit remote.php on your server, you can create new adresses in the remote wallet.
Everytime a new address is created on the remote wallet, it will show up in the local wallet.

Note that the remote wallet does not need to be connected to an Electrum server.
All this script does is generate new addresses, and tell your local wallet how many it generated.
1417  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - a new thin client on: February 22, 2012, 04:41:32 PM
I made a new release, version 0.41

changelog:
* 'create' and 'restore' commands are now distinct, so that it is possible to create offline wallets. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Electrum#Offline_wallet
* Support for remote wallets. (demo here: http://ecdsa.org/remote.php. Detailed explanation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65136.0

1418  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - a new thin client on: February 21, 2012, 02:11:24 PM
hopefully complete documentation is here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Electrum#List_of_commands
1419  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Electrum Unofficial Windows Builds on: February 20, 2012, 08:43:06 PM
Cameyo packaged version of Electrum v0.40a.
It's GUI only, no console window.

Electrum.v0.40a.Cameyo-minimal.exe
MD5: 930d6a8efa2ee8fdafc1ab1a21696724

nice!
there's been an increase of traffic on the servers, I guess it has to do with the release of the Qt version
1420  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - a new thin client on: February 20, 2012, 02:05:06 PM
It's not monospace on windows! Sad
Qt looks nice though Smiley

Thanks for the Windows build!

I have started to write documentation on the wiki page:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Electrum
Please feel free to improve or augment it!

Pages: « 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 [71] 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!