Basically welcome if this is a new casino. But this thread isn't that interesting if it's just a few words for $5 free it won't be as much interesting as it is if you don't explain the site more fully, like another suggestion you should make the thread more interesting by displaying pictures as well as a copper member account to be able to start posting pictures. And by the way, I signed up on the casino, only got a $1 sign up bonus, the op said I will get $5, why the lie?
What? only one $1 credited? when registering using a cellphone number, is that required or can it be optional? Looks like I'll have to wait for more explanation from the OP. |
|
|
|
|
14. Josh Emmett
13. Amanda Ribas
12. Justin Tafa
11. David Onama
10. Bruno Silva
9. Neil Magny
8. Randy Brown
7. Mateusz Rebecki
6. Gillian Robertson
5. Joshua Van
4. ---
3. Jamall Emmers
2. Tatsuro Taira
1. Cody Brundage
NOT go the Full Distance 6
|
|
|
|
|
Username : ajiz138
Address: bc1qnkpv5d232z7uh2nxalxgftygzfwfjd2uvh865n
|
|
|
|
Latest Updates!
Sources have revealed that it is thought West Ham will turn down the £90m bid and it looks like this will be the second time West Ham have turned down an offer. I think West Ham is too much for one player whose contribution to winning a major trophy is unclear and this rejection makes it clear that West Ham will never be satisfied with such an offer. On the other hand, West Ham is still expecting an offer from Manchester City and of course the offer must be higher than what Arsenal made. I think as a mediocre club, West Ham will actually be seen as not good if the problem of player transfers is still dissatisfied with this large nominal.
I think with Arsenal making a second bid of £90 million it's high, it's just that West Ham is too ambitious for a high price, even though it's clear that we know that the price Arsenal want is big enough, it's just that maybe West Ham wants to keep Declan Rice so the price continues to be raised and there is no decrease at all, then with Manchester City's offer more than Arsenal, will he want to make a bigger bid? Maybe Manchester City will think twice and look for players who are cheaper than Declan Rice's price but the quality remains the same as they want. |
|
|
|
In your opinion, bitcoin is an asset or a currency?
In my country bitcoin is a commodity asset besides that it cannot be used for other payments but there are several countries that legalize bitcoin (El Salvador) their bitcoin as a currency. But mostly bitcoins are still assets that must be held to allow for long-term upside. If bitcoins were currency, it would be complicated if bitcoins were used to buy cheap things, transaction fees would be very expensive
Bitcoin fees are inexpensive in fact less than $1 if fees are down, so it doesn't matter as much as you might think especially when using a lightning network it will be even cheaper. Have I ever bought something like hardware (Trezor) that costs little except for shipping costs, so that will be very different? |
|
|
|
- Georgia U21 vs Belgium U21 = 2
- Portugal U21 vs Netherlands U21 = 1
- Romania U21 vs Ukraine U21 = X
- Spain U21 vs Croatia U21 = 1
vbetFTN userID: 1378704323
Slightly behind total goals so I do quotes to add to the number of goals. Total goals = 8 |
|
|
|
It will always happen, we will see a significant rise as FOMO sets in by many investors who start getting in and don't want to miss the 2024 Halving Hype that will happen.
Usually they will react at the end of the year because FOMO has always been their way of buying bitcoin because from the end of the year to the halving it will happen in a few months for sure investors will take the time to buy with their funds that have been prepared for the preparation that is approaching, I will not avoid FOMO because they will also feel how important it is to own bitcoin but maybe from now on it won't be done because they are waiting for the price to drop, but when there is a significant movement in bitcoin there will be FOMO. Though now is the right time to start DCA, May-June had a stronger drop but now it is still in the $26k+ price area.
Let's say from mid-June now to the end of the year I think they still have a chance for DCA at the best price in the market maybe still under $30K but other people always think differently in their view and when the price goes up a bit and there it will be panic buying in the end at a high price with this thing I think it's pretty common for them. |
|
|
|
|
- Georgia U21 vs Belgium U21 = 2
- Portugal U21 vs Netherlands U21 = 1
- Romania U21 vs Ukraine U21 = X
- Spain U21 vs Croatia U21 = 1
vbetFTN userID: 1378704323
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction 2: $26,335.96
bech32 address: bc1qnkpv5d232z7uh2nxalxgftygzfwfjd2uvh865n
|
|
|
|
You don't know the owner, but what makes you sure to deposit bitcoin to exchange?.
Most of us know bitcoin exchange owners because they are publicly known, making their deposits easy to exchange for trading. what makes you sure that your Bitcoin arrived safely and was not taken away by the owner?
Actually, this is still in doubt, we know how the FTX case is, we trust the owner, but in the end, bitcoin was taken away by him with his own interests. It's better not to put too much faith in the exchange. I always thought that,
same as banks, I don't want to save it for long time, because banks often go bankrupt, and the owner run overseas.
Banks usually always have insurance of a certain nominal value, if you are still unsure, just leave the bank, but believe me, some banks will not go bankrupt at the same time. |
|
|
|
|
I'm not a Quora user, I mean haven't been on this platform in a while so I don't know if there's a discussion about bitcoin there maybe someone else is discussing it there.
But with the above, I will just ignore it because if you argue with someone who doesn't know anything (aka stupid) it will be a waste of time, even though he has spread lies about bitcoin and another crypto, then just deny it because you think he won't reply again, people who don't understand them will only spread bad things because they don't like bitcoin so there will be a lot of opposition every time he finds the bad news.
I don't think you should worry about them because for me they won't read news from just one source, maybe some other news sources should also be read.
|
|
|
|
Apart from that, there are rumors that Al-Ittihad will also sign N'Golo Kanté and if that happens then of course, Al-Ittihad also have a good squad because they already have Benzema in their squad as well. Therefore, of course, Al-Nassr will still find it difficult to win the Saudi Professional League title next season, because the rival teams are also making big strides by recruiting star players. But yes, of course with the signing of these players, the Saudi Professional League can be even more interesting to watch because the teams competing in the title race have famous players.
It has been confirmed as mentioned above that N'Golo Kante has now officially become an Al-Ittihad player with Benzema and this team is one of the strongest candidates in the Saudi Professional League, I don't think Al-Nassr will stay silent by only having just one Ronaldo star some of them are trying to submit bidding proposals to other players maybe what is more interesting is the Premier League players of course with several players brought in to strengthen their attack line and they can do anything because they are never short of money for this SPL team. Maybe if more star players come the betting market will be even more interesting in the Saudi Professional League and they will also pay a lot of attention after many players have come to this league, of course there will be more to look forward to in the coming season. |
|
|
|
By buying the lump sum method, you really have to be able to identify market trends because even a slight decrease is worth the bitcoins you get, but if you do it with DCA, you don't need to do it that way DCA only needs to be consistent every week/month because there will be an accumulation of prices at an even average, but it depends on the strategy they want.
DCA is a useful strategy especially when you expect price to grow over time but are not sure will the price be moving in cycles. But historically speaking, those who were aiming to buy only during the dips (or what looked like a possible dip) note better results than those doing the DCA. Of course buying the dips require more analysis, but it's not like you have to time the market perfectly. Sometimes all it takes is to avoid buying at what looks like a peak of the hype, or just buy when moods are low. Yes, I think with the DCA strategy, I expect it to grow from time to time, but I only look at the history of the 4 year cycle, so I think it would be very appropriate if we do DCA for 4 years. I know that dips are buying dips and we have to understand about normal market movements when there is a dips that lead to crashes it's the right time to buy dips when it's the most appropriate moment, but I can't do that because from a financial point of view at mine I just prefer DCA even if it's small at $10 but at least bitcoin holdings grow weekly and don't need to buy dips for some other reason. With a note by buying dips I think it's a good result they buy every dips they just need to manage their time and finances to be ready when the market crashes again. |
|
|
|
Whether it is or isn't a good time to buy should not depend on your current holdings. Why would you propose "no-coiners" to buy now and to those who already hold to wait for a deeper dip? This makes no sense.
With ownership let it not be bothered anymore because building bitcoin ownership is a little more difficult to expect more so if you already have capital then the time is now to start again but if you are waiting that is uncertain that makes it more complicated even when the price has been discounted want more discounted price and it is a temperamental exposed people. But yeah, for those who want to enter with a lump sum and not do the DCA, I'd probably wait a little longer to see how the current situation will unfold. You can't time the market perfectly anyway so it's all about identifying the price trend.
By buying the lump sum method, you really have to be able to identify market trends because even a slight decrease is worth the bitcoins you get, but if you do it with DCA, you don't need to do it that way DCA only needs to be consistent every week/month because there will be an accumulation of prices at an even average, but it depends on the strategy they want. |
|
|
|
I don't think it's going to impact bitcoin any more than CZ isn't a bitcoin owner unless it refers to BNB then it's bound to happen but for another implied boom in bitcoin I wouldn't believe bitcoin would be any worse but for a bit of a correction, I think this is reasonable thing. Yeh US is a market threat but it's only for part of the region but globally it can't influence that resulted in the market going down badly even I saw on twitter BlackRock and other US banks bitcoin in large quantities is this maybe a sign where they are doing anything to buy more bitcoins in preparation for Halving 2024 later? |
|
|
|
The advice you give does sound wise enough for those who still don't own a property like a house, but there is one more solution that might also be wiser if someone can't buy a house in cash. Those who want to buy a house but don't have enough money for a house unit can also make a way with a home developer by paying it off every month.
This of course will not be related to the bank because the home developer himself will handle this as long as there is a clearer agreement from the buyer. However, if the buyer feels that this is quite a burden, then the solution to renting a house can also be used by those who don't own a house, even though the level of burden is not much different even though the rental fee is only considered once a year.
Not everyone can afford to buy a house in cash, most of them are renters because with this they can afford to pay monthly, of course, their monthly income must be adjusted according to their wishes. What I know is that every house installment involves a bank, because developers also won't be able to afford long-term installments, unless by buying cash directly, the developer can do it. What's more complicated than home installments is that it takes a long time, even 10 more years, that's what will make us burdened if financially does not support, therefore the wiser advice is to rent, that is my view. |
|
|
|
Erik Ten Hag would suffer a significant loss if he lost De Gea from his roster for next season; after all, he is not on the Red Devils' retained list. David De Gea's contract with Manchester United expires on June 30, after which he will be a free agent, and his new contract remains pending. United have not yet triggered the extension of his contract, but conversations have taken place, and the club's new contract proposal for David will result in a £375,000 weekly salary cut, which I believe the Spaniard will find it hard to accept. De Gea's contract has been active since 2011, and his presence has been extremely beneficial to the club's growth.
I think Erik Ten Hag already has a potential replacement for David De Gea if he leaves, I think Andre Onana will be the candidate if he will replace De Gea, the current stage is still negotiating because De Gea doesn't want a salary cut with his new contract maybe that's the reason where he will go but we never know if this will be maintained or even let him go in free agency. I know Erik Ten Hag only wants to overhaul the squad of several players including goalkeepers, defenders, midfield and strikers but we have to know that Erik Ten Hag has a strong instinct which player he needs. |
|
|
|
And in the first week of the match which was even more interesting, Chelsea vs Liverpool, of course, Chelsea has now undergone a change from before.
The first game will be more of a big test for Chelsea than it will be for Liverpool considering how very disappointing Chelsea finished last season and the high expectations that the supporters of the club have for the new coach and the new team that will start on a fresh slate next season. Pochettino has a big job on his hand and the result he will be expecting from that game is a win or a draw. If he looses that game, and say embarrassingly, he will be heavily mocked and criticized by the media. Chelsea will play at home, that is more reasons to win the game. I will see from Chelsea how much they overhaul the squad and rotate some of the old players that are not needed, at the moment there are many who are linked with Chelsea including Havertz and Mount will leave Chelsea including some of the defense Chelsea will also be released because Pochettino wants to rotate also, I think I will decide the match after Chelsea brought in several players who are hunting him. Pochettino had a tough task against Liverpool. It was also a bit more difficult than I predicted, but I have to look at Chelsea from a change perspective again because it's obvious they want to get back to their form under Pochettino's tutelage. |
|
|
|
|
Why not if it makes it easier for you to understand blockchain, because with a seminar with this event at least you know and can socialize with other people who attend the event.
Then where is the confusion if it's not feasible?
Now I see a lot of this seminar and many are enthusiastic for those who participate it means they still need some further knowledge than searching the internet themselves.
But to be honest, I've never done a seminar on blockchain events before.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
