I have the skills you require, but you already told me I'm not welcome in your project because I was asking legitmate questions as part of my due diligence.  How about that. ROFL Pampa I am wandering with millions invested can you just hire someone instead of asking for help You still didn t get it? aim of the game is to contact people who are familiar with pcb and firmware for bitcoin miner where did u see i m asking for help ? still you don t understand that some people move on and talk less but still you are here trolling since year now just find another thead or space to troll , i m seriously tired by people like you Yeah make it self moderated then to get exhausted Nice when chips come out if they ever come I have one secret place in mind where you can stick them in |
|
|
|
I have the skills you require, but you already told me I'm not welcome in your project because I was asking legitmate questions as part of my due diligence.
How about that.
ROFL Pampa I am wandering with millions invested can you just hire someone instead of asking for help |
|
|
|
Martin,
This is getting ridiculous. I have now been waiting for 3 months for you to send my items.
I have asked you nicely and had nothing.
Asked again and got even less as you keep making up excuses.
I have replied to your PM but you keep on ignoring it so do i have to ask a solicitor to contact you/speedy in order to get a refund?
Don't feel bad, I gave him 1.43 BTC in June of last year that he walked off with. Said he sent me chips in October, they never showed. You know how you can tell he is lying? His lips are moving! Joe, I am wandering if there is a single person who did not hear about your bulshit. Please have some mersy ! And enjoy your chips kept in a safe place |
|
|
|
Normal it is because of dupes buffer needs to be increased  yor host is too fast Patch will come shortly Try paid shares formula to see the actual hash rate 2pow32/dev elapsed*diff accepted/10pow9 Android tablet Yeah you know your stuff dude:) Nice.... |
|
|
|
I swear that i did nothing to cgminer  Only hoping that it was true  Normal it is because of dupes buffer needs to be increased yor host is too fast Patch will come shortly Try paid shares formula to see the actual hash rate 2pow32/dev elapsed*diff accepted/10pow9 |
|
|
|
Was my faulty, i have selected a other tag on the git site. Now works perfect.
I am wandering what have you changed the hub or? oldest version is ok also even showing more MH/s because of the dupes Guy's, I found a bug for hex16A2 boards loosing woork of chip 0 - 87f0213112a3c69e2c55160b9c674b9de2cde996_u_1d.patch while waiting for fix you can change driver-hexminerc.c line 363 if (libhexc_cachenonce(&array_nonce_cache[0], nonce) && libhexc_cachenonce(&array_nonce_cache[lastchippos], nonce)) { to if ( libhexc_cachenonce(&array_nonce_cache[lastchippos], nonce)) { This will bring back some dupes but will increase the performance with 1/16  |
|
|
|
Was my faulty, i have selected a other tag on the git site. Now works perfect.
I am wandering what have you changed the hub or? oldest version is ok also even showing more MH/s because of the dupes |
|
|
|
HMM
2 PCI-E plugs for 1 miner?
That kinda kills the idea of buying more and stacking them to a "tower" like we could with the previous ones. Well, it's still possible, but then we'd need more PSU's.
How much is the power usage on these current models? Any numbers you can share?
Yeah when you need OC there is nothing you can do about it. Chip needs power dude:) |
|
|
|
Anyone has these problem on patch? root@rpi:~/cgminer-3.10.0# patch -p1 < 87f0213112a3c69e2c55160b9c674b9de2cde996_u_1d.patch
patching file cgminer.c
patching file configure.ac
patching file driver-hexminerb.c
patching file driver-hexminerb.h
patching file libhexb.c
patching file Makefile.am
Hunk #1 FAILED at 51.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.am.rej
patching file miner.h
patching file usbutils.c
patching file usbutils.h
patching file api.c
patching file driver-hexminera.c
patching file driver-hexminera.h
patching file libhexa.c
patching file hubpower.c
patching file driver-hexminerc.c
patching file driver-hexminerc.h
patching file libhexc.c
patching file driver-hexmineru.c
patching file driver-hexmineru.h
patching file libhexu.c
patching file driver-hexminer8.c
patching file driver-hexminer8.h
patching file libhex8.c
patching file lib_mcp2210_hexu.c
on make: make[2]: Entering directory `/root/cgminer-3.10.0'
CCLD cgminer
cgminer-libbitfury.o: In function `spi_reset':
/root/cgminer-3.10.0/libbitfury.c:226: undefined reference to `mcp2210_set_gpio_settings'
/root/cgminer-3.10.0/libbitfury.c:233: undefined reference to `mcp2210_spi_transfer'
/root/cgminer-3.10.0/libbitfury.c:239: undefined reference to `mcp2210_set_gpio_settings'
cgminer-libbitfury.o: In function `spi_txrx':
/root/cgminer-3.10.0/libbitfury.c:255: undefined reference to `mcp2210_spi_transfer'
/root/cgminer-3.10.0/libbitfury.c:265: undefined reference to `mcp2210_spi_transfer'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [cgminer] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/cgminer-3.10.0'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/cgminer-3.10.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2
cgminer 3.10.0 87f0213112a3c69e2c55160b9c674b9de2cde996_u_1d.patch from technobit 0.1.7. The 3.8.5 patching, configure and make work well. Try latest git dude. 3.8.5 is ok for you concentrate on other issues first. |
|
|
|
Urgent help needed I´ve upgraded my router with last image and now i get this error in SSH: ntpd: bad address '3.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 3.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '2.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 2.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '1.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 1.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '0.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 0.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping Alarm clock ntpd: bad address '3.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 3.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '2.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 2.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '1.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 1.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '0.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 0.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping Cgminer won´t start  Ip mask gw and DNS check them Super Yeah  You are the man, all working again, many many tks let´s get back to minning |
|
|
|
Urgent help needed I´ve upgraded my router with last image and now i get this error in SSH: ntpd: bad address '3.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 3.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '2.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 2.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '1.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 1.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '0.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 0.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping Alarm clock ntpd: bad address '3.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 3.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '2.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 2.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '1.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 1.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping ntpd: bad address '0.openwrt.pool.ntp.org' ntpd: could not resolve peer 0.openwrt.pool.ntp.org, skipping Cgminer won´t start Ip mask gw and DNS check them |
|
|
|
Any price drops on the 400+ GH/s models or introduction of higher GH/s setups (basically an addon master card/board)?
I see they are selling them quite good and overpriced of course. When people are buying them is there any reason prices to be dropped? The answer is...... I still don't understand why people are paying for overpriced miners to fund bitfury's private farm (currently at 200TH). Remember people: for every miner sold, bitfury adds a couple more to his farm so think twice before ordering. Stupid stupid people. Because it's an ASIC miner that ships today. And do you honestly think that Bitfury doesn't currently have enough funds to support it's own private farm without the few pennies that we add to their coffers? Lol. Who's stupid now? Everything has a reason dude... Just think about it |
|
|
|
Nothing can be seen in provided urls what you need to check if all chips are hashing chip nonces count should be equal +-20 is ok from chip to chip I think all is good with chips change the hub but first try one board only without a hub |
|
|
|
In Ssh type cgminer-API devs Then cgminer-API stats and post it here please All commands are lower cased Dude trust me by the one from amazon de you want regret the one is not good any output from API? |
|
|
|
|
There are three more issues with your setup which can impact performance
1. Disable blacklist cdc-acm driver
2. Buy mtt hub the one you are having is not. You can follow my and Zich posts about such hubs
3. Try three boards first single psu wth common ground for the pi hub and boards
|
|
|
|
In Ssh type cgminer-API devs Then cgminer-API stats and post it here please All commands are lower cased |
|
|
|
3 chips hashing @ 200 mhz and 25 GH/s each  Hot ... I am eager to see turbo  H/W Errors seems a bit high. If they're 3.4% in normal mode they're probably gonna be 10% in turbo? That's about 2x what Avalon 55nm chips had. Thanks for the update on progress. One of the chips is faulty as you can see + a dev board without proper cooling I guess. There is A lot room for improvement for sure |
|
|
|
Any price drops on the 400+ GH/s models or introduction of higher GH/s setups (basically an addon master card/board)?
I see they are selling them quite good and overpriced of course. When people are buying them is there any reason prices to be dropped? The answer is...... |
|
|
|
Oh sorry, on the image is all connected, but today i have one unplugged. There is only 5 board connected to the RPI. When i plug the sixth works too. RPI can handle much more boards.
Chimner API output? |
|
|
|
3 chips hashing @ 200 mhz and 25 GH/s each Hot ... I am eager to see turbo |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
