Good hype? I agree.
Good community? I doubt.
As you've mentioned, meme tokens have no utility. The only thing which puts value into such coins, is demand from hype and popularity which only lasts for a short period of time upon its release in the msrket or exchangers. So if it is futuristic viewpoint, nothing's assured. Most of the time, memetokens' value are only going with trend but never leads it. Most of the meme tokens has no progressive development over years therefore, it would be some sort of a gamble investing and holding it for years unlike with other cryptos which have utilities, sustaining its market price for a long period of time.

FUD and FOMOs.
Remember how hard the market fell last time with FTX issue? Even if cases are not totally the same, people would more likely associate one another because it involves funds on the exchanger which is why it won't be surprising to see a market crash but I hope it won't be too hard that the market will have a hard time to recover. Supposedly, the market should not crash because of what happened simply because it is still an allegation. It is just people tend to react easily which causes to do so. I disagree. Scope of accessibility of an exchanger has nothing to do with issues concerning funds, as accused to Binance and the other exchanger. In fact, it is even the reason why it became the largerst exchanger, because being more accessible makes the volume larger basically.

Your investment would be a gamble if you don't have any plans for it. Unlike with gambling, an investor could actually manage the risk such as putting a stop loss depending on one's preference unlike in gambling wherein once you bet n mount, either you lose or win. Such concept confuses many people but they're actually different from one another. The only thing which binds these two concepts is risk of losing money especially in crypto industry wherein volatility is obvious. Proper risk management would yield to profit. Patience would also contribute to the result which I guess is another difference in comparison to gambling.

Well, there are instances I am calculating my losses within a week or month but a year would be thru speculations. Doing the calculation for a year might stress me out so I'm avoiding it as well. Fortunately, my losses are not as big as before because I am able to manage to accept losses whenever I am playing.
Likewise on my end when I moved into sportsbetting in particular with basketball and boxing. I am just betting to make it more thrilling. Setting limitation should be a must to all players to avoid frustrations no matter what the outcome is. But I'd say the type of gambling game would help you to do so; one reason is the length of time you'd spend in every game. In sportsbetting, you'd consume an hour or more depending on the sports you are into which I guess allows the player gamble for less, in comparison with slots, dicegames and others.

I agree, to some players RTP doesn't matter that much sinply because they are aware of how pure-luck games work. Either hot or cold slot, if you are unlucky, then you'd lose. I doubt there are players or is player who consistently win on slots, dice, and other pure luck games, I doubt that there's such thing. Bigger RTP won't guarantee winning 'coz we are talking about probability only.

If such timezone promotes certainty, then most of its players should be rich by now and all players would play on that certain timeframe. I'm not saying slot providers are fooling people on their data but there's one thing players are not seeing; there are timeframes wherein rewards are often given to the gamblers by playing but not with the ratio of those who win and who lose. So I guess things are just the same to both classification/category.

Things are still virtual but with a different perspective. It'll give enjoyment indeed to the gamblers but would it be an added risk to gambling addiction? If by gambling engagement I think it would do so, first of all the more a players enjoys what he's doing, it would push him to play for a longer period of time. But with regards on betting more and losing more, that depends on the player. A change with gambling experience won't guarantee an increase to betting amount, I guess, the player will just enjoy it more. However, if it is just "true gambling experience" they are seeking of, why do they just go to a landbased one? Convenience? I doubt.

Acceptance.
Accept that you'd more often lose than win; that's what gambling is even if odds are 50:50. Such mindset will help you to not be wrecked because of losing an amount. It is more of mentally preparing oneself of the worse case scenario. Ofcourse it won't be easy. It is money we are talking to or money which is not easily earned. You've worked hard for it and being sad from losing it is a normal response. As I've said, learning how to accept things would set you free. No regrets should be felt 'coz if you win, things would be different on how you would respond or feel. As a gambler you just grabbed the chance of winning and making your money bigger. Unfortunately, there's no certainty with gambling.

Most of us for sure experienced such instance. We will always have a tendency to swear and avoid gambling probably due to losses, but will end up playing the next day. One reason is boredom especially if gambling is a part of your daily routine; you're used up to it. Another is frustration for your losses and it pushes you to get back with it. Last I guess is to enjoy things more; perhaps in sportsbetting wherein it is more thrilling to watch a game if you have bet in it. As long as you still function normally on a daily basis and if you are not struggling financially, I think you are managing things well as a gambler.

Litecoin has the potential to have a higher market price and is not a coin to be considered dead. It is one of the early and biggest coins in this industry. But if it is surpassing the market value of Bitcoin, I highly doubt of it. In every uptrend, Bitcoin is leading the way and other coins are just following.As long as a coin is having volume, then that means it is still alive and there's still a possibility for its market price to go up. Its development on the other hand is the reason why its market value won't or struggling to multiply as much as others but an increase in the market value is the minimum. Check its chart and you'll see. Since it is one of the biggest, I guess its will also be able to recover on the next bullrun.

As we all know, there are expectations for a lower market price around $20k-ish, so I guess it is better to wait. The market value won't go up in a single snap so avoid FOMO. Actually, there's no perfect entry point it just depends on the investor if he'd be satisfied to where would he invest. With regards to either holding or buying, that depends on your capability. If you have the capacity to invest more then wait for another possible dip, and invest again. But if you're already okay with the amount you are holding, then just prepare yourself from the possibility of a market crash, such that if it happen, practice to not panic and avoid selling 'coz prices would again go up and you just have to be patient by that time.

We can be patient whenever the market price of Bitcoin is falling. Most of us are either thrilled or worried during a crash because it is an opportunity to invest more at a huge discount. Being patient on waiting for the right entry point would more likely yield to profit.
We should be calm even if there are possible FUDs especialy recently, again regarding exchanges, to avoid panic and FOMOs. May people sold their holdings recently because of what they have heard about Binance being sued. They might had such response in fear of FTX issue before and this should be stopped.
And we should not be encouraging people in this industry for the purpose of profit. This is a common mistake wherein non-investors are having huge expectations that profit would be easily earned, but it is totally not.

Not all robbers are knowledgeable of technology and this currency in the first place but attempt is an attempt. Indeed bitcoin cannot be stolen in an ATM but it can be accessed through your device if the bad person knows how to. Crypto assets can be robbed, and to be precised, stolen. Therefore, investors still should be cautious of their actions to avoid such tendencies to occur. Keep this in mind; if you can access it then there would always be a way for others to do so especially if you will give them an idea or if you would be negligent of it. Bad persons are becoming more eager to do things so never be too confident.

Eversince, such scheme has been existing in this indusstry and even outside. People keep faalling for suspiscious links with desire of earning free money by jist clicking. First of all, there's no such thing. We are all tired of hearing stories on how they became a vicitim wherein they're the ones who pushed through. This will continue as long as there are people being unrealistic of how investments should be done.From being in years in this industry but not to brag, I haven't had any experience falling for untrusted websites. It is not because i'm smart or what not but because I am learning from others who made the mistake. Also with the idea that if by clicking I'd eaarn, why are not all people in this industry rich?

Indeed, but I think it would go with another correction before such thing happen and that is probably around $23k or less. If we would base in chart, the graph shows bullish pattern still and cme gaps are still not field under the current price and as we all know, its price will be needing to fill it first before having a continuous increase.Also with issues as you've mentioned. Well, supposedly iy should not have a direct effect towards crypto market prices 'coz those are only issues which are being sued towards those exchanges. It happened that such news triggered panic to some investors, resulting to a slight dump yesterday. I also agree with the said support. It is still too early I guess but we'd be on our way for sure.

Familiarity.
Such struggle exists in every field not only in this industry. Ofcourse you are a new one which means you are still unfamiliar with terminologies which are not being used on a daily basis. But on the other hand, sources of information is everywhere. Once you encounter aanything you're not familiar with, try to atleast search for its definition in order to not be shocked once you again encounter that particular thing or word.Indeed, things won't be learned in an instant and it will take time. It is not a bad thing to not know something right after the first glance. It will be a bad thing if you will still be unfamiliar of something even if you are being exposed into it for a period of time 'coz that would mean you are not doing your part as a learner.

If it is to promote the project, eitherway is fine. But if it is the way to reward the participants and for the project itself, I think signature campaigns (pays in btc) would be better. One reason is what happened before. There were many bounty campaigns paying rewards in form of the project token. Profit is way bigger than with signatures, but it has something to do with long term progress of a project. The moment bounty hunters recieved their rewards, they tend to sell it immediately which causes a huge dump with the token's market value, affecting long term potential of the project.

And for participants' end, I think signature is still better in a way that it has a fixed reward in btc. Indeed bounties will give you instances of way big  rewards but there'll also be times you'd be recieving small from a 3-month work.

Eitherway is good but depends on what type of an investor you are. Problem with lending your bitcoin is whether it would really be trustworthy or not. It will always give you worries of not being paid, right? 'coz anything could happen. Unlike with just investing and holding wherein no other person or company would be able to make use of your asset and even if it would require you to hold for a long period of time. So maybe, to determine which would be a better way to earn profit, depends on risk tolerance of the investor. Everything has its own risk and as an investor your task is to minimize it as much as possible.

On my end, I am using 5 to 10% in every bet when I feel like being aggressive or if I am javing a gut feeling that I would be winning. If such amount is not advidablr to othet players, don't worry, 'coz everytime I used all of my alloted money in gambling and to each day, I can manage to stop and do other things for entertainment, and I think this is more important. Some players can manage betting small but gives them the odd feeling of not being satisfied and ending up forcing to win until they have lost too much to the extend wherein frustration would be present. Ofcourse it would be better to prolong yoyr betting chances through small bets but that depends on your satisfaction with returns, as a gambler.

If you have lost that much, more likely you would encounter such feeling, and that is normal. What's not is to comeback playing the moment you regret, 'coz that would be frustration. As we all believed, we should onlu invest or gamble an amount we can afford losing. That's a given ideaa, but in reality most of the gamblers cannot really afforf losing any amount. Like, who would be? We all gambled with an expection of getting something bigger in return. Those who has wealth are the only ones who are just playing for fun 'coz if they lose, it won't be that much fot them. All emotions are vlid just don't sit or stand by on negative emotions.

Would be a wise move if we have the assurance that nothing bad will happen in this industry, in the future. This technology runs in blockchain and there are even restrictions regarding its usage to some countries which should already impose a risk from storing huge value with a futuristic purpose. If it is security you are looking for, then engage with bank savings or properties. Still has risks buy for sure lower. Bitcoin indeed is a profitable investment, we all know that but if it is for the future of your child, would you be too confident of it?Both has risks. It is a good thing to invest in Bitcoin for long term but to put everything into it won't be advisable. Always manage the risk right?