It is ok. We are in a forum and anyone is entitled to make questions and ask for clarification. Of course you are also entitled to decide the extent of your answers. Let's not take things personal  It is also necessary to follow the rules of the forum, especially paragraphs 26 and 32. |
|
|
|
|
Есть информация когда баунтисты получат свои награды?
|
|
|
|
|
Есть информация когда баунтисты получат свои награды?
|
|
|
|
|
Есть информация когда баунтисты получат свои награды?
|
|
|
|
Что творится с таблицей блог баунти? Когда ждать награды?
По последним данным - до конца месяца. А сейчас какие данные? |
|
|
|
|
Есть информация когда баунтисты получат свои награды?
|
|
|
|
Вы так пишете, как будто Вас вполне устраивает такое положение дел. Причем тут трудовой договор?
Я хотел сказать, что участие в баунти сугубо добровольное дело. Так же как и выплата после токенов. Участие в баунти ведь не дает гарантии 100% получения вознаграждения за проделанную работу. Принимая Вас как участника, Хонор ведь не предоставил никакого договора, мол обязуюсь по окончанию баунти выплатить токены. Выплату обещаю осуществить в срок. Прописанные условия являются публичной оффертой. Нет выплат за баунти равно СКАМ! |
|
|
|
Here is the internal exchanger, but not the exchange. Thus, there will be no market supply and demand. If make a exchange, then a license, a lot of work of other specialists this is a big full-fledged separate project.
Nothing prevents the team from running after the internal exchanger and ordinary if there is a desire among investors.
Electronic exchange is a completely different activity. A team that participates in one project probably does not have the qualifications for a completely different project. I do not understand why you can not combine the development of an advertising application and an exchanger? Just people in the team with special knowledge should be more and money is enough. I also think that it is quite possible to combine and accordingly involve more people in the project. |
|
|
|
I m lost too. Why is he asking so many questions?
Because you can not answer the question. |
|
|
|
Here is the internal exchanger, but not the exchange. Thus, there will be no market supply and demand. If make a exchange, then a license, a lot of work of other specialists this is a big full-fledged separate project.
Nothing prevents the team from running after the internal exchanger and ordinary if there is a desire among investors.
Electronic exchange is a completely different activity. A team that participates in one project probably does not have the qualifications for a completely different project. You can always hire someone. There would be a desire for investors and developers. |
|
|
|
Also for that we will reward you 1500 tokens
It's very strange that you make bonuses to a liar. You see his dashboard. The man claimed that he made a contribution of $ 6,500, but could not confirm this, and you credited him with a bonus for the fake screen. How should we understand this? This member presented proof that he/she actually purchased as you can see in the video and he/she also has shown his dashboard. We also could confirm from our backend that the transaction was legit and not a scam so for us that is enough. Here is txn hash we were able to extract from his payment https://www.etherchain.org/tx/0xe59d82af024e48433546a0c539081455ad23d335b732dd5a6c0b0593b8d13e97First, this transaction is $ 752, not $ 6500 as it claimed. Secondly, this transaction is done after he posted here about the contribution. Namely, the transaction is made on the 30th day, and the deposit post is made on the 27th. Those. already after my question. The user lied. I see where you coming from. We also checked the amount of tokens this user is holding and it clearly shows that he invested a considerable amount of tokens. There is no other way he could have this amount of tokens. Now talking to someone else from our team, it seems he was a very early investor. We did run private sales even before running public sale where some people were approached directly so that could be the case possibly, not sure, would have to ask or investigate more with someone from the financial side. Nevertheless, the management approved his claim and that's irreversible. We do appreciate your concerns and how you are trying to help us spot spammers. We really do, thank you! So the fact of the matter is that the number of tokens does not match and the person himself disclosed his deception. I correctly understood that the project makes bonuses to liars? The management doesn't consider that the member lied and I do believe they found enough evidence so no, we do not give bonus to liars Management deliberately does not see the facts? Like I said, they found enough evidence and that's why they approved. I don't see why they would support a spammer or liar, that's not good for business. You have all the right to question facts though and we will not censor you for that. Well, why then the amounts from your transaction and its screen are different? I think that's the last transaction this member made so it doesn't include the past payments. I can see if someone can get me the list of his past transactions, no guarantees but worth trying What are you doing from me? From his wallet there are no other transactions. Not really following you. What I meant is that they may get his past transaction which could be from different wallets as well. I m not sure all his transaction were made from sale wallet if that's what you meant Then he's just a virtuoso if he can change his wallets in 7 seconds for different payments. |
|
|
|
Also for that we will reward you 1500 tokens
It's very strange that you make bonuses to a liar. You see his dashboard. The man claimed that he made a contribution of $ 6,500, but could not confirm this, and you credited him with a bonus for the fake screen. How should we understand this? This member presented proof that he/she actually purchased as you can see in the video and he/she also has shown his dashboard. We also could confirm from our backend that the transaction was legit and not a scam so for us that is enough. Here is txn hash we were able to extract from his payment https://www.etherchain.org/tx/0xe59d82af024e48433546a0c539081455ad23d335b732dd5a6c0b0593b8d13e97First, this transaction is $ 752, not $ 6500 as it claimed. Secondly, this transaction is done after he posted here about the contribution. Namely, the transaction is made on the 30th day, and the deposit post is made on the 27th. Those. already after my question. The user lied. I see where you coming from. We also checked the amount of tokens this user is holding and it clearly shows that he invested a considerable amount of tokens. There is no other way he could have this amount of tokens. Now talking to someone else from our team, it seems he was a very early investor. We did run private sales even before running public sale where some people were approached directly so that could be the case possibly, not sure, would have to ask or investigate more with someone from the financial side. Nevertheless, the management approved his claim and that's irreversible. We do appreciate your concerns and how you are trying to help us spot spammers. We really do, thank you! So the fact of the matter is that the number of tokens does not match and the person himself disclosed his deception. I correctly understood that the project makes bonuses to liars? The management doesn't consider that the member lied and I do believe they found enough evidence so no, we do not give bonus to liars Management deliberately does not see the facts? Like I said, they found enough evidence and that's why they approved. I don't see why they would support a spammer or liar, that's not good for business. You have all the right to question facts though and we will not censor you for that. Well, why then the amounts from your transaction and its screen are different? I think that's the last transaction this member made so it doesn't include the past payments. I can see if someone can get me the list of his past transactions, no guarantees but worth trying What are you doing from me? From his wallet there are no other transactions. |
|
|
|
Also for that we will reward you 1500 tokens
It's very strange that you make bonuses to a liar. You see his dashboard. The man claimed that he made a contribution of $ 6,500, but could not confirm this, and you credited him with a bonus for the fake screen. How should we understand this? This member presented proof that he/she actually purchased as you can see in the video and he/she also has shown his dashboard. We also could confirm from our backend that the transaction was legit and not a scam so for us that is enough. Here is txn hash we were able to extract from his payment https://www.etherchain.org/tx/0xe59d82af024e48433546a0c539081455ad23d335b732dd5a6c0b0593b8d13e97First, this transaction is $ 752, not $ 6500 as it claimed. Secondly, this transaction is done after he posted here about the contribution. Namely, the transaction is made on the 30th day, and the deposit post is made on the 27th. Those. already after my question. The user lied. I see where you coming from. We also checked the amount of tokens this user is holding and it clearly shows that he invested a considerable amount of tokens. There is no other way he could have this amount of tokens. Now talking to someone else from our team, it seems he was a very early investor. We did run private sales even before running public sale where some people were approached directly so that could be the case possibly, not sure, would have to ask or investigate more with someone from the financial side. Nevertheless, the management approved his claim and that's irreversible. We do appreciate your concerns and how you are trying to help us spot spammers. We really do, thank you! So the fact of the matter is that the number of tokens does not match and the person himself disclosed his deception. I correctly understood that the project makes bonuses to liars? The management doesn't consider that the member lied and I do believe they found enough evidence so no, we do not give bonus to liars Management deliberately does not see the facts? Like I said, they found enough evidence and that's why they approved. I don't see why they would support a spammer or liar, that's not good for business. You have all the right to question facts though and we will not censor you for that. Well, why then the amounts from your transaction and its screen are different? |
|
|
|
Also for that we will reward you 1500 tokens
It's very strange that you make bonuses to a liar. You see his dashboard. The man claimed that he made a contribution of $ 6,500, but could not confirm this, and you credited him with a bonus for the fake screen. How should we understand this? This member presented proof that he/she actually purchased as you can see in the video and he/she also has shown his dashboard. We also could confirm from our backend that the transaction was legit and not a scam so for us that is enough. Here is txn hash we were able to extract from his payment https://www.etherchain.org/tx/0xe59d82af024e48433546a0c539081455ad23d335b732dd5a6c0b0593b8d13e97First, this transaction is $ 752, not $ 6500 as it claimed. Secondly, this transaction is done after he posted here about the contribution. Namely, the transaction is made on the 30th day, and the deposit post is made on the 27th. Those. already after my question. The user lied. I see where you coming from. We also checked the amount of tokens this user is holding and it clearly shows that he invested a considerable amount of tokens. There is no other way he could have this amount of tokens. Now talking to someone else from our team, it seems he was a very early investor. We did run private sales even before running public sale where some people were approached directly so that could be the case possibly, not sure, would have to ask or investigate more with someone from the financial side. Nevertheless, the management approved his claim and that's irreversible. We do appreciate your concerns and how you are trying to help us spot spammers. We really do, thank you! So the fact of the matter is that the number of tokens does not match and the person himself disclosed his deception. I correctly understood that the project makes bonuses to liars? The management doesn't consider that the member lied and I do believe they found enough evidence so no, we do not give bonus to liars Management deliberately does not see the facts? |
|
|
|
Also for that we will reward you 1500 tokens
It's very strange that you make bonuses to a liar. You see his dashboard. The man claimed that he made a contribution of $ 6,500, but could not confirm this, and you credited him with a bonus for the fake screen. How should we understand this? This member presented proof that he/she actually purchased as you can see in the video and he/she also has shown his dashboard. We also could confirm from our backend that the transaction was legit and not a scam so for us that is enough. Here is txn hash we were able to extract from his payment https://www.etherchain.org/tx/0xe59d82af024e48433546a0c539081455ad23d335b732dd5a6c0b0593b8d13e97First, this transaction is $ 752, not $ 6500 as it claimed. Secondly, this transaction is done after he posted here about the contribution. Namely, the transaction is made on the 30th day, and the deposit post is made on the 27th. Those. already after my question. The user lied. I see where you coming from. We also checked the amount of tokens this user is holding and it clearly shows that he invested a considerable amount of tokens. There is no other way he could have this amount of tokens. Now talking to someone else from our team, it seems he was a very early investor. We did run private sales even before running public sale where some people were approached directly so that could be the case possibly, not sure, would have to ask or investigate more with someone from the financial side. Nevertheless, the management approved his claim and that's irreversible. We do appreciate your concerns and how you are trying to help us spot spammers. We really do, thank you! So the fact of the matter is that the number of tokens does not match and the person himself disclosed his deception. I correctly understood that the project makes bonuses to liars? |
|
|
|
Also for that we will reward you 1500 tokens
It's very strange that you make bonuses to a liar. You see his dashboard. The man claimed that he made a contribution of $ 6,500, but could not confirm this, and you credited him with a bonus for the fake screen. How should we understand this? This member presented proof that he/she actually purchased as you can see in the video and he/she also has shown his dashboard. We also could confirm from our backend that the transaction was legit and not a scam so for us that is enough. Here is txn hash we were able to extract from his payment https://www.etherchain.org/tx/0xe59d82af024e48433546a0c539081455ad23d335b732dd5a6c0b0593b8d13e97First, this transaction is $ 752, not $ 6500 as it claimed. Secondly, this transaction is done after he posted here about the contribution. Namely, the transaction is made on the 30th day, and the deposit post is made on the 27th. Those. already after my question. The user lied. |
|
|
|
Also for that we will reward you 1500 tokens
It's very strange that you make bonuses to a liar. You see his dashboard. The man claimed that he made a contribution of $ 6,500, but could not confirm this, and you credited him with a bonus for the fake screen. How should we understand this? |
|
|
|
Actually, I wonder about competitiveness of the Project... There are job seeking-finding projects already, some of them seem to be more reliable.
This project has its advantage that's why I invested form the very beginning. It is very simple and clear what the team is trying to do and I totallky support the project. What kind of investment did you make? Sorry not following you. You wrote that you made an investment in the project. What is the size of this investment? Ah ok got it. So far over $6500 And planning to buy more. I sold some of my eth and crpt so will get more dcnx tokens. Hopefully during another promotion Give me the transaction hash so I can check it. I can show you but first I m.kind of curious why you want to know about my investment since it is personal. Any particular reason? Because this is a financial forum. And according to the rules, such statements must be verified with transaction hashes. Show me where this is written. In the rules of the forum with which you agreed at the registration. You can contact the moderator for clarification or I can invite him. How do I understand proofs will not be? I was talking about hash transaction. Similar screenshots any child can do a great many. Confirmation of the contribution will not be? |
|
|
|
can someone here refer me to the Zerostate official ico review website such as icolist or tokenmarket, blog/resources that talk about zerostate project?
This is the official website of the project: https://zerostate.io/ |
|
|
|
Internal exchange is interesting. Where does the project's token exchange rate come from? What is the source of the exchange rate of other crypto?
I think it will be like everyone else. Based on the offers of sale and purchase will be formed by the market.
What are you talking about? Here is the internal exchanger, but not the exchange. Thus, there will be no market supply and demand. If make a exchange, then a license, a lot of work of other specialists this is a big full-fledged separate project. Nothing prevents the team from running after the internal exchanger and ordinary if there is a desire among investors. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
