Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 10:28:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 [718] 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 »
14341  Local / 跳蚤市场 / Re: 卖BTT帐户 on: December 17, 2014, 11:49:13 PM
这个生意做的不错啊
是的生意做得很好。 Bitmixer.io只是改变了他们的活动,这样就可以使.14BTC每月通过200个职位有一个完整的会员帐户

过来看看账号行情。出乎意料,HERO要3.5BTC。顺便说明一下,这个账号不卖。
我有其他的英雄帐户也是如此。我愿意接受更低的报价,如果您有兴趣购买。我会接受1.8BTC
14342  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: Selling Full Member BitCoinTalk account on: December 17, 2014, 06:27:35 PM
whats your ideal price offer?

make an offer. it can enroll to sig campaigns rewarding max 0.15 per month!
what sig campaign pays 0.15 for full member?  Shocked
bitmixer pays .14 per month now. Prime dice will have unlimited earnings.
14343  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: December 17, 2014, 05:52:17 PM
Its interesting what happened. Obviously segvec was the middleman and it fell thru. He is responsible here, not the OP, I don't understand why he thinks he isn't.

Blazed I don't think segvec's intentions were to build up rep and scam someone for a big amount eventually. I thought that at first but so many times he paid with methods that require ID (Western Union, Moneygram, W2W) or address info (buying things shipped to him) and he bought stuff on this forum. If his true intent was to scam he wouldn't have done all that and expose his identity for when he scammed later.

The problem here is that after this segvec's account is trashed. Its value and trust is 0 and no one will trust him again, even if the $5k is paid in February. This then becomes a situation of will his "friend" pay the debt owed come February and will segvec actually be around still to pay it.

$5k is a lot of money, but anyone can disappear. It'll be interesting to see if segvec's account is abandoned or not.

Well, he did buy BTC with paypal and moneypaks. If he planned on scamming we should know soon Wink

This just sounds like a man in the middle deal gone wrong but you can't blame HBO for not wanting to wait 2 months for his BTC (especially since the value is dropping right now). If nothing was mentioned about this partner and etc then segvec should just pay up since he made the mistake of using this "partner".
Yeah, I think you should watch out for the MoneyPaks, he has told me once that he gets them for up to 40% off face value on the deepweb, so all the MoneyPaks that he has passed around without a receipt are definitely obtained fraudulently. I have PM'd WoodCollector, if anyone else is a professional doxxer, or knows one please PM me with their contact info. And KOS, please PM me any personal info you have on segvec, thanks.

Lol, you fail to realize it isn't possible to dox me.
You are fully clearnet so know nothing about hiding, being anonymous, etc.

Use drops, fake ids, and be the man in the middleman and you never reveal your identity.
PM WoodCollector...I think he will give you the Canton, Michigan drop...or maybe the bloomfield hills. Or the royal oak, Birmingham...who knows what I used.

Even if I do never make repayment, there is nothing you can do.
I'm doing as I'm legit and don't scam.

Cheers.

That is really underhanded about you for offering to release info. Consider this - if you're the guy at the other side waiting for his money, would you still be so cool about this?
From how I see this, he is using the fact that he has sensitive information about the OP as leverage to get him to be quiet and say the issue is "resolved" so he can continue his business (and potentially scam again)
14344  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: December 17, 2014, 05:44:10 PM
Good luck to all trying.
@turtlehurricane, trying to elimate the individual who wiped out your client base...nice.  Smiley

The vast majority who commented are members who never buy/sell.
From what I see, all having bankrolls of $10k and below...with that being said, business is not a topic that the accusers should attempt to pounce me on. Everyone is against me because I hate foreign idiots that are uneducated. Key word being uneducated. I'm dealing with an idiotic Indian muck muck. Call me racist, an asshole, whatever you wish. In February, all accusing idiots will be deleting their posts and biting their tongue. Also police? How do you file a police report with drop names and deals that involve money laundering as HBO failed to mention? That must be new.

Thanks.
You're gonna end up in jail, if not from this case it'll happen eventually.

You're eliminating yourself, it ain't me doing this to you.

Still operating just fine. Thanks for your concern.
Now go work your way out to your "big scam" that you were telling me about. 
For some reason I doubt that people are still working with you after you admit that you have not sent over $5k that you agreed to send them and received bitcoin for.

And no, they do not want to wait until February to get their money.
14345  Other / Meta / Re: Forum 250 Btc theft, what's being done about it? Inside job? on: December 17, 2014, 05:29:08 PM
I think this is hardly a theft. It is possible that someone in his family has access to his bitcointalk account password, but not the private keys to the bitcoin being held for the forum.
14346  Economy / Services / Re: Up to 0.035 BTC weekly for YOUR SIGNATURE *New rules on: December 17, 2014, 02:44:31 PM
We change rules, see the first message. Pay per post now.
you should offer higher rates overall since you have a low max earnings potential.

You should also have higher rates for higher ranking memners.
14347  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: December 17, 2014, 02:00:08 PM
All I see are a bunch of $20's and a few $100's covering what, more $100's or perhaps paper?
Even if there is not $120k in that picture, he should have at least $5k to send the money now. He always likes to flaunt how he's done $200k in deals in November only, so a measly $5k should be nothing to him, right  Huh If the partner tax return story is true, why doesn't he collect the money from his partner himself in February and pay me now? Because I made the deal with him, not his partner.

You are not seeing a dollar until February. It was not my mistake and that's just how the cookie crumbles. Tarnish my rep with false claims...do what you have to do. I don't care if I had $5 million...I'm not covering my partners mistake. There is a reason why the poor stay poor, and the rich stay rich. Take notes. Call me an asshole, racist prick, dickhead, rude, whatever you want...at the end of the day, take a step back and see how horrible of an idea it was to make this false claim.

I'm not sure why I keep posting when I'm just repeating the same thing over and over.

Edit: see you guys on the hero/legendary from afar.
your defense is that you were scammed by your "partner" and in return you are scamming someone else so you were not financially harmed.

Partner is repaying out of tax return.
Can anyone read here?
your agreement with the op was ~14 btc for ~5k in fiat today. If you are not paying today then you are not honoring your agreement. It is your partner that owes you 14 btc and you have no valid reason to withhold payment.

The op was doing business with you not your partner.

My statement that you quoted is accurate

Totally agree with the above statement

You are all right, the original agreement was not honored.
As I said, and as I will continue to repeat, payment in February.

Keep making false claims so I can copy+paste the same thing here...post after post.
even if payment ends up being made in February you will have essentially taken an interest free loan from the op that he did not agree to. This is obviously not fair to all parties involved.

Your partner should pay you back in February as it was your fault for trusting that he did not make a mistake.  
14348  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: December 17, 2014, 01:48:49 PM
All I see are a bunch of $20's and a few $100's covering what, more $100's or perhaps paper?
Even if there is not $120k in that picture, he should have at least $5k to send the money now. He always likes to flaunt how he's done $200k in deals in November only, so a measly $5k should be nothing to him, right  Huh If the partner tax return story is true, why doesn't he collect the money from his partner himself in February and pay me now? Because I made the deal with him, not his partner.

You are not seeing a dollar until February. It was not my mistake and that's just how the cookie crumbles. Tarnish my rep with false claims...do what you have to do. I don't care if I had $5 million...I'm not covering my partners mistake. There is a reason why the poor stay poor, and the rich stay rich. Take notes. Call me an asshole, racist prick, dickhead, rude, whatever you want...at the end of the day, take a step back and see how horrible of an idea it was to make this false claim.

I'm not sure why I keep posting when I'm just repeating the same thing over and over.

Edit: see you guys on the hero/legendary from afar.
your defense is that you were scammed by your "partner" and in return you are scamming someone else so you were not financially harmed.

Partner is repaying out of tax return.
Can anyone read here?
your agreement with the op was ~14 btc for ~5k in fiat today. If you are not paying today then you are not honoring your agreement. It is your partner that owes you 14 btc and you have no valid reason to withhold payment.

The op was doing business with you not your partner.

My statement that you quoted is accurate
14349  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: December 17, 2014, 01:44:01 PM
All I see are a bunch of $20's and a few $100's covering what, more $100's or perhaps paper?
Even if there is not $120k in that picture, he should have at least $5k to send the money now. He always likes to flaunt how he's done $200k in deals in November only, so a measly $5k should be nothing to him, right  Huh If the partner tax return story is true, why doesn't he collect the money from his partner himself in February and pay me now? Because I made the deal with him, not his partner.

You are not seeing a dollar until February. It was not my mistake and that's just how the cookie crumbles. Tarnish my rep with false claims...do what you have to do. I don't care if I had $5 million...I'm not covering my partners mistake. There is a reason why the poor stay poor, and the rich stay rich. Take notes. Call me an asshole, racist prick, dickhead, rude, whatever you want...at the end of the day, take a step back and see how horrible of an idea it was to make this false claim.

I'm not sure why I keep posting when I'm just repeating the same thing over and over.

Edit: see you guys on the hero/legendary from afar.
your defense is that you were scammed by your "partner" and in return you are scamming someone else so you were not financially harmed.
14350  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: December 17, 2014, 01:25:09 PM
Good luck to all trying.
@turtlehurricane, trying to elimate the individual who wiped out your client base...nice.  Smiley

The vast majority who commented are members who never buy/sell.
From what I see, all having bankrolls of $10k and below...with that being said, business is not a topic that the accusers should attempt to pounce me on. Everyone is against me because I hate foreign idiots that are uneducated. Key word being uneducated. I'm dealing with an idiotic Indian muck muck. Call me racist, an asshole, whatever you wish. In February, all accusing idiots will be deleting their posts and biting their tongue. Also police? How do you file a police report with drop names and deals that involve money laundering as HBO failed to mention? That must be new.

Thanks.
if you are implying that you have a bankroll of more then 10k then there is no reason why you would not be able to afford to pay him despite your "mistake" without wiping out your bankroll. Plus if you are doing 100k+ in volume per month then there is no reason why you need to wait until tax season as your spreads are clearly large enough that you made as much as the "error" in one month
14351  Economy / Services / Re: [PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting on: December 17, 2014, 01:14:28 PM
Of course I wasn't being serious, but asking in here every couple of days isn't going to make it come any faster and people just need to wait for Stunna to make an announcement when he's ready.
well in theory it could get him to look at a cost benefit analysis to see how effective advertising will be for him
14352  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: December 17, 2014, 12:36:16 PM
Hopefully some people here can help dox segvec, so that a proper police investigation can occur. I bet he will pay once he realizes he could end up in jail. Jail sucks
For this large of an amount I don't see why a police investigation would not occur without him getting doxxed. This large of an amount of a theft is no small crime
14353  Economy / Services / Re: [PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting on: December 17, 2014, 12:35:07 PM
Everytime someone posts in this thread asking when it's coming Stunna pushes it back by another week.
Has he actually said this or are you being sarcastic? I don't think it would be a very good business practice as it would be depriving him of advertising
14354  Other / Meta / Re: Time to Restructure BTT? on: December 17, 2014, 12:21:35 PM
Am I the only one that sees the irony in this picture?



You have the font size set really big. Do you browse on mobile?
When I was looking at that yes. That is not what is ironic though.

EDIT: it is the fact that there is a shit post directly below the advert that says to report shit posts
14355  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: [S] BitcoinTalk Accounts on: December 17, 2014, 06:16:33 AM
Can you give details of the accounts that have negative feedback?

I think your prices are likely too high for the negative trust accounts.
14356  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SEGVEC CONNED ME OUT OF 14.09 BTC on: December 17, 2014, 06:03:10 AM
I really doubt that segvec even has a partner. That's the shittiest excuse I've seen in a while. Segvec only does small trades for quick profit. Whenever he has a chance to con someone for a big amount he'll do it in the first chance. Like showcased above, and in his trust...

I completed $200k in deals in November alone.
What did you do?  Huh

EDIT: Good night to all.
How do you expect to be able to continue to do as many deals moving forward if you are essentially stealing from your customers? Why would anyone want to do business with you.
1. Partner c+p error and sent wrong address.
2. HBO sent funds to random Bulgarian that my partner was dealing with.
3. Bulgarian cashed out funds and ditched partner and myself.
4. Partner's error...so will be reimbursing via his tax return. (USA; mid-feb arrival)
5. HBO is a foreign national who is not educated enough to understand the situation.
6. Posts here in hopes of this scam report making me pay the funds back now.
7. Fails as we've already made an arrangement that will be followed.
8. /story.
If you told the OP to send to a certain address then you need to treat it as if funds were received to your control. HBO did not send the bitcoin to a random address, he sent to the address that you directed him to send to. The fact that you claim someone else controls the address is impossible to prove. You are essentially forcing your customer to take the loss that occurred because of your own mistake.
14357  Economy / Services / Re: [bounty][up to .16 BTC reward *or more]BB code for signatures advertising my sales thread on: December 17, 2014, 03:42:03 AM
Bump. I will probably let this run until Wednesday at ~2359 forum time.

There are several very good entries so far
Less then 24 hours left. Get your entries in soon
14358  Local / 跳蚤市场 / Re: 卖BTT帐户 on: December 17, 2014, 02:15:06 AM
可以卖这么贵啊
我的价格是非常合理的。你可能可以从参与签名运动做出很多比特币的,并且可以acheive在很短的时间上的我的账户的价格回报。我愿意谈谈我的价格,如果您有兴趣购买。
14359  Economy / Lending / Re: Taking loans -- 100% collateral in BTC -- Escrow Accepted on: December 17, 2014, 01:42:36 AM
but you are asking to borrow BTC in order to spend BTC Huh how would doing that benefit you?

I understand how borrowing BTC that is secured by NXT would help you (as I explained how it would help others who are  wanting to use alt coins as collateral), but a BTC loan that is secured by BTC does not make sense to me

EDIT: also for clarification, I did not ask to borrow money from the OP, I was offering to lend money to the OP

EDIT2: I would also be curious to know if the OP can sign a message from an address containing at least 1 BTC or 53k NXT
14360  Economy / Lending / Re: Taking loans -- 100% collateral in BTC -- Escrow Accepted on: December 17, 2014, 01:13:04 AM
For the record, I inquired about the OP's loan, made it clear that the loan would not be funded until either I, or an escrow that we both trust has received collateral and have the transaction sufficiently confirmed. I also expressed the same concerns that it appears he is buying trust, that there is no clear benefit to him taking out this loan other then the fact that he would be receiving trust, and that I was uncomfortable making the loan if it would only be selling trust. I asked for an explanation as to how it would benefit him and he was not able to give one. I explained the logic behind using alt coins as collateral for a bitcoin loan (that the borrower would not have to incur slippage, trading fees, nor the possibility that the price of the altcoin would increase while the loan is outstanding).

He eventually agreed to borrow 2.5 BTC secured by 120% worth of NXT (he wanted it to be held by John K - I'm not sure if he contacted him about this or not), he offered to pay 1% and I countered with him paying 3% for one week, and haven't heard from him since.

He also has a somewhat suspicioius loan request (or at least one that I do not understand how the lender could be protected), so I think his actions are somewhat sketchy.
Pages: « 1 ... 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 [718] 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!