We change rules, see the first message. Pay per post now.
you should offer higher rates overall since you have a low max earnings potential. You should also have higher rates for higher ranking memners. |
|
|
|
All I see are a bunch of $20's and a few $100's covering what, more $100's or perhaps paper?
Even if there is not $120k in that picture, he should have at least $5k to send the money now. He always likes to flaunt how he's done $200k in deals in November only, so a measly $5k should be nothing to him, right  If the partner tax return story is true, why doesn't he collect the money from his partner himself in February and pay me now? Because I made the deal with him, not his partner. You are not seeing a dollar until February. It was not my mistake and that's just how the cookie crumbles. Tarnish my rep with false claims...do what you have to do. I don't care if I had $5 million...I'm not covering my partners mistake. There is a reason why the poor stay poor, and the rich stay rich. Take notes. Call me an asshole, racist prick, dickhead, rude, whatever you want...at the end of the day, take a step back and see how horrible of an idea it was to make this false claim. I'm not sure why I keep posting when I'm just repeating the same thing over and over. Edit: see you guys on the hero/legendary from afar. your defense is that you were scammed by your "partner" and in return you are scamming someone else so you were not financially harmed. Partner is repaying out of tax return. Can anyone read here? your agreement with the op was ~14 btc for ~5k in fiat today. If you are not paying today then you are not honoring your agreement. It is your partner that owes you 14 btc and you have no valid reason to withhold payment. The op was doing business with you not your partner. My statement that you quoted is accurate Totally agree with the above statement You are all right, the original agreement was not honored. As I said, and as I will continue to repeat, payment in February. Keep making false claims so I can copy+paste the same thing here...post after post. even if payment ends up being made in February you will have essentially taken an interest free loan from the op that he did not agree to. This is obviously not fair to all parties involved. Your partner should pay you back in February as it was your fault for trusting that he did not make a mistake. |
|
|
|
All I see are a bunch of $20's and a few $100's covering what, more $100's or perhaps paper?
Even if there is not $120k in that picture, he should have at least $5k to send the money now. He always likes to flaunt how he's done $200k in deals in November only, so a measly $5k should be nothing to him, right If the partner tax return story is true, why doesn't he collect the money from his partner himself in February and pay me now? Because I made the deal with him, not his partner. You are not seeing a dollar until February. It was not my mistake and that's just how the cookie crumbles. Tarnish my rep with false claims...do what you have to do. I don't care if I had $5 million...I'm not covering my partners mistake. There is a reason why the poor stay poor, and the rich stay rich. Take notes. Call me an asshole, racist prick, dickhead, rude, whatever you want...at the end of the day, take a step back and see how horrible of an idea it was to make this false claim. I'm not sure why I keep posting when I'm just repeating the same thing over and over. Edit: see you guys on the hero/legendary from afar. your defense is that you were scammed by your "partner" and in return you are scamming someone else so you were not financially harmed. Partner is repaying out of tax return. Can anyone read here? your agreement with the op was ~14 btc for ~5k in fiat today. If you are not paying today then you are not honoring your agreement. It is your partner that owes you 14 btc and you have no valid reason to withhold payment. The op was doing business with you not your partner. My statement that you quoted is accurate |
|
|
|
All I see are a bunch of $20's and a few $100's covering what, more $100's or perhaps paper?
Even if there is not $120k in that picture, he should have at least $5k to send the money now. He always likes to flaunt how he's done $200k in deals in November only, so a measly $5k should be nothing to him, right If the partner tax return story is true, why doesn't he collect the money from his partner himself in February and pay me now? Because I made the deal with him, not his partner. You are not seeing a dollar until February. It was not my mistake and that's just how the cookie crumbles. Tarnish my rep with false claims...do what you have to do. I don't care if I had $5 million...I'm not covering my partners mistake. There is a reason why the poor stay poor, and the rich stay rich. Take notes. Call me an asshole, racist prick, dickhead, rude, whatever you want...at the end of the day, take a step back and see how horrible of an idea it was to make this false claim. I'm not sure why I keep posting when I'm just repeating the same thing over and over. Edit: see you guys on the hero/legendary from afar. your defense is that you were scammed by your "partner" and in return you are scamming someone else so you were not financially harmed. |
|
|
|
Good luck to all trying. @turtlehurricane, trying to elimate the individual who wiped out your client base...nice.  The vast majority who commented are members who never buy/sell. From what I see, all having bankrolls of $10k and below...with that being said, business is not a topic that the accusers should attempt to pounce me on. Everyone is against me because I hate foreign idiots that are uneducated. Key word being uneducated. I'm dealing with an idiotic Indian muck muck. Call me racist, an asshole, whatever you wish. In February, all accusing idiots will be deleting their posts and biting their tongue. Also police? How do you file a police report with drop names and deals that involve money laundering as HBO failed to mention? That must be new. Thanks. if you are implying that you have a bankroll of more then 10k then there is no reason why you would not be able to afford to pay him despite your "mistake" without wiping out your bankroll. Plus if you are doing 100k+ in volume per month then there is no reason why you need to wait until tax season as your spreads are clearly large enough that you made as much as the "error" in one month |
|
|
|
Of course I wasn't being serious, but asking in here every couple of days isn't going to make it come any faster and people just need to wait for Stunna to make an announcement when he's ready.
well in theory it could get him to look at a cost benefit analysis to see how effective advertising will be for him |
|
|
|
Hopefully some people here can help dox segvec, so that a proper police investigation can occur. I bet he will pay once he realizes he could end up in jail. Jail sucks
For this large of an amount I don't see why a police investigation would not occur without him getting doxxed. This large of an amount of a theft is no small crime |
|
|
|
Everytime someone posts in this thread asking when it's coming Stunna pushes it back by another week.
Has he actually said this or are you being sarcastic? I don't think it would be a very good business practice as it would be depriving him of advertising |
|
|
|
Am I the only one that sees the irony in this picture?  You have the font size set really big. Do you browse on mobile? When I was looking at that yes. That is not what is ironic though. EDIT: it is the fact that there is a shit post directly below the advert that says to report shit posts |
|
|
|
|
Can you give details of the accounts that have negative feedback?
I think your prices are likely too high for the negative trust accounts.
|
|
|
|
I really doubt that segvec even has a partner. That's the shittiest excuse I've seen in a while. Segvec only does small trades for quick profit. Whenever he has a chance to con someone for a big amount he'll do it in the first chance. Like showcased above, and in his trust...
I completed $200k in deals in November alone. What did you do? EDIT: Good night to all. How do you expect to be able to continue to do as many deals moving forward if you are essentially stealing from your customers? Why would anyone want to do business with you. 1. Partner c+p error and sent wrong address.
2. HBO sent funds to random Bulgarian that my partner was dealing with.
3. Bulgarian cashed out funds and ditched partner and myself.
4. Partner's error...so will be reimbursing via his tax return. (USA; mid-feb arrival)
5. HBO is a foreign national who is not educated enough to understand the situation.
6. Posts here in hopes of this scam report making me pay the funds back now.
7. Fails as we've already made an arrangement that will be followed.
8. /story.
If you told the OP to send to a certain address then you need to treat it as if funds were received to your control. HBO did not send the bitcoin to a random address, he sent to the address that you directed him to send to. The fact that you claim someone else controls the address is impossible to prove. You are essentially forcing your customer to take the loss that occurred because of your own mistake. |
|
|
|
Bump. I will probably let this run until Wednesday at ~2359 forum time.
There are several very good entries so far
Less then 24 hours left. Get your entries in soon |
|
|
|
可以卖这么贵啊
我的价格是非常合理的。你可能可以从参与签名运动做出很多比特币的，并且可以acheive在很短的时间上的我的账户的价格回报。我愿意谈谈我的价格，如果您有兴趣购买。 |
|
|
|
but you are asking to borrow BTC in order to spend BTC how would doing that benefit you? I understand how borrowing BTC that is secured by NXT would help you (as I explained how it would help others who are wanting to use alt coins as collateral), but a BTC loan that is secured by BTC does not make sense to me EDIT: also for clarification, I did not ask to borrow money from the OP, I was offering to lend money to the OP EDIT2: I would also be curious to know if the OP can sign a message from an address containing at least 1 BTC or 53k NXT |
|
|
|
For the record, I inquired about the OP's loan, made it clear that the loan would not be funded until either I, or an escrow that we both trust has received collateral and have the transaction sufficiently confirmed. I also expressed the same concerns that it appears he is buying trust, that there is no clear benefit to him taking out this loan other then the fact that he would be receiving trust, and that I was uncomfortable making the loan if it would only be selling trust. I asked for an explanation as to how it would benefit him and he was not able to give one. I explained the logic behind using alt coins as collateral for a bitcoin loan (that the borrower would not have to incur slippage, trading fees, nor the possibility that the price of the altcoin would increase while the loan is outstanding). He eventually agreed to borrow 2.5 BTC secured by 120% worth of NXT (he wanted it to be held by John K - I'm not sure if he contacted him about this or not), he offered to pay 1% and I countered with him paying 3% for one week, and haven't heard from him since. He also has a somewhat suspicioius loan request (or at least one that I do not understand how the lender could be protected), so I think his actions are somewhat sketchy. |
|
|
|
^^^ this should mean that we will see more competition in the signature campaign market which translates to higher rates
Wouldn't have thought.. PocketDice offers decent rates but not many members are eager to join as they limit posts to 35 a week (which is nothing). Bitmixer.io has stated they will be changing the maximum to 0.035btc/week which is 35 posts maximum a week at 0.001/post; less if the rate for seniors is higher. There is no one to say they wouldnt offer effective pay per post rates comparable to fixed rate deals (like the effective .0025 for seniors that bitdice offers or the effective .002 that GAW offers). They have always marketed themselves as a campaign for people that don't post much so it will probably affect the fixed rate market more but it could still spill over to the "real" pay per post market. |
|
|
|
|
Are you wanting to do a loan in terms of fiat or in terms of Bitcoin
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one that sees the irony in this picture? |
|
|
|
|
I think it is better to keep Bitcoin related sections separate from "other" and then both separate from altcoins.
|
|
|
|
Do you have any documentation as to your claim of being a "high volume" asset exchanger and the fact that you are "trusted". Your trust profile is showing no trust that I would consider trustworthy and have no other indications of reasons to trust you. Can you provide any kind of documentation to both of these claims as well as your claim that you recently paid out 30 btc to your shareholders?
Also the reason someone would put up an altcoin as collateral is because they want to borrow money but think the altcoin will rise in value and do not want to sell.
I really do not think your asset would really be considered "in hand" by the lender because in the event of a default you have control over if the asset ever receives any kind of dividend.
If this was a legit request you would probably have a better chance of finding a lender on the NXT forum. If this is a scam you have a better chance of getting someone to fall for your scam here.
Now you're just getting fancy, sir. I guess I should take that as a no :/ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
