|
It's a busy thread with a lot of comments to respond to and points to make, who's the fucking whiny bitch here? You guys are the ones crying to the fucking mods because I responded to 3 people and made 2 comments over a 10 hour period when there's less users on line? You guys are fucking losers.
|
|
|
|
On a globe the horizon is a convex dome of water that ships go up over and behind. On a flat earth the horizon rises to eye level due to convergence and perspective on a plane.
Observation of the horizon is consistent with convergence and perspective on a plane no matter how much you mock me, or insult me, or claim the I'm lying and report me to the mods, or tag me as a scammer or try to hide my posts with spam about the earth being a pretzel, or cry to the mods to censor my posts, or post photoshopped images from NASA and PBS.
The horizon just keeps on rising and I want you all to die horrible deaths for lying to my face.
You're being reported because you're multi-posting. I haven't reported you for that yet but you're such an irritating whiny bitch that I'm considering whether it would be fun to make this thread 100 pages shorter. Same goes for your sidekick Joe. Kinda makes sense that you two flat-brainers are unable to grasp the simple concept of posting on a forum. Oh, by the way, the Earth is not flat. Sorry if that spoils your Wednesday. Show me the dome bitch, three miles out, where is it? Oh that's right you claim there is no dome, guess what that makes you bitch? Even NDT has to bow to the dome! |
|
|
|
Don't you just love notbatman and his buddies? The more they talk, the more they tell us that they have a comical, pseudo, flat-earth religion going for themselves. And the pictures show it best of all. Probably this thread is one of the most religious threads in this whole forum. Watch, now. if they answer my post here, it will be with more FE religion content.   I can show you the horizon rising to eye level, can you show me a convex dome three miles out that causes your horizon? You're fucking with me here bro, you can't back up your claims, period.  Go drink yourself to death motherfucker! |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Define "wave-shifting".
Established, replicated and peer reviewed proofs of a stationary Earth:
1. Airy's Failure Experiment.
2. The Michaelson & Morley Experiment.
3. Dufour & Prunier's replication of the Sagnac Experiment.
Your move Mr. Science.
|
|
|
|
Observation of the horizon is consistent with convergence and perspective on a plane no matter how much you mock me, or insult me, or claim the I'm lying and report me to the mods, or tag me as a scammer or try to hide my posts with spam about the earth being a pretzel, or cry to the mods to censor my posts, or post photoshopped images from NASA and PBS.
The horizon just keeps on rising and I want you all to die horrible deaths for lying to my face.
Dude, this is a forum about bitcoin, not a support group for those crying out for help. Kill yourself if you can't deal with the horizon rising to eye level. On a globe the horizon is a convex dome of water that ships go up over and behind. On a flat earth the horizon rises to eye level due to convergence and perspective on a plane.
Observation of the horizon is consistent with convergence and perspective on a plane no matter how much you mock me, or insult me, or claim the I'm lying and report me to the mods, or tag me as a scammer or try to hide my posts with spam about the earth being a pretzel, or cry to the mods to censor my posts, or post photoshopped images from NASA and PBS.
The horizon just keeps on rising and I want you all to die horrible deaths for lying to my face.
Observation of the earth from space indicates otherwise. The russians have photos of earth too, are they faked as well? Kill yourself for spreading propaganda, there's no scientific proof of "outer space" and pictures at high altitude are taken with a fisheye lens then manipulated in photoshop. CGI images and testemony from dishonest fags doesn't count as observation. If you could live stream it too that would be great, I'd love to see the piano wire ripping through your jugular and blood spraying everywhere. |
|
|
|
I was re-posting deleted content, replying to an individual user and I didn't realize I hit the arbritary limit however, I deleted one post. I hope you're happy now you fucking gaslighting cock smoker. It was a single post that was removed not 5, that's why I'm here bitching about it. |
|
|
|
I didn't remove them, but there's one report on you that has been handled and it's for "user posting 5 times in a row", so that's probably why. Please read the rules before you start accusing people of things as many of these situations can be cleared up by just following the rules.
Vod told suchmoon to report me for posing 5 times in a row so I consolidated all 5 posts into a single amended post. Now that single post gets removed, I don't understand? |
|
|
|
|
I'm dealing with an organized effort by multiple users, they're resorting to underhanded tactics to stop the spread of factual information. Petitioning mods is part of their game, don't be tools for scumbags like Vod and suchmoon.
I already have my political options in politics censored by fyinghellfish, my libertarian values must rub him the wrong way. You guys suck for putting a leftist, atheist communist in charge of moderation.
Also I really don't apreceates the canned response.
|
|
|
|
|
On a globe the horizon is a convex dome of water that ships go up over and behind. On a flat earth the horizon rises to eye level due to convergence and perspective on a plane.
Observation of the horizon is consistent with convergence and perspective on a plane no matter how much you mock me, or insult me, or claim the I'm lying and report me to the mods, or tag me as a scammer or try to hide my posts with spam about the earth being a pretzel, or cry to the mods to censor my posts, or post photoshopped images from NASA and PBS.
The horizon just keeps on rising and I want you all to die horrible deaths for lying to my face.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm having posts about the horizon rising to eye level in my Flat Earth thread censored by mods.
Is censorship of scientific information in line with the values heald by BCT?
|
|
|
|
The Moon has it's own "glory" but according Enoch it's lit by the Sun, "Huston, we have a problem". I agree with The Council of Nicaea in their in their decision not to include this book. I'd watch your video but the link doesn't work for me, just error messages. |
|
|
|
Globalists are like scammers or cockroaches, there's no possible way to negotiate with them. They know the Earth is flat and there's nothing that can be done to get them to stop claiming it's a globe. Empirical proof doesn't work, established physical experiments don't work, science doesn't work, observation doesn't work, rationalization doesn't work, logic doesn't work, even the math for the globe is broken and proving it 100% doesn't work. If you pull out a gun and murder the guy standing next to him and put the gun to his head and tell his he's going to die if he says globe one more time. He will die for the globe and the other lies!  |
|
|
|
It's a shame that FE people are duped into accepting science that is incomplete. However, everybody has a religion of some sort. Go fucking choke to death on a bottle of Everclear, I already exposed you bullshit with the narrow band mirage at the horizon a few pages ago yet you just change gears to perspective and keep going with boats over the curve. |
|
|
|
^^^ spammed with shill comments just like here, I guess you couldn't handle the facts presented in either the video or the linked paper. You even omitted the link to the paper, yet included the entirety of the rest of the comments. Why would you remove the thoroughly researched and documented paper with references? You redacted the most relevant section of the quote. Oh wait, no don't answer. I figured it out, BECAUSE YOU'RE A SHILL!
If you sail from North America to Europe on a spherical object how can you not be sailing up the water at some point?
Joe, you said water always finds it's level. One lie not playing nice with the others? Ah the only take part of the quote act. Not sure you fooling anyone. Full quote below. "If you sail from North America to Europe on a spherical object how can you not be sailing up the water at some point? The water surface is never level on your model. Your either sailing up or down (the entire time). Please explain." Still waiting on the answer as well. You been able to prove anything with math yet? Or talk to any more probes billions of miles away. Did you use math to do it? Come with something better next time. ---- Nice try on deleting your post once you got exposed. Is it just (((coincidence))) that both Vod and Astargath are both playing the omit a section of the quote game? This fucking guy has the hubris to cry science then removes the scientific paper and points to fucking youtube comments left by shills. If Earth is a globe why are all these people gaslighting so hard instead of arguing facts?
Well on a globe there's a convex dome of water 3 miles out that a ship sails up, over and behind and, the horizon line is the peek of this convex dome.
No. That's just something you made up. A globe is a globe, it doesn't have "domes" in its oceans and ships don't sail "up" on them. Universities, NASA, PBS, etc, all say "boats sail over the curve" because they have to, the globe math forces them to claim this absurdity and they do.
Googling "boats sail over the curve" shows only one result from a flat-earther site, so you're lying again. If the Earth is a globe then there's a fucking convex dome of water, I didn't invent the fucking globe math, I didn't make this shit up.
"... "If you send a ship straight to the horizon eventually it begins to disappear until it’s no longer visible beyond you horizon," he said. ..." <-- Tyson's quote when questioned for proof of Earth's curve.
Source: https://www.newsweek.com/neil-degrasse-tyson-flat-earth-startalk-explains-842432
"... a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton University. ...",
"... He was awarded the NASA Distinguished Public Service Medal ...",
"... hosted the television show NOVA ScienceNow on PBS. ..."
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson
Why do you keep making false accusations about me lying? Because you lied. There is nothing about sailing over curves in Tyson's quote. As I said, the only place where that phrase appears is a flat-earther site: https://i.snag.gy/5XqBRC.jpgIf you sail from North America to Europe on a spherical object how can you not be sailing up the water at some point? The water surface is never level on your model. Your either sailing up or down (the entire time). Please explain.
You should let your kid go to an actual school and perhaps go with him too, you dumbass scammer. You should fuck off with your gaslighting bullshit if you can't argue facts. Accusing me lying because I didn't quote verbatim something said 100 different ways by a 100 different scientists? I got that quote after the fact from Google with 10 seconds of searching, 3rd fucking link down. Go fucking kill yourself! |
|
|
|
Hey astargath I'm not going to keep adding all our old text its blowing the page up and making it hard to read.
Ok you called it "gravity" and I agree gravity is just a name but what causes the phenomenon of gravity to act on us and objects on earth? What exactly is the reason that water is pasted to the exterior of the sphere? What are the mechanisms that cause it? Can you prove that these are the actual causes?
You keep using the word "believe". It is irrelevant what I believe in. This is science. We need to prove it to each other or it's just shit talking. In science we need to prove it. This may be the entire crux of the issue if your arguing honestly.
If this is all a belief to you then I have zero issues with that. Same as religion.
If you are saying it is a fact then we need a practical demonstration. If you cannot practically demonstrate it, is it science?
Final line of questions how do you know space exists as it's been taught? How do you know we are hurling through the universe at millions of miles per hour? How do you know it was gravity and not some other force causing it? How can one prove as factual these things. I have yet to find solid proof.
Hence my position. I only know what I know. Everything else is a belief and I teach science from both sides since I have yet to see proof of the flat earth map which is presented or the heliocentric model.
Do I believe in space? I used to. Now I simply don't know if being honest. How would I unless I simply believed what was being presented.
Can you prove that these are the actual causes? Yes, again, look at planets, we can measure their gravity.  This formula uses the mass of the planet or object to calculate ''gravity''. We know gravity on Mars is around 3.7m/s2 We know gravity on the Moon is around 1.6 m/s2 We went there and... guess what, it was true, gravity was 1.6m/s2 If this is not enough proof then I don't know what you need, really. G was derived from watching heavy balls in a 18th century shed through a small hole drilled in the wall. ((They)) literally measure Mars and the Moon's weight (and gravity) with heavy balls in a shed. That's right folks, heavy balls in the shed proves there are heavy balls in the sky. *facepalm* Why the Cavendish Experiment Is Ridiculous -- https://youtu.be/pJ-7kbaHUgMHere's a rigorous debunking of the experiment. -- http://milesmathis.com/caven.html |
|
|
|
...
What keeps water in a container? The container?
I'm glad you asked, it's the ridged container gravity creates. You can prove the ridged nature of gravity yourself just by looking at a hot air balloon. You see the Earth is spinning and the balloon gets pulled along by Earth's atmosphere so, while the balloon is floating in one spot and you're traveling a 1000 miles per hour (at the equator) below it, the balloon remains stationary above you. It's the ridged immovable connection gravity creates between the air molecules surrounding the balloon and the molecules in the ground & water that causes the air to pull on the balloon. The fact the balloon doesn't move away from you at high speed is proof of this ridged immovable connection. As this example shows the ridged walls of a container are actually the perfect analogy for how the force of gravity pulls on objects. Perhaps an even better example of the ridged structure gravity creates is, the solid barrier it forms between the pressurized gasses in the atmosphere and the vacuum of space. Without this barrier all the gasses would escape into the vacuum and that proves that gravity is not only real but, it showcases how it works just like a container.
Well on a globe there's a convex dome of water 3 miles out that a ship sails up, over and behind and, the horizon line is the peek of this convex dome.
No. That's just something you made up. A globe is a globe, it doesn't have "domes" in its oceans and ships don't sail "up" on them. ... "A globe is a globe, it doesn't have "domes" in its oceans and ships don't sail "up" on them." If you sail from North America to Europe on a spherical object how can you not be sailing up the water at some point? The water surface is never level on your model. Your either sailing up or down (the entire time). Please explain. It seems the poor boy is a tad bid confused and it's probably my fault for using a poor choice of words. By dome I'm referring to the mound, bulge or hump formed by the convex section of water that conforms to the globe between the two points of an observer standing on the water, and a ship. On the globe up is relative to gravity. When you look out over the globe everything around you in a 360 degree circle is down hill and the ship is actually traveling down but, since up is relative the ship moves up relative to the point on the curve that forms the horizon. After the horizon ship continues its voyage down hill until it is hidden by the horizon curve.
|
|
|
|
Well on a globe there's a convex dome of water 3 miles out that a ship sails up, over and behind and, the horizon line is the peek of this convex dome.
No. That's just something you made up. A globe is a globe, it doesn't have "domes" in its oceans and ships don't sail "up" on them. Universities, NASA, PBS, etc, all say "boats sail over the curve" because they have to, the globe math forces them to claim this absurdity and they do.
Googling "boats sail over the curve" shows only one result from a flat-earther site, so you're lying again. If the Earth is a globe then there's a fucking convex dome of water, I didn't invent the fucking globe math, I didn't make this shit up.
"... "If you send a ship straight to the horizon eventually it begins to disappear until it’s no longer visible beyond you horizon," he said. ..."
Source: https://www.newsweek.com/neil-degrasse-tyson-flat-earth-startalk-explains-842432
"... a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton University. ...",
"... He was awarded the NASA Distinguished Public Service Medal ...",
"... hosted the television show NOVA ScienceNow on PBS. ..."
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson
Why do you keep making false accusations about me lying? |
|
|
|
We've got you admitting that you know "there is no dome of water" in a weak attempt to fleece a user out of $50. Now you've done a 360 and it's back to ships up, over and behind a convex dome of water 3 miles out. You just can't let go of the domerizon can you?
There is no "dome" and there is no "up" and the ship doesn't disappear 3 miles out. I just can't let go laughing at your fight with your own straw man. There's only one straw man here and you're propping it up, nowhere do I state the point at which the ship vanishes, only that there's a convex dome of water that the globe can't exist without. Remember you're the one screaming you can't bring a ship back into view with binoculars and that perspective isn't dictating what's being seen. Well on a globe there's a convex dome of water 3 miles out that a ship sails up, over and behind and, the horizon line is the peek of this convex dome; THE DOMERIZON. You're the one arguing for the globe and this fucking convex dome of water. If the dome of water isn't there, neither is the globe. Convergence and perspective on a plane; if your height is 6' then it takes 3 miles of ocean to visually rise up to eye level, beyond that objects moving away become obscured from the bottom up. With the naked eye and a 6' vantage point objects will pass the vanishing point due to convergence before any other effects such as narrow band mirages begin to obscure them. Objects past the vanishing point for the human eye can be brought back into view with binoculars, perspective will still cover some of the bottom and the magnified image will reveal the narrow band mirage covering the horizon line. At the limit of binoculars either the vanishing point is reach or the object is obscured by the narrow band mirage and a telescope must be used. If atmospheric conditions are good the telescope may bring the object back into view where it will start to become magnified by the atmosphere in an effect called looming, this effect like perspective and the narrow band mirage also obscure the bottom of objects by enlarging them beyond the horizon line.
Using the Earth curvature formula of 8" per mile squared it dictates that, when viewing a ship 7 miles away between you and the ship there's a 8' tall convex dome of water. If you claim the Earth is a globe then you can not escape THE DOMERIZON! The globe is huge in scale compared to our size so, even the slight bend over 7 miles translates into a massive 8' tall convex dome of water that ships sail up, over and behind. This is why sources like Universities, NASA, PBS, etc, all say "boats sail over the curve" because they have to, the globe math forces them to claim this absurdity and they do.
I just can't let go laughing at your fight with your own straw man.
Just report him for posting five times in a row. Liar needs to go.  I've condensed the posts into a single amended post you festering sack. You're the one that needs to go...empty his bowels in a more appropriate location; your accusations are as full of shit as you are. "Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness." -- Exodus 23:1, KJV
|
|
|
|
|
Questions:
1. Does the artificial horizon in a jets cockpit match the visual horizon line?
2. How does the pilot know he's flying level with the ground?
3. If the pilot corrects for the 3 degree angle drop the metabunk calculator predicts in the horizon at 33k feet, will the plane remain at the same altitude?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
