^Stalker  |
|
|
|
That was a great video, this guy gets it! |
|
|
|
Whatever it is still over a Booring range and i am sure about the upcoming week its gona be red again then might be a rally again.
...
You just made my ignore list with your non resized images. LOL, that's a bit harsh. Done but chart looks oddd in the resized image to manage it do let me know
When you resize your image, don't define both width and height. One is enough, otherwise the scale is off. Also, it's more of a thread etiquette to resize an image when you quote someone compared to an original post. However, most observers would appreciate if you resized the image in your original post too, if the image is too large. Right now, your image is too small in your original post, making it hard to read. Try to set width to 600 or something suitable. Like this:  And when you quote someone, set the width to e.g. 200, like this: Just keep posting. I'm enjoying reading your posts. Sir thanks actually a user said that resize is better to post then i looked for the Posts regarding resize and got a code then simple pasted that code now i know how to use thanks for your guidance i will take care of it next time. Like he said when you requote an image then resize it again like I did here. |
|
|
|
Done but chart looks oddd in the resized image to manage it do let me know
Removed, just resize it to the size where you can read the text and that is usually the optimal size, you'll get better at it over time. All you have to do is use either the height or the width, not both and the aspect ratio will do the rest. Go back and quote some good examples from previous pages and you will see how its done. |
|
|
|
You're right. Thanks for the ignore tip, this is what i just was about to do anyway.
EDIT: And i keep standing by my decision to abandon the forum ignore list, of course.
I have a huge ignore list, I even have chart buddy on it. It keeps me sane (relatively) and I just hit the show toggle if I want to see whats there. Really the only way I can keep up with this thread for all these years. Whatever it is still over a Booring range and i am sure about the upcoming week its gona be red again then might be a rally again.
...
You just made my ignore list with your non resized images. |
|
|
|
Who would pay $100 fees?
Only banks. |
|
|
|
About that, dear Hueristic.
Do you remember our “hyperbole” debate on Bob’s WO fork?
It was the single post of mine that got deleted there. So much for “ignoring”.
Actually no i don't but my memory sucks now, sorry you have dropped to this level though. I used to enjoy you posts and all I can assume now is you have made a poor decision and are flailing about blaming everyone else except yourself. Was it grin that did you in? Remember I warned people about that. |
|
|
|
Careful with the quotations there.
Linus seems to lose large amounts of data on a semi-regular basis. I leave people to infer from that what they will.
My bad, not sure what happened there. Booze maybe  |
|
|
|
Those lists of large BTC stashes treat 30k as a big deal. In 2010 that was only enough for a half dozen pizzas. Remember Manwhalebear? Dumped 30k just like that (October 6, 2014). I wonder how many more he kept hodling. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdqKOKsymfkI watched it happen live. Jolly good fun. You don't see these type temper tantrums anymore. |
|
|
|
Broken clock and all that... But I gotta admit BA's retirement looks quite bizarre, particularly the timing after Brady's un-retirement. Agreed, it is head scratching. However, did Tom Brady and Bruce Arians have conflicts or disagreed much when Brady joined the team during that superbowl winning season? I never heard anything and have always thought that the Buccaneers was a team of players with similar minds and disposition. There were in fact disagreements between Brady and Arians during the season they won the SB and Arians even criticized Brady in front of the media at least once, so who knows what went behind closed doors between those two. Maybe Arians retired because of a power struggle, after all when Brady was with the Patriots he had in Belichick someone which could keep him and the rest of the team in check, however with the Bucs who could keep Brady in check? Arians? Not really, If Arians told you to do something and Brady told you to do the opposite who would you listen to? In theory the players should listen to Arians, but the prestige of Brady is so great that maybe the players decided to follow Brady’s instructions over Arians, and even Arians talked about this saying that if he gave an order the players were not very enthusiastic about doing it but if Brady said the same thing to them then they will do it without thinking about it. I wouldn't doubt Arians/Brown had something to do with it as well. |
|
|
|
This sick fuck has to be banned ASAP.  We ignore here, not cancel. |
|
|
|
Linus is a pos and I would never trust anything hes involved in. I've been trying to block his crap for years and youtube still pushes it on me, that in itself is telling. https://odysee.com is the wtg imo. |
|
|
|
I've always been a bitcoin and Monero bull but have always thought of BTC as being the store of value for the ngu tech but it seems like we may be hitting a point where the tweeters are realizing Moneros value and we may see the value proposition sooner rather than later. IOW I think the next few months are critical.  @Caps..Hope your weathering the coof reasonably, being vaxed helped me alot imo. <<<--- not gonna post this in wo as don't need to hear the insane asylum lose their shit. |
|
|
|
Let's not count :p
but I heard gays are most soft hearted people on earth they can't hurt any one and they are harmless too. Is it true?
Don't ask me how i know.
 |
|
|
|
It's pretty fucking gay.
Don't much like things gayer than myself.
 |
|
|
|
I have to admit... I am not done processing this news, and the concept gives me a little pause.
BUT. One thing I think many have not yet seen (gawd I sound like CSW) is the fact that the Bitcoin blockchain will continue to be the most secure distributed shared database on the earth. And that quality gives it the unique ability to underpin these sorts of products.
One thing you often hear from the mouths of alt-coiners is that Bitcoin will not be able to pay the miners after a few more halving to remain as secure as it should. But the tradeoffs being made imply the possibility that transactions on the base layer could become quite expensive over time. Either that or we allow more of them, or a combination.
But what we have here is a transactional currency that is rooted in the security of the base chain.
I really wish Finney had lived to see this. I would love to hear his thoughts on the matter. I feel like it could be a sort of extension to what he described with his "bitcoin banks" ideas.
Is it dangerous? Does it somehow subvert Bitcoin and give control back to the elites?
I have no idea. But I do know we will hear that a lot. Tech surprises us. This is a VERY interesting evolution in the history of Bitcoin. i do think this is going to get the attention of a lot of very powerful people. And the fun part is... if the Fed does not allow the dollar to be traded this way, then something else will happen instead. They either embrace this. Or they get steamrolled.
I haven't looked into any of this but are they just copying bitcoin omni layer onto lightning? Sir i want to Explain it as much i know it. It is going to be merged like The Lightning layer and the OMNI layer the basics of OMI layer is to provide the Base of the Flow of Stable Currency as USDT through out the various nodes on the Lightning Layer for the funds transection. It seems like combo in which stable coin flow will be of Pegged or Derivative Contract as TUSD and USDT. Other i am not sure for The Communication between the layers Sorry but I just can't follow your broken English posts, maybe in the future you might want to just quote pertinent information rather than trying to paraphrase it? I've found this article that seems to do a pretty good job of eli5ing it and indeed it does look like a patch to run omni code over lightning. https://thebitcoinmanual.com/articles/ln-stable-coins-work-omnibolt/OmniBOLT is based on the fundamental theory of Lightning Network specification and describes how to enable OmniLayer assets to be circulated via lightning channels and how can smart assets benefit from this novel quick payment theory. |
|
|
|
I have to admit... I am not done processing this news, and the concept gives me a little pause.
BUT. One thing I think many have not yet seen (gawd I sound like CSW) is the fact that the Bitcoin blockchain will continue to be the most secure distributed shared database on the earth. And that quality gives it the unique ability to underpin these sorts of products.
One thing you often hear from the mouths of alt-coiners is that Bitcoin will not be able to pay the miners after a few more halving to remain as secure as it should. But the tradeoffs being made imply the possibility that transactions on the base layer could become quite expensive over time. Either that or we allow more of them, or a combination.
But what we have here is a transactional currency that is rooted in the security of the base chain.
I really wish Finney had lived to see this. I would love to hear his thoughts on the matter. I feel like it could be a sort of extension to what he described with his "bitcoin banks" ideas.
Is it dangerous? Does it somehow subvert Bitcoin and give control back to the elites?
I have no idea. But I do know we will hear that a lot. Tech surprises us. This is a VERY interesting evolution in the history of Bitcoin. i do think this is going to get the attention of a lot of very powerful people. And the fun part is... if the Fed does not allow the dollar to be traded this way, then something else will happen instead. They either embrace this. Or they get steamrolled.
I haven't looked into any of this but are they just copying bitcoin omni layer onto lightning? |
|
|
|
Apparently the Chinese need to stock up on pickle jars. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
