Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 03:51:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 »
1461  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - a new thin client on: February 08, 2012, 09:21:49 AM
Quote
I would suggest we add them as options, instead of full commands.

Done. I'm changing my previous post to reflect the changes.
great, thanks. I just merged your code.
1462  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: what light client/client to use? on: February 08, 2012, 08:35:00 AM
I use Electrum. because I am developing it  Grin
1463  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - a new thin client on: February 08, 2012, 06:01:26 AM
I've modified electrum and made a pull request:
Added two cli commands: payfromto and paytoch:
- payfromto makes a payment from a keypair given as argument without saving the keypair in the wallet or using any other address in it.
- paytoch is the same as payto but specifying a custom change address (useful for imported keys).

hi dithi,

thanks, these are nice functionalities.
I would suggest we add them as options, instead of full commands.

for example:
Code:
payto --fromaddr <addr>
payto --changeaddr <addr>
with options, it should be possible to apply these options to both 'mktx' and 'payto', and to combine them
1464  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [PROPOSAL] Give proof of identity to your customers on: February 07, 2012, 05:22:08 PM
I added these features to Electrum.
See the announcement here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=50936.msg735942#msg735942
1465  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - a new thin client on: February 07, 2012, 05:19:46 PM
I just released Electrum version 0.38.

This version introduces new and experimental features: aliases and signed URIs

Aliases are dynamic pointers to Bitcoin addresses. They may be signed by a trusted authority, or self-signed.

Signed URIs are URIs that are signed by a merchant, with an address that is linked to the reputation of the merchant.
The goal is to provide a proof of payment for consumers (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=58534)

See here for a complete description of aliases and signed URIs: http://ecdsa.org/bitcoin_URIs.html
Of course it is possible to combine both: Merchants may have their main address signed by a trusted authority, and use that address in order to sign the URIs they give to their customers.

These features are still experimental, and they are very likely to evolve.
I plan to write a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) for them later.
However, I believe that it is important to get feedback from users at an early stage.
This is why I went ahead and wrote a demonstrator.

Changelog:
* aliases and signed URIs (see http://ecdsa.org/bitcoin_URIs.html )
* 'signmessage' and 'verifymessage' commands, same syntax as in bitcoind
* 'eval' command, that evaluates a python statement. Use it to examine or modify the content of your wallet from the command line.
examples:
Code:
electrum eval wallet.aliases
electrum eval wallet.aliases.pop('an_alias')
1466  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - a new thin client on: February 07, 2012, 10:55:40 AM
Looks like libbitcoin is getting closer! I think there was some talk about using it once it was more stable.
yes this is something I have been watching closely.
for the last few weeks I have been working on adding new features to the client.
I will try to release 0.38 soon.
1467  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin's relationship with the Internet. on: February 07, 2012, 09:07:51 AM
in soviet russia, the internet pays you
That would explain the fast speeds.

oh, and in soviet russia, the blockchain downloads you
1468  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin's relationship with the Internet. on: February 07, 2012, 06:25:38 AM
in soviet russia, the internet pays you
1469  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum created a negative balance - rounding errors on: February 05, 2012, 08:50:51 PM
who do I need to  nudge to get the windows client recompiled, or do i need to pull and compile myself?

marked

there's a dedicated thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=53858
1470  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum created a negative balance - rounding errors on: February 04, 2012, 10:51:25 PM
Using floating point numbers? Oh my.
indeed, the command-line interface interface displays amounts with floating point numbers; thanks for spotting it, I will fix it.
1471  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Feedback to bitcoinate.org (beautiful "donate bitcoins" buttons) on: February 02, 2012, 03:41:16 PM
do you know about bitcoin: URIs ?
I thought that this would be introduced soon, but I didn't know that it is already available.
Thanks a lot! I'll integrate it into bitcoinate! =)

it is not yet available for the official client gui (bitcoin-qt), except through drag and drop.
however, it should be available in the next release.
1472  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Feedback to bitcoinate.org (beautiful "donate bitcoins" buttons) on: February 02, 2012, 03:15:20 PM
do you know about bitcoin: URIs ?
see here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0021
and here: http://ecdsa.org/bitcoin_URIs.html
1473  Economy / Goods / Re: Spend your bitcoins at my eBay store! Computer Hardware / Components and much mo on: February 02, 2012, 06:57:56 AM
why don't you sell there: https://bitmit.net
1474  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [EUROBIT] Rick Falkvinge - Banks: The Fourth Victim of Citizen's empowerment on: February 01, 2012, 01:14:36 PM
also here: http://bitcoinmedia.com/eurobit-rick-falkvinge-banks-the-fourth-victim-of-citizens-empowerment/
1475  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Accepting Bitcoin on eCommerce site? on: January 31, 2012, 10:10:20 AM
http://bit-pay.com
1476  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Need more clarification on backing up wallet on: January 30, 2012, 02:49:52 PM
well, the official Bitcoin client is the defacto client proposed at bitcoin.org
it does not look like their policy is to redirect noobs to more user-friendly clients.
True but not exactly a surprise that they don't want the responsibility of having to worry about the alternative clients they endorsed.
Not gonna happen.
this is understandable.
I guess the official client should use a deterministic wallet by default.
1477  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Need more clarification on backing up wallet on: January 30, 2012, 02:46:25 PM
Er... thanks guys, this is suddenly too much information for me to digest.
So basically if I have no transactions or not expecting any, my backup will be good for years?
(I am using the official client)

yes.
do not forget to wait until the blockchain is fully synchronized everytime you use it; if you use it rarely the synchronization will take some time.
1478  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Need more clarification on backing up wallet on: January 30, 2012, 02:42:50 PM
... only a minority of users can be expected to follow a secure backup routine.

are you saying that the official client is written for a minority of users?
why doesn't it have a deterministic wallet?


The official client likely will never be casual user friendly.  It is the reference design.  It tests out new functionality but it likely will never be the best client for casual users.  Personally I think this is a good thing.  We don't want one defacto client. 

well, the official Bitcoin client is the defacto client proposed at bitcoin.org
it does not look like their policy is to redirect noobs to more user-friendly clients.
1479  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Need more clarification on backing up wallet on: January 30, 2012, 02:34:13 PM
... only a minority of users can be expected to follow a secure backup routine.

are you saying that the official client is written for a minority of users?
why doesn't it have a deterministic wallet?
1480  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Need more clarification on backing up wallet on: January 30, 2012, 02:22:13 PM
if you fail to backup your wallet with the official client, you might lose some coins when your PC crashes.
but I guess the client warns you when its pool of addresses gets deprecated.
If it only were that simple... The pool is always being repopulated, no problem there. Nothing for the client to warn about.
The problem arises when one has to rely on a very old wallet backup missing some of the recently-generated keys.
exactly. but I was under the impression that the client warns you when the pool gets repopulated.
if it doesn't, how do you know when you need to back up?


It doesn't the pool is ALWAYS being repopulated.  The client also has no idea when your last backup was.

As example might help.

Your keypool by default has 100 keys.  These are unused keys, the "next 100".

You make a backup today.  The backup contains all existing transactions plus the next 100 into the future.

EVERYTIME you click NEW ADDRESS or receive funds one address from keypool is used and the client automatically puts 1 new key into the keypool.  So as long as your backup occured within the last 100 "new keys" being used you are safe.

You can set a larger keypool and honestly given how small keys are I don't know why client doesn't use a more "noob safe" number like 500 keys in the keypool by default.

This is not how I thought it worked.
Given that 100 addresses are pre-generated, I thought it would wait until they are all used until it generates another batch of 100.
This would be way safer, because you could warn the user that it is time to do another backup.
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!