Are you referring to the Google Spread Sheet?  This was discussed (yet again) half a dozen pages ago.

I'll give it about another two days for anyone to ask questions or air their concerns and will then create a moderated version of the Known Alts thread.

Watch this space.

I couldn't agree more and this comes back to two points I make time and again.  Firstly investigators should thoroughly investigate a UID for things such as social media profiles and wallet addresses - anything that can give away clues of other alts *including* checking trust feedback both trusted and untrusted.  Which leads me straight into:

Secondly, I keep saying that in investigator should mark an alt with neutral or negative trust feedback that way later investigators can see at a glance that a previous investigation has occurred instead of relying on others to do the marking, or appealing to DT to place a neutral/negative on UID's.  Do it yourself!

Absolutely!

Merit exchanging (or even one way merits), Default Trust (again, either mutual or one way) as well as DT trust, or trust feedbacks occurring in the same 24 hour period (or week in the case of default trust) are all hall marks of alts being used to build up one or more profiles.  An example of this can be seen in my thread: [Investigation] Four users who distrust pooya87, ndnh, aliashraf,gembitz etc

Other examples include registration, or last active dates, posting one after the other in threads (usually attempting to join campaigns) - even spelling and turns of phrases can be markers of alts/connections.

Above all actual use of the same wallets, or wallet addresses not just once but on multiple occasions are solid indicators of two or more UID's being alts.

BUT...

Just because alts use the same wallets/wallet addresses/social media accounts doesn't in itself prove anything unto-wards - like most others, I will mark alts trust feedback page with neutral trust feed back to advise others.

OTOH, two UID's applying for the same bounty / signature campaigns using the same wallet address (or in some instances sending funds from two seemingly separate wallet addresses to the same wallet address) are proof of ulterior intentions and most investigators will mark these UID's with negative trust feedback.

Rugby League Australia.

I had a few wins in round five.  (Six wins from eight games)


For round six, I'm going with the following:

Canberra Raiders - North Queensland Cowboys   Money Line   North Queensland Cowboys @ 2.41   Taken Amount: 0.10 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.24 mBTC
South Sydney Rabbitohs - Canterbury Bulldogs   Money Line   South Sydney Rabbitohs @ 1.25   Taken Amount: 0.10 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.13 mBTC
Penrith Panthers - Brisbane Broncos      Money Line   Penrith Panthers @ 1.09      Taken Amount: 0.10 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.11 mBTC
Manly Sea Eagles - Gold Coast Titans      Money Line   Manly Sea Eagles @ 1.52      Taken Amount: 0.10 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.15 mBTC
Melbourne Storm - Cronulla Sharks      Money Line   Melbourne Storm @ 1.36      Taken Amount: 0.10 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.14 mBTC
Sydney Roosters - New Zealand Warriors      Money Line   Sydney Roosters @ 1.16      Taken Amount: 0.10 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.12 mBTC
St George/Illawarra Dragons - Newcastle Knights   Money Line   Newcastle Knights @ 2.41   Taken Amount: 0.10 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.24 mBTC
Parramatta Eels - Wests Tigers         Money Line   Parramatta Eels @ 1.07      Taken Amount: 0.10 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.11 mBTC

Although the Raiders are building from week to week, I feel the Cowboys may just pull something out of the bag to keep them in contention.  The Bulldogs will chase the Rabbitohs around, but they won't be able to catch them.  The Broncos did their dough last round and I'd be surprised if they were to beat the top placed Panthers.  Similarly, the Sea Eagles are starting to soar all the while the Titans are proving they are anything but.  The Sharks won't be able to ride out the Storm while the Roosters will have something to crow about (should be a close game).

The Knights will slay the Dragons (never gets old saying that) while the Paramatta Ells will fax their game play to the Wests' Tigers who will then languish on seven losses this season in the first six rounds.

 

It really doesn't work that way... The fact you have received ZERO merits should disqualify you from any and all signature campaigns.  Bounty posts, and simultaneously claiming from the same campaign are frowned upon and you're never, ever going to get people to change their opinions on that one within this forum.

---

---

There seems to be universal approval to migrate this thread into a moderated thread (something I never thought I'd find myself typing out, but there you have it) .

I do however, feel there should be some ground rules so that there are no misunderstandings about which posts are going to be deleted through moderation.  (Hopefully these ground rules will address @holydarkness ' concerns)

• No "Newbie" or, "Junior Member" can post an investigation in this thread.  They can however post a link (once) to a thread in the reputation section where their investigations can be investigated and analised.
• The only way in which a newbie, or Jr Member can post is if they are appealing NEGATIVE trust being left on their trust feedback page.  (If the post is neutral, then their appeal *may* be deleted)
• Any user of any rank who quotes an entire post then makes a one line comment in response (usually "it wasn't me!" or similar) will have their post deleted.  
  
  Trim a quote e.g.
  
  
  Quote from: (name of investigator)
  ...
• Two UID's  being uncovered as alts does not justify either, or both receiving negative trust feedback.  Unless, of course they have done something such as claiming from the same campaign which is frowned upon by most users here.
• There needs to be a minimum standard of "proof" connecting two or more UID's - e.g.
  
  
  • multiple alts claiming from the same campaign.  In saying this, there have been instances of brand new/newbies using the details of another user to join a campaign.  This may be a case of the newbie copying another users work.  In this case, that does not warrant a negative.
  • multiple users waking up on the same date
• If you merit an investigation, you are asserting that you have verified the contents of the other person's investigation to be correct.
• You cannot post an investigation via an alt, known, suspected, or not known now, but uncovered at a later date.  i.e. choose just one UID you are going to post investigation from.  ^{I'm not sure what action I'll take, but it may involve one, or all alts posts being deleted.}
• If you leave negative trust feedback with a link to a post in this thread, you agree to remove (or change to neutral) any trust feedback found to be incorrect and agree to either remove, or modify with updated information to correct your mistake of a post in this thread in a timely manor.  Should you leave negative trust feedback, or incorrect information in this thread after multiple requests to have that information removed, the post may be deleted, and you may be temp-banned.
• Teletalk.org is banned from posting for twelve months from the date of the first post in the Mk IV thread.

How do people feel about these guidelines?

I'll leave this open for discussion for a few more days.

@JeromeTash - even now, zazarb does not distrust james.lent

Make of that what you will.

It's sad that you shun this thread and disrespect me in other threads then use a throw away one post brand new newbie to start a thread that you then take over to post you thin findings.

---

---

LoyaltyShanto has already been banned (according to BPIP.org;s information) so I expect their alts will go fairly soon.

---

---

Can I ask the various investigators here what your thoughts are on newbies and jr members posting investigations here?  I don't want to turn this thread into a moderated thread, however, there is growing unrest caused by investigations that have inaccurate information as evidenced this week resulting in my decision to ask Teletalk.org not to post for the remainder of this year ^{(and they stopped posting for over a week)} then a brand new user is created immediately thereafter and began posting findings.

PM me, or post your thoughts here.

Rugby League Australia


You'd have to face palm if you backed the Broncos who led the Roosters 10 - 0 at half time then, after leading during the second half, still managed to loose 20 - 24 to the Roosters who move into fifth place on the points table.  The Broncos might have one or two moments of brilliance, but I wouldn't put any money on them for the remainder of this year.

Amazingly, the Sea Eagles have jumped from fifteenth place to sixth place with their third win out of five starts.

The other game last night between the Warriors and Cowboys was a tense affair - for at least the last twenty minutes the teams were tied at 24 - 24 then in the last two minutes, the Warriors attempted two one point field goals missing both times which forced the match into "golden point" over time.  After three minutes of play, the Warriors scored a one point field goal pushing them to 25 - 24 and winning the game.

Tonight the Raiders should be swept away by the Storm while the Rabbitohs should slay the Dragons.

@Teletalk.org

Please refrain from posting in the Known Alts thread for the remainder of 2022.

If you want to post in 2023, then contact me first so that I may consider your application.

Super Rugby Pacific

The Hurricanes were pipped at the post by the Chiefs 29 - 30

Super W

Brumbies Women vs Western Force  27 - 19

(One from two wins from my pics ten hours ago)

---

---

Rugby League Australia.

Five from eight in round four.

My other six pics for round five are as follows:


Warriors, Storm, Rabbitohs, Eels, Sharks and Panthers with the two previously mentioned, the Knights to beat the Sea Eagles and the Broncos who if they don't win this game you can write off for the rest of the season.

I won't be posting much for the next two weeks, but will be posting my pics for the Easter long-week-end matches towards the end of next week.

Had you ever praised my work in the past then I might be offended.

---

---

For warned is for armed.

Super Rugby Pacific Round 7

The Blues beat Moana Pasifika 32 - 19 in their game on Tuesday.  The Crusaders won over the Highlanders 17 - 14 while the Waratahs out played Fijian Drua 38 - 14 both games were on Friday.  Yesterday Blues won over Moana Pasifika 46 - 16 (from recollection, Tuesday's encounter was a catch up game after Moana Pasifika earlier had Covid related absences for most of their team) and in the late game last night, the Reds won over the Brumbies 21 - 7

Super W

On Friday, Fijiana Drua continued the winning streak over the NSW Waratahs Women 29 - 10 then on Saturday the Women's Red's team smashed the Rebels 55 - 5

I'm expecting the Hurricanes to win over the Chiefs this afternoon then the Women's Brumbies over the Western Force in the later game.

---

---

Rugby League


I'm now three from six for round four after all three teams I have money on yesterday lost out.  The Sea Eagles have now had their first win of the season  25 - 6 against the Raiders) and the Warriors are finding their way having beaten the Broncos 20 - 6.  The Roosters move to fourth spot on the ladder winning over third placed Cowboys 28 - 4.

For today's games I'm hopeful the Storm over the Bulldogs in the early game then the Ells will eat the Dragons who are languishing in fifteenth place on the ladder.

*edit* After 25 minutes the Storm leed the Bulldogs 12 - 0 after two quick tries and conversions.

See also this cryptic post from zazarb ten hours ago re mnightwaffle's loan from them.

---

---

In the same vein, I can show you multiple users who take out then repay loans without ever seeming to need them - the only real purpose of the loan appears to be building trust to then ?? ?? mount an exit scam at a later date.

For example, two days apart, @DarkStar_ loans to two ^{(of the disgraced members of a three-way abuse of donated funds)}

cabalism13 was lent $200 USDT HERE and crwth was lent $500 USDT HERE

cabalism13 it should be noted had been off line since before Christmas when concerns were raised about their participation in a so-called charity, but instead of addressing those concerns when they returned has instead attempted to join multiple campaigns and now taken out a loan - all the while bragging that they have an alt on the forum they use to log in regularly (and then going dark for the following week after the loan was funded)

Surely such claims as having an alts should be disclosed to any lender when considering facilitating a loan?

As to the two loans,

"Clarence" cabalism13 was lent $200 USDT to wallet address https://usdt.tokenview.com/en/address/TNwxxkjsDv54wXgM4R2zWvfuFW6nw2fjNf on the 03-19-2022 03:59:15 "to support my Physical Therapy" while
crwth was lent $500 USDT to wallet address https://usdt.tokenview.com/en/address/TR12gbXWhQ5oXMjiRG5CYSMRNDYLYfP5hL on the 03-21-2022 04:37:21

Nearly two weeks later, neither funds have been touched and are supposed to be repaid at the end of the month / two months respectively.

As I stated at the start of this post, there are many lenders who seem to be taking out meaning less loans to simply build trust - motive?

With ten minutes to go, the Broncos are down 6 - 16 against the Warriors - all three Qld teams seem to be playing a very patchy game this season - winning once, then tanking the next.

There are two more games today, the Sea Eagles Vs Raiders followed by the Cowboys Vs Roosters game in a couple of hours.

You don't have even one merit and you use the term "Sir" twice in one paragraph?

What sort of projects?

How much?

What guarantees will you give that the project will remain listed?

Rugby League.

This week I'm going for the following teams in round four:

Gold Coast Titans - Wests Tigers   Money Line   Gold Coast Titans @ 1.23   Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.07 mBTC
Cronulla Sharks - Newcastle Knights   Money Line   Cronulla Sharks @ 1.36      Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.08 mBTC
Penrith Panthers - South Sydney Rabbitohs   Money Line   Penrith Panthers @ 1.38   Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.08 mBTC
New Zealand Warriors - Brisbane Broncos      Money Line   Brisbane Broncos @ 1.54   Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.09 mBTC
Manly Sea Eagles - Canberra Raiders   Money Line   Canberra Raiders @ 2.95      Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.18 mBTC
North Queensland Cowboys - Sydney Roosters   Money Line   North Queensland Cowboys @ 2.95      Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.18 mBTC
Melbourne Storm - Canterbury Bulldogs   Money Line   Melbourne Storm @ 1.16      Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.07 mBTC
Parramatta Eels - St George/Illawarra Dragons   Money Line   Parramatta Eels @ 1.29   Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC   Possible Payout: 0.08 mBTC

Titans, Sharks, Panthers, Broncos, Raiders, Cowboys, Storm and Eels.

In round five, I've seen some good prices, so I've gone ahead and placed a couple of bets:

Brisbane Broncos - Sydney Roosters Money Line Brisbane Broncos @ 2.66 Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC Possible Payout: 0.16 mBTC
Newcastle Knights - Manly Sea Eagles Money Line Newcastle Knights @ 2.37 Taken Amount: 0.06 mBTC Possible Payout: 0.14 mBTC

---

---

Nitrogen still doesn't have any Rugby Union bets for the New Zealand competition  

---

---

*edit*

The Gold Coast Titans played as badly as the Wests' Tigers and the score was 2 - 2 until the 69th minute.  The game finished at 8 - 6 to the Titans.  The Titans move to seventh position, but there has only been their game in round four, so I expect they will drop out of the top ten by the end of the round.

*2nd edit*

Three from three so far this round with the Sharks over the Newcastle Knights and the Panthers over the Rabbitohs.

For a while now I'm attempting to give a user not more than two merits (one each for two separate posts).  I do find that on occasion I want to give merits to a user who I've already merited, however, on the whole, I tend to stick to just two merits per user due to a limited supply.  (And yes, I'll usually check out loyce.club merit list for a user to ensure I haven't given them merits in the past)

Why do we have to wait until a user has been nuked/banned and their content removed?  Why no dial it up in much the same way you can't post in your signature until you've advance through the ranks - the higher the rank, the more bells and whistles (and colour and amount of characters etc you can include).