FTFY   

So far, the attack  on $4,405 is taking place on relatively low trade volume.  Things might change.. but patience, is ok. too..

If we keep inching up little by little (like the past few weeks) on relatively low trade volume, at some time the higher volume battle might begin?

We have the best feuds.

Exactamente!!!!

That ship has sailed

like water under the bridge

 toothpaste out of the tube

 a cat out of the bag

spilt milk

and

a genie out of the bottle

There are probably more similar expressions, but I cannot think of anymore off the top of my head.

O.k.  Thanks... .just seems strange then, because you negated my attempts at explanations.. I have no problem with companies attempting to receive as many fees as the market can bear, but in this case, doesn't seem like Binance has any solid approach, unless they are just pricing the product high because of regulatory risk.   Binance is known for being a low fee trader. 

Accordingly, Binance is not really known for onramping of peeps from fiat systems... so maybe they are charging high fees because that is NOT really the business that they want to be in, but they figure that some people (newbies, like you say) are still going to want to onramp through them because of Binance's increasing name recognition.

You are kind of making my point in another way.  You have a logistical and ease of reference reason to continue to use a BTC flow through point that was always yours (namely your old-ass wallet address(es)). 

If you sell me the private keys to that wallet, after you empty it, then I can act as if I was always the owner of such wallet - except in your case there would seem to be a whole hell-of a lot of extra baggage for me to have to explain in my attempt to impersonate you, because then, someday, I might also have to provide explanations for the various other transactions that came out of that wallet address(es), which I would not know such information as someone buying it from you and not knowing what all the god damned transactions were for.

Here, I would imagine that Craig, would prefer a much less utilized empty wallet(s) in order that he would have less that he would have to explain, if push were to come to shove.

Apparently it is worth $4k to be able to impersonate a 2010 miner for certain people.  It is a uncommon appreciation, and that is why it would likely only be valuable to a narrow kind of a person (someone likely attempting to engage in some kind of fraud or deception). 

Of course, if no early miner really wants to enable such a likely shady request, then the price may have to go up in order to satisfy a theory that most things have a price, it's just a matter of how much.

O.k.... You are not making it up... but that is not trading fees but instead the initial fees to get into the system. 

Hadn't I read that in Australia there were a lot of limitations or lack of connection with ways to onboard from fiat and into BTC... so perhaps, lack of competition is causing the onboarding fees to be higher in Australia?  and it is not just about altcoins, but getting into any crypto from Australia, including BTC?

Do you know if they have decent heart stem cell treatment in Turkey?  Panama is supposed to have some decent locations for heart stem cell treatment.  Several years ago, I had seen some publications of heart stem cell treatment in Thailand, but I haven't run across it recently.

Heart cells can be challenging because older theories were that heart cells could not regenerate, but in recent years some medical studies/applications are finding that certain kinds of cells can be used, such as placenta cells (or certain stem cell treatment applications) that cause some new heart cell growth.

In the USA... some of the issues with heart stem cell treatment is cost and insurance approval.  But it is also more limited in terms of what kinds of cells that they are able to use (can only use your own stem cells in many circumstances).  I think placenta cells have been shown amongst the better of heart regenerative, but are not allowed to be used or studied in the USA.

Wait until the price is over $17.75k, and then buy.  Once the BTC price gets over $17.75k for sure FOMO is going to kick in, and cause the price to go shooting past the previous ATH... for sure, profits!!!!!!!    

You can thank me later.  

Huh?  Can you provide a link for that?  Seems like your decimal might be in the wrong place, because a vast majority of exchanges are trading less than .5%, and I seem to recall that last year, Gemini had gone up to 1.5%, and even they had to back off of that - so Gemini remains among the highest of fees with 1% fees.

Link?

WTF?

Deja vu all over again. 

Did that article use the word bitcoin in any one place ?  What the fuck is "blockchain"?  Seems like a diversion at best and most likely some kind of scam central, to me. 

Team mic and team blob may have to attend treatment togedder.

Treatments are not effective when "in silence".       

Never heard about the regretful hanger on(ers) in BTC... hahahahaha

In that regard, haven't seen BillyJoelAllen around recently to rub our noses in how bad of an investment BTC is and how BTC is such a non-scaleable nightmare.    

Roach and BJA should "hook up" for some reminiscence of the good ole days back when they were big balling in bitcoin in the three digit arena, before the sold all of their respective stashs.. to make a killin and to "show" all of us "bagholders" how it should be done.

That's a good first step.  Congratulations!!!!

I doubt that you can point to one instance or post in which my feelings had been hurt on these here interwebs.  I don't tend to roll in that kind of style.  

You are the one who seems a bit obsessed in your lack of coping, so it would be nice if your were to figure out some ways to work through your ongoing issues.. .. and that term "cupcake" seems to be a kind of sign that you lost it.. .. trolls use those kinds of lame attempts at digging in.    Bob, the troll wannabe.  

Hasn't it been a bit more than a year since one of your first outbursts in my direction in which you went on a supposed ignoring and meditation rant?...

Anyhow.. that does not seem to be working for you, so if you cannot figure it out on your own, then maybe there are other ways to seek counsel because people on the interwebs are not generally in your ability to control... so it seems strange that you would seek such?  

In essence, I tend to be around this thread on nearly a daily basis and have been around for something like 5+ years.. , so it seems that you should attempt to dealio with such flow, in healthy ways.. rather than having an ongoing fight with matters somewhat outside of your control,... no?  

It's not like I am going away from this thread anytime soon, absent some kind of astroid hit or some kind of cosmic occurrence like that.  

Maybe a holy moley image will help?



wwwwwwweeeeeeee!!!!!    

It is not really material nor relevant.. merely descriptive... Focus.  Focus. Focus ur selfie.....  We are here to talk about bitcoin, and its walls, have you heard of such subject? or are you just petty and unable to stay on topic?  

Why would you need to wait until Thursday to say anything to me, you dim witted twat, I mean cock sucker?  

I had presumed that you might be an adult.  So, grow the fuck, up.  

That is a fair characterization (and status update).  I do recall reading the creditor minutes, or something like that (or maybe it was your comments in another thread) that Kobayashi seems to be a bit anxious in terms of wanting to dump a certain amount of additional BTC.. just to feel more insured against possible future BTC downside volatility.

So, I was not saying that dumping was out of the question, but just concerned that Searing's seeming expectation of a distribution in May 2019 (even if that is unlikely too, as you stated), would not necessarily result in a BTC "dumping" as he had implied as a kind of current uncertainty that is hanging over bitcoin and causing it to price-move sideways.