Do they have to deny such hack again? they are used to denying every hack/allegation against them and this could be the beginning of their problem if they are not careful. Do they think its easy to stay up as one of the best exchanges in the world, I foresee this. The 7000 btc theft was swept under the rug since customers were not affected but this needs to be addressed before traders start losing confidence in them

we should consider that these are startups, they shouldn't need more than the softcap in most cases, 'fund to kick off'. Most of the 2017 high price have been discovered to be scam and worth peanuts. Some never gave investors any opportunity to get profit for such a huge investment. We see most IEO with such low marketcap and dont consider to control their gut. Except for cases of scam with careful research, low cap crowdfund should be encouraged.

I didnt relate the 5000 ferrum deposit for social mining to the bounty distribution. What extent do they require for the sign up? do we have to fill all spaces provided? cause it might not be different from KYC then

Bakkt should start next month, ETF is still in shortest view. Libra might struggle to see the light of the day, where the government is going beyond the shore of America to visit the supporter of that coin, to discourage the launch. If the coin will eventually start it will join the other altcoins as a result of the size of control by the government.

There might be clarity on this move as time passes. It is still a test idea and could changed as explained. At this time 5000 FRM is still less than $100 but I dont like the silence of the BM on this new update. Since he started the campaign he should pull it through to distribution, now, he doesn't care about the bounty participants opinion on the change in rule.

I used to believe hardfork coin are deposited in wallets with coin not empty wallets, am very surprised, the last hardfork of BCH didnt fund my empty bitcoin wallets with previous transactions. There is high possibility of using the wallet transaction history to swindle. Some social media account with long history are also offered for sale, it is believed to have genuine users.

#Proof of authentication
Joined Signature campaign
Telegram username : @royalfestus

the moderator of the thread should respond to this please. I think it is very important before any other steps can be taken with the project from any investor

Stake is not that profitable if you are low rank participant and as long as high rank members keep joining the campaign they keep diluting the reward and low rank member keep losing their reward to them. Also for fixed reward the low number of participants is not beneficial but it is very good for low rank bounty participants, they have guaranteed reward without sharing with anyone

As at June when the price was at the peak, bitcoin search was so high on google and so also is the greedy level of traders. More bitcoin addresses were added, actually there are no proves if it was from existing bitcoin users or new. News like this when the market is doing well are mere distraction, every trader/investors should decide what he/she wants.

Making a new coin wont solve such problem, the approach sometimes about economic problem in all the third country is astonishing.  They should know that they will go back to the same product, if the inflation itself is not handled. The national debt, demand pull, exchange rate, money supply to the economy is properly managed. If not controlled the value of the money will still reduce. The country need to determine and put the right people in place

It will still demand more of bounty hunter cooperation than the admin intervention. We can demand more interaction and discussion of such projects on this forum than telegram. There are few restriction on this forum announcement thread for projects, then we found it easy to get our token and see moderator intervention because we had most of our discussion here. the red trust tag are meant to control members but we limited the use by running absolutely else where. Telegram had reduced the influence of this forum on most project scam. There could however be some reduction in reward if the team can present there case due to inability to raise enough fund.  

It is important to know if binance is able to give more profit in bitcoin value, do they have enough developments to increase demand and improve price? And at present the price is a little dip, lesser with the bitcoin value (better time to buy), if bitcoin goes dipper we could see the price dump or pump more. The season looks different this time, most predictions with altcoin are delayed. The decision should be taking before the BAKKT launch, it could trigger the next bitcoin run into the end of the year high price. 

In the past 2 weeks I have had series of error from this google authentication from 2 of the exchanges I use, What have not seen until recently. I am afraid there is possibility of compromise if such error persist. Anything is possible with hacking in this space and we may not know the possibility until it happen. The google authenticator don't see much upgrade like other app, it might not be necessary if we are well protected .

The scam projects inability to get their coin listed and make some profits brought doubt to the process. The risk was higher and it was the innovation out bear market. Investors and exchanges still care about their profits, if IEO keeps getting everyone involved profitable it might last longer than we expect but we need more money in the space. If we rely on the fund that comes from bitcoin alone the dominance will continue and will strangle altcoins more, every altcoins holders will keep on moving to bitcoin.

U hit the nail on the head. Thats why we need ICO. Even if it is with small cap like we see in most exchanges, it will bring more money into the space. At a point during the ICOs there was too much ETH to sell by the project team which lead to dump. ETH is planning to stake, it could make the coin scarce but that can only work if the demand is equally high. ETH still have a governing system unlike bitcoin and they could make a lot of development with it

Sometimes I thinks one might appreciate signs up before it get to ones wallet, what if is not safe and u got it without your consent and it becomes a problem. However, I prefer it in an exchange than in my private wallet. Exchange wallet could come as result of holding certain coin and exchanges will be responsible for security check-up of such coin.

Interestingly BNB has not seen that price growth like we saw at the beginning of the year till June since bitcoin has been losing some gains. It is making the news as top exchange for volume trade, and adding new projects through IEO and some existing coin are also getting listed. The decentralized platform will bring a lot of interest. $50 is quite possible in the shortest time with all this developments while bitcoin price also increases.

Sadly, we still project that raised fund this year has not paid their hunters. They didn't give any reason for this and are unnecessarily quiet in all the channels they engaged during their crowdfund. Even the manager cant say their whereabouts, and this is the project we consider not to be scam according to the same manager. The size of fund is not considered for this action as long as the softcap was reached. Some of those projects lied on the amount raised, they presented high amount and failed to reveal information about the fund.

I am not sure private keys can be changed and revealing where you keep your private keys on this forum can expose someone if a familiar individual is on this forum, reading your post and have access to getting close to where you could put the keys. What is equally important is  to understand how to manage the keys safety, either online or offline.