Never encountered platforms asking for these personal details such as bank details (aside from bank number) and specific IDs and I think there's no need to especially in this industry wherein anonymity is supported. If casinos would push such they should rather be on Centralized margin or fiat based.

Features on the other which I guess would be helpful in gambling platforms and players themselves would be instant deposits during or halfway your play time and not a repetitive procedure for a single day. Quite of a 'one click' feature. Also an enhanced bot detector.

Would it matter on sportsbetting? The match you are about to bet with, is only between two opposing teams; how come things, odds, or chances to win a bet, would depend to timezone? I more expect timezone to be effective on other gambling games such as dice, cardgames, and other luck games wherein odds of winning might(but not assured) change varying across timezones. My personal point on this stand is winning continuously during early morning on my timezone, but did not solely rely into it. Things do still change, I just observed that I win more often on the mentioned games above. But still, I won't gamble my luck with such basis that has no strong basis.

In almost everything in this world, patience is a must if you are seeking for success. However, in gambling patience should also managed. Not because you are patient you will already guarantee winning the game, that would more depend on your luck. Patience will only be effective in gambling in particular with sportsbetting but in a way of using statistics and researching for fighters' previous fights but still won't guarantee assured profit since there's no certainty with positive outcomes; anything could happen in a match. Much more with pure-luck gambling games wherein no matter how long you wait for fate to go in favor of your end, patience will save you. Another instance on using patience as an advantage in gambling is waiting for a match which has a good odds, also in sportsbetting.

Never heard of such. The only aspect which I think is existing and somewhat related with the 'play and pay later' you have mentioned is free spins and other welcome bonuses which allows players to play and have a chance to win without depositing the usual required amount. But an actual aspect which would allow a player to somewhat borrow an amount like a loan to a gambling site, is something which is not familiar on my awareness.

It would only be possible if you'd go through actual lending procedures such as borrowing an amount you can use to play. However, I won't suggest this way still. Imagine losing the money and still with the responsibility of actually paying an amount.

I'd rather not and choose other platforms which won't require me to do so. It is safe than to be sorry right? Bonuses are good but if it would endanger my savings then that's a big no for me. Only engage if you really trust that gambling platform or if it has a good reputation in this industry. But as I've said it would be better to move to other platform and to act safely especially in this industry where anonymous transactions really occur. Ddisadvantage is somehow giving personal information such as bank details even if that is just your card number so just to avoid worse things to happen, just be patient until you found another platform which would  more go inline with your demands.

You've said it already; that's their business which is to take advantage of other people. Ofcourse gambling is a choice and is nothing requiring an individual to engage. It is our inner drives and desires which pushes us to engage in gambling with expectations of earning huge in an instant. As cited, people were just encouraged by themselves to do so which already answers whether their money should be returned or not 'coz it would be a different feeling if ever they win the game. If you really think they are cheating on people, you may report their activity to the authority to check if they have papers on their operation. But there's no such possibility that your money will be returned.

It will just be a lesson learned to not engage with gambling if you are not ready to lose a certain amount of your wallet.

I agree. Those whoch are being advertised are ones which are risky to be involved with. On my end, I am checking for some airdrops in this forum and if it has the potential, I am making a follow up reading on their site and check reviews of that particular project through social media platforms. However it does not guarantee that a project would be paying. Problem here is that, you'd only know an airdrop is non-paying or a scam once they show it or once they have done it. And such thing would be hard to determine along the process. But some things to consider I guess is general project's activity and engagement to the community. If they aren't as responsive as they should be, then I guess that would be suspiscious.

Depends on where you are using your money with. If it is just 'wants' you are using your money, then would you be expecting for returns? Also with investments, the bigger the amount the bigger the return indeed . However, that will depend on the chosen asset whether it will have the potential to do so. If you have a fixed income, then spending more would leave you with less amount. Best thing is to stretch your income in order to spend more; get some profitable assets. The thing here is that, you cannot extend your expenses if you have limited sources, then expecting that you'd still have money for other things. Bottomline here is having a limited fund, and that is where your solution should be done.

It is supposed to be an alternative currency to fiat but has certain chracteristics which is advantageous. However, Bitcoin is more beneficial to users as a form of asset or investment. One reason why Bitcoin is not widely being used as a currency is because of its adoption issues concerning countries. Many countries still are not supporting this technology's usage due to taxation and volatility issues.  It is being used as an investment on the other hand 'coz investors are making use of its volatile market price at a higher rate in comparison with other assets such as Gold. If it is a bad thing, I'd say no. People are free to use Bitcoin on any way they would want to. We cannot force people to use Bitcoin as a currency 'coz they'd be at guilt from doing so, missing the opportunity to earn profit especially when market prices goes up.

In terms of technology, they are all the same. On the other hand, there are people who only invest in Bitcoin simply because they want to lessen the risk of losing because of the idea that the market price of Bitcoin is less likely to fall in an instant and as deep as worse expected. Indeed it would be better to diversify investment but to some, diversifying would mean bigger risk. Since we have different viewpoints in this industry, and all having the same chances of not getting an assured return from what we have invested, then that is I guess, not wrong.

As Op have pointed out, there's still a long way. By the rule and relationship of demand and supply, the price is meant to increase with sky as the limit but that is only if, the demand would be continuously increasing as well in the future. Indeed it is still early and not too late for those who wants to but atleast find that price point where you would be confident no matter how the market behave.

SHIB I guess, it has a bigger 24hr volume than DOGE but the opposite with their market caps. Well $PEPE has larger twenty-four hour volume but not on my consideration 'coz it has been released in the exchanger I am using, just recently and its price have already fell below its price when it was released which for me shows very high market price volatility. Likewise with Floki I think. I have no other basis 'coz these are just meme coins and there are no utility to drw concludions from. Also, it is hard to predict price actions for meme coins so I am not extending my time looking at their charts to be honest.
As believed, has chance. But I doubt with assurance. I do expect the increase on such tokens' market value during altcoin season and that is after the bull run.

I'd Agree with $35k as a barrier to break out $38k to $40k this year. Right now we are around $26k but atleast on the first wuarter the price managed to reach $31k from a very low market value last year. The price is  progressive and is recovering but still we are far from its ATH. However, progress is progress. The cycle in this blockchain is that, the price would always be back and is meant to break previous ATH but I am never expecting such thing to occur even in the future. Once all the Bitcoin are mined, will the demand continue to rise? Technically it should be but for the reason that Bitcoin is not accepted as a mode of payment to he used on a daily basis, which should sustain demand, I think we are not yet sure of this one. The price may fall 'coz the only reason why it is rising is due to the increase on demand but in purpose of investment.

It can be put in memory indeed by memorizing. I do get the idea which is to avoid writing it up on a piece of paper and minimizing the risk of other people getting access into it but still, I'd suggest having a physical copy of it even in code, just to be sure 'coz human mind is limited and there will always be that risk of forgetting things out of some uncontrollable reason. Another factor I guess is that, not all investors here are logging out their wallet in their device which makes sense to say that not all investors are accessing their funds with the use of seed phrase. Given that it won't or is not in a daily routine, then that supports the idea of eventually forgetting.

Both investors and bounty hunters have invested into projects; investors with money while hunters with their time and effort. But personally, as both a bounty hunter and investor, I think I can easily move on with wasted effort and time than with wasted money, if ever the project turns out to be non-paying. I cannot really be more specific with the feeling but this is how I viewed things eversince I entered this industry. But I do understand those who who be in contrast with my stand 'coz we have different perspectives and viewpoints. But one thing is for sure emotion would be the same but not with the weight of the feeling or emotion, as I personally experienced.

Actually, the anticipated Bitcoin halving does not assure a bull trend, the only teason why uptrend is associated with halving is because of what happened from the previous one. But with Ethereum fork, it wasn't as huge as with Bitcoin's which somehow supports the idea of lack of certainty with price movement to what is anticipated. Inspite of high hopes, manage still the risk of expecting that much. We are in crypto industry and nothing is certain here. We may only assume but to be hookep up with those expectations will never be advisable. As OP havee mentioned, pattern was broken already by this year's price movement. For now being patient is all we can do until that 'thing' happen.

I think Bitcoin is so influential towards other cryptocurrencies especially in terms of market prices. Well, indeed there's this thing called altcoin season wherein prices of other coins are increasing in contrast with the market price behavior of Bitcoin but most of the time, Bitcoin's price action triggers either uprise and downfall of other crypto's value. One good example is previous ATH of Bitcoin wherein most of cryptos' also reached ATH and likewise when correction occured same thing happened with others. But in terms of general usage, there is I think where parallelism ends. Not all cryptos are being used in a platform even if Bitcoin is most of the time an option.

Right now, it would be only good for swing trades but not with long term holding. $PEPE is a meme token and we all know how things go likewise with DOGE and SHIB to name a few. Utility is not there so we cannot hope for sustainability on its market value unlike other cryptocurrencies in this industry. The market price is solely dependent with the demand. Indeed upon its release, there was a massive increase on its value but not longer than a day, it suddenly fall and that simply indicates that investors took profit already. If there is a clear bull trend, then there could be a chance for an increase but if it is with normal market behavior, I doubt investing at this moment that the price is falling.

Well gold is a better option especially if you are into  long term holding;rate of increase is higher which will basically generate profit but this is only if you can provide the security to your asset. The advantage of bank is them handling your money for you and that includes securing your funds. Unlike with investments such as gold, you are the one responible for it whether its price would fall or lost assets. Therefore it is a matter of preference.
I agree, the increase with the depositied value is not catching with the faster rate of increase on the price of marketable goods. Therefore, it is just more of ystematic way of saving. Banks would also imply taxes with transactions which is a disadvantage from choosing a profitable asset.

Definitely a case to case basis. Not all exchanger bankruptcy means abandonment of their users, some are still minding of how would they be able to return the funds to their consumers. But since it is asked whether to still patronize an exchanger which is from bankruptcy, I'd day it depends on how it ended with regards to their previous dilemma. If they managed to not leave their users then there'd a tendncy that they will come back stronger. But if they created a bad impression already, then it will not be worth of our time and money. This is not to be discriminativr but just putting a sense of safeguarding our funds. Never settle for less if you have better options in this industry.

Is it only with altcoins?

The idea of high risk and high rewards, drive those investors. Whether it is a good thing to do or not, no one would be able to tell 'coz if they manage to come up with a huge win, those who did not believe in them would be put in silence. For sure they are aware of the chances of losing, no doubt. Except for those who are just easily carried away by their emotion and those who are just following what's solely popular. Not totally wrong except for their entry points wherein some would enter when prices are at peak, expecting for a higher market value. Unfortunately, things does not work as simple as that. Even simple price action would give you the answer to the question whether it would be still profitable to engage in a particular token, halfway of the increase. Bottomline is, we are all guessing how will the market price behave. Difference only is with basis or hunch as is.