I cannot tell this to every new user, really.. Please check who gave you the negative. (Well, I did. And a Legendary from the DefaultTrust is not somebody I'd call "a random guy"). Then go and ask him nicely if you can work this out, 1 to 1, maybe you have a chance to get the negative trust removed.
However, since you are still a newbie, this negative you've got is not a huge loss. Try to learn from it. Really.
|
|
|
depends on layers (Trust depth (max 4)) of trusted feedback. Dunno, what is default (I guess 2), but on layer 2 it is really showing: Trust: 0: -0 / +0
mods, admin...anybody, please start doing something with the trust system, it is not obviously working as intended..
Oh, indeed, this is the one! I played to set it by hand. If I set it to 3, our guy has -30, as you stated. If I set it to 4 (max), he has -4093: -12 / +3 Maybe the trust depth increases with the rank and that makes amiryaqot have trust depth 3 while I have trust depth 2? But it's known that current trust system is in trouble. I guess that the big hope is that we move quick (yeah...) on the new forum software and there maybe this is better thought/done.
|
|
|
but it shows me clear Red Trust -30 as i think it depends on members ranking as i am hero member, there is nothing wrong with trust system as it's working properly.
Do you have anything special in your trust settings? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
|
|
|
As long as nobody from the default trust list bothered to give him a negative, he's as good as new Maybe you can ask Vod to do that, he use to be rather eager to spread negatives (which in most cases is very good actually).
|
|
|
I tend to accept such theories, no matter how strange they are, as theories. However, if somebody tells that he found out something new and better, I tend to be careful with what is done and what is proven. The proven levitation is simple these days, all you need is (natural) magnets and electro-magnets. Maglev has all that. (Powerful air stream is another way, but that's not on this subject.) What these guy do is, however, not very clear to me. No special preparations were made except the positioning. There were metal items on the levitators and around the room.
Maybe I've missed something, but those metal items may be the key. You know, with metal and electricity, if the positioning is right, you have just the same tech as maglev, nothing new, nothing spectacular. Also it's not stated if that kettlering is made of metal or not, maybe it's something special. Maybe it's a magnet or magnetized material. Human body and nature can also build electricity, but not enough for this. So it's not clear - at least not to me - what they did and how. so the object had apparently lost 33% of its weight.
(...)
Also the goal to achieve zero or negative gravity when the circumstances are correct seems achievable.
It may not work like that. You know, I count what remains. And if we repeat the process infinite times, it still remains more than 0. It's a sequence: 1, 0.66, 0.66*0.66, 0.66*0.66*0.66, .... (sorry, En is not my main language and I am not great on explaining) Further tests: To efficiently measure the antigravity, the next experiment will include a scale.
I'd like in the future tests, for example, to also see them done somewhere they can't possibly have electricity / electromagnets. I'd like them to prove that the kettleball doesn't contain any kind of magnets. However, it's an interesting subject. I'd like to have something proven for real. It could help on lifting and transportation, maybe even make something cheaper than Maglev. Now.. antigravity is a more hazardous subject and I don't think that they did that. And that's also harder to prove, I think.
|
|
|
$225, ± 25, is the new normal. For the last 5 months, the price has been in that range except for two brief bubbles and one brief crash.
230 was the normal of my liking, but yeah, it dropped a little. Actually now is just above 230 again. And, despite all the FUD, the price is rather stable lately. Agreed. We may have a chance at a bubble next year during halving, but other than that it's just slowly going down.
My experience from alts tells that the bubble - if it will actually happen - it'll be shortly before the halving and it will not last long.
|
|
|
So I fired up the BTC Qt Core client yesterday to sync up with the blockchain. And it took 98% of CPU and something around 980 MB RAM while syncing. This does not happen to me with any other Qt-based cryptocurrency. What I was amazed by, however, was the total lack of any development. The GUI looks the same as with the first initial version, the client is becoming ever-heavier, there are no new functionalities (seriously Hobonickels have better dev team of one person than Bitcoin), the only difference is a pesky "client is shutting down" notice. BTC is nowhere near comparable to NXT.
NXT blockchain downloading is fast, simple and does not lag the client or take any unnecessary resources from the system - not true for Bitcoin.
NXT is available across all platforms that support Java without additional need for compiling for the specific platforms - not true for qt-based clients, including Bitcoin.
Writing an NXT plugin is extremely simple and effective - programming on the Bitcoin core is complicated and required dedicated companies for feasible results.
Not even word like "sidechains" can save Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a tech startup, it is not a platform, it is an application developed by a single man.
Goodbye, Bitcoin
The Core client has that much work to do because the chain is big. And this is a sign of a healthy coin. The core client is not for "now and then" use. I have MultiBit for that. And there are many other choices. Your advertising for NXT only tells that NXT chian is tiny. How old is NXT? And is anybody actually using it? (Sorry if this is too harsh).
|
|
|
done.. is the campagain still open??
17Mr2FFPxaHEoBHvtaTzt3SFjEr2Z5rJ4M
The campaign is still open. However, he never paid. If any of you would read up, would find that out quickly.
|
|
|
You must sell something to people have default trust than you ask him to give you trust i think that is work You should be also careful who you do business with from the default trust list. That's because if the user is "kicked out" from the list, your shiny green trust may become black again. And lately that (kick) happened more than I'd expect.
|
|
|
How do I recover my doge wallet? I have 2 factor authenticator but doesn't let me in. Same with bitcoin wallet.
If you have the 2FA codes, the times sync has to be the issue. I've had it too in multiple occasions. There is already a good post here on how to sync, read it. However, I'd suggest you try what I write here before and, if it didn't work, after time sync too. If that also doesn't work, try to press the enter after the 2FA key at different "times". It's rather hard to explain. Basically the other site's 2FA generator may be a little bit out of sync too. It happened to me too. I will give my examples: 1. site 1: there I have to enter the 2FA key in the first 75% of the time before it expires (on my android). If I do it later than that, it's invalid. 2. site 2: here, iirc, I had to enter the 2FA key in the last 25% of the time before it expires, else it was invalid. That was rather hard to use, so I switched back to SMS auth. Though I sync my Google Authenticator from time to time, I still have such problems. Good luck!
|
|
|
N00b here,
Simple question I think... where is the best place to park bitcoin?
From an outsider perspective with a n00b lense, there's some tags that clout cryptocurrency. Amongst them, volatility and fraud.
I believe in bitcoin despite the mediums I and most people tune into though. So... is there a place / process where I can buy bitcoin, forget about it, and come back to in 10 years when it hits 10,000 usd per coin? Reputable sources / sites etc?
I may be missing the point as I'm home grown on centralized currencies... I'm not too sure. Im just hoping to know the safest place i can store coins and forget ablut it (I dont mind the current extreme volatility, just mostly about thieves)
Make a secure enough environment and generate on it a bunch of paper wallets. Print them all. A piece of paper with all public and private keys would do. And keep only a file with the list of public keys. Pick one of them and start parking bitcoin there. When the amount looks good / big enough, move on to another paper wallet. You can check your amounts at any time on the block chain related website you like more (blockchain.info, chain.so/BTC, ..) Whenever you'll want to access your savings, you just redeem one or more of your paper wallets. Obviously, store the paper wallets somewhere safe. Background: 1. (Online) computers are easier and more susceptible to break in than your house, for example. 2. If you don't write "here are my valuable bitcoin paper wallets with shitload of money on them" a thief will see them as a piece of paper with strange writings on it, so you are safe
|
|
|
No. It was a solid project, not a pump and dump. People don't have the patience to wait this much for a scam. If it would have been a pump and dump, Bitcoin would have become dust even before the first altcoins came to life.
I think people doing this pump and dump because of arbitrage from one exchanger through another exchanger so if they dont have the patience they still can get their own profit through pumping and dumping. But how is this things become a solid project if its price is still volatile? Stock market, Forex, name it. Everywhere pumps and dumps can happen. And if they don't, it may be because of the regulations and the high volumes. Bitcoin market is not regulated and it's full of newbies. Anyone that has enough money and know some psychology and trading techniques can take profit really. And then there are the huge mining facilities which, frankly, work to gain fiat, not bitcoin. Imho Facebook is a much weaker project than bitcoin. Facebook stocks are also traded, they also have better or worse times and some know how to profit. And yet, I didn't hear voices telling that FB is just a pump and dump. US dollar. Just ask around how much you could buy with 20$ some 50-70 years ago. Now its value is greatly diluted. Is USD just a pump and dump?
|
|
|
Where to buy Bitcoins with debit card without this shitty ID verifications?? Any recommendations?
If you use debit card, you are actually not anonymous anymore. If you want anonymity, use cash. I have Payment processor "ATM"s in my city and I buy from those, for example. That's closer to anonymous.
|
|
|
Wanted to know how greedy people actually are , I'am personally not into gambling with the real meaning to be honest however I see a lot of my friends says "im stupid" and stuff like that , because they start earning a lot on the begining then they get greedy and lose basically all , does it happen to you ?
I am greedy enough to gamble - now and then. I think that gambling feeds the greed somehow. If I would be smarter I'd use that time to work and actually earn money. Also fortunately I am not rich enough and I use to play with pennies, most of the time not even with my own money. The feeling is good when you are on a winning streak, but that can never last. So yeah, I mostly lose
|
|
|
Bitcointalk is just a small part of BTC world. There are many other forums, there's reddit and there are also bitcoiners which don't care to read any of them.
|
|
|
Received the payment, all is good, thank you. Just as fyi, that week started with -1 posts but I don't complain, I guess that one of threads I posted in was moved.
|
|
|
No. It was a solid project, not a pump and dump. People don't have the patience to wait this much for a scam. If it would have been a pump and dump, Bitcoin would have become dust even before the first altcoins came to life.
|
|
|
Some of the core developers aren't supporting this for some reason and are sticking with current *temporary* limit which is not good. A fork is needed now IMHO and this is the only way. They should accept this but instead, they are rejecting this proposal. I even tried to get answers from one if the developer who are against this but he is just ignoring my message. I would really like to Theymos' opinion on this proposal.
Hmm, I was expecting more from the devs of the mighty Bitcoin. Yet one more disappointment for the day. I somehow hope that we are missing something. Maybe they'll conclude together in a reasonable time and Gavin just did this act of "bad politics" with a good purpose.
|
|
|
|