It's because you guys are not really into gambling that's why you say things like that. That's not applicable for me as a regular bettor for long. It's easy for you to just say things without experiencing the real situation on your feet. You don't know the feeling of being a pure bettor so for me, just sit back and relax and allow us to become addicted responsibly.

You also have to remember that even if we are already addicted to gambling, we are automatically irresponsible all-around. It's already very common that there are lots of people that is addicted to gambling but NOT ALL do have the same irresponsible act. From what I observed here in the forum, especially among those not gamblers or newbies, when they saw the term "addict" it means that person is now going nowhere else and has already fallen into the trap of gambling which is not in reality.

That's why I said as long as that boxer follows their respective strategy, then being overconfident is just fine. Being overconfident is not that bad since it means regardless of their opponent's strengths and advantages, they are confident that they can match those. Of course, they know there might be some flaws but that what's they worked for during their training.

I'd rather see an overconfident boxer that acts responsibly instead of being too much on a defensive phase and only throwing a few blows if there's a chance. Magsayo as a champion already knows what to do. It doesn't mean he is overconfident too much, he will likely mess up.

This is Magsayo's first title defense after all that's why I'm seeing him as a more pumped and hyped here compared to the challenger.

Agree and it's really insane and crazy to think that those applications will help the gambler to stop or even minimize their gambling activity for real. Why such a gambler that is recovering from their gambling habit will try those applications where in the first place, they are just giving excitement for these people to return to gambling.

Can't imagine what will be the feeling of these people do when they hit big multipliers at those applications. That was a good feeling.

Since those are just a virtual money jackpot, that will leads these people to try a real deal by testing their luck again at legit gambling sites or applications.

Of course, gambling behaviors can be controlled. I don't see any reason why it can't be controlled. Even a gambling addict can overcome that worst behavior.

Tips? It varies and depends on how the gambler is.

- For casual gamblers, no need for any tips as these people are just gambling moderately or when they just feel it

- For regular gamblers, even if they do gamble frequently, these people are still in control of themselves and just a bit of medication if they want to stop for good

- For addictive gamblers, it's not mean that they are addicted, they are not responsible. There are lots of gambling addicts that are still responsible for their life outside gambling. Treatment here varies on how that person is managing their gambling activity.

- For hardcore gambler that isn't responsible now for everything and showing worst actions, they should be assisted by their families and friends as these type of gamblers will ignore any advice and help.

Is that just-dice.com? I miss that old-classic interface.

For those who are not aware of that Clam-based gambling site, it was one of the popular dice sites before, even much early I think before the famous Directbet.eu, Nitrogensports.eu, and Cloudbet.com. There's also an investment part where users can put their Clams in the site's bankroll.

Back to topic, never in my entire dice game experience or slots to hit that kind of multipliers. Regardless of the amount involved, it's so rare to hit that multiplier.

Because of this post, I remember having a bankroll investment on that site way back several years ago. I don't remember how many figures I'm talking about here but I will have a look at them later on.

I also stumbled on those rumor articles about the possible return of Manny Pacquiao to the ring. First, it's about against Mayweather. And there are many speculations that I can't remember the names of those fighters. As long as Pacquiao has no statement, that will remain a rumor.

He is currently out of the country for a vacation after losing the PH Presidential bid and as we know Manny, when he is out of the country, he is not just doing a vacation but making business. Maybe one of those is his return on the right for an exhibition match. Well, as long as it was against a big name too, he can pursue exhibition matches.

Who knows something is currently brewing behind the scene.

I remember reading the article that if only Canelo shows a close fight against Bivol, he might end up winning the judge's score.

But since Bivol cornered Canelo in most rounds that whatever manipulation attempt will do, it won't help Canelo, there is no choice but to give Bivol a win which is no doubt, he clearly won the fight without a question. Canelo got frustrated during the fight and Bivol takes advantage of it.

In my own personal interest, I also like GGG winning the match to shut down Canelo's mouth where recently he throws bad words against GGG.

I tried to search for some related news involving Floyd Mayweather Jr. and his connection to the anticipated fight between Terence Crawford and Spence Jr.

What I found is here: Mayweather: When Spence-Crawford is Done You Will Hear It From Me! Established June 14, 2022

There's no mention of anything about the involvement of Mayweather Jr. rather than he just wants to promote the fight. I don't know what does Mayweather have to do with the fight and it looks like he has an intel tracking the negotiation behind the scene.

What if I will say, I'm not treating gambling as entertainment but rather I tried my best to win every one of my bets.

Isn't it more entertaining to win rather than consider everything as entertainment?

You don't have to treat it as a source of money but if it's just for entertainment then gambling is not for you.


It's really bad to chase losses but if you are betting on sports betting, those losses will give you encouragement to do your very best next time.

I'm not chasing my losses but I do everything to get those in a responsible way.


Definitely no and I disagree with you. Since when do we have to follow specific things just to be successful in gambling?

Work on your way as we have different ways and behavior in terms of gambling.

I have to agree with you. John Wall is even more injury-prone compared to the Los Angeles Clippers superstars, Kawhi Leonard and Paul George.

Regardless of whether the Clippers will get John Wall for a reasonable contract, they can save those instead to acquire more good role players that will fill the bench. Since when is the last time we saw John Wall playing? Even prior to him being on the baseline for long, he's not getting good numbers for the Houston Rockets. Anyways, according to the shared report, it seems the deal is close to happening.

All I can say is, Houston Rockets made a good move. Not the other way around which is by the Clippers.

Good thing you have controlled it in your own way. It does mean that other people also have their own way to address their problems.

Thanks for sharing your tips but that would not change the fact that everyone needs to suffer big consequences in order to learn. I really don't like tips and advice from anyone thinking that would be a big help. We will be those who will create our own solution to our problem since we are not in the same boat.

Hope you continue being changed. It's fine to gamble even breaching our limit as long as we remain responsible.

How come you ended up with that horrible idea? Do you really think it has the potential to minimize the gambling activity of a certain gambler?

Non-paying apps are already common apps and there are lots of them from anywhere. Did you even imagine what's the effect of it on a player who will experience big winnings on that app but it's just virtual money that they will receive? If they can win big at these apps, it will just give them more interest to test their luck at legit gambling-paying application apps.

That tool won't help. You just contradicted this statement of yours if you truly believed on that idea:

I think creating or building an ETH casino is not OP's goal or purpose but rather looking for opinions if playing in Ethereum casinos is somehow convenient too like playing in the usual bitcoin casino. We really are concerned about gas fees in ETH and I think there will be no solution for it for now. Depositing ETH to an external service will likely cost a huge fee compared to usual.

The only advantage of using ETH casinos, as I mentioned already, is the ability to link our own wallet like Metamask into the platform making the deposit cheaper and much safer. But I doubt gamblers really prefer that way that's why it's now up to OP if he will test the experience of gambling in an ETH Casino.

There are lots of VPN-friendly crypto casinos and sportsbooks but if your region is really prohibited to use the site, that is something you shouldn't consider doing as you will violate the site's Terms of Service. Check first those. If your region is not listed as a prohibited country then you can try to access the site first with your normal ISP connection then next, try it with a VPN.

So far, what sites have you already done some tests on?

Why not just try different sites until you breached successfully.

Terence Crawford vs Errol Spence is one of the most awaited fights for several years. It was highly demanded by most boxing fans around the world. Disregarding the money, they will really meet each other no matter what at the end of the line in the Welterweight Division as they are both undefeated. Money is a factor but there's no other way that these fights should not happen. A total of 4 World Titles are at stake here and it's not just about being money.

If this is a non-title match and these two didn't target each other, then it's a money matter fight but it's not. It's even a must-watch for me compared to GGG vs Canelo III where the former is now in his retirement period and the latter just came from an embarrassing loss against Bivol that he even wasn't able to make it a close fight as a heavy favorite to win in that match.

Being at a disadvantage in height and reach is already a typical thing to see for a PH Boxer. We are not even looking at it now as a disadvantage, thanks to the PH Boxers that erased the speculations that being much shorter in height and reach is a hindrance.

Besides, even with an advantage of height and reach, if that boxer doesn't utilize it in his match, it's all useless. Might be a good factor if a boxer does have physical traits like that but nothing beats a good strategy. Magsayo's speed and power punch can make that disadvantage turned into his advantage.


Being overconfident is good for me as long as the boxer follows properly the strategy that they worked hard for and does not treat the fight as an easy match.

Not sure until some official news was raised about it. But for me, as long as Paul brothers are involved, I believed there will be always a shit that will happen behind the script. The reputation of these Paul brothers is not so good that the community thinks they are just ruining the sports of boxing.

They are playing with the bookies. They will find a way to lure people to bet on their match as they know many wants to see them being defeated. That's how these brothers do business and not just they will sacrifice their bodies for nothing.

I'm against these Paul brothers so I will now conclude your shared rumor is true lol.

Not just those who are previously gamblers already but even those who are not into gambling, either casual, average or totally newbies, even try to gamble while they are just at their home because of the lockdown. In Europe, there are reports I remember back in 2020 that are being shared here that a big number of minors entering the gambling scene also increases because their activities got suspended during the lockdown.

Regardless if there's a pandemic or not, the gambling industry will really grow. It's unstoppable. The pandemic contributes to the rapid increase of gamblers because during the peak, people have nothing to do but stay home and they are exposed too much to the internet.

Macau is called the Las Vegas of Asia. It's now obvious why gambling there is considered essential.

It's like the primary core of businesses there that if you removed those, the region will be a total downfall. It's just right for them to let casinos operate there to make everything balance. Lockdown might minimize the spread but that will take a heavy toll on the revenue as money here is used on their primary spendings much especially, as you mentioned, healthcare-related costs.

Surely Macau authorities can now handle the pandemic now unlike before when every country has no idea yet or any information regarding the virus making it difficult to battle against it and the only solution is by doing a lockdown.

That's a different story now since that person badly needs to cash out.

Price volatility has nothing to do with that as we are the one who needs to adjust.

For me, bitcoin being crashed or not won't impact those gamblers since I think that's even an advantage to them as they will have more Bitcoin in return if they will purchase it by cash. Since they are playing with Bitcoin currency on the gambling site, it means more bankroll to them that they can use in the long run.

When it comes to cashing out, if it was really necessary to do, whether the trend is uptrend or downtrend, these guys will convert their Bitcoin to whatever price.