As for who is accepting LTC, there are payment gateways like coinpayments that accept a lot of established altcoins (as long as the shopowner configures them). I'm not a fan of coinpayments, but you might look trough their business directory and check out their vendors to see if you can find one that accepts LTC I had the same thought, and that brought me to https://cryptwerk.com/pay-with/ltc/ |
|
|
|
First and foremost, I would like to sincerely apologize to the mods and the entire community for what I've been doing in this forum.
~
I have made a promise to him not to do such things like this again in the forum.
I'm aware that I'll be gone for good if I do such same style of posts again. Cool story! I almost believed it. Too bad your next "service" is to facility one of the worst kind of spammers this forum has seen: text spinning plagiarism:Hello everyone! I am offering an article spinning service to the community for free. Can spin into different variations. Here’s a sample paragraph:Original (my own article) If you’re somebody who bought the dip around $3k-$4k+, your holdings are now more than double in value. However, if you‘re a day trader, you might be lucky to get a quick good profit with this one. But for a long-term holder who is aiming for something more, patience is your biggest test and might gonna get more in months or years from now. Crypto trading is all about taking and managing your risks, so I suggest you only put an amount that you can afford to lose in today’s market condition. Spintax version If you're {somebody| someone} {who| that} {bought| purchased| got| acquired} the dip around $3k-$4k+, your holdings are {now| currently} {more than| greater than} {double| dual} in {value| worth}. { {However| Nevertheless| Nonetheless}, if you're a day {trader| investor}, you {might be| may be| could be} {lucky| fortunate} to {get| obtain} a {quick| fast} {good| great| excellent} {profit| revenue| earnings} with this one. | If you're a day {trader| investor}, you {might| may| could} be {lucky| fortunate} to {get| obtain} a {quick| fast} {good| great| excellent} {profit| revenue| earnings} with this one. } { {But for| However, for| But also for} a {long-term| long-lasting| lasting} {holder| owner} {who| that} is {aiming for| going for} something {more| much more| a lot more| extra}, {patience| persistence| perseverance} is your {biggest| most significant| greatest| largest} {test| examination} {and| as well as| and also} {might| may| could} gon na {get| obtain} {more| even more} in months or years from {now| currently}. | For a {long-term| long-lasting| lasting} {holder| owner} {who| that} is {aiming| intending} for something {more| much more| a lot more| extra}, {patience| persistence| perseverance} is your {biggest| most significant| greatest| largest} {test| examination} {and| as well as| and also} {might| may| could} gon na {get| obtain} {more| even more} in months or years from {now| currently}. } Crypto trading is {all about| everything about} taking {and| as well as| and also} {managing| handling} your {risks| dangers| threats}, so I {suggest| recommend} you {only| just} {put| placed} an {amount| quantity} that you can {afford| pay for| manage} to {lose| shed} in today's market {condition| problem}. Spinned version (one of many variations, 98% uniqueness) If you're someone that purchased the dip around $3k-$4k+, your holdings are currently greater than double in worth. However, if you're a day investor, you may be lucky to get a fast excellent earnings with this one. For a long-term holder who is aiming for something more, persistence is your greatest test and also might gon na get even more in months or years from currently. Crypto trading is everything about taking and also handling your threats, so I suggest you just placed a quantity that you can manage to shed in today's market problem. Note: Before publishing the spinned article, make sure you check it first on Copyscape or any plagiarism checker. If you are uncomfortable with a word or phrase in a particular sentence, feel free to edit.I would really appreciate an honest feedback or review from you guys after the result. I’m also accepting donations in BTC or ETH in case you want to.(full post quoted as reference). |
|
|
|
Would you please send a testnet on-chain request for the amount you tried to send me that never arrived so that I can reimburse you for the lost testnet on-chain coins, please? There's no need to return any testnet coins - they have no value  If you don't need them anymore, you can donate them to a faucet (example: mkHS9ne12qx9pS9VojpwU5xtRd4T7X7ZUt). |
|
|
|
It's likely many of those 551 are banned from the campaign already. Yahoo62278 can't help it if they don't remove the signature. |
|
|
|
Yes, of course, that would make it much easier to support/oppose, especially when reference topic deleted or does not exist. Done: The BBCode for this has a small mistake, that will be fixed tomorrow. |
|
|
|
I want to save time by selecting a large number of Bitcoin addresses and sending a fixed payment at certain periods of time. Set up a spreadsheet like this, then copy/paste all 3 columns and as many rows as you want into Electrum. I haven't tested this on Electrum mobile though. Be aware of clipboard hijacking malware. |
|
|
|
Just for my own info, does EClair charge you any sort of fee to top up in Bitcoin to the wallet? I know that Wallet of Satoshi charges a fee for this feature. Eclair: create your own channel and pay on-chain transaction fees. BlueWallet (custodial): no fee (other than normal transaction fee) when sending on-chain Bitcoin to get Lightning Bitcoin (but the other way around goes through an external site (which you can choose of course), for a fee) Wallet of Satoshi: I think that's the wallet that required me to confirm my email address, but that part didn't work so I gave up. |
|
|
|
When I think of custodial I don't think of Bitcoin anymore, I think of traditional banking where you're not fully in control anymore and the power of your funds is with someone else now. Yet again, not a real issue when dealing with small amounts of money -- though it still does present the problem of a lack of control -- something that we all love to talk about in the crypto community. All valid points. However, exchanges hold hundreds of thousands if not millions of Bitcoins. Apparently many people don't seem to care about very large amounts, so a small amount for LN shouldn't matter. I must stress yet again that I do like it, and have used it before. I just think that telling people that use Bitcoin, to go and use something that is inferior to Bitcoin in most ways (minus fees) isn't going to be easy. Sending Bitcoin to another person is easy -- you get their address and then you send it to them, that's it. No channels, no nodes, no making sure you're connecting with them. I read about Bitcoin in the early versions, when transactions needed an IP-address to be sent  I can't wait to see what LN looks like 10 years from now. Even in LN sending money is the easiest thing (which in my mind, isn't that easy when comparing it to Bitcoin) receiving money is an entire different issue altogether. True. LN is easy to pay a merchant with an automated system, but more complicated to pay another forum user. Sending 1 satoshi to an online LN casino is easier than withdrawing 1 satoshi. Love the concept, and I do hope that it succeeds. It's just tough to think about right now, when there are still so many issues with the network. It's still experimental, and improving. Give it time |
|
|
|
I also have listed YOBIT in my signature as a scam No you don't  |
|
|
|
I think the problem is that LN isn't easy to use for people. It depends: I never tried setting up my own node, and didn't have the best connections when I set up channels in Eclair, but I'm very happy with a custodial wallet. It's very easy to use. However, I funded it with 250,000 satoshi, but couldn't pay 206,000 satoshi to Coinpayments. It said I could try any amount and pay in parts, so I sent 5 sat first, but after that it didn't accept another payment. I ended up paying on-chain. I love the potential of it, I can't argue with that. But it just leaves a bad taste in my mouth at the moment, I would think that a good deal of the people in crypto feel the same way. A bit But I also think one way to improve LN, is by actually using it. Reward companies that accept it by buying from them, even though it's still a bit more complicated. I don't mind spending some effort to support something that can change the future of payments. Nobody? Taken |
|
|
|
I strongly believe, and a lot of people agree with me via PM's and social media but are positively afraid to voice their opinion here, that theymos should get involved. And do what, exactly? Theymos allowed hundreds of bounty campaigns to spam the forum while paying participants in made-up tokens. If he didn't stop that, there's no way he's going to interfere in a Bitcoin paying campaign that doesn't break forum rules. I am writing here about how malicious people initiate propaganda against the Turkish community at all critical decision stages. From what I've seen, "the Turkish community" is something that only people inside that community see as something that separates them from the rest of the forum. I couldn't care less which country you live in, and I'm pretty sure most forum users think that way. But Darkstar_ announced that he did not accept me in a campaign that I did not apply for. I just wrote that; Things are getting weird here. Up to 4 free places and x5 x6 appliers just now. I think it won't be easy to decide. I wish luck to all joiners If you didn't apply for the campaign, your post was off-topic. DarkStar_ assumed you applied, and rejected you. Since you didn't even want to apply, I don't really see what the problem is. Still, I personally don't blame Darkstar_ for anything anyway. His campaign and his call... Agreed! There's no coordinated attack in progress against the Turkish community--that's all in your head, sorry to say. Nor is this some sort of case of racism/nationalism/whatever on the part of DarkStar_ or Chipmixer or anyone else. The campaign is extremely competitive and there aren't that many slots. So you're saying you can't call it racism if you don't get selected for a job that 150 other people applied for too? |
|
|
|
|
What does theymos have to do with tihs? Theymos tries to keep this forum "as free as possible", so he's not going to get involved in who gets into a signature campaign.
DarkStar_ has to choose 4 out of 150 participants, many of those 150 users have very good post quality. There's a strong competition, and it's entirely up to DarkStar_ who he chooses.
So far, I can only say he's picked strong candidates, and from what I've seen, ChipMixer trusts his judgement on this.
|
|
|
|
There's another Flag spammer (now nuked): 2020-01-23 Thu 03.18hsource: loyce.club1314 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged witcher_sense (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by witcher_sense[/size]. 1313 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged stompix (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1312 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged stompix (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1311 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged stompix (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1310 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged peloso (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1309 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged peloso (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1308 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged peloso (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1307 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Vadi2323 (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1306 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Vadi2323 (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1305 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Vadi2323 (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1304 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Balthazar_home (type 1, see why). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1303 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Balthazar_home (type 2, see why). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1302 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Balthazar_home (type 3, see why). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1301 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Balthazar (type 1, see why). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1300 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Balthazar (type 2, see why). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1299 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Balthazar (type 3, see why). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1298 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged nutildah (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1297 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged nutildah (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1296 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged nutildah (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1295 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Cyrus (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1294 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Cyrus (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1293 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Cyrus (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1292 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged xandry (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1291 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged xandry (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1290 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged xandry (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1289 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged kzv (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1288 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged StartupAnalyst (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1287 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged FontSeli (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by nobody. 1286 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged StartupAnalyst (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov[/size]. 1285 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Veleor (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov[/size]. 1284 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged taikuri13 (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by taikuri13, Ratimov, StartupAnalyst. 1283 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged witcher_sense (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by witcher_sense, Ratimov, StartupAnalyst. 1282 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged StartupAnalyst (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov[/size]. 1281 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Veleor (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov[/size]. 1280 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Veleor (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov[/size]. 1279 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged FontSeli (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov, StartupAnalyst. 1278 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged kzv (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov[/size]. 1277 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Ratimov (type 1, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Kingf1sher, VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov, peloso. 1276 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Ratimov (type 2, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Kingf1sher, VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov, peloso. 1275 Insufficient support. VIVA-E flagged Ratimov (type 3, see why Reference topic does not exist). Supported by Kingf1sher, VIVA-E. Opposed by Ratimov, peloso. Most of these Flags are easy to oppose without looking into them: the Reference topic doesn't exist.
Question: should I add direct links to "Support" or "Oppose" Flags on my Trust Flag viewer? Pros: This makes it much faster to Oppose all Flags from a Flag spammer. Cons: That would mean you have to trust me for creating the correct link. |
|
|
|
Can someone please compile a list of all users wearing any Yobit signatures? Thanks. I'm on it: I'll make a list of all users who have posted in the past 7 days, and have "yobit" in their profile. Give me a few hours, scraping 8290 profiles now. |
|
|
|
It seems the community came to the general consensus that yobit is not too much of a scam for it to be advertised on the forum right?
I don't like that they were allowed to come back and advertise after being banned for it but the community allowed it.. Small correction: Yobit's signature was never banned for being a scam, it was banned for spamming the forum. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
