Er mye bedre enn som så, dette er en av de bedre coinsene jeg har sett i det siste.
Fordi...? Gjerne besvar spørsmålene over istedet for å feie de bort å bare si at det er en av "de beste".. Hva gjør den spesiell? Kan den skape rosa ponnyer? Største forandringen jeg ser er denne; int64 static GetBlockValue(int nHeight, int64 nFees)
{
int64 nSubsidy = 8000 * COIN;
if(nHeight < 1440)
{
nSubsidy = 72000 * COIN;
}
else if(nHeight < 5760)
{
nSubsidy = 16000 * COIN;
}
// Subsidy is cut in half every 1051200 blocks, which will occur approximately every 2 years
nSubsidy >>= (nHeight / 1051200);
return nSubsidy + nFees;
}
static const int64 nTargetTimespan = 0.10 * 24 * 60 * 60; // 2.4 hours
static const int64 nTargetSpacing = 60; // 60 seconds Det er hele 16 linjer kode og 1 linje kommentar.. Wow. |
|
|
|
Hi all! Been a little afk from internet the past week, but back now! Many has wondered and asked about whats Anoncoin going to do when v2 of zerocoin is released, if it's gonna affect it's development, etc etc etc. And it's not time effective to answer one at a time  I will write a blog entry about it, where I will answer where,what,when,why and hopefully the rest of w's :p We're about to release a new site as well. I'll get back to you in short time! Also, I think Matthew is going to give a talk on Monday at New York City College, so I think I post the blog entry after that, in case he says anything that could become a question.
Any closer to the blog entry? Really keen to see what's going on regarding ANC and Zerocoin. Waiting for this announcement before making the next move bold (first off, I need to get a copy of what he said, next I need to think trough it, after that discuss it with the rest of the team, then get time to write the blog) I'm a little bit confused of Matthew Green's speech right now, as he doesn't mention Anoncoin anywhere as far as I can see... but it was mentioned a few times already that Zerocoin will be implemented into Anoncoin: how far is your zerocoin implementation?
Was just coming here to ask the same thing. Any updates? It's still in an early stage. The first part will be implementing the early alpha of Zerocoin into the Anoncoin testnet, then comes the testing to discover bugs within Zerocoin itself that the Zerocoin devs will be working on. I would not expect a fully working zerocoin implementation until the end of the year at best. If it works flawlessly the first time around (personally I believe there's a ~1% chance of that happening) it would probably be complete during november. So I'm really looking forward to a clarification of the implementation of Zerocoin into Anoncoin. In simple and quick words: Matthew is a odd guy saying "please send an mail", and when we do it there is no fucking reply. We have decided to do it on our own, we don't need him. Final. There has been no contact between us other than the public posts on twitter, he obviously can't handle email systems since he has not replied me, Gnosis or any other person trying to contact him. The zerocoin mailinglist is also dead, seen people ask questions, never any replies from the zerocoin guys. There is also no "flaws" with the old zerocoin implementation, just some temporary disk increments that can be solved. From the little I read on reddit it seems like Matthew and the rest of the group of can't-handle-email-systems guys haven't been able to even get the whitepapers finished. Those was dued to early December IIRC from Matthew's tweet 16. Nov?. - Blog entry will be written when I've gone more into details about his speak, haven't had time to hear it yet. At last, sneakpeak; we're in discussion on "upgrading" zerocoin with multiple modulus, different denominations (10 ANC, 1 ANC, 0.1 ANC, etc.) and more. This will then slowly move away from the original zerocoin design. |
|
|
|
|
Det var jo samme sak med BTC Guild eller hva de het for noen år tilbake da de fant 6 blocks på rad. Ingen krise det her.
|
|
|
|
+1 Quarkcoin. The security features alone should be worth adding it.
Lol. I'll come back to this after the inevitable 51% attack happens. It won't be long now. Indeed. Locking a coin to CPU is not a good idea.. *thinking of serverhalls* *lots of CPU, less GPU* |
|
|
|
I finally understood that , Its really not easy to get a php based blockchain exprloer up and running.. Here is what i have achieved till now : http://95.85.62.252/index.php/block/fce58f21e2e55d48cfb53e25f55023772bbc960f7cf26930b51a0ae551a0f445Currently it gets data from mysql database. I think we can get abe to update data in background and use php to display frontend. But there is a lot of data thats missing.. Like difficulty.. Can you please help me with formula for difficulty calculation of anoncoin? I would also like to know whats the scrypt parameters for Anoncoin. for example , for Litecoin , its N = 1024, r = 1 , p = 1 and salt is same as input. Looking forward to answers. Awsome! It's the same, we use N = 1024, r = 1 , p = 1 as well |
|
|
|
Still not showing up.
I would recommend not using cryptsy for ANC deposits for the time being, they are working on the backend right now, no idea if this issue is related to it or not.
Has anyone else had a deposit show up on cryptsy within the last few hours?
cryptsy is unstable and is not recommended to use for the moment :/ |
|
|
|
Hi all! Been a little afk from internet the past week, but back now! Many has wondered and asked about whats Anoncoin going to do when v2 of zerocoin is released, if it's gonna affect it's development, etc etc etc. And it's not time effective to answer one at a time I will write a blog entry about it, where I will answer where,what,when,why and hopefully the rest of w's :p We're about to release a new site as well. I'll get back to you in short time! Also, I think Matthew is going to give a talk on Monday at New York City College, so I think I post the blog entry after that, in case he says anything that could become a question.
Any closer to the blog entry? Really keen to see what's going on regarding ANC and Zerocoin. Waiting for this announcement before making the next move bold (first off, I need to get a copy of what he said, next I need to think trough it, after that discuss it with the rest of the team, then get time to write the blog) |
|
|
|
It has been brought to our attention that the pool anc.usr.io is under new management, and they are _not_ paying out requested withdrawals for an extended period. Find yourself another pool or you risk losing coins.
thats why ppl should use p2pool. technology cant be flawed by some administrator/stupid-human-being Somehow I just knew that post would come  |
|
|
|
Og hvorfor er ikke flere typer hashing mer sikkert?
Les posten min over en gang til. 60ce4639bf63532b27e8f8b036b9846f5d2ae18556289f80e38b85a5df4910e1 - Scrypt 7680b70b9da195fcaf8c9def3733e9f03807c73e4037a5be8a7deb62e5492045 - SHA256 Du gjetter på et 256bit tall uansett hvilke hashing du bruker, f.eks bitcoin = sha256, litecoin = scrypt. Du får ikke betre sikkerhet bare fordi den roterer mellom vilke hash den gjetter på. Hvilke vei du bruker til målet har _ingenting_ med sikkerhet å gjøre! De har bare låst seg til CPU, noe som gjør de svak mot serverhaller. Se på det slik; Om du gjetter på enten: rosa, blå eller grønn. Og: 1, 2 eller 3. Uansett om du velger å gjette farger eller tall, så vil du treffe en av de 3 alternativene. Og om du gjetter farger og tall annenhver gang så har ikke det så mye å si... Så kan du se noen sikkerhetsfordeler med å drive å skifte på det her? |
|
|
|
Personlig holder jeg meg til Bit, Lite, Anon, Peer, Prime, Name - coin.. Mest på grunn av at alle de har noe vitalt som skiller seg fra ande coins og ikke bare er en "same shit, different branding" Kort fortalt: - Har programmereren gjort litt mer enn å skifte på bildene, navnet og innstillingene så er coinen verdt å se på. F.eks PoS, Scrypt, I2P, Primenumbers, "DNS", etc. Men det finnes tilfeller hvor jeg er skeptisk også. For eksempel Quarkcoin.. what the fuck.. Secure transactions? På grunn av 9 hashing muligheter? Det har irritert meg så lenge at jeg må legge inn en forklaring. Det eneste de har gjort er å sørge for at algo. for å generere rett hash blir så komplekst at man ikke får det til å kjøre på GPU/ASIC/etc. Så, det gjør at vi kun sitter igjen med CPU mining.... Mange coins er redd for 51% attack.. 51% attack blir meget lettere for mennesker med serverhaller tilgjengelig. Hadde fort blitt værre om personen trengte GPUer også. Sett f.eks Anoncoin så bruker den scrypt bevist nemlig for at per idag så er det GPU som kan utvinne mest der. Og sjansen for å møte på BigBrother med en serverhall fult av GPUer er noe mindre enn å treffe på en serverhall full av CPUer Hva skjer i *coin ved mining? Og hvorfor er ikke flere typer hashing mer sikkert? Python: import hashlib
i=0
ikke_vunnet=True
noice = "fff000"
win="0000"
while (ikke_vunnet):
hash = hashlib.sha256("lastblock_partly_hash+transactions(N,N,N)" + noice + str(i)).hexdigest()
if hash.startswith(win):
ikke_vunnet = False
i = i+1
print hash
print "Hash/block is found: "+hash For de som ikke kan kode er eksemplet mitt ovenfor "lotto" mer eller mindre. Det går ut på at man får et tall der man skal kombinere transactions og hash av forige block for generere neste, som da må være mindre enn target. Og ettersom difficulty øker vil target bli lavere, og sjansen for å gjette en hash med en tallverdi under den blir stadig mindre. Om difficulty går ned vil selvfølgelig target øke igjen. Så igjen, om noen kan forklare meg hvordan Quarkcoin kan bli "Secure transactions" fordi man bruker 9 typer tall å gjette på, kjør på! |
|
|
|
Skal staten begynne å sjekke kontooverføringer for å sjekke om det er handel med Cryptovaluta? Hvordan skal staten avdekke handel?
Lite trolig at det er kapasitet til det.
Neida, leier inn NSA til sånt siden de er så godt igang  haha. (ikke alvårlig) |
|
|
|
Tak.
Det er jo helt vildt hvor mange forskellige der er.
Hvorfor er der så mange forskellige? Opfinder man bare nogle nye fordi det bliver svære at mine de andre?
Hvad bruger man til at minere de forskellige coins?
99,9% av alle nye coins blir laget for å scamme noobs, og berike devs/early adopters. Så hold deg unna. De aller fleste alt coins er helt ubrukelige og har ingen nytteverdi/innovasjon. Vist du likevel vil investere i alts så anbefaler eg peercoin og anoncoin. Hvorfor bør du undersøke selv. Meget enig. Sist var dogecoin, prøvde å advare men folk ville tape penger der Desverre har vi nok bare sett første bølge med scamcoins, mens verden vokner mer og mer opp for coins vil dette være en industri for noen. Desverre litt skadelig for cryptocurrency miljøet i mine øyner. |
|
|
|
Sjefen på jobb har nevnt noe om hosting av minere, skal høre mer om det og kommer tilbake om det er utleie |
|
|
|
As said in the chat thread: Many has wondered and asked about whats Anoncoin going to do when v2 of zerocoin is released, if it's gonna affect it's development, etc etc etc. And it's not time effective to answer one at a time I will write a blog entry about it, where I will answer where,what,when,why and hopefully the rest of w's :p We're about to release a new site as well. I'll get back to you in short time! Also, I think Matthew is going to give a talk on Monday at New York City College, so I think I post the blog entry after that, in case he says anything that could become a question. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the settings. I am getting another error while trying to run Abe using this command " python -m Abe.abe --config abe-my.conf --commit-bytes 100000 --no-serve " : File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/MySQLdb/connections.py", line 187, in __init__
super(Connection, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs2)
TypeError: keywords must be strings
Here is my configuration for MYSQL in abe-my.conf file # MySQL example; see also README-MYSQL.txt:
dbtype MySQLdb
connect-args {'user':'abe','db':'abe','password':'XBKvkmIRWz5P'}
upgrade
port 2750
use " not ' I did. Still shows the same. I'm gonna check the config at my server after dayjob, please PM me if I forget it. And ofc reward you for designing |
|
|
|
Trying to send some Anoncoins and I have been waiting for one confirmation for over an hour. Doing some reading on the anoncoin.net forums and it looks like there may be a problem with the new client? How do I get some confirmations to get my coins out of limbo here?
How many connections do you have? - and please continue this in chat thread. |
|
|
|
Hi all! Been a little afk from internet the past week, but back now! Many has wondered and asked about whats Anoncoin going to do when v2 of zerocoin is released, if it's gonna affect it's development, etc etc etc. And it's not time effective to answer one at a time I will write a blog entry about it, where I will answer where,what,when,why and hopefully the rest of w's :p We're about to release a new site as well. I'll get back to you in short time! Also, I think Matthew is going to give a talk on Monday at New York City College, so I think I post the blog entry after that, in case he says anything that could become a question. |
|
|
|
I just read this entire thread. Is the only fundamental difference from BTC/LTC that ANC can use I2P? Is I2P and coin mixing going to be implemented in such a way that it is easier to be anonymous than with other coins? If an exchange is not using I2P does the client need to be in clearnet mode in order to transfer coins in and out? Any clarification on what makes this coin more anonymous would be helpful in deciding if I should make it an alt coin investment.
I doubt Bitcoin will implement I2P support, it's getting to known now, which means they move away from "darknet" and such, and into the wallets of regular people and not just special interested. The developers have other, bigger issues to solve. We however, focus on anonymity, and will continue working on that case as main focus. I2P is only the beginning. Update on Zerocoin: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/wiki/Zerocoin-design-&-docshttps://pay.reddit.com/r/ZeroCoin/comments/1tplgt/please_help_us_implement_zerocoin/ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
